Results for “Tomato production”

DOE OSTI2026

Introducing furanocoumarin biosynthetic genes in tomato results in coumarins accumulation and impacts growth

Over the past three decades, efforts to decipher plant metabolism have shed light on key enzymes driving specialized metabolite biosynthesis. Although only few pathways have been completely investigated to date, their characterization paves the way for exploring the potential effects of specialized metabolites on plant physiology. Among them is the linear furanocoumarin pathway, which was recently completed to produce up to psoralen. In this study, we report the first metabolic engineering of the linear furanocoumarin pathway to enable artificial psoralen production in tomato, through the integration of four genes coding for the enzymes: Umbelliferone Synthase (PsDiox), Demethylsuberosin Synthase (PsPT1), Marmesin Synthase (FcCYP76F112) and Psoralen Synthase (PsCYP71AJ3). Metabolic analyses confirmed the detection of small quantities of psoralen in the transgenic tomato line, but also highlighted a larger accumulation of coumarins and particularly scopoletin. Using morphophysiological and multi-omics analyses, we explorate how such metabolic modifications, could impact growth and affect plant physiology.

coumarins↗

DOE OSTI2026

The Interactions Between Shading and Organic Fertilizer Application on Dry-farmed Tomato Grown Between Photovoltaic Panels

Agrivoltaic systems are mixed systems of solar photovoltaic (PV) panels and agricultural production, where shade from the panels can result in lower evapotranspiration for crops, which is of particular interest for dryland agriculture. Dry-farmed tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) production in the Willamette Valley of Oregon has lower total yields and higher rates of blossom-end rot (BER) than irrigated tomato production, resulting in reduced marketable yields. To determine how dry-farmed ‘Early Girl’ tomato performed in an agrivoltaics system, a trial was conducted at the Valley Creek Solar Project (Salem, OR, USA) in 2020, using three different amendment treatments and three levels of shading from the panels. Amendment treatments were 0N (receiving no fertilizer), 84N (receiving 84 kg·ha −1 N), and 168N (receiving 168 kg·ha −1 N), applied as processed chicken manure. Plants were estimated to receive an irradiance factor of 30%, 76%, and 89% for full-shade, partial-shade, and full-sun treatments respectively. There was an interaction between amendment treatments and shading treatments in their effects on unblemished yield (yield of fruit without BER or sunscald). The optimum fertilizer application for full-shade and partial-shade rows was 84N, the optimum for full-sun rows was 0N. Fertilizing these rows at these rates resulted in an unblemished yield for the aisle of 11.1 t·ha −1 , which was lower than unblemished yields reported in previous experiments and trials in open fields. However, these results are from a single location and a single year, and other solar sites may behave more similar to open-field conditions. Shading from the panels increased average fruit weight and decreased incidence of BER and sunscald, suggesting that crops were less drought stressed. This resulted in similar unblemished yields for the full-shade and full-sun plots at 84N and 168N. Applying fertilizer resulted in higher total yields, smaller average fruit weight, increased BER incidence, and decreased sunscald incidence. The results suggest a possible synergy between dry-farmed tomato production and agrivoltaics, although several concerns remain, including difficulties managing the vegetation under panels, rules restricting PVs on high-value agricultural soils, and the possibility of soil compaction during PV installation.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗