Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Phase space stitching”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

3 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2012

TPSAS-NF1676L-13678-DND

An area that shows promise in enhancing structural integrity of aircraft and aerospace structures is integral stitched composite technology. The most recent generation of this technology is the Pultruded Rod Stitched Efficient Unitized Structure (PRSEUS) concept. The goal of the PRSEUS concept is to provide damage-containment capability for composite structures while reducing overall structural weight. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the Boeing Company, and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) have partnered in an effort to assess the damage-containment features of a full-scale curved PRSEUS panel using the FAA Full-Scale Aircraft Structural Test Evaluation and Research facility. The background, test plan, fixture modifications, pre-test analysis, and planned experimental procedure were presented at the 2011 Aircraft Airworthiness and Sustainment Conference. This follow-on paper and presentation will provide details of the experimental procedure, test results, nondestructive inspection results, and preliminary test analysis comparison. The test program included three phases of loading and inspections: Phase I, as-built; Phase II, with barely visible impact damage (BVID); and Phase III, with a two-bay notch severing the central stiffener. Axial tension, internal pressure, and combined axial tension and internal pressure load conditions were applied during each phase using load levels that demonstrate compliance with the strength, deformation, and damage-tolerance requirements of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 25. Pressure loads were based on an operating pressure of 9.2 psi, designated as 1P, and the axial loads were based on a design limit load (DLL) of 227 kip. The Phase I test results provided a baseline. First, 50 percent limit-load levels were applied for each of the three load cases to verify proper load introduction and repeatability by examining strain and displacement results. Next, three limit-load cases were applied: limit pressure of 12.2 psi (1.33 P), axial DLL of 227 kip, and combined 1P pressure and axial DLL. Linear strain and displacement results were observed in all load cases. For Phase-II testing, the panel was impacted to introduce BVID with an energy of 40 ft-lb, with the impact located between the central stringer stitch line and flange edge. The impact created non-penetrating visual damage with fiber breaks and delamination between the skin and stringer flange. Limit-load conditions were applied followed by pressure overload of 18.4 psi (2P) and ultimate load conditions, defined as 1.5 times DLL. Inspections were performed after each load case; no damage growth was observed. For Phase-III testing, a two-bay notch was machined severing the central stiffener. The panel was then subjected to limit-load conditions, followed by combined 1P pressure while increasing axial tension load to catastrophic failure. As limit combined loads were approached, damage initiation was observed in the form of 45? splitting at 1P + 79% DLL. Axial loading was increased to 1P + 150 percent DLL causing damage to propagate to the adjacent stringer flanges. Damage was contained within the two-bay region by the stitching rows up to 1P + 176% DLL. Axial load was further increased until catastrophic failure, when a stringer rod failed at 1P + 192% DLL. These test results further verify the damage containment features of the PRSEUS concept and suggest its appropriateness for future flight vehicles.

Andrew Bergan↗
NASA NTRS2011

Full-Scale Test and Analysis of a PRSEUS Fuselage Panel to Assess Damage-Containment Features

Stitched composite technology has the potential to substantially decrease structural weight through enhanced damage containment capabilities. The most recent generation of stitched composite technology, the Pultruded Rod Stitched Efficient Unitized Structure (PRSEUS) concept, has been shown to successfully arrest damage at the sub-component level through tension testing of a three stringer panel with damage in the form of a two-bay notch. In a joint effort undertaken by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and the Boeing Company, further studies are being conducted to characterize the damage containment features of the PRSEUS concept. A full-scale residual strength test will be performed on a fuselage panel to determine if the load capacity will meet strength, deformation, and damage tolerance requirements. A curved panel was designed, fabricated, and prepared for residual strength testing. A pre-test Finite Element Model (FEM) was developed using design allowables from previous test programs to predict test panel deformation characteristics and margins of safety. Three phases of testing with increasing damage severity include: (1) as manufactured; (2) barely visible impact damage (BVID) and visible impact damage (VID); and (3) discrete source damage (DSD) where the panel will be loaded to catastrophic failure. This paper presents the background information, test plan, and experimental procedure. This paper is the first of several future articles reporting the test preparations, results, and analysis conducted in the test program.

Bergan, Andrew↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Trajectory Engineering with Modular Patched Conics for Entry Systems and TPS (TEMPEST)

Brief Presenter Biography (35 word limit): Bohdan Wesely is an Aerospace Engineer in the Entry Systems and Technology Division at Ames. He has worked on a variety of projects for NASA including integrated TPS (thermal protection system) flight hardware deliveries and testing services for commercial partners. Introduction: TEMPEST is a new trajectory analysis framework that is designed to fill the gap between dedicated flight mechanics tools and aerothermal and TPS sizing tools. The project started as an SJSU master’s thesis and has since evolved into a general conceptual design tool capable of studying a wide variety of entry problems. Development is ongoing in the Entry Systems and Technology Division at NASA ARC. Why TEMPEST: Space missions involving entry into a planetary atmosphere involve a series of unique requirements across multiple disciplines. Whether it is traditional entry descent and landing (EDL), or aerocapture, the vehicle must navigate to its target landing location or orbit state, and the TPS must protect the payload during entry. The design process typically involves iterative handoffs between various flight mechanics, flow solver, and material response level tools. During the early conceptual phase, a wide variety of feasible trajectories are simulated in a Monte Carlo scenario which broadly satisfy the mission or landing requirements. Next, computational fluid dynamics (CFD), direct simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC), and other flow solver analyses are performed at various key trajectory points to generate an aero-database, heating and TPS design requirements also emerge at this stage. At this point, with updated aerodynamics from the various flow solvers, trajectories can be re-run, this in turn can change the required freestream conditions for the CFD tools, and as a project progresses, these analyses converge, and uncertainty is reduced. However, there is always a “hand-off” occurring between two inherently coupled phenomena. Analysis Description: One of the goals with TEMPEST is to use a variety of first principles estimation methods coupled with an atmosphere model to predict vehicle aerothermodynamics across the entire flight regime while propagating a 3 or 6 degree of freedom (DoF) trajectory. Aerodynamics methods include modified Newtonian, Maxwell and Cercignani- Lampis-Lord (CLL) for continuum, transitional, and free molecular flow regimes. Aerothermodynamics include boundary layer and reference enthalpy methods, and Mutation++ for non-equilibrium chemistry modeling. TEMPEST is also capable of stitching multiple trajectory segments together to study mission scenarios like multi-pass aerocapture and aero-gravity assists. Most of the program is implemented in MATLAB using modern system objects, it relies on several C++ shared libraries for supporting tools like Gmsh, the Global Reference Atmospheric Model (GRAM), and Mutation++. The various first principles aerothermal estimation methods are discretized across either a structured axisymmetric panel mesh or an unstructured tri-mesh generated from an open-source tool such as Gmsh, this allows solutions on the same mesh to be compared across tools such as CB-Aero. CFD Coupling. A physics-aware, gaussian process CFD anchoring scheme is proposed to adjust the various first principles methods as a CFD database is populated. One goal for this anchoring module is to inform the project where CFD should be run. Full knowledge of the entire trajectory, atmosphere, and aerothermodynamics allows for easier identification of high sensitivity areas and uncertainty quantification. While the first principles effects are well known and proven accurate in existing tools such as CB- Aero and Cart3D, a physics aware CFD anchoring scheme increases tool credibility across a project lifecycle. Material Response Modeling. Correct TPS sizing is critical for optimizing mass for science payloads and ensuring mission success. The process typically involves a thermal analysis along the trajectory with surface heating environments as a boundary condition. Several design constraints are maximum bondline temperature and maximum recession with various margining techniques. The material response tool FIAT, developed out of NASA Ames, is currently being integrated into the TEMPEST environment. TPS recession, shape change, mass loss, and mass property alteration are all factors that can perturb an entry trajectory. For missions like Mars 2020, recession was minimal and was safely handled separately as a post process. For missions such as Jupiter Galileo with a high TPS mass fraction or asteroid entries, recession plays a major role. The proposed fully coupled scheme is to use an epoch-based approach where the trajectory integration is halted after a recession threshold, the energy balance and FIAT are solved at each panel, the mesh, aerodynamics, and mass properties are updated, and the trajectory continues. Several computational tradeoffs have been made during the development of TEMPEST to limit the cost of a single trajectory and preserve its utility as a conceptual, rapid iteration tool. Conclusion: Development of TEMPEST is ongoing and the project is still in its infancy. This talk aims to showcase its unique capabilities to support future NASA entry systems missions.

Bohdan O Wesely↗