SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
NAS (NASA Advanced Supercomputing) Division: Advanced Computing: High-End Computing Capability (HECC) Project; Quantum Artificial Intelligence Lab (QuAIL); NASA Earth Exchange (NEX); Data Analytics Infrastructure for NASA; Cloud Services for Science & Engineering Projects.
High Performance Computing (HPC) has become an integral part of NASAs Aeronautics research and application endeavors. HPC requirements for Aeroscience applications are increasing by leaps and bounds as scientists and engineers increase the fidelity of the simulations and the size of the engineering databases needed for NASA missions. In this talk we present several such applications and describe how they have benefited from the use of supercomputing. We provide an overview of the resources available at NASA Advanced Supercomputing (NAS) facility at Ames Research Center in Silicon Valley, and also describe the progress in performance of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) codes on current and future HPC technologies. We also discuss some of the challenges in efficiently exploiting the underlying computational resources for such codes.
For over 35 years, the NASA Advanced Supercomputing (NAS) Division at Ames Research Center has housed and managed the U.S. space agency’s largest supercomputing assets. Focused on high-end computing technologies, efficient operations, and user success, the NAS Division has worked with industry to deploy a series of highly successful systems that enable scientific and engineering achievements across NASA. The complementary role of the High-End Computing Capability (HECC) project is evolving to meet NASA’s future challenges in returning to the Moon as a pathway to Mars, while continuing exciting research in aeronautics, space exploration, and Earth science.
Presentation for the LaRC HPC Community monthly meeting series. Overview of the uPSP measurements system(s) at ARC, with a focus on the processing software applications deployed at the ARC NAS Division.
NASA has increasingly relied on high-performance computing (HPC) re- sources for computational modeling, simulation, and data analysis to meet the science and engineering goals of its missions in space exploration, aeronautics, and Earth and space science. The NASA Advanced Supercomputing (NAS) Division at Ames Research Center in Silicon Valley, Calif., hosts NASA’s premier supercomputing resources, integral to achieving and enhancing the success of the agency’s missions. NAS provides a balanced environment, funded under the High-End Computing Capability (HECC) project, comprised of world-class supercomputers, including its flagship distributed-memory cluster, Pleiades; high-speed networking; and massive data storage facilities, along with multi-disciplinary support teams for user support, code porting and optimization, and large-scale data analysis and scientific visualization. However, as scientists have increased the fidelity of their simulations and engineers are conducting larger parameter-space studies, the requirements for supercomputing resources have been growing by leaps and bounds. With the facility housing the HECC systems reaching its power and cooling capacity, NAS undertook a prototype project to investigate an alternative approach for housing supercomputers. Modular supercomputing, or container-based computing, is an innovative concept for expanding NASA’s HPC capabilities. With modular supercomputing, additional containers—similar to portable storage pods—can be connected together as needed to accommodate the agency’s ever-increasing demand for computing resources. In addition, taking advantage of the local weather permits the use of cooling technologies that would additionally save energy and reduce annual water usage. The first stage of NASA’s Modular Supercomputing Facility (MSF) prototype, which resulted in a 1,000 square-foot module on a concrete pad with room for 16 compute racks, was completed in Fall 2016 and an SGI (now HPE) computer system, named Electra, was deployed there in early 2017. Cooling is performed via an evaporative system built into the module, and preliminary experience shows a Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE) measurement of 1.03. Electra achieved over a petaflop on the LINPACK benchmark, sufficient to rank number 96 on the November 2016 TOP500 list [14]. The system consists of 1,152 InfiniBand-connected Intel Xeon Broadwell-based nodes. Its users access their files on a facility-wide file system shared by all HECC compute assets via Mellanox MetroX InfiniBand extenders, which connect the Electra fabric to Lustre routers in the primary facility over fiber-optic links about 900 feet long. The MSF prototype has exceeded expectations and is serving as a blueprint for future expansions. In the remainder of this chapter, we detail how modular data center technology can be used to expand an existing compute resource. We begin by describing NASA’s requirements for supercomputing and how resources were provided prior to the integration of the Electra module-based system.
The NASA Advanced Supercomputing (NAS) Division enables advances in high-end computing technologies and in modeling and simulation methods to tackle some of the toughest science and engineering challenges facing NASA today. The name "NAS" has long been associated with leadership and innovation throughout the high-end computing (HEC) community. We play a significant role in shaping HEC standards and paradigms, and provide leadership in the areas of large-scale InfiniBand fabrics, Lustre open-source filesystems, and hyperwall technologies. We provide an integrated high-end computing environment to accelerate NASA missions and make revolutionary advances in science. Pleiades, a petaflop-scale supercomputer, is used by scientists throughout the U.S. to support NASA missions, and is ranked among the most powerful systems in the world. One of our key focus areas is in modeling and simulation to support NASA's real-world engineering applications and make fundamental advances in modeling and simulation methods.
Recent developments at the NASA AMES Research Center's NAS Division have demonstrated that the new generation of NUMA based Symmetric Multi-Processing systems (SMPs), such as the Silicon Graphics Origin 2000, can successfully execute legacy vector oriented CFD production codes at sustained rates far exceeding processing rates possible on dedicated 16 CPU Cray C90 systems. This high level of performance is achieved via shared memory based Multi-Level Parallelism (MLP). This programming approach, developed at NAS and outlined below, is distinct from the message passing paradigm of MPI. It offers parallelism at both the fine and coarse grained level, with communication latencies that are approximately 50-100 times lower than typical MPI implementations on the same platform. Such latency reductions offer the promise of performance scaling to very large CPU counts. The method draws on, but is also distinct from, the newly defined OpenMP specification, which uses compiler directives to support a limited subset of multi-level parallel operations. The NAS MLP method is general, and applicable to a large class of NASA CFD codes.
The technology required to develop and manage a production metacenter or grid environment is an important ingredient in such a project. However, this technology may neither be the most difficult piece of the puzzle nor the one demanding the most patience and perseverance. This paper touches on the technical underpinnings of the collaborative effort that resulted in a production metacenter joining two cooperating IBM SPs, one at NASA Ames Research Center (ARC) and the other at NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC). The discussion then focuses on the problems attributable to differing environments, both physical and cultural, even though both sites were part of the same agency. The approach for the Phase I NASA Metacenter was centralized with most decisions made by the NAS Division at Ames. Also discussed is the distributed approach to resolving the even greater difficulties encountered in the multi-agency effort to modify NASA's technology to build a similar metacenter in the Department of Defense. The DoD Metacenter joins two DoD Major Shared Resource Centers (MSRCs), the Aeronautical Systems Center (ASC) MSRC at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base and the U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) MSRC. The final discussion focuses on similar problems that have arisen at NASA with the NASA Information Power Grid.
This document describes the design and plan of the Extended Operating Configuration 2 (EOC-2) for the Numerical Aerodynamic Simulation division (NAS). It covers the changes in the computing environment for the period of '93-'94. During this period the computation capability at NAS will have quadrupled. The first section summarizes this paper: the NAS mission is to provide, by the year 2000, a computing system capable of simulating an entire aerospace vehicle in a few hours. This will require 100 GigaFlops sustained performance. The second section contains information about the NAS user community and the computational model used for projecting future requirements. In the third section, the overall requirements are presented, followed by a summary of the target EOC-2 system. The following sections cover, in more detail, each major component that will have undergone change during EOC-2: the high speed processor, mass storage, workstations, and networks.
This report briefly discusses our preliminary performance experiments with parallel versions of OVERFLOW-D applications. These applications are based on MPI and hybrid paradigms on the IBM Power4 system here at the NAS Division. This work is part of an effort to determine the suitability of the system and its parallel libraries (MPI/OpenMP) for specific scientific computing objectives.
On behalf of the High Performance Computing and Modernization Program (HPCMP) and NASA Advanced Supercomputing Division (NAS) a study is conducted to assess the role of supercomputers on computational aeroelasticity of aerospace vehicles. The study is mostly based on the responses to a web based questionnaire that was designed to capture the nuances of high performance computational aeroelasticity, particularly on parallel computers. A procedure is presented to assign a fidelity-complexity index to each application. Case studies based on major applications using HPCMP resources are presented.
Planning complex missions requires a number of programs to be executed in concert. The Application Navigation System (ANS), developed in the NAS Division, can execute many interdependent programs in a distributed environment. We show that the ANS simplifies user effort and reduces time in optimization of the trajectory of a martian airplane. We use a software package, Cart3D, to evaluate trajectories and a shortest path algorithm to determine the optimal trajectory. ANS employs the GridScape to represent the dynamic state of the available computer resources. Then, ANS uses a scheduler to dynamically assign ready task to machine resources and the GridScape for tracking available resources and forecasting completion time of running tasks. We demonstrate system capability to schedule and run the trajectory optimization application with efficiency exceeding 60% on 64 processors.
This presentation includes a discussion of the Columbia 10,240-processor system located at the NASA Advanced Supercomputing (NAS) division at the NASA Ames Research Center which supports each of NASA's four missions: science, exploration systems, aeronautics, and space operations. It is comprised of 20 Silicon Graphics nodes, each consisting of 512 Itanium II processors. A 64 processor Columbia front-end system supports users as they prepare their jobs and then submits them to the PBS system. Columbia nodes and front-end systems use the Linux OS. Prior to SC04, the Columbia system was used to attain a processing speed of 51.87 TeraFlops, which made it number two on the Top 500 list of the world's supercomputers and the world's fastest "operational" supercomputer since it was fully engaged in supporting NASA users.
Faster than most speedy computers. More powerful than its NASA data-processing predecessors. Able to leap large, mission-related computational problems in a single bound. Clearly, it s neither a bird nor a plane, nor does it need to don a red cape, because it s super in its own way. It's Columbia, NASA s newest supercomputer and one of the world s most powerful production/processing units. Named Columbia to honor the STS-107 Space Shuttle Columbia crewmembers, the new supercomputer is making it possible for NASA to achieve breakthroughs in science and engineering, fulfilling the Agency s missions, and, ultimately, the Vision for Space Exploration. Shortly after being built in 2004, Columbia achieved a benchmark rating of 51.9 teraflop/s on 10,240 processors, making it the world s fastest operational computer at the time of completion. Putting this speed into perspective, 20 years ago, the most powerful computer at NASA s Ames Research Center, home of the NASA Advanced Supercomputing Division (NAS), ran at a speed of about 1 gigaflop (one billion calculations per second). The Columbia supercomputer is 50,000 times faster than this computer and offers a tenfold increase in capacity over the prior system housed at Ames. What s more, Columbia is considered the world s largest Linux-based, shared-memory system. The system is offering immeasurable benefits to society and is the zenith of years of NASA/private industry collaboration that has spawned new generations of commercial, high-speed computing systems.
This report provides a description and performance evaluation of the optimization techniques for high performance computing (HPC) implementation of the open source Computational Materials mini-application Aladyn (https://github.com/nasa/aladyn). Aladyn is a basic molecular dynamics code written in FORTRAN 2003, which is designed to demonstrate the use of adaptive neural networks (ANNs) in atomistic simulations. The role of ANNs is to efficiently reproduce the very complex energy landscape resulting from the atomic interactions in materials with the accuracy of the more expensive quantum mechanics-based calculations. The ANN is trained on a large set of atomic structures calculated using the density functional theory (DFT) method. While achieving orders of magnitude faster computational performance than DFT, the ANN-based approach was still very computationally demanding compared to the conventional approach of using empirically fitted energy functions. After its initial development, Aladyn was evaluated and optimized by experts at the NASA Advanced Supercomputing (NAS) division to exploit modern supercomputer architectures. The code has been optimized for execution on multicore central processing units (CPUs), including Intel® Skylake microarchitecture, and on graphic accelerators, such as Nvidia® V100 graphic processing units (GPUs), using Open Multi-Processing (OpenMP) and Open Accelerators (OpenACC) programming interfaces. The optimization achieved a speedup of 4.7 times the baseline version on CPU performance and an additional 2.4 times on CPU+GPU performance. Atomistic computer simulations are a fundamental tool in materials research to model material properties form physics-based first principles. Atomic interaction, governed by Quantum Mechanics (QM) require sophisticated and highly computationally demanding mathematical models to calculate [1]. Classical methods use approximate functional forms, empirically fitted through a set of variable parameters to emulate atomic energies as direct functions of atomic coordinates [2]. While empirical potentials are computationally much simpler, allowing simulations of large-scale systems of up to a trillion (1012) atoms [3], they are substantially less accurate compared to quantum calculations and applicable only to very specific atomic configurations or predefined crystallographic phases. A recently suggested approach is to use heuristic machine learning methods [4], such as those based on Adaptive Neural Networks (ANNs) to predict atomic energies, after being trained on a sufficiently large database of QM-calculated structures [5,6]. This approach reduces significantly the computational complexity, allowing for simulations of orders of magnitude larger systems compared to QM-based methods without compromising accuracy. Still, compared to classical methods using empirical energy functions, ANN methods remain two- to three orders of magnitude more computationally demanding. Hence, the computational cost of simulations, together with the need for extensive training of ANNs, still makes the practical implementation of ANN-based methods quite challenging. The purpose of the Aladyn mini-application software [7], available as open source at https://github.com/nasa/aladyn, is to be a testbed for exploring possible optimization strategies to develop highly scalable parallel algorithms for ANN-based atomistic simulations. Aladyn is aimed at utilizing the architecture of the high-end modern highperformance computing (HPC) hardware based on multicore central processing units (CPUs) equipped with graphic processing unit (GPU) accelerators. Specifically, the goal is to optimize the performance on a single HPC compute node, before implementing scaling to multi-node parallelization using message passing interface (MPI). At the same time, the open source code of Aladyn can serve as a training model for students and professors in academia.
Pressure transducers have been the instrumentation of choice for measuring unsteady flow phenomena. With recent advances in high-speed cameras, high-powered LEDs, and fast-response, pressure-sensitive paint, the unsteady pressure-sensitive paint (uPSP) technique has become a valuable alternative for production wind tunnel facilities, enabling time-resolved measurements of unsteady pressure fluctuations over a dense spatial grid on a wind tunnel model. Launch vehicle ground tests have proven to be a particularly well-matched application for uPSP due to the high signal level relative to tunnel background acoustics, relatively simple camera optical access, and rigidity of the model in wind-on test conditions. This presentation will highlight recent advances in data reduction of uPSP measurement data from recent launch vehicle wind tunnel tests at the NASA Ames Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel Complex (UPWT). The system can provide both localized surface pressure spectra as well as regional or zonal estimates of turbulence correlation model parameters. In addition, integrated vehicle-scale loads can be provided for buffet analysis. Data is reduced at the on-premise NASA Advanced Supercomputer (NAS) Division for just-in-time delivery of results during an ongoing wind tunnel test.
Pressure transducers have been the instrumentation of choice for measuring unsteady flow phenomena. With recent advances in high-speed cameras, high-powered LEDs, and fast-response, pressure-sensitive paint, the unsteady pressure-sensitive paint (uPSP) technique has become a valuable alternative for production wind tunnel facilities, enabling time-resolved measurements of unsteady pressure fluctuations over a dense spatial grid on a wind tunnel model. Launch vehicle ground tests have proven to be a particularly well-matched application for uPSP due to the high signal level relative to tunnel background acoustics, relatively simple camera optical access, and rigidity of the model in wind-on test conditions. This presentation will highlight recent advances in data reduction of uPSP measurement data from recent launch vehicle wind tunnel tests at the NASA Ames Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel Complex (UPWT). The system can provide both localized surface pressure spectra as well as regional or zonal estimates of turbulence correlation model parameters. In addition, integrated vehicle-scale loads can be provided for buffet analysis. Data is reduced at the on-premise NASA Advanced Supercomputer (NAS) Division for just-in-time delivery of results during an ongoing wind tunnel test.