Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “closed loop guidance”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1983

Optimization and closed loop guidance of drag modulated aeroassisted orbital transfer

An analysis of optimal and near optimal atmospheric flight trajectories for drag modulated aeroassisted orbital transfer is presented. An explicit and adaptive closed loop guidance approach for this mode of orbit transfer is also presented with performance near the optimal nominal trajectories. The orbital transfer of interest is for return from high earth orbit to low earth orbit. Most of what is discussed in this paper concerns the aeroassisted or atmospheric segment which lowers the apogee of the high earth orbit to the apogee of the low earth orbit. Minimization of the total impulsive delta-V at this low earth orbit apogee is the optimization criterion. Control about this impulse due to a number of potential error sources in atmospheric braking is the requirement imposed on closed loop guidance.

Kechichian, J. A.↗
NASA NTRS2018

JWST Cryo Fine Guidance Closed Loop Test Results

The James Webb Space Telescope uses the Fine Guidance Controller to achieve pointing accuracy to a millionth of a degree needed for its scientific observations. This closed loop controller includes the Fine Guidance Sensor instrument, the Attitude Control System, and the Fine Steering Mirror, all working together to generate precise attitude updates every 64 ms to stabilize and point the Observatory. It was exercised for the first time with the flight hardware during the cryogenic test at Johnson Space Center. We provide a top level summary of the test, the results, and its performance in preparation for on-orbit operations.

Line of Sight↗
NASA NTRS2018

JWST Cryo Fine Guidance Closed Loop Test Results

The James Webb Space Telescope uses the Fine Guidance Controller to achieve pointing accuracy to a millionth of a degree needed for its scientific observations. This closed loop controller includes the Fine Guidance Sensor (FGS) instrument, the Attitude Control System (ACS), and the Fine Steering Mirror (FSM), all working together to generate precise attitude updates every 64 ms to stabilize and point the Observatory. It was exercised for the first time with the flight hardware during the cryogenic test at Johnson Space Center.

Vila, M. Begoña↗
NASA NTRS1991

Mars entry-to-landing trajectory optimization and closed loop guidance

The guidance strategy of the Mars Rover Sample Return mission is presented in detail. Aeromaneuver versus aerobrake trades are examined, and an aerobrake analysis is presented which takes into account targeting, guidance, flight control, trajectory profile, delivery accuracy. An aeromaneuver analysis is given which includes the entry corridor, maneuver footprint, guidance, preentry phase, constant drag phase, equilibrium guide phase, variable drag phase, influence of trajectory profile on the entry flight loads, parachute deployment conditions and strategies, and landing accuracy. The Mars terminal descent phase is analyzed.

Ilgen, Marc R.↗
NASA NTRS2018

Closed Loop Guidance Trade Study for Space Launch System Block-1B Vehicle

NASA is currently building the Space Launch System (SLS) Block-1 launch vehicle for the Exploration Mission 1 (EM-1) test flight. The design of the next evolution of SLS, Block-1B, is well underway. The Block-1B vehicle is more capable overall than Block-1; however, the relatively low thrust-to-weight ratio of the Exploration Upper Stage (EUS) presents a challenge to the Powered Explicit Guidance (PEG) algorithm used by Block-1. To handle the long burn durations (on the order of 1000 seconds) of EUS missions, two algorithms were examined. An alternative algorithm, OPGUID, was introduced, while modifications were made to PEG. A trade study was conducted to select the guidance algorithm for future SLS vehicles. The chosen algorithm needs to support a wide variety of mission operations: ascent burns to LEO, apogee raise burns, trans-lunar injection burns, hyperbolic Earth departure burns, and contingency disposal burns using the Reaction Control System (RCS). Additionally, the algorithm must be able to respond to a single engine failure scenario. Each algorithm was scored based on pre-selected criteria, including insertion accuracy, algorithmic complexity and robustness, extensibility for potential future missions, and flight heritage. Monte Carlo analysis was used to select the final algorithm. This paper covers the design criteria, approach, and results of this trade study, showing impacts and considerations when adapting launch vehicle guidance algorithms to a broader breadth of in-space operations.

Von der Porten, Paul↗
NASA NTRS2018

Closed Loop Guidance Trade Study for Space Launch System Block-1B Vehicle

NASA is currently building the Space Launch System (SLS) Block-1 launch vehicle for the Exploration Mission 1 (EM-1) test flight. Since EM-1 has an exo-atmospheric flight profile similar to the Space Shuttle, Block-1 guidance utilizes the shuttle-heritage Powered Explicit Guidance (PEG) algorithm. The Block-1 implementation of PEG has been thoroughly tested, and is robust to certain failure scenarios, including loss of a single core engine.

Von der Porten, Paul↗
NASA NTRS2018

Closed Loop Guidance Trade Study for Space Launch System Block-1B Vehicle

The Space Launch System (SLS) Block-1B vehicle includes a low thrust-to-weight upper stage, which presents challenges to heritage ascent guidance algorithms. A trade study was conducted to evaluate two alternative guidance algorithms: 1) Powered Explicit Guidance (PEG), based on a modified implementation of PEG used on the Block-1 vehicle, and 2) Optimal Guidance (OPGUID), an algorithm developed for Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) and used on Constellation and other Guidance, Navigation, and Controls (GN&C) projects. The design criteria, approach, and results of the trade study are given, as well as other impacts and considerations for Block-1B type missions.

Ahmad, Naeem↗
NASA NTRS1965

Linear feedback guidance

Determination of closed loop guidance function with linear, time-variable feedback studied by behavior of motion equations

FEEDBACK↗
NASA NTRS2013

Closed Loop Terminal Guidance Navigation for a Kinetic Impactor Spacecraft

A kinetic impactor spacecraft is a viable method to deflect an asteroid which poses a threat to the Earth. The technology to perform such a deflection has been demonstrated by the Deep Impact (DI) mission, which successfully collided with comet Tempel 1 in July 2005 using an onboard autonomous navigation system, called AutoNav, for the terminal phase of the mission. In this paper, we evaluate the ability of AutoNav to impact a wide range of scenarios that an deflection mission could encounter, varying parameters such as the approach velocity, phase angle, size of the asteroid, and the determination of spacecraft attitude. Using realistic Monte Carlo simulations, we tabulated the probability of success of the deflection as a function of these parameters, and the highest sensitivity to be due the spacecraft attitude determination mode. In addition, we also specifically analyzed the impact probability for a proposed mission which would send an impactor to the asteroid 1999RQ36. We conclude with some recommendations for future work.

closed loop guidance↗
NASA NTRS1993

A time optimal Space Station reboost guidance strategy

A closed-loop guidance strategy for time and fuel optimal reboost of Space Station Freedom is discussed in this paper. The reboost maneuver is formulated as an optimal control problem rather than a parameter optimization problem, the parameters being the thrust switching times. In the present approach the thrust switching structure need not be prescribed a priori to solve the resulting two point boundary value problem. Non-optimality of singular control or intermediate thrust is proved by utilizing the second order Kelley condition or the Generalized Legendre-Clebsch condition. Only a few sets of initial co-states and time-to-go guess values need to be stored on-board for a wide range of reboost scenarios.

Kumar, Renjith R.↗
NASA NTRS1993

A time-optimal Space Station reboost guidance strategy

A closed-loop guidance strategy for time and fuel optimal reboost of Space Station Freedom is discussed in this paper. The reboost maneuver is formulated as an optimal control problem rather than a parameter optimization problem, the parameters being the thrust switching times. In the present approach the thrust switching structure need not be prescribed a priori to solve the resulting two point boundary value problem. Non-optimality of singular control or intermediate thrust is proved by utilizing the second order Kelley condition or the Generalized Legendre-Clebsch condition. Only a few sets of initial co-states and time-to-go guess values need to be stored on-board for a wide range of reboost scenarios.

Kumar, Renjith R.↗
NASA NTRS1995

Ascent Guidance Comparisons

This paper contains results from ascent guidance studies conducted at the NASA Marshall Space Flight Center. The studies include investigation of different guidance schemes for a variety of potential launch vehicles. Criteria of a successful ascent guidance scheme are low operations cost, satisfaction of load indicator constraints, and maximization of performance. Results show that open-loop designs as a function of altitude or velocity are preferable to designs that are functions of time. Optimized open-loop trajectories can increase performance while maintaining load indicators within limits. Closed-loop atmospheric schemes that involve linear tangent steering or feedback of velocity terms for trajectory modification did not yield any improvement. Early release of vacuum closed-loop guidance, including use during solid rocket booster operation, yields some improvements. Evaluation of a closed-loop optimization scheme for flying through the atmosphere shows no advantages over open-loop optimization. Dispersion study results for several potential guidance schemes and launch vehicles are included in the paper and are not a discriminator between guidance schemes. The primary cost driver is mission operations philosophy, not choice of guidance scheme. More autonomous guidance schemes can help in movement towards a philosophy that would reduce operations costs.

Hanson, John M.↗
NASA NTRS2018

Powered Explicit Guidance Modifications and Enhancements for Space Launch System Block-1 and Block-1B Vehicles

NASA is currently building the Space Launch System (SLS) Block-1 launch vehicle for the Exploration Mission 1 (EM-1) test flight. NASA is also currently designing the next evolution of SLS, the Block-1B. The Block-1 and Block-1B vehicles will use the Powered Explicit Guidance (PEG) algorithm (of Space Shuttle heritage) for closed loop guidance. To accommodate vehicle capabilities and design for future evolutions of SLS, modifications were made to PEG for Block-1 to handle multi-phase burns, provide PEG updated propulsion information, and react to a core stage engine out. In addition, due to the relatively low thrust-to-weight ratio of the Exploration Upper Stage (EUS) and EUS carrying out Lunar Vicinity and Earth Escape missions, certain enhancements to the Block-1 PEG algorithm are needed to perform Block-1B missions to account for long burn arcs and target translunar and hyperbolic orbits. This paper describes the design and implementation of modifications to the Block-1 PEG algorithm as compared to Space Shuttle. Furthermore, this paper illustrates challenges posed by the Block-1B vehicle and the required PEG enhancements. These improvements make PEG capable for use on the SLS Block-1B vehicle as part of the Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GN&C) System.

Von der Porten, Paul↗
NASA NTRS1992

Guidance and dispersion studies of National Launch System ascent trajectories

The National Launch System (NLS) is a joint concept, between DoD and NASA, for building a family of new launch vehicles. Two of the many choices to be made are the trajectory shaping methods and the onboard guidance scheme. This paper presents results from some ongoing studies to address these issues. First, potential gains from new guidance concepts are listed. Next the paper gives a list of possible discriminators between different guidance schemes, lists a number of potential guidance schemes, and explains two in some detail. A reference scheme is tested to determine its performance versus the discriminators. Finally, results from some special studies using the reference guidance scheme are given, including the effects of closed-loop guidance initiation time, time of enforcement of sideslip, vehicle roll for engine out, time and location of an engine out, use of load relief control, and use of day of launch wind biasing.

Hanson, John M.↗