Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “US DOT”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2018

Advanced Hydrogen Fueling Station Supply: Tube Trailers

Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (Air Products) is reporting on the results of a DOE-funded program to develop and validate Advanced Hydrogen Fueling Station hydrogen tube trailers to support hydrogen and fuel cell market applications. The project involved the engineering design and development of a new composite over-wrapped pressure vessel to increase the pressure capability of tube trailers to deliver hydrogen to greater than 8500 psi (586 bar). The new composite over-wrapped pressure vessel tube trailer was expected to provide improved delivery technology and reduce the cost of transporting hydrogen from central hydrogen production sources. The project aimed to meet or exceed DOE’s 2020 delivery targets for tube trailer hydrogen distribution. A gated approach was taken for the project, with early project Go/No-Go decision points. Specific goals for this four-stage product development project included: Preliminary Study, Modeling, and Analysis: Complete a preliminary design analysis and cost viability of a >8500 psi (586 bar) hydrogen storage vessel with an appropriate frame and chassis configuration for a complete trailer to US DOT requirements; Develop New Tube Size for >8500 psi (586 bar) Vessel: Fabricate tubes for test units, perform testing, and submit test results for a DOT Special Permit; Design, fabricate, and test a delivery trailer unit; Deploy the delivery trailer to hydrogen stations and collect data. Work conducted under DE-EE0006524 established costs for US DOT Type III vessels at 8500 psi (586 bar), 12500 psi (862 bar), and 14000 psi (965 bar) with manufactured water volumes up to 375 liters. Trailer module designs were established for the maximum US DOT design limits and for Air Products’ design limit of a 40-foot trailer length that addresses California hydrogen fueling station ingress and egress operating constraints. Conceptual trailer designs were not capable of achieving the DOE 2020 capacity and cost targets, but they did exceed the DOE pressure target of 500 bar. Based on new trailer cost and simulated operating performance, the 8500 psi (586 bar) new trailer design is not feasible in comparison to Air Products’ DOT-approved 7500 psi (520 bar) trailer design in operation today. Also, the project was expected to incur significantly higher product development costs associated with new US DOT vessel development and approval. Alternative trailer design concepts were explored that included 700 bar compression-less mobile fueling that could be promising for early-market hydrogen infrastructure fueling station placement and development and niche military applications. Due to the economic and budget challenges identified in the feasibility phase of the program, Air Products, in agreement with the Department of Energy, decided to terminate this development program.

08 HYDROGEN↗
DOE OSTI2019

Challenges of SLOWPOKE-2 HEU Irradiated Fuel Transportation from Canada to USA - 19123(2)

The SLOWPOKE-2 (Safe Low-Power Kritical Experiment) was designed by AECL (Atomic Energy of Canada Limited) in the late 1960's. The core consists of HEU (highly enriched uranium) fuel with an enrichment of 93%. The fuel cage typically has approximately 300 fuel pins assembled in a triangular pitch between the two plates. The fuel pins are made from uranium-aluminum alloy cladded with aluminum. The SLOWPOKE-2 reactor is rated at a nominal 20 kW. with varying neutron flux, maximum being 1 E12 n/cm{sup 2}/s. The mass of the fuel cage is 5.06 kg. The life of the core can be extended by adding layers of beryllium reflector. The transportation flask for the irradiated fuel is a Type B(U)F. The shipment classification is UN3328 Class 7. To date, 4 SLOWPOKE-2 reactors have been decommissioned. The fuel from all these reactors was transported to the U.S. The CNSC (Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission) joint Canada-United States guide for approval of Type B(U) and fissile material transportation packages (RD-364) satisfies the requirements stipulated in International Atomic energy Agency (IAEA) TS-R-1 1996 edition (revised) and is acceptable to the DOT (Department of Transportation) and NRC (Nuclear Regulatory Commission) for complying with U.S. code of federal regulations 10 CFR Part 71. The export license is issued by the CNSC. The transportation licence is issued by CNSC after approval from TC (Transport Canada) and also by DOT after approval from NRC. The final home of the HEU SLOWPOKE-2 irradiated fuel is in Savannah River Site of DOE (Department of Energy). The transportation licence requires that the Type B(U)F flask is structurally sound in case of a crash. The US DOT provides a CAC (Competent Authority Certificate) which describes the irradiated fuel specifications that can be transported in the designated flask. The U.S. DOT also requires a leak test certification in accordance with ANSI N14.5-2014 to verify a leakage rate not to exceed 1 E-7 std-cm{sup 3}/s. As most SLOWPOKE-2 facilities are not located on the existing approved routes for nuclear fuel transportation, a route survey needs to be performed and submitted to the NRC. The route survey report is assessed by the NRC and issues a route approval for the transportation of the fissile material. This technical paper will discuss the detailed processes required to obtain approvals in order to transport the HEU SLOWPOKE-2 irradiated fuel from Canada to U.S. based upon recent experiences of decommissioning SLOWPOKE-2 reactors in Canada. It will provide details on the requirements of various regulators in Canada and the U.S. that govern and regulate this shipment including transportation, safety and security. It will also present lessons learned from previous experiences that can be utilized for best practice on other similar projects. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

The NAC-SMP - a Next Generation Transformation Package - 18391

NAC International Inc. (NAC) is developing a Small Multi-Purpose (SMP) Type B(U)F-96 transportation cask designed with flexibility and cost-efficiency objectives to support shipment of a wide range of wastes with fissile material contents. The NAC-SMP package is a small, modular design that meets US DOT weight limits for road transport. Contents can be accommodated in multiple configurations including standard drums of up to 416 liters (110 U.S. gallons) in capacity. The package will also accommodate unique waste contents and fuel designs where cost-effective packaging options have been a challenge. The NAC-SMP development goals include simplicity of design and operational flexibility to meet Type B requirements. In particular, the cask body is designed to satisfy the dimensional and mass constraints, shielding requirements, and general transport requirements for a variety of contents under 10 CFR 71 and IAEA SSR-6 regulations. Flexibility is assured by the cask's modular design, which consists of multiple vessels to provide containment, shielding and overpack capability. The containment boundary design permits adaptability to content requirements by relying on interchangeable internal components for secondary containment, supplemental shielding and shoring, as required. In this paper, NAC provides an overview of the NAC-SMP cask and identifies the design features and technology advancements that makes the cask a readily adaptable and flexible solution for packaging US DOE and other orphan wastes, and to enable the integration of these wastes into the waste management system process and disposition infrastructure. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Investigating the Impact of Connected Vehicle Market Share on the Performance of Reinforcement-Learning Based Traffic Signal Control

We aim to understand and explore the performance of reinforcement learning based signal control algorithms in a mixed environment with less than 100% market share of connected and automated vehicles (CAVs). Within a simulation environment, we have considered partial connectivity—less than 100% market share of CAVs—in the network and investigated the impact on the performance of the signal control algorithm. Two test networks including a four-intersection arterial in Lankershim Boulevard, CA, and a portion of downtown Springfield, IL, with 20 intersections. The first network is calibrated in the micro-simulator PTV Vissim with the US DOT provided NGSIM datasets. The results provide insights regarding the impact of the connectivity and sensing technologies on the practical implementation of traffic signal control algorithms that leverage the data sharing capability of a connected environment. For scenarios with 40% or more market share of CAVs, we observed improvement in the performance metrics—travel time, queue time, and energy consumption—with the increase in market share. Results from our experiments do not indicate any clear trend when the networks have low (less than 40%) market share of CAVs. The higher standard deviations as obtained from the statistical analyses of the performance metrics at low market share may indicate the instability of the RL controller arising from the partial (if not zero) observability of the traffic states. Further, we have conducted simplified scenario analyses to explore the impact of the market share of battery electric vehicles (BEVs) on energy consumption due to the regenerative braking feature. Our results and findings will be the foundation for the future reinforcement learning based control algorithm development that accounts for partial connectivity—less than 100% CAV market share, and the presence of BEVs in a network of connected and automated signalized intersections.

33 ADVANCED PROPULSION SYSTEMS↗
NASA NTRS2012

Development and Testing of a Green-Propellant Micro-Hybrid Thruster with Electrostatic Ignition

As early as 1937 German scientists at Peenemunde experimented with highly unstable fuel blends of nitrous oxide (N2O) and ethanol. These early tests mostly resulted in explosions and destroyed rocket engines. More recently several companies have developed experimental nitrous oxide fuel blends (NOFB) with Isp exceeding 300 sec. Although NOFBx has recently been cleared for tests on the International Space Station, this propellant remains highly experimental and has not been cleared for commercial transport by the US DOT. Recent work by Karabeyoglu et al. has raised concerns about the safety risks of mixing hydrocarbons with N2O. Liquid oxidizer/fuel blends are highly explosive and require extreme care in transport and servicing. By adding small amounts of a liquid organic fuel such as alcohol or a hydrocarbon, the odds of an explosive decomposition event are significantly increased.iv The proposed solution mitigates the explosion hazards of NOFB by separating the oxidizer from the hydrocarbon fuel formed as of a small cylindrical section of ABS thermoplastic. As N2O vapor flows across the grain segment, current enters a 1000 VDC high-tension lead in the ABS fuel grain and produces an inductive spark that vaporizes a small amount of the material. The ablated fuel vapor plus residual energy from the spark seed a localized exothermic N2O dissociation that produces sufficient heat to initiate combustion. The process is also effective when gaseous oxygen is used. A low TRL (2-3) prototype demonstrating the feasibility of controlled hydrocarbon-seeding was recently tested at Utah State University.v The unit features a miniature 2.5 cm ABS fuel grain fabricated using a Stratasys Dimension 3-D printer. The 9-N thruster was pulse-fired up to 27 consecutive times on a single ABS grain segment. Ignition was achieved by as little as 12-15 Joules energy input. This value is contrasted with the typical 30-minute pre-heat requirement for the ECAPS LMP-103S ADN-based monopropellant, requiring an energy input of 14,850 Joules for catalytic dissociation. The hydrocarbon-seeded micro-hybrid was also adapted as a non-pyrotechnic ignitor for a 900 N (200-lbf) thrust hybrid motor. The motor was successfully ignited 4 consecutive times with no hardware swaps or propellant additions. The amount of ABS seed material that can be fit into the injector cap is the only limit to the number of available repeat firings. This series of tests marks the first time a hybrid motor was ever ignited by other than a solid-propellant pyrotechnic charge or bi-propellant flame ignitor. Nitrous oxide hybrid motors are typically difficult to ignite and usually require multiple solid-propellant charges to initiate combustion, so this nonpyrotechnic ignition is a significant accomplishment. The controlled hydrocarbon-seeding approach is fundamentally different from all other green propellant solutions offered by the aerospace industry. Although the proposed system is more correctly a hybrid technology; the system retains all the simple features of a monopropellant design. To date no optimization study has been performed to identify the best grain geometry for electrostatic ignition. Fortunately, because the grain segments are fabricated using rapid-prototyping technology, changing the grain geometry is as simple as modifying the 3-D printer CAD-file. Vacuum Isp exceeding 270 seconds has been demonstrated (Ref v), a value significantly higher than those offered by competing green monopropellant options. The propellants of choice, N2O/GOX and ABS are 100% non-toxic, non-explosive, and environmentally benign. Because the inert oxidizer and fuel components are mixed only within the combustion chamber, the system retains the inherent safety of a hybrid rocket and can be piggy-backed as a secondary payload with no overall mission risk increase to the primary payload, an excellent characteristic for secondary launch systems.

Whitmore, Stephen A.↗
NASA NTRS2011

Logic Model Checking of Unintended Acceleration Claims in the 2005 Toyota Camry Electronic Throttle Control System

Part of the US DOT investigation of Toyota SUA involved analysis of the throttle control software. JPL LaRS applied several techniques, including static analysis and logic model checking, to the software. A handful of logic models were built. Some weaknesses were identified; however, no cause for SUA was found. The full NASA report includes numerous other analyses

Toyota↗
DOE OSTI2018

Radioactive Waste Disposal Strategies within the US Army Corps of Engineers FUSRAP - 18328

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' (USACE) highest priority is the protection of human health and the environment and public and worker safety during the cleanup, transportation, and disposal of Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) material. In addition to following all appropriate federal and state rules and regulations, the USACE has its own safety program that ensures that we are being protective. One aspect of the USACE FUSRAP is the radioactive waste disposal strategies that we must consider. The USACE will only dispose of FUSRAP material in a facility that is licenses/permitted to accept it. The estimated exposures to facility workers and members of the public from the permitted disposal of FUSRAP wastes is evaluated as part of this process. The USACE uses the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) process to study and remediate FUSRAP sites. An evaluation is performed to decide whether it is best to manage the waste on-site or off-site and the requirements for disposal. The action selected must be protective of human health and the environment and must comply with regulations. When making the decision, there are several other factors taken into consideration including cost of the disposal and whether the public and state agencies support the action. Prior to determining disposal options, wastes must first be characterized. This involves an evaluation of both site history and analytical data. Determining the proper disposal requirements and subsequent disposal option involves: Characterizing the waste as stated above. This is important because there are several regulatory agencies which may oversee management of the waste. The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), the US Department of Transportation, and state hazardous waste and/or radiation protection agencies may all have varying degrees of involvement. Identifying disposal requirements. Certain wastes must be disposed at licensed radioactive waste disposal facilities. Wastes containing US EPA regulated hazardous waste must be disposed at permitted hazardous waste disposal facilities. Certain wastes must be disposed at facilities licensed/permitted for both radioactive and hazardous waste. Some lower activity wastes may be accepted for disposal at other types of landfills. Considering acceptance criteria of the disposal facility. Radionuclides and/or hazardous constituents in the waste, as well as physical and chemical form of the waste, are evaluated to ensure they meet the acceptance criteria of the receiving facility's license and/or permit. If they don't, another disposal location must be used. Considering the accessibility and location of the disposal facility. Some facilities are able to accept shipments only by truck and others can accept material via railcar as well. The distance to a disposal facility impacts the risk of transportation accidents and efficient use of project resources such as the number of trucks required to perform the transportation. These factors are also important in evaluating whether material can be cost effectively shipped to a disposal facility. Evaluating the compliance status of the receiving facility. It is not assumed that just because a facility has a license or permit that it is acceptable for the USACE' waste. Prior to selecting a facility for disposal of FUSRAP waste, a site visit, audit and consultation with the US EPA is required to determine whether there are any known relevant violations at the facility. Facilities that have violations that negatively impact the USACE or US EPA approval of the facility are not used for disposal of FUSRAP waste. Once a facility is selected. The USACE procures contracts, or utilizes existing contracts, to facilitate the transportation and disposal action. Additionally, the USACE continues to consult with US EPA routinely to confirm the compliance status of the facility. Considering state acceptance of wastes to a facility. The USACE seeks to obtain written authorization from the facility state regulator indicating the action is compliant with existing licenses, permits, laws, and regulations. Each of these factors is considered by the USACE in selecting a FUSRAP disposal location. The goal is to provide safe, cost effective disposal which is protective of human health and the environment and which complies with all regulatory requirements. These steps all feed in to the disposal strategy consideration that USACE must go through for our FUSRAP waste streams. There are a number of challenges in the process to include In order to achieve the Congressional mandate of completing cleanup work under FUSRAP in a more cost effective, timely manner, while assuring protection of public health and safety. USACE must determine all disposal options that are available for the types of waste at each FUSRAP site. As a solution, completion of a disposal strategy document can help ensure this goal is met and will foster consistency across the FUSRAP. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

The Role of Indian Tribes in the Safe, Secure, and Routine Transportation of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste - 19463

Far too often federally recognized Indian Tribes are the last stakeholders invited to the table to discuss a particular issue with potentially wide-ranging impacts. Indian tribes were the first governments on this continent. With respect to the future transportation of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) or high-level radioactive waste (HLW), Indian tribes are potentially impacted in a myriad of ways: economics, cultural, environmental, health and safety. Yet few regulators fully understand and appreciate the legal and political standing of Indian tribes. This paper will examine the ways in which Indian tribes must be involved with the planning for safe, secure and routine SNF and HLW shipments and the ways in which the federal government is obligated to involve tribes. Indian tribes are similar to states in that they are responsible for the health and safety of its members (which they themselves define). Tribes, like states, make, implement, interpret, and enforce laws, and provide public services - healthcare, public education, social services, drug treatment, public safety and emergency management, transportation, managing natural resources, public housing, and environmental and cultural preservation. Many tribes also operate economic enterprises - manufacturing, farming, forestry, and gaming. The most basic principle of Indian law is the principle of 'sovereignty,' that is, an Indian tribe possesses all the powers of any sovereign state. Tribal governments are not subject to state or local jurisdiction but are subject to federal jurisdiction. The tribes enjoy a government-to-government relationship (and expectation) with the federal government (i.e., agencies, like the Department of Energy, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission). Of paramount concern to Indian tribes is the doctrine of Trust Responsibility, the general principle that the federal government's conduct 'in dealing with the Indians should therefore be judged by the most exacting fiduciary standards.' With respect to SNF/HLW this means that the federal government has an obligation (or a Trust Responsibility) to ensure that tribal people, lands and resources are protected. Equally important is the expectation that federal agencies will work with the Indian tribes on a government-to-government basis before undertaking any action with potential negative consequences on the tribe's people, land or resources. The concept of government-to-government consultation between Indian tribes and the United States is long standing and well recognized. As expressed in Executive Order 13175, 'Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments': 'Consultation - Each federal agency must have an accountable process to ensure meaningful and timely input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory policies that have tribal implications.' The purpose of consultation is to ensure that Indian tribes are consulted before government officials make decisions that may have an impact on their lives and territories. The three agencies involved with SNF and HLW transportation - the US Department of Transportation (DOT), the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), and the US Department of Energy (DOE) - have had various degrees of success with respect to direct consultation with Indian tribes. Given that there is plenty of lead-time before the first shipments commence, there should be ample time to develop a strategy for ensuring that tribes are equal partners when planning and preparing for shipments of SNF and HLW to the first interim storage facility. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

WCATS: Waste Documentation, Course No. 8504

This course was developed for individuals at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) who characterize and document waste streams in the Waste Compliance and Tracking System (WCATS) according to Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Department of Transportation (DOT) regulations, Department of Energy Orders, and other applicable criteria. When you have completed this course, you will be able to recognize how waste documentation enables LANL to characterize and classify hazardous waste for compliant treatment, storage, and disposal, identify the purpose of the waste stream profile (WSP), identify the agencies that provide guidance for waste management, and more.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Path of Disposal for Hazardous and Non-hazardous Waste from Cradle to Grave

Hazardous waste is a threat to human health and the environment and must be managed and disposed of properly. A Solid Waste is defined as any material (solid, liquid, containerized gas) which has been discarded, abandoned (no longer needed), or recycled. The Resource Conservation Recovery Act (RCRA) is a law that creates the framework for the proper management of solid waste. Under RCRA, EPA has developed a program which ensures hazardous waste is managed safely from the moment it is generated to its final disposal (cradle-to-grave)2. To educate about how waste is handled at the Savannah River Research Campus (SRRC) under RCRA, the path it takes from point of generation (cradle) to disposal (grave), and the responsibilities of every person involved in the process. Researcher or other laboratory personnel that generates waste as a result of their work Responsibilities: - Fill out inventory log sheet and corresponding container sheet which includes the constituents of the waste; - Properly label waste container with SAA/WSA ID no., generator's name, what it is, the hazards, and date; - Place waste in designated waste storage area. Laboratory Custodian Responsibilities: - Ensures waste is handled and stored properly; - Ensures inventory is updated; - Ensures all container sheets are completed; - Ensures only authorized personal have access to waste storage areas. Environmental Compliance Authority Responsibilities: - Develops waste procedures; - Provide waste training; - Inspects for improperly handled waste; - Establishes or closes waste storage areas as needed; - Determines if waste can be recycled; - Determines if waste is RCRA hazardous: Is it U or P listed? - Unused commercial chemical products; Is it F listed - Spent solvents; Is it characteristic? - Flammable/Oxidizer, Corrosive, Reactive, Toxic; - Weighs waste to ensure laboratory has not exceeded its monthly or total storage limits; - Maintains waste records; - Determines how waste should be disposed: Trash - Nonhazardous solids; Drain - Nonhazardous Liquids; Labpack; - Prepares waste for shipment with Vendor and Department of Transportation (DOT) personnel. Packages, Transports, and Treats Hazardous Waste Responsibilities: - Must be EPA permitted and approved by the Department of Energy - Picks up hazardous waste for transport to a treatment, storage or disposal facility depending on waste disposal requirements - Must meet all Department of Transportation regulations for transporting hazardous waste - Dispose of waste according to RCRA regulations. Due to the potential risks to human health and the environment, waste must be handled safely through the chain of possession from cradle to grave. To ensure proper handling, there are many safety checks as required by RCRA and DOT regulations. This includes proper labeling, inventory, and characterization to ensure all hazards are known, inspections by the Custodian, ECA, and the state regulator (SCDHEC), and transportation verifications and manifesting. One of the best ways to reduce the risks that waste presents is to minimize or eliminate the creation of waste. This can be accomplished through source reduction which includes: Inventory control, material substitution, process modification, improved housekeeping, and preventative maintenance and recycling.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2015

Transportation Secure Data Center: Real-world Data for Planning, Modeling, and Analysis (Fact Sheet)

The Transportation Secure Data Center (TSDC) at www.nrel.gov/tsdc provides free, web-based access to detailed transportation data from a variety of travel surveys conducted across the nation. While preserving the privacy of survey participants, this online repository makes vital transportation data broadly available to users from the comfort of their own desks via a secure online connection.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗
DOE OSTI2015

Phonon bottleneck in GaAs/Al{sub x}Ga{sub 1−x}As quantum dots

We report low-temperature photoluminescence measurements on highly-uniform GaAs/Al{sub x}Ga{sub 1−x}As quantum dots grown by droplet epitaxy. Recombination between confined electrons and holes bound to carbon acceptors in the dots allow us to determine the energies of the confined states in the system, as confirmed by effective mass calculations. The presence of acceptor-bound holes in the quantum dots gives rise to a striking observation of the phonon-bottleneck effect.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2019

Engineering Auger recombination in colloidal quantum dots via dielectric screening

Auger recombination is the main non-radiative decay pathway for multi-carrier states of colloidal quantum dots, which affects performance of most of their optical and optoelectronic applications. Outstanding single-exciton properties of CdSe/CdS core/shell quantum dots enable us to simultaneously study the two basic types of Auger recombination channels-negative trion and positive trion channels. Though Auger rates of positive trion are regarded to be much faster than that of negative trion for II-VI quantum dots in literature, our experiments find the two rates can be inverted for certain core/shell geometries. This is confirmed by theoretical calculations as a result of geometry-dependent dielectric screening. By varying the core/shell geometry, both types of Auger rates can be independently tuned for ~1 order of magnitude. Experimental and theoretical findings shed new light on designing quantum dots with necessary Auger recombination characteristics for high-power light-emitting-diodes, lasers, single-molecular tracking, super-resolution microscope, and advanced quantum light sources.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2016

EnergySolutions' Implementation of HM-250 - 16641

This presentation discusses the various changes at EnergySolutions' radioactive material disposal and processing facilities to implement the recent changes in Department of Transportation (DOT) with respect to the receipt and return to service of conveyances and packages used to transport radioactive material. Effective July 13, 2015, the DOT has revised 49 CFR 173.443(c) in an effort to prevent inadvertent diversion of conveyances and bulk packages into general commerce that had previously been used to transport radioactive material. Previous to this change, conveyances, such as, trailers, rail cars, gondolas and bulk packages, such as, sea-lands and inter-modals that were received at radioactive material management facilities could be released back to the customer as 'Return to Service' (RTS) in accordance with the contamination and dose limits specified in 49 CFR 173.443(c). At the point of release, these conveyances or packages were not required to be dedicated exclusively for subsequent radioactive material shipments. The DOT revised this regulation to implement additional controls that require any conveyance or package that was transported as Class 7 (radioactive) materials exclusive use shipment to be dedicated to subsequent radioactive material shipments. If these conveyances or packages are not use for Class 7 (radioactive) use, then they must be released for unrestricted use in accordance with the DOT and the respective radioactive material license or other regulatory authority. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

HMPT: Hazardous Waste Transportation Live 27928, Test 27929

HMPT: Hazardous Waste Transportation (Live 27928, suggested one time and associated Test 27929, required initially and every 36 months) addresses the Department of Transportation (DOT) function-specific training requirements of the hazardous materials packagings and transportation (HMPT) Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) lab-wide training. This course addresses the requirements of the DOT that are unique to hazardous waste shipments. Appendix B provides the Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) reference material needed for this course.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

HMPT: Basic Radioactive Material Transportation

Hazardous Materials and Packaging and Transportation (HMPT): Basic Radioactive Material Transportation Live (#30462, suggested one time) and Test (#30463, required initially and every 36 months) address the Department of Transportation’s (DOT’s) function-specific [required for hazardous material (HAZMAT) handlers, packagers, and shippers] training requirements of the HMPT Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) Labwide training. This course meets the requirements of 49 CFR 172, Subpart H, Section 172.704(a)(ii), Function-Specific Training.

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2019

Panel Session 124: Challenges and Opportunities in Establishing a System for Transportation of SNF/UNF

An audience of approximately 24 attended this panel session, which focused on the current challenges and status of establishing a transportation system for spent and used nuclear fuel (SNF/UNF), which includes planning efforts, continuing impacts, risk assessment, equipment (e.g., rail cars, handling equipment, and fuel storage systems), and transportation routing. Individual panelist presentations focused on: - Planning for removal of SNF and greater-than-Class C (GTCC) waste from the shut down Oyster Creek nuclear power plant site; - Scope and workshop conducted to better understand how the railroad carriers are likely to route shipments of SNF based on U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) route risk assessment regulatory requirements; - Atlas railcar design and fabrication project for producing new railcars for transporting SNF that are compliant with Association of American Railroads (AAR) Standard S-2043.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Cask RT-100 Type B(U) Self-Certification for DOT 7A, Type A Nuclear Waste Transportation - 20098

The purpose of this Type A certification is to diversify the use of the RT-100 cask by allowing the end user to transport either Type A or Type B radioactive waste in accordance with the handling procedures for each waste category. The project's scope included the development of a matrix that contains all applicable requirements for a Type A package from the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 49 for the Department of Transportation (DOT) with a justification for each requirement. Moreover, the scope included the writing of conditions and restrictions list for the transportation of Type A nuclear waste, the writing of a compliance statement, and the design and fabrication of a Type A placard to be permanently placed on the RT-100 cask. Type A packages are self-certified by the end user using one of three methods as permitted by 49 CFR 173.461, either by performance of tests with prototypes or samples of the specimens representing the packaging, or reference to a previous satisfactory demonstration of compliance of a sufficiently similar nature, or calculations or reasoned evaluation using reliable and conservative procedures and parameters. Since the RT-100 cask was licensed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) as a Type B cask, Robatel relied on the method of reference to a previous satisfactory demonstration of compliance of a sufficiently similar nature for Type A certification. This method was determined to be acceptable, since Type B packages are evaluated for more demanding transport conditions than those required for Type A packages. This paper presents Robatel's process for certifying the RT-100 cask for Type A shipments, an overview of the DOT regulations related to Type A packages, and the documents that were generated for the end user. This paper is concluded with a discussion on the advantages of having the option to transport both Type A and Type B nuclear waste, and possible future projects to further improve the operation of the cask when making Type A shipments. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗