Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “WATER MODERATED REACTORS”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records

An economic analysis of a light and heavy water moderated reactor synergy: burning americium using recycled uranium

An economic analysis is presented for a proposed synergistic system between 2 nuclear utilities, one operating light water reactors (LWR) and another running a fleet of heavy water moderated reactors (HWR). Americium is partitioned from LWR spent nuclear fuel (SNF) to be transmuted in HWRs, with a consequent averted disposal cost to the LWR operator. In return, reprocessed uranium (RU) is supplied to the HWRs in sufficient quantities to support their operation both as power generators and americium burners. Two simplifying assumptions have been made. First, the economic value of RU is a linear function of the cost of fresh natural uranium (NU), and secondly, plutonium recycling for a third utility running a mixed oxide (MOX) fuelled reactor fleet has been already taking place, so that the extra cost of americium recycling is manageable. We conclude that, in order for this scenario to be economically attractive to the LWR operator, the averted disposal cost due to partitioning americium from LWR spent fuel must exceed 214 dollars per kg, comparable to estimates of the permanent disposal cost of the high level waste (HLW) from reprocessing spent LWR fuel. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Minor actinide transmutation in thorium and uranium matrices in heavy water moderated reactors

The irradiation of Th{sup 232} breeds fewer of the problematic minor actinides (Np, Am, Cm) than the irradiation of U{sup 238}. This characteristic makes thorium an attractive potential matrix for the transmutation of these minor actinides, as these species can be transmuted without the creation of new actinides as is the case with a uranium fuel matrix. Minor actinides are the main contributors to long term decay heat and radiotoxicity of spent fuel, so reducing their concentration can greatly increase the capacity of a long term deep geological repository. Mixing minor actinides with thorium, three times more common in the Earth's crust than natural uranium, has the additional advantage of improving the sustainability of the fuel cycle. In this work, lattice cell calculations have been performed to determine the results of transmuting minor actinides from light water reactor spent fuel in a thorium matrix. 15-year-cooled group-extracted transuranic elements (Np, Pu, Am, Cm) from light water reactor (LWR) spent fuel were used as the fissile component in a thorium-based fuel in a heavy water moderated reactor (HWR). The minor actinide (MA) transmutation rates, spent fuel activity, decay heat and radiotoxicity, are compared with those obtained when the MA were mixed instead with natural uranium and taken to the same burnup. Each bundle contained a central pin containing a burnable neutron absorber whose initial concentration was adjusted to have the same reactivity response (in units of the delayed neutron fraction β) for coolant voiding as standard NU fuel. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Annular seed-blanket thorium fuel core concepts for heavy water moderated reactors

New reactor concepts to implement thorium-based fuel cycles have been explored to achieve maximum resource utilization. Pressure tube heavy water reactors (PT-HWR) are highly advantageous for implementing the use of thorium-based fuels because of their high neutron economy and on-line re-fuelling capability. The use of heterogeneous seed-blanket core concepts in a PT-HWR where higher-fissile-content seed fuel bundles are physically separate from lower-fissile-content blanket bundles allows more flexibility and control in fuel management to maximize the fissile utilization and conversion of fertile fuel. The lattice concept chosen is a 35-element bundle made with a homogeneous mixture of reactor grade Pu and Th, and with a central zirconia rod to help reduce coolant void reactivity. Several annular heterogeneous seed-blanket core concepts with plutonium-thorium-based fuels in a 700-MWe-class PT-HWR were analyzed, using a once-through thorium (OTT) cycle. Different combinations of seed and blanket fuel were tested to determine the impact on core-average burnup, fissile utilization, power distributions, and other performance parameters. It was found that the various core concepts can achieve a fissile utilization that is up to 30% higher than is currently achieved in a PT-HWR using conventional natural uranium fuel bundles. Up to 67% of the Pu is consumed; up to 43% of the energy is produced from thorium, and up to 363 kg/year of U-233 is produced. Seed-blanket cores with ∼50% content of low-power blanket bundles may require power de-rating (∼58% to 65%) to avoid exceeding maximum limits for peak channel power, bundle power and linear element ratings. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Lattice cell and full core physics of internally cooled annular fuel in heavy water moderated reactors

A program is underway at Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL) to develop a new fuel bundle concept to enable greater burnups for PT-HWR (pressure tube heavy water reactor) cores. One option that AECL is investigating is an internally cooled annular fuel (ICAF) element concept. ICAF contains annular cylindrical pellets with cladding on the inner and outer diameters. Coolant flows along the outside of the element and through the centre. With such a concept, the maximum fuel temperature as a function of linear element rating is significantly reduced compared to conventional, solid-rod type fuel. The preliminary ICAF bundle concept considered in this study contains 24 half-metre long internally cooled annular fuel elements and one non-fuelled centre pin. The introduction of the non-fuelled centre pin reduces the coolant void reactivity (CVR), which is the increase in reactivity that occurs on voiding the coolant in accident scenarios. Lattice cell and full core physics calculations of the preliminary ICAF fuel bundle concept have been performed for medium burnups of approximately 18 GWd/tU using WIMS-AECL and reactor fuel simulation program (RFSP). The results will be used to assist in concept configuration optimization. The effects of radial and axial core power distributions, linear element power ratings, refuelling rates and operational power ramps have been analyzed. The results suggest that burnups of greater than 18 GWd/tU can be achieved in current reactor designs. At approximately 18 GWd/tU, expected maximum linear element ratings in a PT-HWR with online-refuelling are approximately 90 kW/m. These conditions would be prohibitive for solid-rod fuel, but may be possible in ICAF fuel given the reduced maximum fuel temperature as a function of linear element rating. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Checkerboard seed-blanket thorium fuel core concepts for heavy water moderated reactors

New reactor concepts to implement thorium-based fuel cycles have been explored to achieve maximum resource utilization. Pressure tube heavy water reactors (PT-HWR) are highly advantageous for implementing the use of thorium-based fuels because of their high neutron economy and on-line re-fuelling capability. The use of heterogeneous seed-blanket core concepts in a PT-HWR where higher-fissile-content seed fuel bundles are physically separate from lower-fissile-content blanket bundles allows more flexibility and control in fuel management to maximize the fissile utilization and conversion of fertile fuel. The lattice concept chosen was a 35-element bundle made with a homogeneous mixture of reactor grade Pu (about 67 wt% fissile) and Th, and with a central zirconia rod to help reduce coolant void reactivity. Several checkerboard heterogeneous seed-blanket core concepts with plutonium-thorium-based fuels in a 700-MWe-class PT-HWR were analyzed, using a once-through thorium (OTT) cycle. Different combinations of seed and blanket fuel were tested to determine the impact on core-average burnup, fissile utilization, power distributions, and other performance parameters. It was found that various checkerboard core concepts can achieve a fissile utilization that is up to 26% higher than that achieved in a PT-HWR using more conventional natural uranium fuel bundles. Up to 60% of the Pu is consumed; up to 43% of the energy is produced from thorium, and up to 303 kg/year of Pa-233/U-233/U-235 are produced. Checkerboard cores with about 50% of low-power blanket bundles may require power de-rating (65% to 74%) to avoid exceeding maximum limits for channel and bundle powers and linear element ratings. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Transmutation, Burn-Up and Fuel Fabrication Trade-Offs in Reduced-Moderation Water Reactor Thorium Fuel Cycles - 13502

Multiple recycle of long-lived actinides has the potential to greatly reduce the required storage time for spent nuclear fuel or high level nuclear waste. This is generally thought to require fast reactors as most transuranic (TRU) isotopes have low fission probabilities in thermal reactors. Reduced-moderation LWRs are a potential alternative to fast reactors with reduced time to deployment as they are based on commercially mature LWR technology. Thorium (Th) fuel is neutronically advantageous for TRU multiple recycle in LWRs due to a large improvement in the void coefficient. If Th fuel is used in reduced-moderation LWRs, it appears neutronically feasible to achieve full actinide recycle while burning an external supply of TRU, with related potential improvements in waste management and fuel utilization. In this paper, the fuel cycle of TRU-bearing Th fuel is analysed for reduced-moderation PWRs and BWRs (RMPWRs and RBWRs). RMPWRs have the advantage of relatively rapid implementation and intrinsically low conversion ratios. However, it is challenging to simultaneously satisfy operational and fuel cycle constraints. An RBWR may potentially take longer to implement than an RMPWR due to more extensive changes from current BWR technology. However, the harder neutron spectrum can lead to favourable fuel cycle performance. A two-stage fuel cycle, where the first pass is Th-Pu MOX, is a technically reasonable implementation of either concept. The first stage of the fuel cycle can therefore be implemented at relatively low cost as a Pu disposal option, with a further policy option of full recycle in the medium term. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Development of SiC-based Cladding for Accident Tolerant Fuels

Fuels and core structures in current light water reactors (LWR's) are vulnerable to catastrophic failure in severe accidents. This vulnerability is attributed primarily to the rapid oxidation kinetics of zirconium alloys in a water vapor environment at very high temperatures. Alternative materials to zirconium alloys with reduced oxidation kinetics are sought to enable enhanced accident-tolerant fuels and cores. Among the candidate alternatives, silicon carbide (SiC) - based materials, in particular continuous SiC fiber-reinforced SiC matrix ceramic composites (SiC/SiC composites), are considered to offer outstanding safety benefits. The primary objective of this work is to provide with updated overviews of the concepts, development status, and future prospect for the SiC-based accident-tolerant fuel (ATF) claddings. A systematic technology evaluation program plan was developed and updated to review the technologies needed, to identify and analyze critical gaps, and to lay out a road-map toward establishing key technologies. The technology review and the gap analysis in this exercise were based on an early study and community workshops. Many of the technical gaps identified are related with the three key feasibility issues: hydrothermal corrosion, mechanical failure, and fuel compatibility. Additional performance issues including accident-tolerance features and fission product retention during the normal operation have also been identified. The program plan was designed to systematically address the key gap issues and is formulated in a work breakdown structure. Simultaneously, the plan is being established to set a technical program for advancing the technological readiness levels of concept non-specific essential technologies in three top-level categories of Design and Failure, Environmental Effects, and Off-normal Behavior. The execution of the program plan is in progress across the U.S. Department of Energy laboratories, industries, universities, and international collaborators. The critical issues for SiC composite-based fuel cladding concepts were found to be related to the performance in the normal operation. In particular, radiation-assisted hydrothermal corrosion and the gaseous fission product (FP) retention are identified to be the most critical issues. The primary ORNL concept pursues the use of dual-purpose coating on the SiC composite cladding wall to mitigate the corrosion and the gas permeation issues at the same time, whereas the alternative approaches such as the dense monolithic SiC protective layer combined with the water chemistry control may be feasible. Surface metallization through variations of physical vapor deposition and electroplating are being demonstrated. The FP gas retention is an issue associated with the cracking for the ceramic matrix composite cladding. To establish the probabilistic failure behavior, the relevant test methods were developed in ASTM Committee C28 on Advanced Ceramics. Toward the end-plugging technology development, various methods for joining SiC to SiC had been developed and tested for mechanical properties, irradiation effects, and environmental effects. Multiple methods including the pressureless transient eutectic SiC joining and CVD-based SiC joining were identified particularly promising. In addition, a multi-physics, three-dimensional finite element-based modeling is in progress toward an integrated simulation of the SiC composite-cladded fuel evolutions. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Nuclear Fuel Traces Definition in Storage Ponds of Research VVR-2 and OR Reactors in NRC 'Kurchatov Institute'

The Gas Plant complex is the experimental base of the Institute of Nuclear Reactors, which is part of the Kurchatov Institute. In 1954 the commissioning of the first Soviet water-cooled water-moderated research reactor VVR-2 on enriched uranium, and until 1983 the complex operated two research water-cooled water-moderated reactors 3 MW (VVR-2) and 300 kW (OR) capacity, which were dismantled in connection with the overall upgrades of the complex. The complex has three storage ponds in the reactor building. They are sub-surface vessels filled with water (the volume of water in each is about 6 m{sup 3}). In 2007-2013 the spent nuclear fuel from storages was removed for processing to 'Mayk'. Survey of Storage Ponds by Underwater Collimated Spectrometric System shows a considerable layer of slime on the bottom of ponds and traces of spent nuclear fuel in one of the storage. For determination qualitative and the quantitative composition of radionuclide we made complex α-, β-, γ- spectrometric research of water and bottom slimes from Gas Plant complex storage ponds. We found the spent nuclear fuel in water and bottom slime in all storage ponds. Specific activity of radionuclides in the bottom slime exceeded specific activity of radionuclides in the ponds water and was closed to levels of high radioactive waste. Analysis of the obtained data and data from earlier investigation of reactor MR storage ponds showed distinctions of specific activity of uranium and plutonium radionuclides. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Nuclear Fuel Traces Definition in Storage Ponds of Research VVR-2 and OR Reactors in NRC 'Kurchatov Institute' - 16022

The Gas Plant complex is the experimental base of the Institute of Nuclear Reactors, which is part of the Kurchatov Institute. In 1954 the commissioning of the first Soviet water-cooled water-moderated research reactor VVR-2 on enriched uranium, and until 1983 the complex operated two research water-cooled water-moderated reactors 3 MW (VVR-2) and 300 kW (OR) capacity, which were dismantled in connection with the overall upgrades of the complex. The complex has three storage ponds in the reactor building. They are sub-surface vessels filled with water (the volume of water in each is about 6 m{sup 3}). In 2007-2013 the spent nuclear fuel from storages was removed for processing to 'Mayak'. Survey of Storage Ponds by Underwater Collimated Spectrometric System shows a considerable layer of slime on the bottom of ponds and traces of spent nuclear fuel in one of the storage pond. For determination qualitative and the quantitative composition of radionuclide we made complex α-, β-, γ - spectrometric research of water and bottom slimes from Gas Plant complex storage ponds. We found the spent nuclear fuel in water and bottom slime in all storage ponds. Specific activity of radionuclides in the bottom slime exceeded specific activity of radionuclides in the ponds water and was closed to levels of high radioactive waste. Analysis of the obtained data and data from earlier investigation of reactor MR storage ponds showed distinctions of specific activity of uranium and plutonium radionuclides. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Ab initio generation of thermal neutron scattering law for uranium dioxide

Neutronic analysis of moderated nuclear fission systems, e.g. nuclear reactors, relies upon an accurate prediction of the thermal neutron spectrum. Thermal neutrons have wavelengths on the order of the interatomic spacing between atoms in matter. Consequently, the scattering cross-sections of these neutrons are affected by the scattering law of the material (i.e. S(α,β), where α and β are dimensionless momentum and energy transfer variables), which describes the atomic structure and thermodynamic motion of the atomic nuclei. Uranium-dioxide (UO{sub 2}) is the primary fuel source for nuclear power reactors moderated by light water. In such systems (e.g. nuclear power reactors, spent fuel pools, etc.) the nuclear fuel comprises a large fraction of the system volume, approximately 1/3 in light-water reactors. Therefore, the scattering law of the fuel material may impact the thermal neutron spectrum and criticality of these systems. In this work previously established ab initio lattice dynamics (AILD) methods were utilized to calculate the phonon density of states (DOS), which acts as a fundamental input to the scattering law. Subsequently, the S(α,β) of UO{sub 2} was generated for publication as an ENDF thermal scattering library (TSL), which will be available for use in standard neutronics computer applications. (authors)

07 ISOTOPE AND RADIATION SOURCES↗

Breeding of {sup 233}U in the thorium–uranium fuel cycle in VVER reactors using heavy water

A method is proposed for achieving optimal neutron kinetics and efficient isotope transmutation in the {sup 233}U–{sup 232}Th oxide fuel of water-moderated reactors with variable water composition (D{sub 2}O, H{sub 2}O) that ensures breeding of the {sup 233}U and {sup 235}U isotopes. The method is comparatively simple to implement.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Heavy Water Moderated, Molten Uranium Cooled Reactor MCNP Model

Two of the major challenges facing the nuclear industry are the large amounts of nuclear waste produced by the current light water reactors and the risk of nuclear proliferation. Most proposed solutions for the waste problem involve fast breeder reactors, but that doesn't help with the nuclear proliferation problem. It is generally understood that a uranium fueled (U-238 + U-235) thermal reactor cannot be a breeder because there aren't enough neutrons. That analysis does not include the effects of fast fission of U-238. This is not surprising because the percentage of fast fissions in existing thermal reactor designs is low, around 3% (in Candu reactors) or less. Table I shows the neutrons involved in 1,000 fissions in a thermal reactor for a conversion ratio of 1.000 when the fuel is mostly U-238 and the fissile content is low enough so that most fast fissions are of U-238. The top section of the table is for U-235 in U-238, the bottom section is for Pu-239 in U-238. The bottom line in each section shows the number of neutrons available for all other losses (escape from the reactor, absorption in non fuel components, and absorption in xenon, samarium, and other fission products). If the percentage of fast fissions of U-238 is 10 or 15 % a thermal breeder may be feasible. This is largely independent of the percentage of fissile content of the fuel. If the reactor starting fissile content is mostly U-235, as the U-235 is replaced with Pu-239 the number of available neutrons increases even if the conversion ratio is only 1.000. The percentage of fast fissions in a reactor is a question of reactor geometry, as the minimum dimension of the fuel elements increases the average distance a fast neutron travels in the fuel before exiting increases and with it the probability of fast fission of U-238.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Utilization of non-weapons-grade plutonium and highly enriched uranium with breeding of the {sup 233}U isotope in the VVER reactors using thorium and heavy water

A method for joint utilization of non-weapons-grade plutonium and highly enriched uranium in the thorium–uranium—plutonium oxide fuel of a water-moderated reactor with a varying water composition (D{sub 2}O, H{sub 2}O) is proposed. The method is characterized by efficient breeding of the {sup 233}U isotope and safe reactor operation and is comparatively simple to implement.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Analysis of the uncertainties in the physical calculations of water-moderated power reactors of the VVER type by the parameters of models of preparing few-group constants

The article covers the uncertainty analysis of the physical calculations of the VVER reactor core for different meshes of the reference values of the feedback parameters (FBP). Various numbers of nodes of the parametric axes of FBPs and different ranges between them are investigated. The uncertainties of the dynamic calculations are analyzed using RTS RCCA ejection as an example within the framework of the model with the boundary conditions at the core inlet and outlet.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Minimization of Nuclear Waste using AHWR Reactor Technology

Nuclear sciences have grown from creating reactors to a greater understanding of how to dispose off the waste exhibited by the nuclear activities. Various methodologies have been proposed and are being used in order to do the same. This poster poses great attention to 'Using a fuel cycle dedicated to the production of the lower quantity of minor actinides, is one of the key targets in reducing nuclear waste in india'. A significant fraction of thorium is utilized as a fertile host in the Advanced Heavy Water Reactor (AHWR300-LEU) fuel. Being lower in the periodic table, it leads to a reduction of minor actinides. It produces only half of the minor actinides as a waste as compared to modern LWRs. As thorium oxide has inert nature, it benefits in its prolonged storage. Therefore, safe disposal of spent fuel is achieved due to the inert matrix, on completion of one fuel cycle mode. AHWR is a 300 MWe, vertical, pressure-tube type, boiling light water-cooled, and heavy water-moderated reactor. Employs natural circulation for removal of heat from the reactor core. In-situ conversion of {sup 232}Th into {sup 233}U. The reactor design permits flexible fuel cycle options. There are two types of AHWR depending upon the fuel cycle options. Uses thorium-based oxide fuels: two fuel cycle options. With the adoption of thorium fuel cycle, AHWR300-LEU produces less minor actinides. As compared to modern LWRSs, it produces almost 37% less amount of actinides for the same amount of energy production, which in turn minimizes the burden on waste disposal requirements. But, it is associated with radionuclides such as {sup 231}Pa (produced through absorption of one neutron and emission of two neutrons). Since, the reaction rate of (n,2n) reactions is very low in thermal neutron reactors, thus making the fuel cycle the favorable one. Thorium oxide (ThO{sub 2}) is chemically stable and is the highest oxidation state of thorium, therefore the inert nature of the matrix is advantageous for safe disposal of spent fuel in case of adoption of open fuel cycle mode and offers prolonged storage of spent fuel. The AHWR is thorium fueled Indian nuclear reactor that assimilates several new features with diminished environmental concern due to reduced waste generation. Since thorium fuel cycle produces less long lived nuclear waste, thus it can possibly bring the world cleaner and more sustainable nuclear energy. Currently, India being the only country with large scale research program of thorium nuclear power serves a platform for the development and demonstration of all technologies and advanced safety systems.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Physics and Environmental Assessments for a Heavy-Water Moderated, Molten Uranium Reactor Concept

Previous papers describe a method for controlling a thermal nuclear reactor by moderator displacement between the reactor core and the reflector. The low neutron loss and high control range of this method enable a design for a molten natural uranium fueled and cooled heavy water moderated reactor. The design is geometrically similar to CANDU (Canadian Deuterium Uranium) reactors but with fewer, larger, vertically oriented fuel tubes. The fuel tubes contain molten natural uranium as both the fuel and the coolant instead of fuel rods and water coolant. The large fuel tubes have a mixed spectrum which is largely thermal at the periphery of the tubes with a very hard spectrum in the large central region of the tube. This configuration provides a fast fission rate of around 15% (mostly of U-238) and an initial conversion ratio of around 1.15. It is a hypothetical reactor because it is unclear what materials could actually be used to fabricate the fuel tubes and other primary coolant plumbing. The molten uranium serves both as the fuel and the primary coolant and as such is continuously circulated through the fuel tubes in the reactor core, the primary heat exchange, and back to the the reactor core. This means that at any point in time all the fuel has the same isotopic configuration no matter where it is in the reactor or heat exchanger. Over time the isotopic configuration changes, but it changes uniformly for all the fuel. Uranium melts at 1135 deg. C, so a proposed temperature range for the circulating molten uranium is 1200 deg. C at the exit of the heat exchanger and entry to the core fuel tubes and 1400 deg. C at the exit from the core fuel tubes and the entry into the heat exchanger. The advantages of this design include: 1. Reduced nuclear proliferation concern because of natural uranium fuel. 2. High conversion ratio and large fuel mass provides 30 to 100 year fuel life. 3. No heavy metal waste because fissile content increases over the fuel life. 4. High output temperatures are suitable for high efficiency turbine generators. This assessment will examine three perspectives: reactor physics, regional grid management, and global resource utilization and impact. This assessment will examine three perspectives: reactor physics, regional grid management, and global resource utilization and impact. The proposed reactor type can generate much of the future CO{sub 2} emission free electric power demand with a low impact on total uranium required to be mined, zero heavy metal waste produced, zero enrichment capability required, and capacity (with thermal storage) to meet fluctuating demand. There are engineering issues to be addressed before such a reactor can be built, but thanks to the demand for high efficiency gas turbines and other high temperature applications, high temperature materials and technology are developing rapidly. An operating temperature of 1400 degrees C does not seem unreasonable in the near future. The implied advantages of this reactor type compared to other existing or proposed reactors suggest that further work on the issues raised would be well worthwhile. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Reactivity measurements using the Zolotukhin-Mogilner Method

The zero count probability method (also called Zolotukhin-Mogilner Method, after its inventors) is a method for measuring the reactivity in nuclear reactors, being a competitor of the [more well-known in the West] Feynman-alpha Method and the Rossi-alpha Method. The modus operandi of this method is using the detector channels where there was no counting at all in order to calculate reactor parameters. In deep subcriticality few models have been tested and this work tries out the Zolotukhin-Mogilner Method in one of such scenarios: measurements will be made in environments below -3,5 k pcm in the zero-potency water-moderated reactor IPEN/MB-01 which is fuelled by UO{sub 2} enriched by 4.3%. These extremely low reactivity environments are required because the chance of no counts on the detector must be significant: otherwise, the method would demand a large time of acquisition of data. Besides that, the method is very simple and straightforward. One of the advantages of this method is that it needs very little data reduction, since the essential data is directly given by the measuring apparatus. The detection will be in charge of modern BF{sub 3} detectors. It will be assumed that, in these deep subcritical systems, the function K{sub eff} = f(N-Nkp) has a linear portion in its first part, resulting of the decomposition of it in a Taylor series. The value of alpha is related to the reactivity ρ with linear dependency. The results will be compared with recent studies of the two main methods described above. Presented for the first time in the 60's, this tool has seen little use in the west hemisphere. This work shows its use in the measurements of the nuclear reactor IPEN/MB-01, as well as the code developed for its employment. It will be the first time this method is used in the south hemisphere. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Codisposal Waste Package Loading Options for DOE SNF and HLW

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is responsible for managing spent nuclear fuel (SNF) that is currently in, or will in the future come into, its possession. DOE must continue to safely store that SNF, transport it to an interim storage site or a repository, and dispose of it. These fuels come from a wide range of reactor types, such as light- and heavy-water-moderated reactors, graphite-moderated reactors, and breeder reactors, with various cladding materials and enrichments. Many of these reactors, now decommissioned, had unique design features, such as core configuration, fuel element and assembly geometry, moderator and coolant materials, operational characteristics, and neutron spatial and spectral properties resulting in a large diversity of reactor and fuel designs. Because of the wide variety and condition of SNF, a robust canister termed the DOE Standardized SNF Canister was proposed that would confine radionuclides and preclude moderator. The DOE Standard SNF Canister had four variations consisting of a 10- or 15-foot length and an 18- or 24-inch diameter. For ultimate disposal in the Yucca Mountain Repository these canisters were to be grouped with 24-inch diameter HLW canisters in a codisposal waste package. The 18-inch DOE Standardized SNF Canister could be placed in the middle of five HLW canisters. The 24-inch DOE Standardized SNF Canister would take the place of one the five HLW canister on the outer ring in the codisposal waste package. No DOE Standardized SNF Canisters have been loaded, and many fuel types can be loaded in multiple canisters. Depending on the selected diameter of the DOE Standardized SNF Canister for a particular fuel, the number of potential codisposal waste packages could vary. In addition, different types of DOE SNF may be able to be combined in a single canister. This could significantly change the number of DOE SNF canisters that are loaded and result in a decrease of the number of total potential codisposal waste packages. Ultimately, if too many HLW canisters need disposition, then a reduction in the number of DOE Standardized SNF Canisters will change the final total of codisposal waste packages very little. Likewise, if the ratio of DOE Standardized SNF Canisters to HLW canister produced is too high, then DOE Standardized SNF Canisters will not have enough HLW canisters to surround them in the codisposal waste package. This paper examines the results of differing loading strategies for a few DOE SNFs. It also compares the ranges of DOE Standardized SNF Canisters that may be produced to the ranges of HLW canisters that may be produced in order to determine potential scenarios.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗