DOE OSTI2018
The Department of Energy (DOE) National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) and other critical stakeholders (e.g., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), state regulators, and industry) seek to more accurately characterize and quantify methane emissions from compressors and gathering lines within the Gathering and Boosting (G&B) segment of the natural gas system network. These efforts will reduce uncertainties in emissions estimates in USEPA’s current Green House Gas Inventory (GHGI) under their Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). For this study, four G&B stations in the Gulf Coast Area were visited four times over the course of one year. Components were classified according to equipment and component type and emissions from select components were measured using multiple measurement technologies. The following major equipment types were considered: i) compressors, ii) separators, iii) dehydrators, iv) coalescers, v) slug catchers, vi) yard piping, vii) tanks, and viii) gathering lines. Individual components on each equipment type were further divided into the following main categories: i) connectors, ii) valves, iii) pressure relief valves (PRV), iv) meters, v) gauges, vi) regulators, vii) pneumatic device vents, and viii) compressor vents (e.g., distance piece vents [DPVs] and rod packing vents [RPVs]). Components were screened for the presence of leaks and venting emissions with an optical gas imaging (OGI) camera, and methane emission rates were measured using a microdilution high volume sampler. Downwind emissions were measured using an Open Path Fourier Transform Infrared (OP-FTIR) Spectrometer. Data were evaluated to assess correlation with site, equipment, time, and operational variables. Key findings and recommendations from the study include: A) Different counting methodologies can result in vastly different component counts, thus influencing total emissions calculations using Subpart W population EFs. A standard methodology should be adopted for classifying and counting components in order to minimize inconsistencies across studies and instruct stakeholders responsible for GHGI reporting. B) Results support current component subcategories listed in USEPA Subpart W, including the subdivision of connectors (flanged and “other”) and pneumatic device vents (intermittent, continuous low bleed, and continuous high bleed). C) Emission rates vary across sites and a relationship between higher emissions and compressor age was observed for some components. D) Component emission rates varied between field campaigns. The type of components contributing to overall measured emissions also varied among field campaigns. However, the emission rate variability was larger between different components (of the same category) than the variability in one component over the four field campaigns. Therefore, when calculating emission factors, it is not necessary to take repeat measurements to capture component variability. E) Measuring the emission rate of a sample for an extended period of time is not necessary to capture the average component emission rate. F) For reporting purposes, excluding liquid lines from site-wide screening may have a negligible effect on component-related emissions. However, from a site management perspective, malfunctioning components were not uncommon on liquid lines and contributed substantially to fugitive emissions at some sites. G) Population EFs, whether including or excluding liquid lines, were a conservative estimate of fugitive emissions. Leaker EFs consistently underestimated emissions at the field sites. Measurements at more sites, particularity sites in other areas of the country, need to be completed before determining the accuracy of EFs.