Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Selective lithium leaching”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

Gas-solid reaction-based selective lithium leaching strategy for efficient LiFePO 4 recycling

As the electric-vehicle market continues to expand, LiFePO 4 (LFP) batteries, valued for their intrinsic safety and cost-effectiveness, are being increasingly utilized. However, this widespread adoption highlights the urgent need for innovative and environmentally friendly recycling methods for spent LFP batteries due to their relatively low material value and the environmental challenges associated with traditional recycling processes. Here, in this study, we present a novel selective lithium leaching technique that involves a gas–solid reaction with chlorine gas. This method achieves a remarkable leaching efficiency of 99.8 % and a selectivity of 98.8 % at 200 °C within just 10 min, without generating acidic wastewater. The resulting LiCl solution was successfully converted into Li 2 CO 3 with an excellent purity of 99.5 %, while producing NaCl solution as the only byproduct. Notably, the olivine structure of the LFP was preserved as FePO 4 after lithium leaching. The regenerated LFP demonstrated excellent performance, retaining 94.1 % of its capacity after 150 cycles, while the lithium-leached FePO 4 delivered a reversible capacity exceeding 150 mAh/g. This approach not only enhances the efficiency of LFP recycling but also paves the way for more sustainable battery technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Selective leaching and solvent extraction of Lithium from spent batteries

Pre-extracting Li from spent lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) is crucial because the recovery efficiency of Li is low after other critical metals have been extracted. Traditional methods involving black mass roasting followed by water leaching have resulted in the extraction of 76 % Li and 61 % Al. However, pre-leaching Li from pretreated black mass using an oxalic acid solution at both ambient and elevated temperatures significantly improved results, achieving 98.1 % Li, 99.5 % Al, and 100 % Fe extraction while leaving Ni, Co, Mn, and Cu behind under optimal conditions. Oxalic acid crystals were recovered by refrigerating the leach solution at temperatures below 5 °C and were reused with nearly identical leaching efficiency. Selective extraction of Li from the oxalate leach solution was achieved using Cyanex® 936P under optimal conditions. Here, due to its extremely low Li extraction efficiency, Dichloromethane proved unsuitable as a diluent. Comparative extraction tests using Cyanex® 936P, Cyanex® 272, and DEHPA in kerosene demonstrated that Cyanex® 936P is an excellent extractant for Li, effectively separating it from other impurities. Under optimal conditions, 98.8 % of available Li was extracted using 20 % Cyanex® 936P, compared to 51.1 % with Cyanex® 272 and 39.9 % with DEHPA in kerosene. Additionally, stripping Li from Cyanex® 936P using H 2 SO 4 and HCl was explored, with HCl yielding the best performance.

Black mass↗

A green closed-loop process for selective recycling of lithium from spent lithium-ion batteries

As the economy started to recover from the COVID pandemic, the price of Li 2 CO 3 skyrocketed to its highest. This situation has aggravated concerns about the supply chain for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). Recycling spent LIBs is a potential solution to alleviate the bottleneck of the supply chain and prevent environmental pollution, and has attracted lots of attention. However, lithium recycling is generally disregarded because of the complex recycling process and its low recycling efficiency. Here, in this work we developed a sustainable lithium recovery process, which can selectively leach and recover lithium with formic acid before recycling valuable metals. With the reported method, lithium can be 99.8% recovered from layered oxide cathode materials with 99.994% purity. In addition, this lithium recovery process is affordable, compared to the typical hydrometallurgical process, by saving 11.15% per kilogram of spent LIBs. Therefore, this research provided a new solution to eliminating the effects of lithium ions on valuable metal separation and the co-precipitation reaction and precluding the influence of other metal ions on lithium recovery. Finally, this simplified lithium recovery process provides new opportunities for sustainable recycling of LIBs and economical restoration of the lithium supply chain.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

Selectively extracting lithium from single and mixed cathode materials

With the burgeoning reliance on lithium-ion batteries for sustainable energy solutions and electric transportation, the environmental and resource management associated with battery disposal are increasingly critical. Addressing these challenges necessitates innovative recycling techniques that recover valuable battery components, particularly lithium. This research introduces a universal, eco-friendly approach tailored for the efficient selective extraction of lithium from both single and mixed cathode materials, achieving impressive selective leaching efficiencies of lithium (99.51 % for LFP, 90 % for NMC, and 97.24 % for mixed cathode). Surprisingly, leaching efficiency of lithium from NMC can be significantly improved by introducing LFP since LFP can remove the dense transition-metal salts on the surface of NMC. The extracted lithium is recovered as lithium carbonate with battery-grade purity. This study also highlights the reuse of formic acid and the adoption of oxygen as an oxidizing agent to prevent wastewater production. Therefore, this method provides a robust foundation for sustainable lithium battery recycling.

economically and environmentally feasible↗

Sequential Recovery of Critical Metals from Leached Liquor of Processed Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries

The processing and extraction of critical metals from black mass is important to battery recycling. Separation and recovery of critical metals (Co, Ni, Li, and Mn) from other metal impurities must yield purified metal salts, while avoiding substantial losses of critical metals. Solvent extraction in batch experiments were conducted using mixed metal sulphates obtained from the leach liquor obtained from spent and shredded lithium-ion batteries. Selective extraction of Mn 2+ , Fe 3+ , Al 3+ and Cu 2+ from simulated and real leached mixed metals solution was carried out using di-2-ethylhexylphophoric acid (D2EPHA) and Cyanex-272 at varying pH. Further experiments with the preferred extractant (D2EPHA) were performed under different conditions: changing the concentration of extractant, organic to aqueous ratio, and varying the diluents. At optimum conditions (40% v/v D2EPHA in kerosene, pH 2.5, O:A = 1:1, 25 °C, and 20 min), 85% Mn 2+ , 98% Al 3+ , 100% Fe 3+ , and 43% Cu 2+ were extracted with losses of only trace amounts (<5.0%) of Co 2+ , Ni 2+ , and Li + . The order of extraction efficiency for the diluents was found to be kerosene > Exxal-10 >>> dichloromethane (CH 2 Cl 2 ) > toluene. Four stages of stripping of metals loaded on D2EPHA were performed as co-extracted metal impurities were selectively stripped, and a purified MnSO 4 solution was produced. Spent extractant was regenerated after Fe 3+ and Al 3+ were completely stripped using 1.0 M oxalic acid (C 2 H 2 O 4 ).

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Separation of cobalt, nickel, and manganese in leach solutions of waste lithium-ion batteries using Dowex M4195 ion exchange resin

Current methods to separate and recover critical metals from waste lithium-ion battery (LIB) scrap require multiple unit operations that involve selective leaching and a combination of separation methods. These methods include impurity removal, solvent extraction, ion exchange, and precipitation, to achieve high purity Co and Ni products. In this paper an efficient extraction strategy was developed to individually separate Ni and Co from a LIB leachate that was generated from an electrochemical leaching process. By using Dowex M4195 resin, as the only method of separation, additional impurity removal operations were not needed. After loading and eluting, three different fractions were obtained: 99.0% Ni concentrate, 98.5% Co concentrate, and a Li/Mn rich concentrate allowing the separation of Ni, Co and Mn. Here, the developed process is then presented as an alternative for metal recovery from leachates from scrap LIBs with minimum chemical addition and pH adjustment.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Ultra-high efficient lithium recovery via terephthalic acid from spent lithium-ion batteries

The recovery of lithium from spent lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) is a critical step in advancing sustainability within the battery industry. Traditional lithium extraction methods from end-of-life LIBs predominantly rely on chemical leaching techniques. However, these methods often involve the excessive use of acids, leading to substantial environmental concerns. Additionally, their non-selective nature can compromise the purity of the recovered lithium salt. To achieve battery-grade purity, further purification and recovery processes are necessary. In this study, we introduce a universal and eco-friendly process for lithium recovery, employing terephthalic acid to selectively extract lithium prior to the recycling of other valuable metals. This innovative method achieves lithium recovery rates exceeding 98.53% from layered oxide cathodes and 98.53% from lithium iron phosphate cathodes, delivering an exceptional purity level of 99.95%. By demonstrating applicability across a variety of cathode materials, this approach establishes a universal, sustainable and efficient solution for LIB recycling. The high-purity lithium extraction enabled by this process supports the comprehensive utilization of valuable resources, contributing significantly to the development of a circular economy for battery materials.

Hou, Jiahui [Worcester Polytechnic Institute, MA (↗

Efficient separation and coprecipitation for simplified cathode recycling

Hydrometallurgical recycling of spent lithium-ion batteries is among the most promising recovery approaches. The current hydrometallurgical method for battery recycling faces challenges such as complex separation and precipitation processes, and environmental concerns from the use of caustic inorganic acid and hazardous hydrogen peroxide. Our proposed modified method, namely polyol-metallurgy, uses citric acid in ethylene glycol as dual-function green solution to overcome these obstacles. This bifunctional solution leaches valuable metal ions from cathode materials (e.g., LiCoO 2 ), and then acts as chelating agents to selectively precipitate cobalt through an esterification reaction, without the need for additional precipitation agents. The leaching efficiency of cobalt and lithium reaches 99.55% and 97.65%, respectively, and more than 96% of cobalt could be directly self-precipitated and recovered. Further, the unique characteristics of the dual-function solution also avoids impurities from Al foils and PVDF/carbon black films, enabling the simple separation process. Therefore, the process can be completed in one-pot system with efficient leaching, separation and coprecipitation, making it more efficient and feasible for operation than existing alternatives.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Cost Competitive Process of Battery Grade Oxides Preparation from Aged LIBs

The increasing demand for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) is driving development of advanced recycling and refining methods. In this project, new cathode active materials are prepared from recycled lithium battery materials and subsequently electrochemically evaluated in coin cells. In detail, scrap LIBs were mechanically processed into a metal rich black mass, then reductive acid leached into an aqueous metal solution, and finally high-purity metal hydroxide precursor materials were prepared by selective electrochemical flow precipitation. Closed-loop LIB recycling into active electrode materials will enable US manufacturers to break their reliance on foreign sources of critical materials. For example, electroextraction process used here has potential to significantly reduce chemical & water use as well as waste production as compared to traditional metallurgic techniques. To this end, electroextracted materials refined from used batteries were collected and processed to be tested as precursor cathode active material (pCAM). For this project, two samples of high purity recycled NMC hydroxide (~1 kg each) were received from N th Cycle’s Ohio demonstration facility. The NMC compositions of the two materials are similar, and the levels of impurities have been confirmed. Indeed, impurities like copper, boron and sodium are present in quantities that could negatively impact battery performance. However, some studies have demonstrated that the control of the quantity of elements like copper or boron may improve the electrochemistry properties of Lithium-NMC batteries. The principal objective is to determine the electrochemical performance of these 2 NMC hydroxide batches and clearly determine the effect of the impurities on the performance.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Cost Competitive Process of Battery Grade Oxides Preparation from Aged LIBS

The increasing demand for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs ) is driving development of advanced recycling and refining methods. In this project, new cathode active materials are prepared from recycled lithium battery materials and subsequently electrochemically evaluated in coin cells. In detail, scrap LIBs were mechanically processed into a metal rich black mass, then reductive acid leached into an aqueous metal solution, and finally high-purity metal hydroxide precursor materials were prepared by selective electrochemical flow precipitation. Closed-loop LIB recycling into active electrode materials will enable US manufacturers to break their reliance on foreign sources of critical materials. For example, electroextraction process used here has potential to significantly reduce chemical & water use as compared to traditional metallurgic techniques. To this end, electroextracted materials refined from used batteries were collected and processed to be tested as precursor cathode active material (pCam).During this project ,samples of high-purity recycled NMC hydroxide (~2kg each) were received from Nth Cycle. In the first received batch some impurities like cadmium, calcium, and sodium are present in quantities that would negatively impact battery performance. Nth Cycle indicated that the impurities such as cadmium are present due to poor battery separation and co-shredding of NiCd batteries with with LIB. Cadmium was not present in the two subsequent batches as Nth Cycle processed cadmium free black mass. Thus, effective recycled battery sorting is critical to closed-loop LIB recycling into active electrode materials.

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗

Targeted Rare Earth Element Extraction from Mine Drainage Treatment Solids Informed by Advanced Characterization

In support of a clean energy transition in the U.S., National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) has collaborated with staff at Hedin Environmental and students at the University of Pittsburgh to characterize critical mineral content and recovery potential from acid mine drainage treatment solids (AMD solids). AMD solids in Appalachia are an unconventional feedstock of rare earth elements (REEs), with potential of suppling 1,102 tons REE/year. To inform recovery efforts, select AMD solids were examined using synchrotron microprobe analysis in conjunction with USGS-developed geochemical modeling to indicate likely phases hosting critical minerals (REE, Co, Ni, etc.) and associated metals . More than 100 AMD solids were collected from 94 passive AMD treatment systems in Pennsylvania, where limestone aggregates are used for acidity neutralization. As pH increases, dissolved metals and critical minerals in AMD are attenuated as surface coatings on limestone. The collected AMD solids contained up to 2000 mg/kg REE, up to 13,000 mg/kg transition metals (Co, Ni, Zn) and up to 440 mg/kg Li. Regardless of the diverse chemical compositions from AMD solids (Al-rich, Mn-rich, or Al,Fe,Mn-rich), REEs were mostly associated with Al and Mn (hydr)oxides, while select heavy REEs (e.g., Gd, Dy) were co-localized with Fe (hydr)oxides. Co and Ni have different distribution zones, while both co-localized with Mn (hydr)oxides. Based on this characterization, NETL developed a patent-pending innovative step-leaching protocol, “Targeted Rare Earth Extraction (TREE)” to effectively recover up to 90% REE and 60% Co in separate steps. In addition, select post-TREE solid residuals (purified Al oxides, or Mn oxides) can be further developed into functional materials (e.g., lithium and CO2 sorbents) needed for green energy transition and carbon management. This characterization-informed approach as well as TREE processing from AMD solids can be used for other legacy wastes (e.g., coal ash, oil and gas drill cutting, mine tailings), and offers an opportunity to transform waste streams into environmental and economic assets that meet U.S. Department of Energy and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency goals.

characterization and extraction of rare earth elem↗

Cost Competitive Process of Battery Grade Oxides Preparation from Aged LIBS

The increasing demand for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) is driving development of advanced recycling and refining methods. In this project, new cathode active materials are prepared from recycled lithium battery materials and subsequently electrochemically evaluated in coin cells. In detail, scrap LIBs were mechanically processed into a metal rich black mass, then reductive acid leached into an aqueous metal solution, and finally high-purity metal hydroxide precursor materials were prepared by selective electrochemical flow precipitation. Closed-loop LIB recycling into active electrode materials will enable US manufacturers to break their reliance on foreign sources of critical materials. For example, electroextraction process used here has potential to significantly reduce chemical & water use as compared to traditional metallurgic techniques. To this end, electroextracted materials refined from used batteries were collected and processed to be tested as precursor cathode active material (pCam). During this project , samples of high-purity recycled NMC hydroxide (~2 kg each) were received from Nth Cycle. In the first received batch some impurities like cadmium, calcium, and sodium are present in quantities that would negatively impact battery performance. Nth Cycle indicated that the impurities such as cadmium are present due to poor battery separation and co-shredding of NiCd batteries with with LIB. Cadmium was not present in the two subsequent batches as Nth Cycle processed cadmium free black mass. Thus, effective recycled battery sorting is critical to closed-loop LIB recycling into active electrode materials.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Metal leaching from Lithium-ion and Nickel-metal hydride batteries and photovoltaic modules in simulated landfill leachates and municipal solid waste materials

Photovoltaic (PV) modules and batteries can either be recycled or disposed of in landfills at end-of-life (EoL). This work focuses on disposal since the benefit of recycling PV modules and batteries is well established. This study characterizes the potential toxicity due to metals leaching from selected PV modules and batteries through both the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) and in-house batch leaching protocols to probe the impact on metallic ion mobility as a function of the different types of e-waste entering the waste stream, the magnitude of device damage when placed into the waste stream, and the simulated municipal solid waste (SMSW) composition. Our results showed that one PV module and three battery types in this study should be classified as hazardous waste within the U.S. However, for some of the other e-wastes, metals of concern including Cr, Cu, Hg, Ni, Pb, and Zn leached during the batch tests but not in the TCLP regulatory method. For most of the waste types, the amounts of metals that leached in the TCLP test and batch tests were much lower than the total extractable amounts, demonstrating the potential for additional unaccounted for amounts of metals to leach. Our results demonstrate that the TCLP regulatory method might fail at predicting potential leaching and at capturing the complexity of e-waste leaching in landfill conditions. It confirms that additional work is needed urgently to develop appropriate EoL procedures for MSW with PV and battery e-waste.

42 ENGINEERING↗

Removal of impurity Metals as Phosphates from Lithium-ion Battery leachates

Recovery of critical materials from end-of life (EOL) lithium-ion batteries (LIB) is gaining interest as demands for materials grows. Hydrometallurgical processes start with an intermediate product known as black mass which contains critical materials of interest (Co, Ni, Li, and graphite) as well as impurities such as Cu, Al, and Fe. These impurities are deleterious to downstream separation processes, as well as impact functionality of the final products. Here, these impurities effectively compete with most solvent extraction (SX) and metal recovery processes to diminish the overall yields of the desired materials. In this work, a process flowsheet is presented where a previously reported electrochemical leaching (ECL) process is followed by selective precipitation using diammonium hydrogen phosphate (DAP) to remove Cu, Al, and Fe from LIB leachate solutions. The electrochemical leach process removes Cu and produces a pH-adjusted leachate, ca. pH 2, without requiring an extra Cu extraction step. The addition of the precipitant DAP to leachate by slightly adjusting the pH to 3–4 at 45 °C, precipitates 95–99% of Al and Fe as their phosphates and the leachate retains >95% of Co, Ni and Li. After the filtration of phosphate impurities, the solution is ready for further processing, such as SX. As an unexpected result from the leachate processing, 20–30% of the Ni and Co co-crystalize as the double salt after cooling to room temperature, which could provide a shorter route to their recovery.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

Toward Sustainable Lithium Recovery: A Universal Hydrothermal Approach for Lithium Extraction

The rapid growth of lithium-ion battery (LIB) deployment presents critical challenges in sustainable end-of-life management and raw material recovery. Conventional pyrometallurgical and hydrometallurgical methods suffer from high energy demand, lithium loss, and complex wastewater treatment. This study established a universal, highly efficient, and sustainable hydrothermal route for lithium extraction and material recovery from various spent lithium-ion battery cathodes using 1,2,4,5-benzenetetracarboxylic acid (BTCA). The optimized process achieved over 99% lithium leaching efficiency for lithium iron phosphate (LFP) and LiNi x Mn y Co 1–x–y O 2 (NMC), with transition metal coleaching below 1%. It was also broadly applicable to lithium manganese oxide, lithium cobalt oxide, and black mass, achieving 98.5%, 98.95%, and 94.06% leaching efficiencies, respectively. The extracted lithium was directly converted into battery-grade lithium sources, while transition metals were recovered as oxides. Unreacted BTCA was efficiently regenerated and reused without degradation. Electrochemical evaluation confirmed that cathode materials synthesized with recovered lithium exhibit comparable performance to commercial products. Compared to conventional hydrometallurgy, the BTCA-based process increased revenue by over 40% and reduced greenhouse gas emissions by up to 39%. This closed-loop, chemistry-agnostic strategy offered a scalable and economically viable solution for industrial LIB recycling, enabling resource circularity and reducing dependency on primary critical materials.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

Mine Water Use, Treatment, and Reuse in the United States: A Look at Current Industry Practices and Select Case Studies

Mining provides significant economic value while often impacting local water supplies and environments because of freshwater usage and waste disposal practices. In this paper we identify current practices in mine water, including how water is used in mining, influent and effluent water quality, treatment technologies, and end uses with the goal of informing future research on implementable, reliable, and cost-effective advanced water treatment in the mining sector. This study also reviews the available literature to broadly evaluate mining in the United States and performs a techno-economic assessment on water use and disposal for three detailed case studies applicable to lithium, uranium, and copper mines. These case studies highlight specific industry examples of distinct extraction methods, geographical regions, and mined commodities. Hypothetical scenarios based on case study baselines revealed potential impacts to mine water available for beneficial reuse through the use of novel water treatment technologies and alternate water management strategies. Finally, an assessment of national level impacts resulting from the reuse of treated mine source water is presented.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗