SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
In NASA's Space Nuclear Propulsion program there is a development effort of for a composite fuel containing zirconium carbide (ZrC) and uranium mononitride (UN), this fuel form is referred to as a CERCER (ceramic-ceramic). These series of slides were put together to showcase the primary achievements in our research over the past year to our program sponsors. This is a yearly meeting to evaluate progress.
This paper presents a few nuclear thermal rocket (NTR) reactor core preliminary conceptual designs based on the use of monolithic uranium nitride (UN) fuel plates or pins clad with tungsten (W), alloyed or unalloyed as needed. High-assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU) as well as high-enriched uranium (HEU) are considered. Nominal core thermal powers are between 300 and 1100 MW corresponding to thrusts between 66 kN and 240 kN. The estimated thrust-to-reactor-weight ratios (T/WRx) achievable with the HEU plate and pin configurations are between 3.8 and 10.9. The T/WRx achievable with the HALEU plate and pin configurations are lower, 1.9–4.0, than those achievable with HEU. It is noteworthy that even a relatively modest increase in fuel enrichment above the HALEU limit enables a significant increase in T/WRx. It must be emphasized that these results do not yet account for uncertainties and that the appropriateness of the assumed fuel thermal design limits for normal operation (i.e., peak centerline temperature of 3100 K) will need to be confirmed. Finally, just like for the other UN-based fuels currently considered for NTR applications (i.e., CERMET and CERCER), the proposed UN fuel systems need significant testing in prototypic conditions to confirm the appropriate performance for safe NTR applications. However, the monolithic fuel systems may have, overall, a higher technology readiness level (TRL), and, consequently, shorter fuel development and validation time may result.
A comparison of 300 MWt HEU and HALEU NTP cores using different fuel forms is presented to demonstrate trends and potentially inform fuel development. Compared to HEU, HALEU cores require additional in-core moderation. Beryllium was chosen as the reference in-core moderator material; metal hydrides may also be considered. Typical NTP fuel forms such as carbide and carbonitride solid solutions, carbide-graphite composites, CERMETs and CERCERs were considered together with less typical fuel forms such as UC and U metal. Be-moderated HALEU cores are heavier than HEU cores (1.9-2.7 and 0.9-2.0 metric tons, respectively). Furthermore, HALEU loading is very sensitive to the amount of in-core moderation which translates into tight fabrication tolerances. HALEU cores requires more reactivity control mechanisms than HEU cores to compensate for temperature feed-back. Using enrichments only slightly above HALEU (e.g., 25%) may provide a compromise between the administrative preference for using HALEU and the engineering preference for simplifying the reactor systems by, for example, not using in-core moderators.