Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “WRPS”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records

WRPS Hanford Update [Slides]

The purpose of this report is to coordinate with the staff from WRPS, the current contract holder for operations at the Hanford site to better inform design decisions for the Autonomous systems for Hanford waste tank handling project. The project goals are to support risk reduction associated with monitoring, inspection and mapping of Hanford tank underground pits and includes: 1. A pit mock-up demonstration of Idaho National Laboratory’s (INL) Autonomous Pit Exploration System (APES) technology, which has two configurations: A. The Autonomous Robotic Arm, which is a proposed collaboration with Florida International University (FIU) and has capabilities to visually inspect, monitor, map and conduct simple tool manipulation tasks in the tank pits, and B. The robotic crawler configuration, which has capabilities to deploy to the bottom of the pits and conduct closer and bottom-up visual inspections. 2. An Implementation Plan that identifies Hanford site-wide application of the INL remote robotics technologies to enhance the performance of the tank farm systems and the characterization of the waste they contain to mitigate risk and optimize the overall waste mission. 3. A first-of-a-kind environmental digital twin will be produced. Digital twins to date require permanently installed sensors in order to produce asset specific predictions. This project will use the intermittent signals during inspections from deployed sensors on robotic systems to produce the data sets used by AI/ML to enable predictions of issues on tanks.

42 - ENGINEERING↗

Progress in Addressing Workers' Concerns Related to Chemical Vapors at the Hanford Site - 19054

Washington River Protections Solutions, LLC (WRPS) is the prime contractor for the Department of Energy (DOE) Tank Farm Operations at the Hanford Site, and is responsible for the management and retrieval of millions of gallons of radioactive and chemical wastes, stored in 177 underground tanks; a legacy of decades of production activities at the Site. The potential for workforce exposure to the chemical vapors from the tanks has long been a concern for the workforce and for DOE and its tank contractors; concerns about tank vapors is an issue that pre-dates WRPS's incumbency as the Tank Operations Contractor. In response to an increase in the number of tank vapor events reported by workers at the Hanford Site in 2014, WRPS commissioned the Savannah River National Laboratory with establishing and overseeing a panel of external, independent experts (Tank Vapor Assessment Team (TVAT)) to examine chemical vapor management and related worker-protection measures at the Hanford Tank Farms. The TVAT released the Hanford Tank Vapor Assessment Report (SRNL-RP-2014-00791) in late 2014, which included several recommendations to reduce the potential for chemical vapor exposures. From 2015- 2018, governmental and external groups conducted additional assessments to review the progress made in implementing the TVAT recommendations, and the overall Industrial Hygiene (IH) program. All of these assessments specifically recommended WRPS take action to improve communications with the workforce around the subject of tank vapors. Some further recommended assessing the effectiveness of vapors-related communications. In fiscal year 2016, WRPS and DOE Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) formed an Integrated Project Team (IPT) to: (1) develop the strategy for addressing chemical vapors and (2) define the future chemical vapor protection actions at the Tank Farms. The actions are designed to address the recommendations from the external assessments as part of the overall effort to mitigate vapors-related exposure incidences, and to ensure workers are safe and feel safe while working in and around the Hanford Tank Farms. A comprehensive vapor management communication plan, engagement processes, and effectiveness measurements were established as essential components of the IPT effort. The Chemical Protection Program Office (CPPO) was formed, in part, to deliver on these IPT initiatives, monitor performance, and drive improvements to WRPS's vapors-related communications and engagement efforts at the Hanford Tank Farms. The CPPO was created as a temporary program office tailored to address these unique challenges by augmenting traditional company performance monitoring and communications (i.e. all employee e-mails, posters, and formal briefings). Modeled in broad concept after the successful program office WRPS created to support the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, CPPO has also proven successful in its mission. Because concerns about chemical vapors in the workplace were expressed by the workforce, they are a key stakeholder. As such, the CPPO has concentrated its information sharing efforts toward the WRPS workforce. With a focus on empathetic engagement, continuous improvement, and transparent information sharing, the CPPO has developed and implemented a strategy for improving worker trust in vapors-related communications and increasing the workforce knowledge of responses taken to address chemical vapors. Effective implementation of this strategy is demonstrated by the results of workforce surveys, which indicate measured and important improvement in the effectiveness of vapors-communications and the knowledge level workers report about vapor issues compared to the previous year. This paper discusses the utilization of a temporary program office and the unique approach that the CPPO implemented to achieve success, including: strategic application of the technical and communications staff skill mix of the organization (including talent development opportunities such as stretch assignments for WRPS's Strategic Talent Development program members and support from WRPS college interns), teaming with other WRPS' organizations such as IH, Engineering and Communications and Public Relations (C and PR), the development of new types of information sharing to support the effort, and the methods by which the effectiveness of the communications efforts are measured to drive continuous improvement. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Analysis of Powered Air-Purifying Respirator (PAPR) Cartridge Performance Testing on Hanford Tanks SX-101 and SX-104: Volume 2 Raw Analytical Data

As the Tank Operations Contractor for U.S. Department of Energy operations at the Hanford site in Washington State, Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS) is responsible for managing highly radioactive wastes stored in tanks at Hanford. WRPS tests of cartridges used in air-purifying respirators (APR) and powered air-purifying respirators (PAPR) commonly used at Hanford Tank Farms. The tests are conducted to determine the period of time the cartridges would provide adequate performance for APRs and PAPRs used to protect workers when exposed to a mixture of Chemicals of Potential Concern (COPC) from any vapors exiting headspaces in the storage tanks. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Standard 29 Code of the Federal Regulations (CFR) 1910.134(d)(3)(iii)(b)(2) specifies that for protection against gases and vapors, employers shall implement a schedule for cartridges to ensure that change-outs occur before the end of service life. The change schedule can be based on objective information or data that ensures cartridge change-outs occur before the end of their service life. The primary function of the WRPS Cartridge Test Program is to obtain objective data to determine service lives for the APR and PAPR cartridges used at Hanford Tank Farms. WRPS contracted with Pacific Northwest National Laboratory to analyze the test data and offer an independent analysis and any recommendations. This report summarizes data analysis of PAPR cartridge testing on headspace vapors from Hanford SX-101 and SX-104 single-shell tanks. Two different PAPR cartridges—one from MSA Safety Inc. (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania) and another from 3M (Maplewood, Minnesota)—were assessed on each tank headspace source on separate days. These data represent the first PAPR cartridge testing under the recent WRPS program, as testing to date had been focused on APR cartridges. Volume 1 of this report documents the testing, data analysis, results, conclusions, and recommendations resulting from the PAPR testing on SX-101 and SX-104 headspace vapors. Volume 2 provides an introduction to the raw data, including analytical laboratory analysis results that supported the analysis and conclusions documented in Volume 1.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

241-AY-102 Leak detection pit drain line visual inspection - 15678

In October 2012, Washington River Protection Solutions LLC (WRPS) determined that waste had leaked into the annulus of Tank 241-AY-102. WRPS conducted an extensive review of Tank AY-102 and increased both inspection and monitoring of the tank; however, the precise cause and location of the leak could not be determined. In parallel with the leak in the primary tank, the Tank AY-102 leak detection pit (LDP) was accumulating water through the drain system external to the secondary tank liner. Liquid collecting in the LDP is suspected to be from water intrusion and collects at a rate such that the LDP must be pumped routinely. Following a routine pumping event on June 20, 2013, elevated radiation dose rates were noted on the transfer hose and surface contamination readings were found on the transfer pump when it was removed from the Tank AY-102 LDP. These two field readings suggested that tank waste from a secondary liner breach could be leaking into the LDP. As a result, WRPS initiated a plan to ascertain the integrity of the secondary tank liner including a robotic inspection of the LDP. To perform the robotic visual inspection, a custom robotic crawler with a deployment device was designed, built, and operated by IHI Southwest for WRPS to inspect the 6 in (152 mm) leak detection pit drain line. To ensure success when deployed in the field, the inspection equipment was demonstrated at both the IHI facility in Denver, Colorado, and the Hanford Site using full scale piping mockups. On November 20, 2013 WRPS inspected the 6 in (152 mm) diameter drain line. The deployment device successfully attached to the drain line, and the crawler entered the drain line and traversed to within approximately 7 ft (2.1 m) of the central sump located under the center of the tank before losing traction. Crawler performance was satisfactory, and the quality of the camera image and lighting provided sufficient detail to document the current condition of the visible regions of the pipe. The inspection showed that the majority of the drain line was dry. Two wet areas were observed, a portion of the line nearest the LDP and a portion near the center of the tank. The portion nearest the LDP was under water prior to pumping on November 14, 2013. Although sediment and debris were seen during the inspection, it is believed to be construction debris and corrosion products. No material was found in the inspection that looked like tank waste or the material seen in the Tank AY-102 annulus (i.e., no greenish or yellowish deposits or dark fluids, dried salt deposits, or crystalline material). The contamination levels seen on the crawler were consistent with past values seen on LDP pumping equipment. Sampling and analysis of the recovered residues from the crawlers did not find material consistent with tank waste. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Refocusing an Employee Engagement Organization to Improve Participation, Member Benefits, and Impact - 19036

Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC (WRPS) provides its employees with programs and opportunities to develop professional skills and to network. Among these is an employee engagement organization called 'WRPSpeed'. WRPSpeed was founded in 2009 initially to support new employees, specifically early-career employees and those new to the Columbia Basin area surrounding the Hanford Site. It was, and remains today, an opt-in program, meaning that in order to join, employees must request to become a member; the only requirement to join is to be a WRPS employee. WRPSpeed has historically offered presentations on professional development topics along with various events and activities supporting professional networking, such as after-work-hours events and community sports teams. Since its creation, WRPSpeed has experienced an ebb and flow of interest, participation, and success. Beginning in early 2017, existing members of the WRPSpeed board examined the stagnant growth trend of the organization and determined change was needed in order to truly accomplish the mission and goals visualized by the board and by WRPS management. These changes culminated in the establishment of a new board position, Marketing and Branding, which allowed WRPSpeed to refocus their messaging and image expressed to the WRPS employee base at large. The primary objectives of the new Marketing and Branding board position were 1) to communicate the identity of WRPSpeed, 2) to communicate the benefits of participation to the WRPS employee base, and 3) to grow WRPSpeed's presence as an active community steward. During the previous years of operation, its brand had developed two main audience perception problems: a perception of exclusivity, which limited membership growth; and a lack of recognition and awareness. Though initially founded as a group for new and early-career employees, the board recognized the benefits of offering all employees the opportunity to participate. This allows more people to engage in the organization and experience the benefits, and also offers the membership and program a more robust network of professional and personal experiences and connections. Concurrent with the launch of Marketing and Branding, the WRPSpeed board reviewed their current functions and activities to determine opportunities for improvement and scale-up. The goal of this internal review was to ensure the benefits offered and advertised by WRPSpeed were high quality, valuable, and engaging. It was up to Marketing and Branding to develop strategies for the success of these efforts and reach all parties in the expanded membership. A marketing communications strategy was developed to establish a revitalized WRPSpeed image and clearly project that new image to a wider audience. The first step was to rewrite the mission statement for the organization, which established, in writing, its primary pillars: community stewardship, professional networking, and professional development. With a new mission statement and the WRPSpeed board in concurrence with - and coached on - the new image, the Marketing and Branding team launched its rebranding campaign. The campaign included a refreshed logo and theme, a new monthly newsletter for existing membership, increased and consistently stylized communications about events, a revitalized organization web page, and a ramp-up schedule for large-scale, multimedia communications to the entire company. From July 2017, when they began, to June 2018, the Marketing and Branding efforts have garnered a 20% increase in membership overall. Additionally, members surveyed in May 2018 showed 49% of respondents had been participating in WRPSpeed between 0 and 12 months; 13% responded '1-2 years'; and 38% responded '2+ years'. These results confirm an upward trend in membership, and attendance records show an increase in new people attending events. Also, parallel increases in number and quality of activities and increases in networking with employee groups from other local companies such as Bechtel National, Inc. and AECOM have improved member satisfaction and positive word of mouth among the employee population. As with any organization, employee engagement-and-retention groups like WRPSpeed face the challenges of staying relevant and beneficial to existing members while continuing to grow their program and impact. However, employee engagement organizations also have the unique opportunity to connect employees across the company and to provide them opportunities otherwise unavailable via other programs. Often these groups also have the flexibility to tailor the offerings, events, and activities to suit the specific needs and aspirations of the employees. With this exceptional position, it is important to continue to strive to offer high quality, significant, and useful benefits to the employees and, thus, the company. The strategies and campaigns employed to revitalize WRPSpeed have proven exceptionally effective in-house and are useful to other employee groups as templates for their own improvement and as opportunities for benchmarking. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Analysis of Air-Purifying Respirator (APR) and Powered Air-Purifying Respirator (PAPR) Cartridge Performance Testing on a Hanford AP Tank Farm Exhauster Slipstream: Volume 2 Raw Analytical Data

As the Tank Operations Contractor for U.S. Department of Energy operations at the Hanford site in Washington State, Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS) is responsible for managing highly radioactive wastes stored in tanks at Hanford. WRPS tests air-purifying respirator (APR) and powered air-purifying respirator (PAPR) chemical cartridges commonly used at Hanford Tank Farms to determine the period of time that the cartridges would provide adequate performance for APRs and PAPRs used to protect workers when exposed to a mixture of Chemicals of Potential Concern (COPC) from any vapors exiting headspaces in the storage tanks. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Standard promulgated in Title 29 of the Code of the Federal Regulations (CFR) 1910.134(d)(3)(iii)(b)(2) specifies that for protection against gases and vapors, employers shall implement a schedule for cartridges to ensure that change-outs occur before the end of service life. The change schedule can be based on objective information or data that ensures cartridge change-outs occur before the end of their service life.[2-5] The primary function of the WRPS Cartridge Test Program is to obtain objective data to determine service lives for the APR and PAPR cartridges used at Hanford Tank Farms. WRPS contracted with Pacific Northwest National Laboratory to analyze the test data and offer an independent analysis and any recommendations. Volume 1 of this report summarizes data analysis of APR and PAPR cartridge testing on vapors from the AP tank farm exhauster. Previous testing of APR cartridges was conducted on the AP exhauster in June 2016. However, an AP exhauster upgrade was completed in September 2016. Two different APR cartridges from SCOTT Safety (Monroe, North Carolina) were assessed for the new AP exhauster source, along with two different PAPR cartridges—one from MSA Safety Inc. (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania) and another from 3M (Maplewood, Minnesota). Volume 2 provides an introduction to the raw data, including analytical laboratory analysis results that supported the analysis and conclusions documented in Volume 1.

61 RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY↗

Analysis of Air-Purifying Respirator (APR) Cartridge Performance Testing on Hanford Tanks SX-101 and SX-104: Volume 2 - Raw Analytical Data

As the Tank Operations Contractor for U.S. Department of Energy operations at the Hanford site in Washington State, Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS) is responsible for managing highly radioactive wastes stored in tanks at Hanford. To protect workers at Hanford Tank Farms, WRPS tests air-purifying respirator (APR) and powered air-purifying respirator (PAPR) chemical cartridges commonly used at the tank farms. The tests were conducted to determine the period of time the cartridges would provide adequate performance for APRs and PAPRs when workers are exposed to a mixture of Chemicals of Potential Concern (COPC) from any vapors exiting headspaces in the storage tanks. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Standard 29 Code of the Federal Regulations (CFR) 1910.134(d)(3)(iii)(b)(2) specifies that for protection against gases and vapors, employers shall implement a schedule for cartridges to ensure that change-outs occur before the end of service life. The change schedule can be based on objective information or data that ensures cartridge change-outs occur before the end of their service life. The primary function of the WRPS Cartridge Test Program is to obtain objective data to determine service lives for the APR and PAPR cartridges used at Hanford Tank Farms. WRPS contracted with Pacific Northwest National Laboratory to analyze the test data and offer an independent analysis and any recommendations. This report summarizes data analysis of APR cartridge testing on headspace vapors from Hanford SX-101 and SX-104 single-shell tanks. Volume 1 of this report documents the testing, data analysis, results, conclusions, and recommendations resulting from the APR testing on SX-101 and SX-104 headspace vapors. Volume 2 provides an introduction to the raw data, including analytical laboratory analysis results that supported the analysis and conclusions documented in Volume 1.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Analysis of Air-Purifying Respirator (APR) and Powered Air-Purifying Respirator (PAPR) Cartridge Performance Testing on Hanford Tanks BY-108 and BY-110 Volume 2: Raw Analytical Data

As the Tank Operations Contractor for U.S. Department of Energy operations at the Hanford site in Washington State, Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS) is responsible for managing highly radioactive wastes stored in tanks at Hanford. WRPS tests air-purifying respirator (APR) and powered air-purifying respirator (PAPR) chemical cartridges commonly used by workers at Hanford Tank Farms to determine the period of time that the cartridges would provide adequate performance for APRs and PAPRs used to protect workers when exposed to a mixture of Chemicals of Potential Concern (COPC) from any vapors exiting headspaces in the storage tanks. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Standard promulgated in Title 29 of the Code of the Federal Regulations (CFR) 1910.134(d)(3)(iii)(b)(2) specifies that for protection against gases and vapors, employers shall implement a schedule for cartridges to ensure that change-outs occur before the end of service life. The change schedule can be based on objective information or data that ensures cartridge change-outs occur before the end of their service life. The primary function of the WRPS Cartridge Test Program is to obtain objective data to determine service lives for the APR and PAPR cartridges used at Hanford Tank Farms. WRPS contracted with Pacific Northwest National Laboratory to analyze the test data and offer an independent analysis and any recommendations. This report summarizes data analysis of APR and PAPR cartridge testing on BY-110 and BY-108 headspace vapors, respectively. Two different APR cartridges from SCOTT Safety (Monroe, North Carolina) were assessed for the BY-110 headspace vapors, and two different PAPR cartridges—one from MSA Safety Inc. (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania) and another from 3M (Maplewood, Minnesota)—were assessed for the BY-108 headspace vapors. Volume 1 of this report documents the testing, data analysis, results, conclusions, and recommendations resulting from the cartridge testing of vapors from the BY-110 and BY-108 headspaces. Volume 2 provides an introduction to the raw data, including analytical laboratory analysis results that supported the analysis and conclusions documented in Volume 1.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Analysis of Air-Purifying Respirator (APR) and Powered Air-Purifying Respirator (PAPR) Cartridge Performance Testing on a Hanford AX Tank Farm Exhauster Slipstream Volume 2: Raw Analytical Data

As the Tank Operations Contractor for U.S. Department of Energy operations at the Hanford site in Washington State, Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS) is responsible for managing highly radioactive wastes stored in tanks at Hanford. To protect workers at Hanford Tank Farms, WRPS tests air-purifying respirator (APR) and powered air-purifying respirator (PAPR) chemical cartridges commonly used at the tank farms. The tests were conducted to determine the period of time the cartridges would provide adequate performance for APRs and PAPRs when workers are exposed to a mixture of Chemicals of Potential Concern (COPC) from any vapors exiting headspaces in the storage tanks. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Standard 29 Code of the Federal Regulations (CFR) 1910.134(d)(3)(iii)(b)(2) specifies that for protection against gases and vapors, employers shall implement a schedule for cartridges to ensure that change-outs occur before the end of service life. The change schedule can be based on objective information or data that ensures cartridge change-outs occur before the end of their service life. The primary function of the WRPS Cartridge Test Program is to obtain objective data to determine service lives for the APR and PAPR cartridges used at Hanford Tank Farms. WRPS contracted with Pacific Northwest National Laboratory to analyze the test data and offer an independent analysis and any recommendations. This report summarizes data analysis of APR and PAPR cartridge testing on a vapor slipstream from the Hanford AX tank farm exhauster. Volume 1 of this report documents the testing, data analysis, results, conclusions, and recommendations resulting from the cartridge testing on AX exhauster slipstream vapors. Volume 2 provides an introduction to the raw data, including analytical laboratory analysis results that supported the analysis and conclusions documented in Volume 1.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

ETF Grout Expansion: Evaluation of MgO Additions and Struvite Precipitation Protocol for Potential Expansion

The ETF ammonia tolerant grout waste form was developed by the Vitreous State Laboratory (VSL) to stabilize ammonium and thereby prevent emission of ammonia vapor during solidification of an ammonium-rich, concentrated sulfate aqueous waste stream generated at the Hanford Effluent Treatment Facility (ETF). VSL did not observe expansion in samples prepared during the waste form development work. However, Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) personnel did encounter expansion, in some cases up to 20+ volume percent expansion in ETF grout samples while preforming work scope to evaluate compositional ranges for ETF brine and of the precipitation and solidification reagent. The work requests can be found in Washington River Protection Services (WRPS) Statement of Work (SOW), Requisitions #: 339922 Revisions 0 and 1, March 11, 2021, and November 2021. Additional evaluation was requested by WRPS SOW Requisitions #: 356730, Revision 1, February 1, 2022, to determine whether differences in the slags or differences in sample preparation protocols used by VSL and SRNL were the cause of the expansion observed in the SRNL samples. G. Chen, WRPS, arranged a materials exchange between VSL and SRNL and coordinated the VSL protocol for grouting and curing 1L of Base Case ETF simulant. Materials were exchanged between VSL and SRNL and both laboratories performed the VSL struvite precipitation-solidification protocol and cured samples for at least 28 days. VSL and SRNL encountered expansion, at varying degrees, in all samples prepared under the material exchange and grouting protocol. Additional material exchange testing between VSL and SRNL and alternative materials evaluation to further investigate the causes of grout expansion and differentiate the effects of various dry materials, grouting procedures, and curing containers was requested by WRPS SOW Requisitions #: 356730, Revision 2, January 10, 2023. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) assembled and distributed materials to both laboratories for testing. Observations from this study indicated variations in MgO additions, water-to-dry mix (dm) ratios and curing containers did not correlate to ETF ammonia grout expansion. In comparison to previous work, SRNL observed the addition rate of NaOH to be a potential factor for the final pH in the struvite precipitation step. In the current testing NaOH was added in bulk (5-10 mL at one time) during the precipitation step. The resulting pH was 7.57-9.15 which is slightly higher than pH observed at a slower addition rate. Additional testing is needed to identify the presence and/or struvite stability in high-pH struvite precipitant ETF ammonia grout samples. Therefore, based on current data, it is unknown if NaOH addition rate is the fundamental cause of grout expansion.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Development and Deployment of the Mobile Arm Retrieval System (MARS) - 12187

Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS) is developing and deploying Mobile Arm Retrieval System (MARS) technologies solutions to support retrieval of radioactive and chemical waste from underground single shell storage tanks (SST) located at the Hanford Site, which is near Richland, Washington. WRPS has developed the MARS using a standardized platform that is capable of deploying multiple retrieval technologies. To date, WRPS, working with their mentor-protege company, Columbia Energy and Environmental Services (CEES), has developed two retrieval mechanisms, MARS-Sluicing (MARS-S) and MARS-Vacuum (MARS-V). MARS-S uses pressurized fluids routed through spray nozzles to mobilize waste materials to a centrally located slurry pump (deployed in 2011). MARS-V uses pressurized fluids routed through an eductor nozzle. The eductor nozzle allows a vacuum to be drawn on the waste materials. The vacuum allows the waste materials to be moved to an in-tank vessel, then extracted from the SST and subsequently pumped to newer and safer double shell tanks (DST) for storage until the waste is treated for disposal. The MARS-S system is targeted for sound SSTs (i.e., non leaking tanks). The MARS-V is targeted for assumed leaking tanks or those tanks that are of questionable integrity. Both versions of MARS are being/have been developed in compliance with WRPS's TFC-PLN-90, Technology Development Management Plan [1]. TFC-PLN-90 includes a phased approach to design, testing, and ultimate deployment of new technologies. The MARS-V is scheduled to be deployed in tank 241-C-105 in late 2012. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Hanford Single-Shell Tank and Double-Shell Tank Integrity Programs - 16390

Waste at Hanford is stored in 149 single-shell tanks and 28 double-shell tanks. Concerns related to aging radioactive waste storage facilities throughout the DOE complex led to Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) developing guidelines for structural integrity programs for tank systems. The committee of experts who developed these guidelines is commonly known as the Tank Structural Integrity Panel (TSIP). The DOE has subsequently adopted these guidelines, and requires site operators to have a program consistent with them. The Double-Shell Tank (DST) integrity is maintained with a variety of activities such as ultrasonic and visual inspections, chemistry controls, corrosion monitoring and structural analyses methods. In October 2012, Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC (WRPS) determined that the primary tank of 241-AY-102 was leaking. WRPS contracted a panel of experts from industry and academia to provide advice and recommendations for the DST Integrity Program. The panel focused on three concerns: - No Early warning - Determine why the existing DST Integrity Program did not predict a primary tank failure or provide early warning of the pending failure. - Program improvements - Recommend activities to either predict a primary tank failure or increase the probability of early warning. - Forensic recommendations - The panel provided additional recommendations regarding forensic assessment of Tank 241-AY-102 (AY-102) to facilitate a conclusion on why the leak occurred. WRPS has prepared a response to the concerns of the panel coupled with recommendations for project action to strengthen the DST Integrity Program [4]. The purpose of this DST Integrity Improvement Plan is to translate the recommendations to specific project activities that are technically and practically responsive. To improve the understanding of the Single-Shell Tank (SST) integrity, WRPS, the Department of Energy-Office of River Protection tank operations contractor, developed an enhanced Single-Shell Tank Integrity Project (SSTIP) in 2009. An expert panel on SST integrity, consisting of various subject matter experts in industry and academia, was created to provide recommendations supporting the development of the project. This panel developed 33 recommendations in four main areas of interest: structural integrity, liner degradation, leak integrity and prevention, and mitigation of contamination migration. In late 2010, seventeen of these recommendations were used to develop the basis for the M-45-10-1 Change Package for the Hanford Federal Agreement and Compliance Order, also known as the Tri-Party Agreement. The change package identified two phases of work for SST integrity. The initial phase, which was completed in 2015, was focused on efforts to envelope the integrity of the tanks. It was divided into two primary areas of investigation: structural integrity and leak integrity. If necessary, based on the outcome from the initial work, a second phase would be focused on further definition of the integrity of the tanks and liners. The two combined phases are designed to support the formal integrity assessment of the Hanford SSTs in 2018 by an Independent Qualified Registered Professional Engineer. This paper will summarize the current status of the DST and SST Integrity Programs and discuss the ongoing efforts to improve these programs. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Low-Activity Waste Pretreatment System Additional Engineering-Scale Integrated Test Report

Washington River Protections Solutions, LLC’s (WRPS) Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System (LAWPS) Project provides for the early production of immobilized low-activity waste (ILAW) by feeding LAW directly from Tank Farms to the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) LAW Facility, bypassing the WTP Pretreatment Facility. Prior to the transfer of feed to the WTP LAW Vitrification Facility, tank supernatant waste will be pretreated in the LAWPS to meet the WTP LAW waste acceptance criteria (WAC). Full-scale and engineering-scale testing of critical technology elements, as part of the technology maturation process, are components of the overall LAWPS Project. WRPS awarded the engineering-scale integrated testing scope to AECOM via WRPS Subcontract 58349. This report is deliverable MSR-008 of the subcontract.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Cesium Ion Exchange Testing Using a Three-Column System with Crystalline Silicotitanate and Hanford Tank Waste 241-AP-107

Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS) is working to support early production of immobilized low-activity waste by feeding Hanford tank supernate from tank farms to the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) Low-Activity Waste (LAW) facility. This goal incorporates the design of a Tank-Side Cesium Removal (TSCR) system, which in effect filters tank waste supernate and processes it through a cesium ion exchange medium to remove 137Cs. The 137Cs-depleted product is sent to the WTP for vitrification. Rovira et al. (2018) reported the successful Cs removal from Hanford tank 241-AP-107 waste (hereafter called AP-107) using crystalline silicotitanate (CST) ion exchange media manufactured by Honeywell UOP, LLC (product IONSIVTM R9140-B, Batch 2081000057) in a lead-lag column system. Since that testing, WRPS has changed the column design to a three-column system. WRPS requested a repeated study with AP-107 tank waste using a different batch of IONSIVTM R9140-B, Lot 2002009604, in a three-column format. A small-scale test platform was constructed to demonstrate solids filtration, Cs removal, and LAW vitrification and installed at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. This report describes the small-scale ion exchange testing system component of the test platform and the processing of approximately 8.55 L of filtered AP-107 supernate using CST, Lot 8056262-999, that passed through a 25-mesh filter. This report also describes the Cs ion exchange batch contact testing to determine the Cs distribution coefficient and the maximum Cs loading capacity in the AP-107 tank waste matrix. Batch contact testing helps to evaluate CST performance on tank waste supernate and is often used prior to processing tank waste through ion exchange columns to assess some performance metrics (e.g., 50% Cs breakthrough). Batch contact tests were performed with the filtered AP-107 tank waste at four Cs concentrations at a phase ratio of 200 (liquid volume to exchanger mass). The distribution coefficient (K d ) at the equilibrium condition of 9.2 µg Cs/mL (AP-107 feed condition) was determined to be 806 mL AP 107/g CST. With a CST bed density of 1.01 g/mL (<25 mesh CST), this K d corresponded to a predicted 50% Cs breakthrough of 814 bed volumes (BVs). The Cs load capacity at the equilibrium feed condition was determined to be 8.3 mg Cs/g dry CST. The three-column format testing was prototypic to the intended TSCR operations, albeit on a small scale with 10-mL CST beds. Flowrate was adjusted to match the CST contact time expected for the full-scale operation, i.e., matched bed volumes per hour (BV/h) flow rate. The feed was processed downflow through the lead column, then through the middle column, and then through the polish column. Loading continued at an average of 1.88 BV/h (1.83 to 2.04 BV/h range) until the entire available AP-107 feed was processed. The Cs-decontaminated product will be provided for vitrification testing. The lead column only reached 45% Cs breakthrough after processing 855 BVs of feed. The 50% Cs breakthrough was extrapolated to occur at ~900 BVs. This extrapolated 50% Cs breakthrough value differed from the batch contact estimate (814 BVs) by 13%. The waste acceptance criteria (WAC) or contract limit for the WTP LAW vitrification facility is 3.18E-5 Ci 137 Cs per mole Na. For the AP-107 tank waste, only 0.127% of the influent 137 Cs concentration may be delivered to the WTP; this required a Cs decontamination factor of 787. The Cs effluent from the middle column reached the WAC after processing 590 BVs. Cs breakthrough from the polish column began at 590 BVs, reaching 6.3E-3 µCi/mL or 4.3E-3% Cs breakthrough after processing 844 BVs of feed.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Acetonitrile Destruction and Fate of Organics in the Reverse Osmosis System at the ETF

The Hanford Site Effluent Treatment Facility (ETF) currently treats aqueous waste streams that include condensates from the 242-A evaporator, leachate from the Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility (ERDF), as well as laboratory wastes and, in the future, will treat liquid effluents from the Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) and Integrated Disposal Facility (IDF) leachate. Liquid effluents from the WTP will have significant concentrations of acetonitrile. Acetonitrile is formed by reaction of nitrates and sugar in the WTP low activity waste (LAW) melters and is prevalent in the submerged bed scrubber (SBS) and wet electrostatic precipitator (WESP) liquid effluents from WTP off-gas treatment. When these liquids are concentrated in the WTP Effluent Management Facility (EMF) evaporator in the direct feed low activity waste (DFLAW) flow-sheet, testing has shown that the majority of the acetonitrile partitions to the evaporator condensate. Since the evaporator condensate is directed to the ETF, this creates a potential issue with the ETF waste acceptance criteria. Consequently, there is a need to validate flow-sheet assumptions on the fate of acetonitrile and other organics within the ETF. The present plan includes the addition of a steam stripper to the ETF to remove acetonitrile. There is, therefore, also a need to determine a suitable method to destroy acetonitrile in the overhead condensate stream from the new steam stripper. Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC (WRPS) previously contracted with Atkins and the Vitreous State Laboratory (VSL) of The Catholic University of America (CUA) to perform development and testing work to evaluate potential methods for destruction of acetonitrile in WTP secondary liquid effluents. Based on the results of that work, WRPS requested that follow-on testing be conducted to further evaluate acetonitrile destruction in the steam stripper condensate using ultraviolet oxidation (UV/OX) with persulfate. WRPS also requested testing to assess the rejection rate of organics in the reverse osmosis (RO) system installed in the ETF. This report presents the results from testing to address those needs.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

ETF Grout Expansion: Effects of Different Slags and Struvite Precipitation Protocols (Stirring Time)

The ETF ammonia tolerant grout waste form was developed by the Vitreous State Laboratory (VSL) to stabilize ammonium and thereby prevent emission of ammonia vapor during solidification of an ammonium-rich, concentrated sodium sulfate aqueous waste stream generated at the Hanford Effluent Treatment Facility (ETF). VSL personnel did not observe expansion in samples prepared during the waste form development work. However, Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) personnel detected expansion, in a few ETF grout samples, up to ~ 20 percent vertical expansion, while preforming work scope to evaluate the effect of ETF brine compositional ranges on the precipitation and solidification processes. The initial work requests can be found in Washington River Protection Services (WRPS) Statement of Work (SOW, Requisitions #: 339922 Revisions 0 and 1, March 11, 2021, and November 2021, respectively. As a result of the waste form expansion observed by SRNL, additional evaluation was requested by WRPS SOW Requisitions #: 356730 Revision 0 and Revision 1, February 1, 2022, and July 11, 2022, respectively. The goal of these requests was to determine whether differences in the slags and / or in sample preparation protocols used by VSL and SRNL were the cause of the expansion observed in the SRNL samples. G. Chen, WRPS, arranged a materials exchange between VSL and SRNL and coordinated the VSL protocol(s) for grouting and curing 1L batches of Base Case ETF base case simulant. Materials were exchanged between VSL and SRNL. Both laboratories performed the VSL struvite precipitation-solidification protocol and cured samples for at least 28 days. Differences in VSL and SRNL slag compositions, mineralogy and particle size results in themselves or combined were determined to not be the cause of the expansion because all samples expanded regardless of whether the VSL or SRNL slags were used. The fundamental cause of the observed expansion could not be attributed to minor variations in the following: 1) chemistry of the slag and other reagents, 2) container wall thickness, 3) ambient bench top curing conditions at VSL and SRNL, 4) pH adjustments to 7 ± a few tenths of unit, nor 5) stirring time between the precipitation and solidification process steps. Additional observations include: grout samples prepared with VSL slag expanded less than those prepared with the SRNL slag and, based on a very limited sample set, some samples stirred for longer times expanded less than those stirred for 20 minutes.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Building a Strong Culture That Produces Sustainable Performance - 13444

Washington River Protection Solutions LLC (WRPS) has been involved with culture improvement for a number of years which has included co-chairing the industry effort to develop the EFCOG safety culture guidance documents [1, 2], and integration of this guidance into organizational processes and behavior expectations, described in more detail below. As various organizational cultural assessments have been periodically performed, and subsequent actions implemented to address improvement opportunities, organizational performance has shown improvement. Culture improvement is evident in the company's industrial safety statistics, event rates, safety culture survey results, employee morale, productivity, leadership effectiveness, and employee engagement. There does appear to be a relationship between striving to demonstrate behaviors consistent with excellent safety culture and good organizational performance over the past couple of years at WRPS. As performance continues to be evaluated, an improvement opportunity was identified to further enhance performance through field oriented behavioral/cultural improvement activities. WRPS recently conducted a three month effort to improve consistent implementation of management expectations by increasing management field presence with a focus on interacting real-time with workers and first line supervisors, and changing behaviors as appropriate. (authors)

61 RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY↗

Integrity Assessment of Hanford 242-A Evaporator Facility E-A-1 Re-boiler Vessel via Fluorescein Liquid Tracer Test Methods - 17357

The 242-A Evaporator Facility is critical to the United States Department of Energy's (DOE) Hanford Site clean-up mission due to limited space within the existing Double-Shell Tanks (DSTs) used to store nuclear and chemical waste until future processing. The 242-A Evaporator Facility is currently the sole waste volume reduction process used at Hanford, and the E-A-1 Re-boiler is essential to the Evaporator process. Due to the potential for cross-contamination between the Re-boiler tubes through which waste passes and the tube sheets of uncontaminated steam, an assessment of the Re-boiler vessel's integrity is required for continuing operations of the facility. In order to meet these requirements, an independent integrity assessment was designed to use fluorescein liquid tracer (LT) to verify the leak-tightness of the Re-boiler vessel in accordance with Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC (WRPS) tightness test standards, as well as, the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel (B and PV) Code, Section III, Division 1, NB-6300. LT test methodologies were evaluated and determined to be appropriate for a vessel with restricted access, such as the E-A-1 Re-boiler, as it provided the needed sensitivity, reliability, and cost; as well as, exceeded the leak-tightness specifications required by both WRPS and ASME B and PV Code standards. The integrity test requires water laced with fluorescein be circulated through the waste processing loop of the 242-A Evaporator and samples of steam condensate be collected and analyzed for traces of fluorescein to determine leak-tightness. Liquid condensate sampling was conducted prior to and during testing and the samples were analyzed for fluorescein tracer to determine the amount of fluorescein that flowed out of the tubes of the Re-boiler into the steam side of the vessel. Given the established criteria for 'leak-tight,' test results determined that the Re-boiler passed the integrity assessment. After further scrutiny of the 2014 test and data results, it was determined that although the Re-boiler was 'leak-tight,' as established by the test criteria, there was concern of future leakage. The DOE and the DOE Office of River Protection (ORP) requested that WRPS repeat the integrity assessment in two and a half years to determine if the potential leak was growing, which could threaten continuing operations of the 242-A Evaporator. The 2017 test has been redesigned using lessons learned from the 2014 test and was modified to account for ergonomic and safety considerations, ease of repeatability, and accuracy of results. The liquid tracer methodology and test plan developed for the Re-boiler will continue to be implemented in 5 year increments to monitor current and future integrity. The method may also prove useful for other aging components across the Hanford Site, where appropriate. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗