Second ARM Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor Users’ Meeting Report
The aerosol chemical speciation monitor (ACSM) was developed to adapt the technology of the aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS) to routine, long-term, standalone monitoring. The calculation of particulate mass concentration from ACSM data requires the measurement of the response of the instrument to aerosol of specific size and composition as well as assumptions about the instrument response based on laboratory measurements and field experience acquired over more than two decades of operation of AMS and a decade of operation of the ACSM. Three parameters in the concentration calculations that are particularly important are the NO3 response factor (RFNO3), relative ionization efficiency (RIE), and the collection efficiency (CE). The values of RFNO3 and RIEs are determined from calibration, however the jump calibration method previously used in calibration can result in errors in the RIE for sulfate. This has been corrected by implementing a continuous calibration method. The default collection efficiency is 0.5. This has been shown to result in mass loadings that do not agree with mass determinations from other instruments because of effects of composition on the vaporization of the particles. The previous work of investigators addressing this issue is discussed. After preliminary work on ACSM and scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS) data from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility Southern Great Plains (SGP) observatory collected in late 2016 and 2017 produced a parameterization of composition dependent collection efficiency very different from the results of previous studies, SMPS data were examined and we determined that there was significant mass that the instrument did not capture because the particles with diameters larger than 465 nm are not counted by this instrument. Data for the ultra-high-sensitivity aerosol spectrometer (UHSAS), SMPS, and ACSM are available for nearly all of 2019. The data from UHSAS and SMPS collected in 2019 were compared. We found that the UHSAS data has particle counts and total volumes significantly less than measured by the condensation particle counter (CPC) and SMPS. The SMPS data were extended by fitting the average volume distribution with a log normal curve and using this relationship to estimate a mass value for the SMPS over extended diameter range. The extended SMPS mass values result in a CDCE parameterization that is in better agreement with the results of other investigators, but is still different from other formulations. The working group recommends that the ACSM data be processed with a collective efficiency (CE)=1, that this be documented clearly in the metadata, and the use of the default CE of 0.5 or a formulation of composition-dependent collection efficiencies (CDCE) chosen by the user should be implemented based on the ammonium nitrate mass fraction. This is clearly necessary for the wintertime SGP ACSM data because of the high nitrate concentrations.