DOE OSTI2015
As a new project and facility, the National Ignition Facility (NIF) located a Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), adopted a design standard that incorporated a safety criteria process that all equipment was to be designed with thorough design documentation and a level of safety evaluation that guaranteed tractability and success in the commissioning of this new asset. The documentation is in the form of a Mechanical Engineering Safety Note (MESN) or Engineering Note (EN), which is a complete stand-alone review document of each design, with backup support, detailed analysis, drawings and a full review committee signoff. The design safety review process was given conservative Factors of Safety (FS) and guidance to evaluated design adequacy, leading to robust support structures. The MESN, EN, FS and guidance requirements were primarily driven by a need for confidence in the early success of the facility and the importance of personnel safety concerns. As the NIF facility and operations have matured and design loads, usage and risks have been become well defined and empirically validated, and we now have an opportunity to streamline the design process by not requiring such strict adherence to historical practice, specifically for non-personnel safety related requirements. This streamlining helps support a congressional review that was performed on NIF to determine cost saving opportunities in all areas of operation and development. This proposed NIF design guidance design approach would save design time, schedule and material costs. The new design approach includes reductions in FS and reduction in formal documentation, and will be implemented through the release of a NIF Design Guidance Document. This document will be used actively by designers, project engineers, structural analysts, safety engineers, scientists and engineering management to prepare, evaluated and approve designs for NIF experiments. This document will also be used as a general supporting reference for all design reviews involving the active stakeholders. The active stakeholders will gain through a faster design cycle time, from requirements, to concept, to final design, using less expensive materials and fewer design iterations. The passive stakeholders will gain through lighter weight equipment, easier to acquire materials, easier to manufacture parts and shorter schedules to get equipment in the hands of the user.