Results for “Micro-macro coupling”

DOE OSTI2020

Interface learning in fluid dynamics: Statistical inference of closures within micro–macro-coupling models

Many complex multiphysics systems in fluid dynamics involve using solvers with varied levels of approximations in different regions of the computational domain to resolve multiple spatiotemporal scales present in the flow. The accuracy of the solution is governed by how the information is exchanged between these solvers at the interface and several methods have been devised for such coupling problems. In this article, we construct a data-driven model by spatially coupling a microscale lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) solver and macroscale finite difference method (FDM) solver for reaction-diffusion systems. The coupling between the micro-macro solvers has one to many mapping at the interface leading to the interface closure problem, and we propose a statistical inference method based on neural networks to learn this closure relation. The performance of the proposed framework in a bifidelity setting partitioned between the FDM and LBM domain shows its promise for complex systems where analytical relations between micro-macro solvers are not available.

42 ENGINEERING↗

DOE OSTI2022

Conservative DG method for the micro-macro decomposition of the Vlasov–Poisson–Lenard–Bernstein model

The micro-macro (mM) decomposition approach is considered for the numerical solution of the Vlasov– Poisson–Lenard–Bernstein (VPLB) system, which is relevant for plasma physics applications. In the mM approach, the kinetic distribution function is decomposed as $f$ = $\mathscr{E}$[$ρ_f$] + g , where $\mathscr{E}$ is a local equilibrium distribution, depending on the macroscopic moments $ρ_f$ = $∫_{\mathbb{R}}$ $efdv$ = $\langle$$ef$$\rangle$$_{\mathbb{R}}$, where e = (1, $v$, $\frac{1}{2}$ $v^2$) T , and $g$, the microscopic distribution, is defined such that $\langle$$eg$$\rangle$$_{\mathbb{R}}$ = 0. We aim to design numerical methods for the mM decomposition of the VPLB system, which consists of coupled equations for $ρ_f$ and $g$. To this end, we use the discontinuous Galerkin (DG) method for phase-space discretization, and implicit-explicit (IMEX) time integration, where the phase-space advection terms are integrated explicitly and the collision operator is integrated implicitly. We give special consideration to ensure that the resulting mM method maintains the $\langle$$eg$$\rangle$$_{\mathbb{R}}$ = 0 constraint, which may be necessary for obtaining (i) satisfactory results in the collision dominated regime with coarse velocity resolution, and (ii) unambiguous conservation properties. The constraint-preserving property is achieved through a consistent discretization of the equations governing the micro and macro components. Here, we present numerical results that demonstrate the performance of the mM method. The mM method is also compared against a corresponding DG-IMEX method solving directly for $f$.

71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSIC↗