Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “TiCrAs”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

Materials Data on TiCrAs by Materials Project

TiCrAs crystallizes in the hexagonal P-62m space group. The structure is three-dimensional. Ti is bonded in a 5-coordinate geometry to six equivalent Cr and five As atoms. There are two shorter (2.79 Å) and four longer (2.88 Å) Ti–Cr bond lengths. There are four shorter (2.61 Å) and one longer (2.68 Å) Ti–As bond lengths. Cr is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to six equivalent Ti and four As atoms. There are two shorter (2.38 Å) and two longer (2.50 Å) Cr–As bond lengths. There are two inequivalent As sites. In the first As site, As is bonded in a 9-coordinate geometry to three equivalent Ti and six equivalent Cr atoms. In the second As site, As is bonded in a 9-coordinate geometry to six equivalent Ti and three equivalent Cr atoms.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Radiation Characteristics of Reflectarray Antennas: Methodology and Applications to Dual Configurations

Reflectarrays combines key features of large reflectors and phased array elements to generate a collimated beam as required in high gain antennas. In reflectarrays, a large flat reflecting surface with many resonant patch elements is illuminated by a feed (or by a feed/subreflector in dual reflector configuration). In many space applications, reflectarrays applications can be advantageous because their large surface can be folded or rolled as a part of spacecraft payload before being deployed. Consequently, a reflectarray can significantly reduce both volume and mass requirements in space deployment. To optimize reflectarray antenna performance, a phase correction mechanism must be applied to its individual array elements some of which are well documented in the literatures. In this study, we attempt to extend analytical techniques in reflector analysis to reflectarrays by introducing a number of approaches to estimate the reflectarray antenna performance independent of its phase compensation mechanism. In one approach, a Physical Optics (PO) current will be assigned to the surface of individual reflectarray elements upon which a phase correction will be applied. In the second approach, a transmit/receive (TX/RX) radiation characteristics will be assigned to individual reflectarray elements from which coupling coefficients will be calculated and assigned as the excitation coefficient of individual elements. PO approach is modeled in the UCLA reflector code while coupling (TX/RX) method is implemented in both UCLA code as well as TICRA (GRASP) software. Results are presented for single and dual configurations with the main reflector as a reflectarray. The approach described is used to design a 3-m Cassegrain offset-fed configuration for dual X/Ka-bands application.

reflectors↗

Large/Complex Antenna Performance Validation for Spaceborne Radar/Radiometeric Instruments

Over the past decade, Earth observing missions which employ spaceborne combined radar & radiometric instruments have been developed and implemented. These instruments include the use of large and complex deployable antennas whose radiation characteristics need to be accurately determined over 4 pisteradians. Given the size and complexity of these antennas, the performance of the flight units cannot be readily measured. In addition, the radiation performance is impacted by the presence of the instrument's service platform which cannot easily be included in any measurement campaign. In order to meet the system performance knowledge requirements, a two pronged approach has been employed. The first is to use modeling tools to characterize the system and the second is to build a scale model of the system and use RF measurements to validate the results of the modeling tools. This paper demonstrates the resulting level of agreement between scale model and numerical modeling for two recent missions: (1) the earlier Aquarius instrument currently in Earth orbit and (2) the upcoming Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission. The results from two modeling approaches, Ansoft's High Frequency Structure Simulator (HFSS) and TICRA's General RF Applications Software Package (GRASP), were compared with measurements of approximately 1/10th scale models of the Aquarius and SMAP systems. Generally good agreement was found between the three methods but each approach had its shortcomings as will be detailed in this paper.

Antenna Modeling↗