Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “NUCLEAR ENERGY”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2015

Hadronic nuclear energy: An approach towards green energy

Nuclear energy is undoubtedly the largest energy source capable of meeting the total energy requirements to a large extent in long terms. However the conventional nuclear energy involves production of high level of radioactive wastes which possesses threat, both to the environment and mankind. The modern day demand of clean, cheap and abundant energy gets fulfilled by the novel fuels that have been developed through hadronic mechanics/chemistry. In the present paper, a short review of Hadronic nuclear energy by intermediate controlled nuclear synthesis and particle type like stimulated neutron decay and double beta decay has been presented.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2016

U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy, Nuclear Fuels Storage and Transportation Planning Project Modeling Tools

The U.S. Department Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy's (DOE-NE) Nuclear Fuels Storage and Transportation (NFST) is developing foundational capabilities and tools to support and inform the future deployment of consolidated interim storage and large-scale transportation of SNF. These tools include Used Nuclear Fuel Storage, Transportation, and Disposal Analysis Resource and Data System (UNF-Standards), Stakeholder Tool for Assessing Radioactive Transportation (START), Transportation and Storage Logistics (TSL), Next- Generation System Analysis Model (NGSAM), Execution Strategy Analysis (ESA), Multi-Objective Evaluation Framework (MOEF), and the Centralized Used Fuel Resource for Information Exchange (CURIE). (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2019

The Ultimate Fast Facts Guide to Nuclear Energy

Nuclear energy has been quietly powering America with clean, carbon-free electricity for the last 60 years. It may not be the first thing you think of when you heat or cool your home, but maybe that’s the point. It’s been so reliable that we sometimes take it for granted. Did you know about a fifth of the country’s electricity comes from nuclear power each year? If not, then it’s about time you get to know nuclear.

Source record↗
DOE OSTI2016

Uncovering Special Nuclear Materials by Low-energy Nuclear Reaction Imaging

Weapons-grade uranium and plutonium could be used as nuclear explosives with extreme destructive potential. The problem of their detection, especially in standard cargo containers during transit, has been described as “searching for a needle in a haystack” because of the inherently low rate of spontaneous emission of characteristic penetrating radiation and the ease of its shielding. Currently, the only practical approach for uncovering well-shielded special nuclear materials is by use of active interrogation using an external radiation source. However, the similarity of these materials to shielding and the required radiation doses that may exceed regulatory limits prevent this method from being widely used in practice. We introduce a low-dose active detection technique, referred to as low-energy nuclear reaction imaging, which exploits the physics of interactions of multi-MeV monoenergetic photons and neutrons to simultaneously measure the material’s areal density and effective atomic number, while confirming the presence of fissionable materials by observing the beta-delayed neutron emission. For the first time, we demonstrate identification and imaging of uranium with this novel technique using a simple yet robust source, setting the stage for its wide adoption in security applications.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗
DOE OSTI2016

Overview of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy's Nuclear Fuel Storage and Transportation Planning Project

The U.S. Department Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy (DOE-NE) is laying the groundwork for implementing interim storage, including associated transportation, per the Administration's Strategy for the Management and Disposal of Used Nuclear Fuel and High- Level Radioactive Waste, and to develop a foundation for a new nuclear waste management organization. The organization within DOE-NE that is responsible for this planning is the Office of Nuclear Fuels Storage and Transportation (NFST). The technical work to support this planning effort is being conducted by DOE's national laboratories. DOE's overarching goal is to develop options for decision-makers on the design of an integrated waste management system. The goal is to develop an integrated plan to (1) implement interim storage; (2) improve the overall integration of storage as a planned part of the waste management system; (3) prepare for the large-scale transportation of SNF and high-level waste (HLW), with an initial focus on removing SNF from the shutdown reactor sites; and (4) develop the foundational information, resources, and capabilities needed to support future implementation decisions and actions. Near-term objectives are to (1) develop and maintain an integrated plan to accomplish the Administration's Strategy goals, (2) improve integration of storage as a planned part of the waste management system, (including evaluating standardization of dry cask storage systems), (3) develop and evaluate design options for an integrated waste management system, (4) develop and apply systems analyses to provide quantitative estimates of system impacts of utility actions' impacts on the system and inform future decisions, (5) prepare for the large-scale transportation of SNF and HLW, (with an initial focus on removing SNF from the shutdown reactor sites), and (6) establish and maintain a unified, integrated SNF database and analysis system to characterize the input to the waste management system. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2017

White paper on nuclear astrophysics and low-energy nuclear physics, Part 2: Low-energy nuclear physics

In preparation for the 2015 NSAC Long Range Plan (LRP), the DNP town meetings on Nuclear Astrophysics and Low-Energy Nuclear Physics were held at the Mitchell Center on the campus of Texas A&M University August 21–23, 2014. Participants met in a number of topic-oriented working groups to discuss progress since the 2007 LRP, compelling science opportunities, and the resources needed to advance them. These considerations were used to determine priorities for the next five to ten years. In addition, approximately 270 participants attended the meetings, coming from US national laboratories, a wide range of US universities and other research institutions and universities abroad.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Summary of Industry Task Orders Completed by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy's Nuclear Fuel Storage and Transportation Planning Project

The Administration released its Strategy for the Management and Disposal of Used Nuclear Fuel and High- Level Radioactive Waste in January 2013. The Strategy includes a phased, adaptive, and consent-based approach to siting, and implementing a comprehensive management and disposal system. These plans include activities to establish one or more ISFs using consent-based siting and to prepare for large-scale transport of spent nuclear fuel (SNF). Nuclear Fuels Storage and Transportation Planning Project (NFST) completed the following three Task Orders, using industry Advisory and Assistance Contracts related interim storage and transportation. These design concepts provide important information to the waste management systems analysis regarding throughput capacities, operational considerations, and cost estimates. - Generic Design Alternatives for Dry Storage of Used Nuclear Fuel- Chicago Bridge and Iron (CBandI) developed and documented generic design alternatives for receipt and storage of SNF and greater-than-class-C (GTCC) waste contained in dual-purpose canisters. - Generic Design for Small Size Standard Transportation, Aging, and Disposal Canister System- EnergySolutions developed a generic design of a small capacity (4 PWR/9 BWR) Standard Transportation, Aging, and Disposal (STAD) canister. - Operational Requirements for Standardized Dry Fuel Canister Systems- EnergySolutions developed solutions to address operational impacts of using a standardized canister at utility sites with a smaller capacity than conventional, dual-purpose canisters (DPC). (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2015

Improving actinides recycling, a key step towards a more sustainable nuclear energy - 15617

Nuclear energy is thought to be one of the energy sources that could help mitigating the global climate change together with the renewables, due to its low green-house-gases emissions, its reliability and its high load power. However, nuclear energy will only develop if future nuclear energy systems meet the criteria of sustainability in terms of durability, bearability and liveability. Nowadays, many countries chose the so-called once-through cycle which basically considers spent nuclear fuel as a waste, whereas others reprocess their spent fuel to recover the energetically-valuable material Pu (and partially U) to produce Mixed Oxide Fuel (MOX) to be irradiated in a second cycle (twice-through cycle). Both options can be considered relevant, fitting diverse criteria; but if we consider a long lasting prospective for nuclear options, the once-through cycle sustainability is clearly lower (low consumption of natural resource, no recycling of potentially valuable energetic material, larger volume of waste...). Reversely, twice-through cycle can be seen as a first step towards an improved sustainability with a partial recycling of U/Pu and the reduction of the waste volume and toxicity. However, it is likely not sufficient for the long-term and implementing more efficient recycling is a key-driver to improve the environmental friendship, the economics and the social acceptability of nuclear energy. Future nuclear fuel cycles will have to better preserve the natural resource by improving the actinides recycling, to minimize the volume and toxicity of nuclear waste, to ensure their long-term confinement and to prevent any proliferation-risk. Such a gradual and progressive process calls for implementing appropriate technologies, either for reactors but also for fuel treatment/recycling facilities. This paper will describe the successive step that would allow improving the overall sustainability. Indeed, recycled Pu can be once recycled in MOX fuel feeding similar PWRs (Pressurized Water Reactor). Together with the recycling of reprocessed uranium, this first step already allows preserving ∼17% of the natural U resource and to confine ultimate wastes without Pu in a tailored durable wasteform. Subsequent Pu multi-recycling requires introducing Fast Reactors (FR) to efficiently use U-238 available in natural and depleted uranium stockpiles. In parallel, recycling processes would have to be adapted for treating spent LWR and SFR MOX spent fuels, which is currently under study thanks to an ambitious R and D program dedicated on MOX treatment and recycling. For the longer term, minor actinides recycling would allow decreasing the waste burden towards future generations: (i) Am-recycling leads to decrease the waste residual heat-power and increase the repository density and lifespan, (ii) Cm-recycling leads to decrease waste long-term toxicity. The stepwise implementation of these different processes defines a path towards sustainability for nuclear energy that are described in this paper from the fuel cycle viewpoint. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2017

Basic Research Needs for Future Nuclear Energy: Report of the Basic Energy Sciences Workshop for Future Nuclear Energy, August 9-11, 2017

Nuclear power today accounts for approximately 20% of the electrical supply for the US. It provides reliable energy that helps to stabilize the national grid. In contrast to current nuclear power facilities, future concepts operate at higher temperatures, are operationally more efficient, more fully utilize the energy stored within the fuel, and reduce the amount of waste produced. Recent advances in chemistry and materials sciences provide an unprecedented opportunity to develop the critical systems—the fuel, coolant, and structural materials—needed for deployment of advanced nuclear reactor designs. To address the challenge of stringent demands on material systems as their properties and performance continuously evolve over the operational lifetime, the frameworks to uncover the underlying processes that cause reduced performance have been developed over the last decade. There is now the prospect of designing materials that report upon their own damage, are self-healing, and leverage what would be considered deleterious chemical processes to increase their performance within advanced reactor designs. Success will provide an energy source needed to secure a stable and safe energy supply for the nation. To identify the key research directions required to discover the chemical processes and material degradation mechanisms that result in loss of performance of the fuel, coolant, and structural materials, nearly 150 theoreticians, computational experts, and experimentalists from industry, national laboratories, academia, and federal agencies participated in a workshop held in August 2017. Based on the discussions held at the workshop, five Priority Research Directions (PRDs) were identified. These PRDs defined the key scientific challenges that must be met as well as the opportunities that can be exploited to achieve a multi-scale spatial and temporal understanding of fundamental processes that govern the properties and performance of the different material systems required for advanced reactors.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2020

The Gulf Nuclear Energy Infrastructure Institute: A Multidisciplinary Educational Approach for Integrated Nuclear Energy Safety Security and Safeguards in the Middle East

The Gulf Nuclear Energy Infrastructure Institute (GNEII) at Khalifa University of Science and Technology was created as a regional institute offering education, research and technical services to support nuclear energy safety, security and safeguards (3S) objectives. A mixed methods approach—using the (1) Course Evaluation, (2) GNEH Alumni Survey, (3) Capstone Project and, (4) GNEII-Related Literature data sets—was used to evaluate the effect of implementing this multidisciplinary `3S' educational program and the broader impact of the associated `3S' multidisciplinary institute on nuclear energy human resource development. Data sets (1), (2) and (3) illustrate how well GNEII implemented this novel 3S curriculum and resulted in successful knowledge transfer. Data sets (2), (3) and (4) illustrate how well GNEII's impact has positively influenced professional workplace behaviors and the institute's broader reputation to support responsible nuclear energy program education. Furthermore, GNEII demonstrates one option for successfully providing a multidisciplinary, 3S curriculum to support broader nuclear infrastructure and human resource development aims.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗