Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “RADIOACTIVE WASTE PROCESSING”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records

Predictive modeling of crystal accumulation in high-level waste glass melters processing radioactive waste

The effectiveness of HLW vitrification is limited by precipitation/accumulation of spinel crystals [(Fe, Ni, Mn, Zn)(Fe, Cr)2O4] in the glass discharge riser of Joule-heated ceramic melters during idling. These crystals do not affect glass durability; however, if accumulated in thick layer, they can clog the melter and prevent discharge of molten glass into canisters. To address this problem, an empirical model was developed that can predict thicknesses of accumulated layers as a function of glass composition. This model predicts well the accumulation of single crystals and/or small-scale agglomerates, but, excessive agglomeration observed in high-Ni-Fe glass resulted in an under-prediction of accumulated layers, which gradually worsen over time as an increased number of agglomerates formed. Accumulation rate of ~53.8 ± 3.7 µm/h determined for this glass will result in ~26 mm thick layer in 20 days of melter idling.

Crystal accumulation↗

Performance-based simulants for Hanford radioactive waste treatment process testing

Radioactive wastes from nuclear fuel processing are stored in large underground storage tanks at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation. Treatment and remediation require that waste feed from the storage tanks be delivered to the Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant continually for the duration of the treatment mission. Furthermore, the complex physical and chemical processes required for this mission, the significant scale, and the hazardous nature of the waste necessitate the use of simulants in process testing. A new class of simulants, “performance-based simulants,” has been developed to match the process performance of the simulant to actual waste performance data.

Hanford tank waste treatment↗

Trisodium Phosphate Phases and Solubility in Alkaline Solutions Relevant to Radioactive Waste Processing

The U.S. Department of Energy’s Hanford Site faces significant challenges in managing millions of gallons of legacy radioactive waste, where phosphate precipitation can obstruct pipelines during retrieval and processing. To resolve long-standing inconsistencies in reported solubility and clarify factors governing trisodium phosphate hydrates, we examined the Na3PO4:NaOH:H2O system. Powder and single-crystal X-ray diffraction revealed that commercial precursors undergo transformations that produce multiple hydrates, including three previously unreported phases comprising an ordered polymorph of Na3(PO4)·12H2O·1/6NaOH, Na3PO4·5H2O, and Na3PO4·9H2O. Computational modeling indicated that the ordered dodecahydrate is more stable than its disordered counterpart, suggesting kinetic persistence of structural disorder. Solubility measurements were conducted with solutions prepared either from anhydrous Na3PO4 or from Na3(PO4)·12H2O·1/6NaOH and revealed that release of interstitial NaOH from the hydrate precursor elevated solution alkalinity, thereby significantly reducing phosphate solubility relative to solutions prepared with anhydrous Na3PO4 across 20–44 °C. These results begin to reconcile inconsistencies in prior solubility data and clarify how phase composition dictates phosphate precipitation under alkaline conditions.

Graham, Trenton R. (ORCID:0000000189078004)↗

Progress Updates for the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Project - 18327

The Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) Project is vital to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) mission to cleanup radioactive waste at the Hanford Site, located in southeastern Washington State. The overall WTP Project objective is to design, build, and commission the facilities and systems that will treat and immobilize approximately 56 million gallons of radioactive waste stored in Hanford's 177 underground storage tanks. The combination of technologies in the WTP makes it a first-of-a-kind facility at a scale larger than ever, built for radioactive waste processing. DOE is proceeding with its approach to complete the WTP Project in phases, which includes the following principal actions: - Completing construction of the Low-Activity Waste (LAW) Facility, Balance of Facilities (BOF), and Analytical Laboratory (LAB) (collectively referred to as LBL); - Implementing a direct-feed low-activity waste (DFLAW) process to treat low-activity waste independent of the Pretreatment (PT) Facility; - Resolving the technical issues associated with primarily the PT Facility; - Completing the design and construction of the High-Level Waste (HLW) and PT facilities to enable integrated WTP operations. In March 2016, a federal judge amended the 2010 Consent Decree 1 completion milestones for the Hanford WTP, which generally aligns with DOE's plans for completing the WTP facilities in sequence: - Complete LAW Facility hot commissioning: December 31, 2023; - Complete HLW Facility hot commissioning: December 31, 2033; - Complete PT Facility hot commissioning: December 31, 2033; - Achieve initial plant operations for the WTP: December 31, 2036. Having established milestones for completing the WTP facilities has enabled DOE to formally implement its plans for completing the WTP facilities in sequence, starting with the LAW Facility. In December 2016, DOE executed a contract modification and approved a change to the project's performance baseline to complete the LBL facilities and incorporate modifications needed to allow direct feed of low-activity waste to the LAW Facility. Significant progress has been made toward completing the design, construction, and planning for commissioning of the facilities needed to enable the DFLAW operations to commence as early as January 2022. In 2012, DOE partially suspended production work on the WTP's PT Facility and to a lesser degree the HLW Facility because of unresolved technical issues associated with those facilities. In September 2017, DOE acknowledged the WTP contractor had met all the criteria for full resumption of engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) activities for the HLW Facility. By December 2017, DOE had completed the actions needed to resolve the six of the eight primary technical issues associated with the PT Facility, with the remaining two issues expected to be resolved in the first quarter of 2018. Although significant progress has been made to prepare for resuming production activities for the HLW and PT facilities, DOE has made the decision to constrain EPC work on those facilities in the near term based on DOE's higher priority of completing the WTP facilities needed to begin DFLAW operations. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Transportation of Low-Level Radioactive Waste from KAERI to the Final Repository - 18179

The Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI) collects the radioactive wastes generated during the operation of nuclear facilities and R and D processes. Radioactive wastes are treated and repackaged according to the national radioactive waste management policy, and then transferred to the final disposal site at the Korea Radioactive Waste Agency (KORAD). After 2015, the wastes delivered to the final disposal site have consisted of spent filters and combustible wastes such as clothes and gloves generated during R and D or facility operation processes at KAERI. The wastes generated by each facility are collected at the radioactive waste treatment facility, then treated and repackaged in 200 L drums according to their generation characteristics, i.e. each drum contains waste of the same type from the same facility, and with the same date of generation. Then, a radionuclide inventory is obtained for the repackaged drum by using a direct measurement method such as the drum assay system, radiochemical analysis through random sampling or an indirect measurement method such as applying a scaling factor. When performing sampling of the radioactive waste drums, the waste samples with a high contamination are selected in a conservative approach as representative. The radioactive waste drums are inspected and checked for acceptability by the Quality Management Division of KAERI, and a preliminary inspection is carried out on-site by KORAD. At this time, the acceptability of the radioactive waste drums is assessed through visual inspection, the appropriateness of their nuclide analysis value is confirmed, and a survey or smear test of sample drums is performed. Drums that meet the acceptance criteria are transferred to KORAD after a radiation environmental impact assessment of the transportation. Since 2015, 1,084 low-level operational radioactive wastes have been transferred from KAERI to the final disposal site, and further preparation work is now being made for the transportation of additional drums. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Performance Evaluation of Decontamination Foam Containing Mesoporous silica NPs - 18453

It is necessary to secure decontamination technology that is easy to apply and minimizes the generation of secondary waste for large-scale equipment and large-area decontamination, which are difficult to be applied structurally when massive repairs or the decommissioning of a nuclear facility are required. In this respect, decontamination foam has a potentially wide application in the removal of contaminants from metallic walls, overhead surfaces, and elements of complex components and facilities. The decontamination efficiency can be enhanced by improving the contact time between the chemical decontamination agents and the contaminated surface through the introduction of stabilizers into the decontamination foam. In this study, the stability of a decontamination foam containing mesoporous silica NPs as a stabilizer and the decontamination performance of radioactive isotope contaminated specimens were evaluated. A process for waste liquid treatment after foam decontamination was also proposed. Decontamination performance tests using RI contaminated specimens were carried out in a decontamination foam prepared only with a solution containing only 1 wt% EM100 surfactant, and in a decontamination foam prepared with a solution containing 1 wt% EM100 surfactant and 1 wt% of various silica NPs. The stability of the decontamination foam was increased owing to the addition of various types of silica NPs. In particular, the liquid film thickness of the decontamination foam containing mesoporous silica NPs was the largest. As a result, the decontamination coefficient for RI contaminated specimens increased as the thickness of the foam liquid film increased owing to the longer contact time between the RI contaminated specimen and the chemical decontamination agent as the thickness of the foam liquid film increased. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Immobilization of Organic Liquid Radioactive Waste (LWR) in a Sulfur Composite Matrix at the BN-350 Fast Neutron Reactor Site, Kazakhstan - 18031

The immobilization treatment and final disposition of all forms of organic radioactive liquids, such as pump oil, spent solvent, tri-butyl-phosphate (TBP) and scintillation fluids, remain a significant challenge for nuclear waste generators and national regulators. The majority of nuclear nations have instituted regulations that require some form of encapsulation of treated organic liquid, notwithstanding LLW organic liquids that can be safely incinerated. In most cases cement is the designated material for encapsulation; however, cement can pose certain problems with the containment of treated organic liquids. In 2013, with funding from the U.S. Department of Energy - National Nuclear Security Administration through its Global Initiative for Proliferation Prevention Program (GIPP), a proven U.S. technology for the treatment of radioactive organic liquids was introduced at the BN-350 fast neutron reactor facility in Aktau, Kazakhstan. As the facility was undergoing full decommissioning, one hundred and sixty cubic meters of contaminated pump oil (including Cs-137, Sr-90 and U-235/238) contained in large above ground tanks had to be treated for final disposal. As a result of the research conducted over a two-year period, a new 2-step treatment process was invented by combining the U.S. solidification technology with a newly developed inorganic filler and molecular sulfur, referred to as radiation-resistant composite (RRC) to fully encapsulate the waste oil. The outcome of extensive test program indicates that the final form can reach up to 60 wt.% with a compressive strength of about 100 kg/cm{sup 2}. Preliminary conclusions indicate that RRC outperforms cement as an encapsulation form for final waste treatment which meets U.S. Nuclear Regulatory requirements for final disposal. This paper examines the preliminary experimental work that was conducted in Kazakhstan with the U.S. polymer technology and radioactive pump oil, and the subsequent secondary process of combining the solidified material into a homogeneous final form utilizing RRC. Topics covered in the paper include: - Kazakhstan's regulatory requirements for attaining an achievable waste form for acceptance, which led to the RRC invention; - Technical objectives for the application of polymer technology and RRC materials to radioactive liquid waste; - Polymer solidification with radioactive oil and the result; step one of the RRC process; - Description of RRC materials, their origin and chemical characteristics; - Process of combining the solidified polymer mass with RRC materials into a solid, homogeneous matrix; step two of the RRC process; - Experimental results including leaching data, waste loading estimates and heat process calculations to create the matrix; - Cost advantages of the RRC process over cementation; - Limitations of the RRC process; - Next steps to verify conformance of the RRC technology to the U.S. requirements. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Implementation of Increased Salt and Decreased Sludge Volumes in the Defense Waste Processing Facility - 19597

The Savannah River Site (SRS) Liquid Waste System (LWS) safely stores and treats high-level radioactive waste. The LWS consists of 51 waste storage tanks (eight of which are operationally closed and filled with grout), waste evaporators, treatment facilities, and solidification facilities such as the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) and Saltstone Production Facility (SPF). The disposition of high-level waste (HLW) into a glass waste form poured into canisters at the DWPF began in 1996. DWPF processed a sludge only flowsheet until 2008 when the Actinide Removal Process (ARP) and Modular Caustic Side Solvent Extraction Unit (MCU) began treating the salt waste from the underground liquid storage tanks by striking with monosodium titanate (MST) to remove actinides, when necessary to meet downstream acceptance criteria, and removing the MST and entrained sludge solids (SS) by filtration before using an organic solvent to strip the cesium from the salt, creating two new concentrated HLW streams. This change caused the DWPF to begin processing under both a sludge-only and a coupled operations flowsheet where salt streams would only be added when available. This strategy allows for continuous glass canister production at DWPF. Recently, DWPF completed a 10-month melter replacement in December 2017 and the Concentrate, Storage, and Transfer Facility (CSTF) has completed repairs to the 3H Evaporator system. These facility outages have caused delays in preparing the next batch of sludge feed for DWPF. Concurrent with these facility outages, the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) has been undergoing system testing and commissioning, working toward startup. SWPF is designed to process salt waste in the same manner as ARP/MCU, but with much higher throughput volumes produced per unit time. In order to process the SWPF salt streams efficiently, DWPF will implement a coupled operation only flowsheet. Based on the facility outages mentioned above, efforts have been made to identify strategies to minimize sludge volumes and maximize salt volumes in the DWPF until the next sludge batch is ready for processing in DWPF. Savannah River Remediation (SRR) recently performed an evaluation that examines the effects of reducing the volume of sludge and maximizing the addition of the cesium-rich concentrated salt solution in each Sludge Receipt and Adjustment Tank (SRAT) batch in order to extend the existing sludge batch as long as possible until the next sludge batch is ready. These effects include a reduction of weight percent solids in the DWPF processing vessels, an increase in cycle time, a new canister heat generation value that remains within regulatory limits, and higher gamma source that remains within bulk facility gamma shielding. Balancing the above parameters resulted in a small reduction of sludge volume per SRAT batch under SWPF operation and maximizing the salt volumes for both ARP/MCU and SWPF operation. This slight reduction in sludge volume and increase in salt volumes allows SRR to mitigate some of the schedule impact incurred by the facility outages. This strategy was evaluated for both ARP/MCU and SWPF operation. This strategy has been successfully implemented under ARP/MCU operation using small step changes in the current process. This paper provides an overview of the evaluation performed for DWPF with ARP/MCU and DWPF with SWPF operations. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Panel Session 57: Nuclear Power Plant Waste Management - LLW Processor Issues

This panel resulted in senior utility managers discussing issues with commercial LLW processors. LLW processors updated utilities/NPPs on new or different services or technologies being offered to assist in their radioactive waste management goals, changes to their facility license, revisions to their acceptance guidelines, and emerging compliance issues. Presentations proposed include: 1 - EnergySolutions Waste Processing Overview (Joe Heckman, EnergySolutions (USA)); 2 - Perma-Fix: A Nuclear Services and Waste Management Company (John Kelly, Perma-Fix Environmental Services (USA)); 3 - UniTech - 'Expanding to Reduce Costs' LLW Processor Update (Gregg Johnstone, UniTech Services Group, Inc. (USA)); 4 - Low - Level Radioactive Materials Processing (Michael Miller, Veolia Nuclear Solutions (USA))

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Use of Robotics in Liquid Waste System - {sup 3}H Evaporator, Tank Closure and Defense Waste Processing Facility - 18525

The Savannah River Site (SRS) Liquid Waste System (LWS) safely stores and treats high-level radioactive waste. The LWS consists of 51 waste storage tanks (eight of which are operationally closed and filled with grout), waste evaporators, treatment facilities, and solidification facilities such as the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) and Salt-stone Production Facility (SPF). At Savannah River Remediation (SRR), the liquid waste contractor, robotic technologies are needed to enter areas and spaces that are otherwise inaccessible or prohibit direct access by workers due to unsafe, unstable, or unknown physical or structural conditions; or configurations that are hard to reach or beyond reach without taking extraordinary mechanical measures. As discussed below, SRR uses robotic technologies at various LWS facilities to reduce dose to the workers as well as provide access to unreachable locations due to the presence of radiological or chemical hazards. (author)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Addressing the Legacy Waste Challenge - IAEA Activities in Support of Member States - 16304

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) promotes the safe and peaceful uses of nuclear energy including the safe management of radioactive waste. Although safe and effective radioactive waste processing technologies and practices are well established and widespread, the issue of legacy waste remains a challenge for many IAEA member states. The primary source of the world-wide legacy waste inventory has its origins in past nuclear weapons programs and associated research and development activities. Other sources include historical waste in old storage and disposal facilities that were either never intended to be a permanent end-state or are no longer considered adequate from a safety perspective. Additionally, many IAEA member states with less advanced nuclear energy programs, often have small inventories of legacy radioactive waste arising from medical, research and industrial activities but lack the processing capabilities to put these wastes into a safe form for storage and disposal. These wastes have the potential to create a safety and environmental hazard and pose a radioactive waste management challenge for many reasons including lack of characterization data and process knowledge, waste package degradation, or the presence of hazardous or mixed waste components. The Waste Technology Section (WTS) within the Department of Nuclear Energy at the IAEA has an extensive program of activities to support the safe retrieval, processing, storage and disposal of radioactive waste including legacy waste. These include publications, co-ordinated research projects, technical co-operation activities, and information exchange forums including workshops, technical meetings and virtual networks. This paper will present an overview of recent IAEA activities and accomplishments aimed as assisting member states with addressing their legacy waste inventories. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Session 078 - Panel: Start-Up of Three Major DOE Treatment Facilities -SWPF, IWTU and DFLAW (2/2) (R2.4)

This panel focused on the successes and challenges of the DOE High-Level radioactive tank waste management program, with an emphasis on the completion of construction and startup of three major treatment facilities - the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) at Savannah River, the Integrated Waste Treatment Unit (IWTU) at Idaho, and Direct Feed Low-Activity Waste (DFLAW) processing at Hanford. As a companion to Session 23, DOE managers and federal project directors discussed the status of facility startup efforts from a federal management and oversight perspective, highlighting readiness planning, challenges and lessons learned. Panelists with presentations: Transitioning Oversight: A Project Becomes an Operating Facility (James Folk); Tools for SU/C (Tom Fletcher); Startup and Commissioning -Integrate Waste Treatment Unit-Federal Perspective (Joel Case)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Modeling and Analysis of Coupled Flow Through Packed Beds as a Diagnostic Tool for Packed Bed Reactor Health - 17172

The US Department of Energy, Office of River Protection, is building the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) in Richland, Washington, to immobilize the hundreds of millions of liters of radioactive waste stored at the Hanford Site in Washington state. The offgas generated during vitrification of these wastes requires treatment to remove and/or destroy chemical and radioactive hazardous components before release to the atmosphere. In particular, volatile and semi-volatile hydrocarbon components are to be catalytically oxidized to carbon dioxide and water, whereas nitrogen oxides (NOx) are to be catalytically reduced to nitrogen and water. These tasks are accomplished in a series of packed bed reactors. Achieving the requisite Destruction/Removal Efficiency (DRE) for each of the tracked components is highly dependent on the flow characteristics of the offgas through the packed beds. The flow kinetics may be monitored and characterized during the initial warm-up of the system. The gases, initially at 76 deg. C (169 deg. F), (a) flow through one side of a countercurrent heat exchanger to recover heat from the exiting gases (which have already passed through the catalytic beds), (b) are then further heated electrically to approximately 400 deg. C (750 deg. F; the preferred operating temperature of the Thermo Catalytic Oxidizer (TCO)), (c) pass through the TCO where the reduced components of the offgas are oxidized over a supported Pt catalyst bed, (d) are partially cooled to approximately 315 deg. C (600 deg. F) by addition of approximately 25% (by weight) diluted ammonia/air mixture, (e) pass through the Selective Catalytic Reducer (SCR) where the NOx components are converted to N{sub 2} and H{sub 2}O over a supported V2O{sub 5}/TiO{sub 2} catalyst bed, and (f) exit through the hot side of the countercurrent heat exchanger. The electrical heater is not powerful enough to raise the temperature of the offgas to the desired 400 deg. C without the contribution of the heat recovered in the heat exchanger. Moreover, the thermal mass of the beds and housings of the TCO and SCR require a significant input of thermal energy to reach the desired operating temperatures; the better part of a day is required to bring the unit from ambient temperatures to operating temperatures. Therefore, the temperature of the stream during the initial warm-up of the system at each point in the system is dependent upon the thermal mass, flow dispersion, and permeability of the components, quantified as characteristic/representative volumes and residence times. By monitoring the temperature of the offgas as it enters and exits each portion of the system during this warm-up period one may model the system as a series of small Continuously Stirred Tank Reactors (CSTR)s (referred to as 'CSTRlets') to explain the flow kinetics through the catalyst beds. These component CSTRlets are adjustable in size and number, that one may model the flow profile of the gases through the catalyst beds. For example, a single large CSTR will present an effluent temperature profile with a simple exponential decay shape. Concatenating more CSTRlets generate more complex sigmoidal responses. Concatenating one CSTRlet significantly larger than the others in the train also alters the shape of the effluent temperature profile, in a fashion not replicable by a train of equal-sized CSTRlets. The ultimate goal is to accurately emulate the entire system as a representative CSTRlet train. Once accomplished, this characterization may be used in subsequent warm-ups (following shutdown for catalyst maintenance, for example) or by an intentional step change in inlet offgas temperature to detect/diagnose anomalies in flow through the beds (e.g., channeling or partial blockage.) This work presents development of this model through analytical, calculational, and empirical means. - The analytic model is accomplished by Laplace transform analysis of each component to recover component process transfer functions. - The calculational portion is performed via brute force finite element calculation. - Fitting empirical data from the warm-up of the TCO skid allows one to select the hypothetical CSTRlet trains which best fit the TCO and SCR beds for the analytical and finite element calculations. The first portion of this paper presents the development of the analytical (Laplace space) model of the coupled system. Estimated values for the initial temperature, mass, specific heat, electrical heat, and relative quantities of the offgas, catalyst beds, stainless steel housings, and ammonia dilution stream are used to generate expected temperature profiles at several selected junctures of the system. The number and size of the component hypothetical CSTRlets are calculated from the analytical model and are used to predict temperature profiles at the exit of the system and at intermediate junctions between system components (where thermocouples are present in the actual unit.) The finite element calculations employ a series of CSTRlet volumes to produce a similar suite of temperature profiles, for comparison with the analytical model results. Finally, empirical data from the Factory Acceptance Test system warm-up are used to select and compare the results from each modeling strategy to select the CSTRlet train(s) which best model the behavior of the actual system. This work presents a novel method of system component characterization, of value to the WTP plant and similar vitrification facilities as well as chemical process industries unrelated to waste management. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Status Update - Installation and Operation of GeoMelt{sup R} ICV{sup TM} Process in the NNL's Central Laboratory on the Sellafield Site - 16410

Thermal treatment of nuclear waste in the UK has seen much renewed interest recently, owing to the advantages that can be gained in terms of reduced waste volumes, compatibility with reactive metals and organics and its ability to treat mixed generic wastes. Vitrification is a treatment option which destroys organics and some hazardous inorganics such as asbestos, reduces wasteform volume, and produces a robust leach resistant wasteform. Kurion's GeoMelt{sup R} In-Container Vitrification (ICV){sup TM} is a vitrification process where the treatment vessel can serve as an interim-storage, transport, and final long-term storage vessel - thus negating the need to pour glass into a separate container, effectively leading to a much simpler system than traditional waste melters. The UK's National Nuclear Laboratory (NNL) and Kurion have entered into a joint project to deploy an active waste ICV{sup TM} plant based on Kurion's GeoMelt{sup R} technology, at NNL's flagship Central Laboratory on the Sellafield site. NNL is the UK's national laboratory for civil nuclear science and technology, providing advice to government, protecting key skills, supporting industry and delivering national nuclear programs. NNL is bringing the Kurion GeoMelt{sup R} process alongside its existing capabilities in thermal waste treatment. Kurion provides technology solutions to minimize and stabilize nuclear and hazardous waste through its families of technologies: access, separation and stabilization processes. The GeoMelt{sup R} plant being installed at the NNL's Central Laboratory creates a platform to evaluate the vitrification technology for the variety of wastes from the NDA estate and creates a treatment path for problematic waste streams that currently have no disposition pathway. With the diverse facilities under NNL management coupled with the NNL's ability to import wastes from within the UK and Europe, this arrangement with Kurion provides waste owners with treatment disposition pathways for problematic wastes. The Kurion / NNL team completed non-radioactive commissioning of a GeoMelt{sup R} ICV{sup TM} treatment system in 2015. Commissioning consisted of performing two tests at NNL's Workington Laboratory. Commissioning Test 1 involved vitrification of 367 kg of glass frit over the course of approximately 18 hours. Commissioning Test 2 consisted of processing 470 kg of soil and additives in approximately 27 hours. The soil processed in the second test was non-radioactive soil from Sellafield and was used as an analog for radioactive soil to be processed during radioactive commissioning at the Central Laboratory at Sellafield. All commissioning test goals were easily achieved and all subsystems operated as designed. Radioactive commissioning will be carried out in early 2016. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Repurposing Hanford Waste Tank AP-106 for Interim Storage of Treated Low-Activity Waste - 20044

Hanford Double-Shell Tank AP-106 is being repurposed to serve as the lag storage tank holding feed for the Direct Feed Low-Activity Waste (DFLAW) process at the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP). The repurposing process is the sequence of tank additions and transfers that will remove the Cs 137 inventory from AP-106. The repurposing process steps are designed to remove Cs-137 more effectively and efficiently as compared to regular supernatant transfers. The process steps are estimated to take 2-months to complete. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

The Evolution of Hot-Isostatic Pressing for the Treatment of Radioactive Wastes - 18276

Hot-isostatic Pressing (HIPing) was first developed by Battelle in the 1950's for applications in the nuclear program. The use of HIPing as a means of treating radioactive wastes was first proposed and patented in Sweden in the 1970's and subsequently gained traction in the US, where throughout the 1980's and 90's work was undertaken at Rockwell, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), and Idaho National Laboratory (INL) on waste-forms for US Defense wastes. This development was coupled with front-end processing options leading to conceptual plant designs which included hot-cell layouts and costings. Industrial maturation of hot-isostatic press (HIP) technology over the last 20+ years has seen it increasingly become a candidate for treating a variety of waste streams. In this paper, we discuss HIP concepts for treating radioactive wastes, present some recent work undertaken by the authors to demonstrate the feasibility of HIPing for sludge wastes and ion exchangers, and discuss the options and technology challenges for implementation. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Monitoring the Composition of Low-Activity Nuclear Waste using In-Situ Measurements - 19356

This paper presents a methodology for on-line monitoring of anion concentrations in low-activity nuclear waste simulants. The study was designed to evaluate and compare the performance of in-situ infrared and Raman spectroscopy probes for use in Hanford tank waste mixtures. Our contribution also explores the performance of various regression models to extract species concentrations from in-situ spectroscopic measurements. This approach can help facilitate processing under the Hanford Direct Feed Low-Activity Waste (DFLAW) project. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Design and Licensing of Irradiated Uranyl Nitrate Liquid Containers and Applicable Loading and Packaging System - 18481

Irradiated highly enriched uranyl nitrate liquid (HEUNL) solutions are typically residual materials resulting from the processing of uranium target materials in the production of radioisotopes. Traditionally, these residual materials have been processed and stored at the site of origin, due to the lack of an option for packaging, transportation and disposition. Modern alternatives to process, stabilize, package and dispose of these materials have been developed, but until recently there has not been a viable Type B package solution that could be used to ship these materials in sufficient quantities to justify the cost of an off-site disposition strategy. For this reason, most facilities that generate irradiated HEUNL materials have implemented on-site storage tanks or containers, resulting in the significant accumulation of HEUNL inventories worldwide. This paper provides an overview of the design and licensing activities for the development of sealed irradiated HEUNL transport containers to permit safe transportation of this material in the NAC Legal Weight Truck (NAC-LWT) cask. A description of the robust HEUNL container, licensing and fabrication is also presented. In addition, NAC has developed a specialized loading system to optimize the process to load, package and un-package HEUNL materials to minimize worker exposure during loading, and execute the packaging process efficiently for safe transport and retrieval. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗