Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “coordinated operation”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1993

Connecting science and operations: The operations coordinator

For a current space mission under development at the Applied Physics Laboratory, the Mission Operations staff includes a team of 'Operations Coordinators' who have been working with the Mission Science and Spacecraft Development teams since completion of mission conceptual design. The Operations Coordinators are responsible for bringing knowledge of the spacecraft to the Mission Science team and bringing knowledge of the experiment requirements to the Spacecraft Development and Mission Operations teams. Once on-orbit operations begin, the Operations Coordinators will be responsible for implementation of specific science experiments from analysis through scheduling, generation of spacecraft command sequences, delivery of science data to the end user, and operations assessment. The Operations Coordinator concept is proving very effective during the development phase of the current mission.

Marshall, Madeleine H.↗
NASA NTRS2017

Operations Coordination Plan Status

This will be presented at the Earth Science Constellation Mission Operations Working Group meeting to discuss Operations Coordination Plan Status.

statu↗
NASA NTRS2015

Operations Coordination Plan Status

This presentation provides the history of the Constellation Operations Coordination Plan and a summary of the changes since the previous version was published in 2011.

Afternoon Constellation↗
NASA NTRS2005

The Earth Science Afternoon Constellation: Preparing for Autonomous but Coordinated Operations

This paper describes how the challenges of coordinating the autonomous operations of geographically dispersed mission control centers for several small and large satellites are being overcome. The Earth Science Afternoon Constellation, also referred to as the "A-Train", is an international grouping of five NASA satellites (two major NASA EOS missions and three NASA/Earth System Science Pathfinder missions) and one French satellite orbiting in close proximity. This grouping of satellites provides scientists with the opportunity to perform coincident observations using data from two or more instruments on various satellites with measurements taken at approximately the same time. Three of the six missions are currently on-orbit, with the two missions expected to join the constellation later this year and one mission in 2007. The operational challenges are daunting for several reasons. There are several Mission Control Centers (widely separated on two continents), operating autonomously under tight budget constraints. All of the Mission Control Centers have reasons to be concerned about safety while flying in close proximity to other satellites, but most Centers did not have the resources or the desire to address this concern alone - the interfaces are too numerous and anticipated operations too costly. Clearly, an efficient approach was needed. This paper describes the steps taken to make this Earth science constellation a reality. Agreements were forged to allow the Mission Control Centers to maintain their autonomy, while ensuring their satellite's safety. Each member mission in the constellation operates independently in accordance with its own mission requirements, but the member missions have agreed to coordinate their operations, i.e., orbital positions and control to ensure the safety of the entire constellation. A centralized system was developed at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center to collect, analyze, and distribute ephemeris data used by each of the mission teams to determine the positions of the satellites in the constellation. The system issues warnings regarding possible dangerous configurations, eliminating the need for redundant capabilities at each Mission Control Center. On-orbit contingency situations were identified and analyzed; agreements were reached in advance of contingency operations to ensure that coordination between the Mission Control Centers can be handled expeditiously and fairly. In this manner, recovery from anomalous situations can be more quickly realized, thereby increasing the science return and reducing costs. The process used to develop these contingency procedures and the systems used to facilitate the contingency resolution are described as well.

Case, Warren↗
NASA NTRS2017

Operations Coordination Plan Status

This will be presented at the Earth Science Constellation Mission Operations Working Group meeting June 13-15, 2017, to discuss Operatioins Coordination Plan Status.

Operations coordination plan↗
NASA NTRS2019

Operations Coordination Plan Status

This presentation will introduce topics of note for the Earth Science Constellation (ESC) Mission Operations Working Group (MOWG) meeting being held in Toulouse, France from June 5-7, 2019.

Case, Warren F.↗
NASA NTRS1999

Mars 2001 Lander Mission: Measurement Synergy Through Coordinated Operations Planning And Implementation

The 2001 Mars Surveyor Program Mission includes an orbiter with a gamma ray spectrometer and a multispectral thermal imager, and a lander with an extensive set of instrumentation, a robotic arm, and the Marie Curie Rover. The Mars 2001 Science Operations Working Group (SOWG) is a subgroup of the Project Science Group that has been formed to provide coordinated planning and implementation of scientific observations, particularly for the landed portion of the mission. The SOWG will be responsible for delivery of a science plan and, during operations, generation and delivery of conflict-free sequences. This group will also develop an archive plan that is compliant with Planetary Data System (PDS) standards, and will oversee generation, validation, and delivery of integrated archives to the PDS. In this report we cover one element of the SOWG planning activities, the development of a plan that maximizes the scientific return from lander-based observations by treating the instrument packages as an integrated payload. Scientific objectives for the lander mission have been defined. They include observations focused on determining the bedrock geology of the site through analyses of rocks and also local materials found in the soils, and the surficial geology of the site, including windblown deposits and the nature and history of formation of indurated sediments such as duricrust. Of particular interest is the identification and quantification of processes related to early warm, wet conditions and the presence of hydrologic or hydrothermal cycles. Determining the nature and origin of duricrust and associated salts is -very important in this regard. Specifically, did these deposits form in the vadose zone as pore water evaporated from soils or did they form by other processes, such as deposition of volcanic aerosols? Basic information needed to address these questions includes the morphology, topography, and geologic context of landforms and materials exposed at the site, together with quantitative information on material mineralogy, chemistry, and physical properties (rock textures; soil grain size and shape distributions; degree and nature of soil induration; soil magnetic properties). The calibration targets provide radiometric and mineralogical control surfaces. The magnets allow observations of magnetic phases. Patch plates are imaged to determine adhesive and abrasive properties of soils. Coordinated mission planning is crucial for optimizing the measurement synergy among the packages included on the lander. This planning has already begun through generation of multi-sol detailed operations activities. One focus has been to develop a scenario to use the arm to dig a soil trench to a depth of tens of centimeters. The activity will be monitored through use of Pancam and RAC to ensure nominal operations and to acquire data to determine subsurface physical properties (e.g., angle of repose of trench walls). Pancam and Mini-TES observations would also provide constraints on mineralogy and texture for the walls and bottom of the trench during excavation. If desired, soils excavated at depth could be deposited on the surface and Mossbauer and APXS measurements could be acquired for these materials. Soil samples from various depths would be delivered to MECA for characterization of aqueous geochemistry and physical properties of soil grains, particularly size, shape, and hardness. These physical properties would be determined by optical and atomic force microscopy. When completed, detailed information of soil properties as a function of depth would be obtained. These various data sets would constrain our understanding of whether or not there are systematic variations in soil characteristics as a function of depth. These variations might be related, for example, to evaporative moisture losses and formation of salt deposits, thereby indicating water transport processes occurred fairly recently. Many other value-added measurement scenarios are being developed. For example, characterizing the nature and dynamics of dust deposition will be done using MIP/DART to provide deposition rates, Pancam and RAC imaging of lander and rover surfaces to extrapolate these measurements to other areas, and a variety of measurements to determine if the bulk loose soil has the same characteristics as dust that accumulates during the mission. Bedrock geology of the site is primarily an APEX-focus setting, mineralogy, and texture, and APXS data to be we interest will be to determine the extent to which rock hydrothermal processes, given that APEX is the precursor 4 and 2005 rover missions. Additional information is contained in the original.

Arvidson, R.↗
NASA NTRS2009

Initial Investigation of Operational Concept Elements for NASA's NextGen-Airportal Project Research

The NextGen-Airportal Project is organized into three research focus areas: Safe and Efficient Surface Operations, Coordinated Arrival/Departure Operations Management, and Airportal Transition and Integration Management. The content in this document was derived from an examination of constraints and problems at airports for accommodating future increases in air traffic, and from an examination of capabilities envisioned for NextGen. The concepts are organized around categories of constraints and problems and therefore do not precisely match, but generally reflect, the research focus areas. The concepts provide a framework for defining and coordinating research activities that are, and will be, conducted by the NextGen-Airportal Project. The concepts will help the research activities function as an integrated set focused on future needs for airport operations and will aid aligning the research activities with NextGen key capabilities. The concepts are presented as concept elements with more detailed sub-elements under each concept element. For each concept element, the following topics are discussed: constraints and problems being addressed, benefit descriptions, required technology and infrastructure, and an initial list of potential research topics. Concept content will be updated and more detail added as the research progresses. The concepts are focused on enhancing airportal capacity and efficiency in a timeframe 20 to 25 years in the future, which is similar to NextGen's timeframe.

Lohr, Gary↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Real-time Hardware-in-the-Loop Evaluation of a Partially Turboelectric Propulsion Control Design

In support of aviation fuel burn and emission reduction goals, NASA is pursuing high-payoff research investments that promise to transform aviation. This includes investments in Electrified Aircraft Propulsion (EAP). Multiple technology challenges must be addressed to unlock the full potential of EAP. This includes addressing challenges related to propulsion controls, which will be vital for ensuring efficient coordinated operation of EAP subsystems. This paper presents results from real-time hardware-in-the-loop testing of a control design for a single aisle partially-turboelectric aircraft propulsion concept conducted at the NASA Electric Aircraft Testbed (NEAT) facility. The control system under test is designed for a propulsion concept consisting of two wing-mounted turbofan engines that produce thrust and generate electrical power to drive a boundary layer ingesting tailfan propulsor via an electrical motor. An integrated control strategy is applied to ensure coordinated operation of the turbofan and tailfan subsystems during steady-state and transient operation throughout the flight envelope. The NEAT test of this integrated control design consists of a partially hardware-in-the-loop, partially simulated configuration. A subscale representation of the electrical system design is implemented in hardware and mechanically coupled to electric machines that emulate turbomachinery and propulsor shaft dynamics. The hardware configuration is then operated under the control of a real-time computer application that runs a simulation of the propulsion system and the developed control logic. The NEAT facility test campaign includes a series of experiments that subject the control design to throttle transients conducted throughout the flight envelope and full-flight mission profiles. Testing under simulated performance degradation is also conducted to evaluate control design robustness. This includes constant and abrupt changes in degradation levels. Results from the hardware-in-the-loop test are presented and shown to be in good agreement with pre-test simulation predictions demonstrating the efficacy of the integrated control design approach.

Electrified Aircraft Propulsion↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Real-time Hardware-in-the-Loop Evaluation of a Partially Turboelectric Propulsion Control Design

In support of aviation fuel burn and emission reduction goals, NASA is pursuing high-payoff research investments that promise to transform aviation. This includes investments in Electrified Aircraft Propulsion (EAP). Multiple technology challenges must be addressed to unlock the full potential of EAP. This includes addressing challenges related to propulsion controls, which will be vital for ensuring efficient coordinated operation of EAP subsystems. This paper presents results from real-time hardware-in-the-loop testing of a control design for a single aisle partially-turboelectric aircraft propulsion concept conducted at the NASA Electric Aircraft Testbed (NEAT) facility. The control system under test is designed for a propulsion concept consisting of two wing-mounted turbofan engines that produce thrust and generate electrical power to drive a boundary layer ingesting tailfan propulsor via an electrical motor. An integrated control strategy is applied to ensure coordinated operation of the turbofan and tailfan subsystems during steady-state and transient operation throughout the flight envelope. The NEAT test of this integrated control design consists of a partially hardware-in-the-loop, partially simulated configuration. A subscale representation of the electrical system design is implemented in hardware and mechanically coupled to electric machines that emulate turbomachinery and propulsor shaft dynamics. The hardware configuration is then operated under the control of a real-time computer application that runs a simulation of the propulsion system and the developed control logic. The NEAT facility test campaign includes a series of experiments that subject the control design to throttle transients conducted throughout the flight envelope and full-flight mission profiles. Testing under simulated performance degradation is also conducted to evaluate control design robustness. This includes constant and abrupt changes in degradation levels. Results from the hardware-in-the-loop test are presented and shown to be in good agreement with pre-test simulation predictions demonstrating the efficacy of the integrated control design approach.

Electrified Aircraft Propulsion↗
NASA NTRS2023

Real-Time Hardware-in-the-Loop Evaluation of A Partially Turboelectric Propulsion Control Design

In support of aviation fuel burn and emission reduction goals, NASA is pursuing high-payoff research investments that promise to transform aviation. This includes investments in Electrified Aircraft Propulsion (EAP). Multiple technology challenges must be addressed to unlock the full potential of EAP. This includes addressing challenges related to propulsion controls, which will be vital for ensuring efficient coordinated operation of EAP subsystems. This paper presents results from real-time hardware-in-theloop (HIL) testing of a control design for a single aisle partially-turboelectric aircraft propulsion concept conducted at the NASA Electric Aircraft Testbed (NEAT) facility. The control system under test is designed for a propulsion concept consisting of two wing-mounted turbofan engines that produce thrust and generate electrical power to drive a boundary layer ingesting tailfan propulsor via an electrical motor. An integrated control strategy is applied to ensure coordinated operation of the turbofan and tailfan subsystems during steady-state and transient operation throughout the flight envelope. The NEAT test of this integrated control design consists of a partially HIL, partially simulated configuration. A subscale representation of the electrical system design is implemented in hardware and mechanically coupled to electric machines that emulate turbomachinery and propulsor shaft dynamics. The hardware configuration is then operated under the control of a real-time computer application that runs a simulation of the propulsion system and the developed control logic. The NEAT facility test campaign includes a series of experiments that subject the control design to throttle transients conducted throughout the flight envelope and full-flight mission profiles. Testing under simulated performance degradation is also conducted to evaluate control design robustness. This includes constant and abrupt changes in degradation levels. Results from the HIL test are presented and shown to be in good agreement with pretest simulation predictions demonstrating the efficacy of the integrated control design approach.

Electrified Aircraft Propulsion↗
NASA NTRS2005

A Data-Based Console Logger for Mission Operations Team Coordination

Concepts and prototypes1,2 are discussed for a data-based console logger (D-Logger) to meet new challenges for coordination among flight controllers arising from new exploration mission concepts. The challenges include communication delays, increased crew autonomy, multiple concurrent missions, reduced-size flight support teams that include multidisciplinary flight controllers during quiescent periods, and migrating some flight support activities to flight controller offices. A spiral development approach has been adopted, making simple, but useful functions available early and adding more extensive support later. Evaluations have guided the development of the D-Logger from the beginning and continue to provide valuable user influence about upcoming requirements. D-Logger is part of a suite of tools designed to support future operations personnel and crew. While these tools can be used independently, when used together, they provide yet another level of support by interacting with one another. Recommendations are offered for the development of similar projects.

Thronesbery, Carroll↗
NASA NTRS2011

Remote Infrared Imaging of the Space Shuttle During Hypersonic Flight: HYTHIRM Mission Operations and Coordination

The Hypersonic Thermodynamic Infrared Measurements (HYTHIRM) project has been responsible for obtaining spatially resolved, scientifically calibrated in-flight thermal imagery of the Space Shuttle Orbiter during reentry. Starting with STS-119 in March of 2009 and continuing through to the majority of final flights of the Space Shuttle, the HYTHIRM team has to date deployed during seven Shuttle missions with a mix of airborne and ground based imaging platforms. Each deployment of the HYTHIRM team has resulted in obtaining imagery suitable for processing and comparison with computational models and wind tunnel data at Mach numbers ranging from over 18 to under Mach 5. This paper will discuss the detailed mission planning and coordination with the NASA Johnson Space Center Mission Control Center that the HYTHIRM team undergoes to prepare for and execute each mission.

Schwartz, Richard J.↗
NASA NTRS1987

Track and capture of the orbiter with the space station remote manipulator system

Results of the first study using the real-time, man-in-the-loop Systems Engineering Simulator (SES) for track and capture of the Space Shuttle Orbiter with the space station manipulator are presented. The objectives include evaluation of the operational coordination required between the orbiter pilot and the space station manipulator operator, evaluation of the locations and required number of closed-circuit television cameras, and evaluation of the orbiter grapple fixture clearance geometry. The SES is a premium quality real-time facility with full fidelity orbiter and space station crew workstations and cockpits.

Bains, E. M.↗
NASA NTRS1976

Protection coordination of the Kennedy Space Center electric distribution network

A computer technique is described for visualizing the coordination and protection of any existing system of devices and settings by plotting the tripping characteristics of the involved devices on a common basis. The program determines the optimum settings of a given set of protective devices and configuration in the sense of the best expected coordinated operation of these devices. Subroutines are given for simulating time versus current characteristics of the different relays, circuit breakers, and fuses in the system; coordination index computation; protection checks; plotting; and coordination optimation.

Source record↗