COMPARISON OF MONTE CARLO AND IONIZATION CALCULATIONS FOR SPACECRAFT SHIELDING
Spacecraft shielding design by monte carlo and ionization calculations
RADIATION HAZARD↗
SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Results for “SPACECRAFT SHIELDING”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
A multi-shock concept for spacecraft shielding
A spacecraft-shielding technique is investigated in which the geometrical configuration and material used are emphasized. Ultrathin spaced shield elements are employed to repeatedly shock the impacting projectile to a high energy state that causes melting and vaporization. The ratio of the thickness of the elements to projectile diameter corresponds to a relatively small percentage of debris-plume mass that can be withstood by the backsheet. The strength of the backsheet is thereby reduced and employed in a specific configuration that prevents the debris plume from destroying successive sheets before the particulates reach the sheet. The primary benefit is weight reduction of 30 percent when compared to a 'Whipple shield' fabricated with the same material. The concept is shown to be effective against all impact types tested and produces minimal secondary debris.
Cour-Palais, Burton G.↗
Understanding the Response of Common Spacecraft Shields to Hypervelocity Impacts of Meteorite and Other Terrestrial Analog Materials
Micrometeoroid and orbital debris (MMOD) populations can vary significantly in composition, density, and homogeneity. Hypervelocity testing campaigns intended to design and optimize MMOD shields for spacecraft are recognizing the need to investigate shield response from different types of impactors that span the range of densities observed in the MMOD population, such as nylon, Al, Al 2 O 3 , steel, and Cu. These tests, however, still pre-dominantly employ spherical and homogenous projectiles. Adding any compositional or mineralogical complexity to the impactor, such as what would be expected from a polymineralic micrometeoroid, for ex-ample, will be concomitant with a more complex shockwave structure in the projectile after it impacts the outer surface of any type of MMOD shield. The magnitude of these complexities will depend on how varied the mineralogy of the projectile is, but in the case of a metal-bearing chondrite, the disparate shock impendence between adjacent metal and silicate grains will potentially create localized areas of shock focusing (local increase in nominal shock pressure), or shock shadowing (local decrease in nominal shock pressure). The response of a MMOD shield is generally predicted using a ballistic limit equation – a semiempirical curve, derived from hypervelocity testing data, that denotes a particle diameter (for a given set of impact conditions such as projectile density and impact angle) when a shield will fail as a function of impact speed. These curves exhibit inflection points as a function of impact speed that represent when the projectile experiences sufficient pressure to fragment, melt, or vaporize. The introduction of shock focusing and shadowing in a heterogenous projectile will add uncertainty to the predicted pressures needed to go through each transition, leading to increased uncertainty in the expected performance of the MMOD shield. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the performance of MMOD shields in hypervelocity tests against more complex, natural projectile materials. To this end we have conducted a comparative test series to begin investigating the impact damage caused by meteoritic and terrestrial-analog projectiles, to that of spherical Al projectiles of similar mass.
Impact testing↗
Nuclear reaction cross sections for spacecraft shield design
Nuclear reaction cross section data for spacecraft shield design, and for determining radiation dose effect on astronauts
Peelle, R. W.↗
Experimental nuclear cross sections for spacecraft shield analysis
Improved intranuclear cascade model for estimating cross sections in spacecraft shield design
Peelle, R. W.↗
Impact of Spacecraft Shielding on Direct Ionization Soft Error Rates for sub-130 nm Technologies
We use ray tracing software to model various levels of spacecraft shielding complexity and energy deposition pulse height analysis to study how it affects the direct ionization soft error rate of microelectronic components in space. The analysis incorporates the galactic cosmic ray background, trapped proton, and solar heavy ion environments as well as the October 1989 and July 2000 solar particle events.
Pellish, Jonathan A.↗
Impact of Spacecraft Shielding on Direct Ionization Soft Error Rates for Sub-130 nm Technologies
We use ray tracing software to model various levels of spacecraft shielding complexity and energy deposition pulse height analysis to study how it affects the direct ionization soft error rate of microelectronic components in space. The analysis incorporates the galactic cosmic ray background, trapped proton, and solar heavy ion environments as well as the October 1989 and July 2000 solar particle events.
Pellish, Jonathan A.↗
Experimental nuclear cross sections for spacecraft shield analysis
Experiments have been performed to validate and to supplement the intranuclear cascade model as a method for estimating cross sections of importance to spacecraft shield design. The experimental situation is inconclusive particularly for neutron-producing reactions, but is relatively sound for reaction cross sections and for proton spectra at several hundred MeV at medium forward angles. Secondary photon contributions are imprecisely known.
Peelle, R. W.↗
Probability Estimates of Solar Particle Event Doses During a Period of Low Sunspot Number for Thinly-Shielded Spacecraft and Short Duration Missions
In an earlier paper (Atwell, et al., 2015), we investigated solar particle event (SPE) radiation exposures (absorbed dose) to small, thinly-shielded spacecraft during a period when the sunspot number (SSN) was less than 30. These SPEs contain Ground Level Events (GLE), sub-GLEs, and sub-sub-GLEs (Tylka and Dietrich, 2009, Tylka and Dietrich, 2008, and Atwell, et al., 2008). GLEs are extremely energetic solar particle events having proton energies extending into the several GeV range and producing secondary particles in the atmosphere, mostly neutrons, observed with ground station neutron monitors. Sub-GLE events are less energetic, extending into the several hundred MeV range, but do not produce secondary atmospheric particles. Sub-sub GLEs are even less energetic with an observable increase in protons at energies greater than 30 MeV, but no observable proton flux above 300 MeV. In this paper, we consider those SPEs that occurred during 1973-2010 when the SSN was greater than 30 but less than 50. In addition, we provide probability estimates of absorbed dose based on mission duration with a 95% confidence level (CL). We also discuss the implications of these data and provide some recommendations that may be useful to spacecraft designers of these smaller spacecraft.
Atwell, William↗
Nuclear reaction cross sections for spacecraft shield design
Nuclear cross sections and center of sphere dose calculations for spacecraft radiation shielding research
Peelle, R. W.↗
Overview of active methods for shielding spacecraft from energetic space radiation
During the 1960's and into the early 1970's, investigations were conducted related to the feasibility of using active radiation shielding methods, such as afforded by electromagnetic fields, as alternatives to passive, bulk material shielding to attenuate space radiations. These active concepts fall into four categories: (1) electrostatic fields; (2) plasma shields; (3) confined magnetic fields; and (4) unconfined magnetic fields. In nearly all of these investigations, consideration was given only to shielding against protons or electrons, or both. During the 1980's and 1990's there were additional studies related to proton shielding and some new studies regarding the efficacy of using active methods to shield from the high energy heavy ion (HZE particle) component of the galactic cosmic ray spectrum. In this overview, each concept category is reviewed and its applicability and limitations for the various types of space radiations are described. Recommendations for future research on this topic are made.
NASA Discipline Radiation Health↗
Evaluation of Spacecraft Shielding Effectiveness for Radiation Protection
The potential for serious health risks from solar particle events (SPE) and galactic cosmic rays (GCR) is a critical issue in the NASA strategic plan for the Human Exploration and Development of Space (HEDS). The excess cost to protect against the GCR and SPE due to current uncertainties in radiation transmission properties and cancer biology could be exceedingly large based on the excess launch costs to shield against uncertainties. The development of advanced shielding concepts is an important risk mitigation area with the potential to significantly reduce risk below conventional mission designs. A key issue in spacecraft material selection is the understanding of nuclear reactions on the transmission properties of materials. High-energy nuclear particles undergo nuclear reactions in passing through materials and tissue altering their composition and producing new radiation types. Spacecraft and planetary habitat designers can utilize radiation transport codes to identify optimal materials for lowering exposures and to optimize spacecraft design to reduce astronaut exposures. To reach these objectives will require providing design engineers with accurate data bases and computationally efficient software for describing the transmission properties of space radiation in materials. Our program will reduce the uncertainty in the transmission properties of space radiation by improving the theoretical description of nuclear reactions and radiation transport, and provide accurate physical descriptions of the track structure of microscopic energy deposition.
Cucinotta, Francis A.↗
Inhibited Shaped Charge Launcher Testing of Spacecraft Shield Designs
This report describes a test program in which several orbital debris shield designs were impact tested using the inhibited shaped charge launcher facility at Southwest Research Institute. This facility enables researchers to study the impact of one-gram aluminum projectiles on various shielding designs at velocities above 11 km/s. A total of twenty tests were conducted on targets provided by NASA-MSFC. This report discusses in detail the shield design, the projectile parameters and the test configuration used for each test. A brief discussion of the target damage is provided, as the detailed analysis of the target response will be done by NASA-MSFC.
Grosch, Donald J.↗
Inhibited Shaped Charge Launcher Testing of Spacecraft Shield Designs
This report describes a test program in which several orbital debris shield designs were impact tested using the inhibited shaped charge launcher facility at Southwest Research Institute. This facility enables researchers to study the impact of one-gram aluminum projectiles on various shielding designs at velocities above 11 km/s. A total of twenty tests were conducted on targets provided by NASA-MSFC. This report discusses in detail the shield design, the projectile parameters and the test configuration used for each test. A brief discussion of the target damage is provided, as the detailed analysis of the target response will be done by NASA-MSFC.
Grosch, Donald J.↗
Impact of Spacecraft Shielding on Direct Ionization Soft Error Rates
No abstract available
Pellish, J. A.↗
Magnetic shielding of spacecraft hardware
Magnetic shielding of spacecraft relays and switches
MAGNETIC SHIELDING↗
Magnetic shielding
Spacecraft and component shielding against earth magnetic field - annotated bibliography
MAGNETIC FIELD↗
Development of Additive Manufacturing Technologies for 3D Printing of Spacecraft Heat Shields
Introduction: Ablative heat shields are an enabling technology for entry into planetary atmospheres. From the PICA heatshields used for several Mars rovers to the carbon phenolic material used for Galileo’s Jupiter entry probe, the heat shield manages the heat load transferred to the payload, protecting the sensitive scientific instruments carried on entry probes. The Additive Manufacturing of Thermal Protection Systems (AMTPS) project, an Early Career Initiative (ECI) funded by NASA’s Space Technology Mission Directorate and led by NASA Johnson Space Center, seeks to develop materials and processes for 3D printing ablative heat shields for spacecraft. Current methods for producing ablative heat shields are extremely labor intensive and re-quire extensive hands-on processes and quality control characterization. Additive manufacturing (AM) offers the possibility of reduced production times, improved reliability, and enhanced performance via graded compositions. Costs will also be reduced by reducing the time and labor required for heat shield production. Direct integration of the heat shield onto the structure during processing simplifies integration and reduces risk. Material Development: A critical challenge for the project is development of a material system that can (1) be printed in a near-net shape process and (2) perform well as an ablator. Achieving printability requires the material to flow under applied pressure, but maintain its shape once extruded from the printer nozzle. Ablative performance is measured by a multitude of markers, including char yield, char strength, thermal conductivity, and recession rate. Furthermore, there are several mechanical and thermal property considerations for vehicle integration including coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) and residual stress. AM technology will be leveraged to grade the material formulation and properties through the thickness of the heat shield, an architecture not possible with current manufacturing processes. To this end, “robust” material formulations have been pre-pared with higher density for use on the surface where most ablation will occur. “Insulative” material formulations, with lower density and lower thermal conductivity, are prepared for use in the depth of the heat shield. This graded architecture will re-duce the overall mass of the heat shield and reduce costs and/or increase scientific payload capacities. To achieve a material system with the required properties, multiple resins have been investigated in collaboration with NASA Ames Research Center. To tune printability and performance, resin additives were studied to improve flexibility of the cured material while maintaining acceptable ablative performance. Material coupons were printed and studied via a suite of mechanical and thermal characterization methods. Arc jet testing was conducted at NASA Ames Research Center to evaluate ablative performance and thermal protection under conditions expected in atmospheric entry. Manufacturing Scale-Up: A partnership with Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) aims to enable full-scale fabrication of a 3D printed heat shield. Leveraging expertise in manufacturing and 3D printing at ORNL, a mid-scale manufacturing demonstration unit will be built and tested, using a dual-layer ablative system printed directly onto the titanium structure. Work on robotic system integration is ongoing and efforts to scale up material mixing with a material compound will ensure accurate and homogenous composition. Flight Test: A hypersonic sub-orbital flight test will provide a rigorous test of material performance ranging from ablation, thermal management, and mechanical integrity. Design of the capsule has taken place in collaboration with the University of Kentucky. Data collected from the flight will inform future design efforts in material formulation, printing methodology, and heat shield-capsule integration.
additive manufacturing↗