Transonic Dynamic Stability Characteristics of Several Models of Project Mercury Capsule Configurations
Transonic dynamic stability characteristics of Mercury capsule scale model configurations
SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Transonic dynamic stability characteristics of Mercury capsule scale model configurations
In accordance with the basic design concepts of the Mercury Capsule, the manual and automatic control systems were developed to provide a redundant and integrated method of controlling the capsule attitude. The systems were designed to meet the requirements of ballistic and orbital flight, for normal and abort missions. Since the orbital mission includes all modes of control, it will serve as a basis for the system description.
Full-scale flight test from sea level of abort- escape system for manned Mercury capsule
Compilation of wind-tunnel heat-transfer measurements on afterbody of Mercury capsule reentry configuration
The approach to orbital thermal control of the Project Mercury capsule environment is relatively unsophisticated compared with that for many unmanned satellites. This is made possible by the relatively short orbital flight of about 4 1/2 hours and by the presence of the astronaut who is able to monitor the capsule systems and compensate for undesirable thermal conditions. The general external features of the Mercury configuration as it appears in the orbital phase of flight are shown. The conical afterbody is a double-wall structure. The inner wall serves as a pressure vessel for the manned compartment, and the outer wall, of shingle type construction, acts as a radiating shield during reentry. Surface treatment of the shingles calls for a stably oxidized surface to minimize reentry temperatures. The shingles are supported by insulated stringers attached to the inner skin. Areas between stringers are insulated by blankets of Thermoflex insulation. This insulation is especially effective at high altitude due to the reduction of its thermal conductivity with decreasing pressure. As a result of the design of the afterbody for the severe reentry conditions, the heat balance on the manned compartment indicates the necessity for moderate internal cooling to compensate for the heat generation due to human and electrical sources. This cooling is achieved by the controlled vaporization of water in the cabin and astronaut-suit heat exchangers.
C-band radar-beacon tracking of the mercury capsule
Effect of canted forward faces on static longitudinal stability characteristics of escape and exit configurations of Mercury capsule at Mach 2.01
On 10 June 1961, 33 tests of the aerodynamic response of the McDonnell model Mercury capsule were conducted. Variables included spin, different parachute tethers, and the addition of baffles.
On 11 May 1959, 24 tests of the aerodynamic response of the McDonnell model Project Mercury capsule were conducted. The initial test demonstrated free-fall; a parachute was used in the remaining test. Several tests included the addition of baffles.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The detailed preparation required in attempting a mission of the magnitude and scope of PROJECT MERCURY obviously cannot and need not be covered in a document of the handbook type. Prior to any actual attempt to launch a manned capsule, many weeks will be spent in an extensive training and familiarization program. The information contained in this manual, therefore, will pre-suppose a detailed knowledge of the capsule systems and will be confined, for the most part, to procedural data.
Trim effectiveness of aerodynamic control flaps on Mercury-type capsule
Afterbody pressure and heat transfer distribution, shock wave shapes, and photographs of local flow conditions for Mercury type capsule at Mach number 15 in helium
Thermal insulator for mercury capsule
Afterbody heating data on Atlas-boosted Mercury capsule during atmospheric reentry
Mercury capsule checkout and prelaunch testing
Effects of transverse barycenter displacement, conical afterbody, curved front face on mercury capsule supersonic aerodynamic characteristics
Flight performance characteristics of Mercury capsule ablative heat shield