SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
PdF2 is Hydrophilite structured and crystallizes in the tetragonal P4_2/mnm space group. The structure is three-dimensional. Pd2+ is bonded to six equivalent F1- atoms to form a mixture of corner and edge-sharing PdF6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 52°. There are two shorter (2.13 Å) and four longer (2.22 Å) Pd–F bond lengths. F1- is bonded in a trigonal planar geometry to three equivalent Pd2+ atoms.
PdF2 crystallizes in the cubic Pa-3 space group. The structure is three-dimensional. Pd2+ is bonded to six equivalent F1- atoms to form corner-sharing PdF6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 60°. All Pd–F bond lengths are 2.19 Å. F1- is bonded in a trigonal planar geometry to three equivalent Pd2+ atoms.
Here, we report for the first time the formation of a HP-PdF 2 -type FeCl 2 phase (space group Pa$\bar{3}$), through high pressure-temperature (P-T) reactions in the hydrous systems (Mg 0.6 Fe 0.4 )SiO 3 –H 2 O–NaCl and FeO2H–NaCl in a laser-heated diamond-anvil cell up to 108 GPa and 2000 K. Applying single-crystal X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis to individual submicrometer-sized grains, we have successfully determined the crystal structure of the as-synthesized FeCl 2 phase, in agreement with our theoretical structure search results. In situ high P-T XRD data revealed the substitution of Cl for OH(O) in such a cubic Pa$\bar{3}$ structure, demonstrating that this topology is a potential host for both H and Cl in the deep Earth. The chemical analysis of the recovered sample showed that the post-perovskite phase contains considerable amounts of Na 2 O and Fe 2 O 3 . The coexistence of the cubic FeCl 2 phase and post-perovskite suggests that the lowermost mantle could be a potential reservoir of Cl. The possible presence of volatiles such as H and Cl in the deep lower mantle would impact the composition and iron valence state of the post-perovskite phase.
Abstract Isoprene has recently been proposed to be a signaling molecule that can enhance tolerance of both biotic and abiotic stress. Not all plants make isoprene, but all plants tested to date respond to isoprene. We hypothesized that isoprene interacts with existing signaling pathways rather than requiring novel mechanisms for its effect on plants. We analyzed the cis‐regulatory elements (CREs) in promoters of isoprene‐responsive genes and the corresponding transcription factors binding these promoter elements to obtain clues about the transcription factors and other proteins involved in isoprene signaling. Promoter regions of isoprene‐responsive genes were characterized using the Arabidopsis cis‐regulatory element database. CREs bind ARR1, Dof, DPBF, bHLH112, GATA factors, GT‐1, MYB, and WRKY transcription factors, and light‐responsive elements were overrepresented in promoters of isoprene‐responsive genes; CBF‐, HSF‐, WUS‐binding motifs were underrepresented. Transcription factors corresponding to CREs overrepresented in promoters of isoprene‐responsive genes were mainly those important for stress responses: drought‐, salt/osmotic‐, oxidative‐, herbivory/wounding and pathogen‐stress. More than half of the isoprene‐responsive genes contained at least one binding site for TFs of the class IV (homeodomain leucine zipper) HD‐ZIP family, such as GL2, ATML1, PDF2, HDG11, ATHB17. While the HD‐zipper‐loop‐zipper (ZLZ) domain binds to the L1 box of the promoter region, a special domain called the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein‐related lipid transfer, or START domain, can bind ligands such as fatty acids (e.g., linolenic and linoleic acid). We tested whether isoprene might bind in such a START domain. Molecular simulations and modeling to test interactions between isoprene and a class IV HD‐ZIP family START‐domain‐containing protein were carried out. Without membrane penetration by the HDG11 START domain, isoprene within the lipid bilayer was inaccessible to this domain, preventing protein interactions with membrane bound isoprene. The cross‐talk between isoprene‐mediated signaling and other growth regulator and stress signaling pathways, in terms of common CREs and transcription factors could enhance the stability of the isoprene emission trait when it evolves in a plant but so far it has not been possible to say what how isoprene is sensed to initiate signaling responses.