Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “ZrSi”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

10 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2022

The crystal chemistry of ZrSi

Reported here is a revised crystal structure of β–ZrSi (TlI/CrB structure type), correcting the atomic position and bond distances. The Si–Si bond length has been modified substantially from 2.723(6) Å to 2.4411(8) Å. The β-ZrSi single crystals were grown from an arc-melted button, and were characterized using single crystal X-ray diffraction. A survey of the TlI/CrB structure type shows that changes to the nomenclature would be useful, separating it into four chemically distinct subtypes: TlI, CrB, CaSi, and ThCo. β–ZrSi is an example of the CaSi subtype. α-ZrSi crystallizes in the related FeB structure type, which is also divided here into the subtypes FeB, CeSi, and YNi. The effect of electron count on the relative phase stabilities of the CaSi and CeSi subtypes is rationalized with the aid of the Zintl concept and electronic structure calculations in the Linear Muffin-Tin Orbital (LMTO) basis.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2020

Materials Data on ZrSi by Materials Project

ZrSi crystallizes in the orthorhombic Cmcm space group. The structure is three-dimensional. Zr4+ is bonded in a 7-coordinate geometry to seven equivalent Si4- atoms. There are five shorter (2.75 Å) and two longer (2.92 Å) Zr–Si bond lengths. Si4- is bonded in a 9-coordinate geometry to seven equivalent Zr4+ and two equivalent Si4- atoms. Both Si–Si bond lengths are 2.46 Å.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2020

Materials Data on ZrSi by Materials Project

ZrSi crystallizes in the orthorhombic Pnma space group. The structure is three-dimensional. Zr4+ is bonded in a 7-coordinate geometry to seven equivalent Si4- atoms. There are a spread of Zr–Si bond distances ranging from 2.75–2.94 Å. Si4- is bonded in a 9-coordinate geometry to seven equivalent Zr4+ and two equivalent Si4- atoms. Both Si–Si bond lengths are 2.48 Å.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2020

Materials Data on ZrSi by Materials Project

ZrSi crystallizes in the tetragonal I4_1/amd space group. The structure is three-dimensional. Zr4+ is bonded in a distorted hexagonal planar geometry to six equivalent Si4- atoms. There are two shorter (2.81 Å) and four longer (2.95 Å) Zr–Si bond lengths. Si4- is bonded in a 6-coordinate geometry to six equivalent Zr4+ atoms.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2025

Control of wetting and uniformity via ZrSi x formation in ceramic-to-metal joints fabricated using Ag-Zr brazes

The deposition of a 2.0 µm SiO 2 film on the alumina surface in Kovar TM /94% alumina joints enables the formation of a silicide reaction layer on the alumina during brazing with 97Ag2Zr1Cu. Additionally, the average and standard deviation of joint thickness decrease from 50 to 15 and 29 to 4 µm, respectively compared to joints without added SiO 2 . Finally, the average failure stress of these braze joints was 45 MPa, while that of similar joints without added SiO 2 was 90 MPa. Sessile drop experiments of 98Ag2Zr on SiO 2 and 99.6% Al 2 O 3 substrates show that the braze wets and spreads to 3x its original area on SiO 2 with a wetting angle near 0°, but remains the same area on 99.6% Al 2 O 3 with a wetting angle of 106.6°. Focused-ion-beam scanning electron microscopy analysis of a cross-section of the 98Ag2Zr sessile drop on the SiO 2 substrate has shown that Zr reacts with SiO 2 to form Zr oxide and silicide layers. Scanning transmission electron microscopy diffraction and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy analysis indicate this silicide layer contains tetragonal Zr 5 Si 4 . In conclusion, analysis shows the silicide layer enhances wetting and joint uniformity while unreacted SiO 2 embrittles the joint and degrades strength.

alumina↗
DOE OSTI2021

Combustion in the ZrF 4 -Mg-Si and ZrF 4 -Al-Si systems for preparation of zirconium silicides

The exothermic reactions in the ZrF 4 –Mg-Si and ZrF 4 -Al-Si systems are investigated by a fast temperature recording (thermocouple) technique, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). A quenching method is used to arrest the combustion process and conduct a layer-by-layer analysis of the products by x-ray diffraction (XRD) and electron microscopy. Two seemingly similar reactive systems exhibited considerably different combustion characteristics, composition, and morphology. Based on these investigations, we propose and discuss phase formation mechanisms at the early stages for each system. Three different pathways involving the reaction of ZrF 4 with other reagents and the Mg 2 Si intermediate are identified to occur in the ZrF 4 –Mg-Si system. Contrary to the complex mechanism in the ZrF 4 –Mg-Si system, the early stage of the combustion process for the ZrF 4 -Al-Si system involves the interaction of ZrF 4 with Al-Si eutectic melt. The exothermic reaction between reduced solid Zr and Si melt is the primary heat-generating step for both systems in spite of substantial differences in the early stages of the reactions. The silicon content in the reactive mixtures governs the phase composition of products. The ZrSi 2 phase, with a high growth rate, forms first on the Zr particle surfaces and then grows by a reactive diffusion mechanism. The ZrSi 2+ Zr reaction produces silicon-lean phases (e.g., ZrSi) when the silicon supply is limited. The combustion temperature also has a considerable influence on the phase compositions of the products. High combustion temperature in the ZrF 4 +2Mg+Si mixture enables the formation of multiphase products (α-ZrSi and β-ZrSi), whereas the relatively lower temperatures in the 3ZrF 4 +4Al+3Si mixture yields a single-phase α-ZrSi. As a result, lower combustion temperatures also make the ZrF 4 -Al-Si system more advantageous for the preparation of zirconium silicides.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2022

Leveraging computational thermodynamics to guide SiC-ZrC chemical vapor deposition process development

Here using the CALPHAD approach to understand zirconium carbide deposition, a series of phase equilibria were calculated from a custom thermodynamic database based on a literature source, and the equilibria were used to explore the potential chemical vapor deposition (CVD) processing space in the ZrCl 4 -CH 3 SiCl 3 -CH 4 -H 2 system as a function of pressure, temperature, and gas composition. Several gas ratios were considered. At a given ZrCl 4 :CH 3 SiCl 3 ratio within the range studied, the most important factor was found to be the ratios of CH 4 :ZrCl 4 , wherein the nature of the composition – carbide vs. silicide – could be controlled. A pure binary composition of ZrC and SiC is expected to form by increasing the initial amount of methane and decreasing the amount of hydrogen from values predicted purely based on thermodynamic equilibrium. Rietveld analysis of the x-ray diffractograms from corresponding experimental depositions confirmed that increasing the CH 4 :ZrCl 4 ratio increased the fraction of carbon-containing species (SiC, ZrC) and decreased the fraction of non-carbides (ZrSi, ZrSi 2 , etc.), as predicted from the CALPHAD results.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2020

Materials Data on ZrSiS by Materials Project

ZrSiS is Matlockite structured and crystallizes in the tetragonal P4/nmm space group. The structure is two-dimensional and consists of two hydrogen sulfide molecules and one ZrSi sheet oriented in the (0, 0, 1) direction. In the ZrSi sheet, Zr2+ is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to four equivalent Si4- atoms. All Zr–Si bond lengths are 2.82 Å. Si4- is bonded to four equivalent Zr2+ and four equivalent Si4- atoms to form a mixture of distorted face, edge, and corner-sharing SiZr4Si4 hexagonal bipyramids. All Si–Si bond lengths are 2.51 Å.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2020

One Structure, Two Elements—LuGe 2 Superconductor vs Ordinary Metallic Conductor LuSn 2 . A Case Study on How Site-Selective Germanium for Tin Atom Substitution Leads to Modulating of the Charge Distribution

The substitution of chemically similar elements in a given crystal structure is an effective way to enhance physical properties, but the understanding on such improvements is usually impeded because the substitutions are random, and the roles of the different atoms cannot be distinguished by crystallographic symmetry. Herein, we provide a detailed crystallographic analysis and property measurements for the continuous solid solutions LuGe x Sn 2–x (0 < x < 2). The results show that there is no apparent change of the global symmetry, with the end-members LuGe 2 and LuSn 2 , as well as the intermediate LuGe x Sn 2–x compositions adopting the ZrSi 2 type structure (space group Cmcm, Pearson index oC12). Yet, the refinements of the crystal structures from single-crystal X-ray diffraction data show that Ge–Sn atom substitutions are not random, but occur preferentially at the zig-zag chain. The patterned distribution of two group 14 elements leads to a significant variation in chemical bonding and charge ordering within the other structural fragment, the 2D square nets, thereby resulting in tuned electron transport. The enhancement is greater than the typical Bloch-Gruneisen model, and more akin to the parallel-resistor model. Magnetization measurements on single crystals show bulk superconductivity in all LuGe x Sn 2–x samples with shielding fractions as high as 90%. Specific heat data confirm the effect to originate from residual metallic tin in the material, indicating that Sn atom substitutions in the 2D square nets cause disruptions of the hypervalent bonding and local anisotropy, which ultimately leads to vanishing of the superconducting state in the end-member LuGe 2 . This work sheds light on how the complexity in chemical interactions by two different carbon congeners leads to changes in the physical properties and how they can be correlated with the induced charge distribution. Furthermore, these studies also provide a general approach to modulation of charge density, and thus, of emerging physical properties in other classes of intermetallic systems based on the main-group elements of groups 13 to 15.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2022

Post-irradiation Examination Status for the BSU-269 Project

High-density uranium inter-metallic uranium silicide (U 3 Si 2 ) was initially considered as a potential advanced nuclear fuel for light water reactor (LWR) systems due to several advantages it demonstrated in thermophysical properties, chemical, and irradiation stability. In addition to understanding the basic thermophysical and mechanical properties of U 3 Si 2 under LWR irradiation conditions, it is important to assess its performance with advanced claddings such as FeCrAl, SiC, or conventional Zr-based claddings. Several aspects of the fuel cycle and fuel performance are being evaluated for U 3 Si 2 coupled with different types of claddings. To thoroughly characterize the U 3 Si 2 -cladding system, their chemical compatibilities and the potential for fuel-cladding chemical interaction (FCCI) must be addressed. Interdiffusion studies have been performed between U 3 Si 2 /Zry-4 and U 3 Si 2 /FeCrAl using diffusion couples. For the U 3 Si 2 /Zry-4 system, ZrSi 2 was the primary interdiffusion product observed at 800°C in addition to other secondary phases from the Zr alloying elements such as Fe and Cr. Low melting point U 6 Fe was also observed at 1000°C. For the U 3 Si 2 /FeCrAl system, at temperatures above 500°C, chemical diffusion Fe-U and Fe-U-Si was observed, increasing with rising temperatures. Although information from these non-irradiated tests is a fundamental first assessment, follow-up with focused irradiation tests is necessary. Irradiation can significantly alter the structure and evolution of the FCCI layers compared to the non-irradiated conditions.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗