Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Shock-interface interaction”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

Vortex-sheet modeling of hydrodynamic instabilities produced by an oblique shock interacting with a perturbed interface in the HED regime

In this work, we consider hydrodynamic instabilities produced by the interaction of an oblique shock with a perturbed material interface under high-energy-density (HED) conditions. During this interaction, a baroclinic torque is generated along the interface due to the misalignment between the density and pressure gradients, thus leading to perturbation growth. Our objective is to understand the competition between the impulsive acceleration due to the normal component of the shock velocity, which drives the Richtmyer–Meshkov instability, and the shear flow across the interface due to the tangential component of the shock velocity, which drives the Kelvin–Helmholtz instability, as well as its relation to perturbation growth. Since the vorticity resulting from the shock-interface interaction is confined to the interface, we describe the perturbation growth using a two-dimensional vortex-sheet model. We demonstrate the ability of the vortex-sheet model to reproduce roll-up dynamics for non-zero Atwood numbers by comparing to past laser-driven HED experiments. We determine the dependence of the interface dynamics on the tilt angle and propose a time scaling for the perturbation growth at early time. Eventually, this scaling will serve as a platform for the design of future experiments. This study is the first attempt to incorporate into a vortex-sheet model the time-dependent interface decompression and the deceleration (as well as the corresponding Rayleigh–Taylor instability) arising from laser turn-off.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗

Assessment of diffuse-interface methods for compressible multiphase fluid flows and elastic-plastic deformation in solids

This work describes three diffuse-interface methods for the simulation of immiscible, compressible multiphase fluid flows and elastic-plastic deformation in solids. The first method is the localized-artificial-diffusivity approach of Cook, Subramaniam et al., and Adler and Lele, in which artificial diffusion terms are added to the individual phase mass fraction transport equations and are coupled with the other conservation equations. The second method is the gradient-form approach that is based on the quasi-conservative method of Shukla et al., in which the diffusion and sharpening terms (together called regularization terms) are added to the individual phase volume fraction transport equations and are coupled with the other conservation equations. The third approach is the divergence-form approach that is based on the fully conservative method of Jain et al., in which the regularization terms are added to the individual phase volume fraction transport equations and are coupled with the other conservation equations. In the present study, all three diffuse-interface methods are used in conjunction with a four-equation, multicomponent mixture model, in which pressure and temperature equilibria are assumed among the various phases. The primary objective of this work is to compare these three methods in terms of their ability to: maintain constant interface thickness throughout the simulation; conserve mass, momentum, and energy; and maintain accurate interface shape for long-time integration. The second objective of this work is to consistently extend these methods to model interfaces between solid materials with strength. To assess and compare the methods, they are used to simulate a wide variety of problems, including (1) advection of an air bubble in water, (2) shock interaction with a helium bubble in air, (3) shock interaction and the collapse of an air bubble in water, and (4) Richtmyer–Meshkov instability of a copper–aluminum interface. The current work focuses on comparing these methods in the limit of relatively coarse grid resolution, which illustrates the true performance of these methods. In conclusion, this is because it is rarely practical to use hundreds of grid points to resolve a single bubble or drop in large-scale simulations of engineering interest.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗