Engineering PapersSearch

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Measurement noise”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records

Quiet Clean Short-haul Experimental Engine (QCSEE). Core engine noise measurements

Noise measurements were taken on a turbofan engine which uses the same core, with minor modifications, employed on the quiet clean short-haul experimental engine (QCSEE) propulsion systems. Both nearfield and farfield noise measurements were taken in order to determine the core internally generated noise levels. The resulting noise measurements were compared to predicted combustor and turbine noise levels, to verify or improve the predicted QCSEE combustor and turbine noise levels.

Sowers, H. D.

Investigation of the effects of a moving acoustic medium on jet noise measurements

Noise from an unheated sonic jet in the presence of an external flow is measured in a free-jet wind tunnel using microphones located both inside and outside the flow. Comparison of the data is made with results of similar studies. The results are also compared with theoretical predictions of the source strength for jet noise in the presence of flow and of the effects of sound propagation through a shear layer.

Cole, J. E., III

Edge-type connectors evaluated by electrical noise measurement

Electrical noise measurement system measures noise generated by edge-type connectors and circuit cards when they are subjected to sinusoidal vibration. It provides a signal across the contact area and monitors the signal change during vibration. Noise measured can be expressed as a varying change in total contact resistance.

Brummett, S. L.

Measured noise reductions resulting from modified approach procedures for business jet aircraft

Five business jet airplanes were flown to determine the noise reductions that result from the use of modified approach procedures. The airplanes tested were a Gulfstream 2, JetStar, Hawker Siddeley 125-400, Sabreliner-60 and LearJet-24. Noise measurements were made 3, 5, and 7 nautical miles from the touchdown point. In addition to a standard 3 deg glide slope approach, a 4 deg glide slope approach, a 3 deg glide slope approach in a low-drag configuration, and a two-segment approach were flown. It was found that the 4 deg approach was about 4 EPNdB quieter than the standard 3 deg approach. Noise reductions for the low-drag 3 deg approach varied widely among the airplanes tested, with an average of 8.5 EPNdB on a fleet-weighted basis. The two-segment approach resulted in noise reductions of 7 to 8 EPNdB at 3 and 5 nautical miles from touchdown, but only 3 EPNdB at 7 nautical miles from touchdown when the airplanes were still in level flight prior to glide slope intercept. Pilot ratings showed progressively increasing workload for the 4 deg, low-drag 3 deg, and two-segment approaches.

Burcham, F. W., Jr.

Measured noise of model fan-under-wing and fan-on-flap jet flap configurations

Noise measurements were made on two jet flap systems proposed for STOL aircraft. In one case a 14.0-cm- (5.5-in.-) diameter fan was mounted under the wing such that the exhaust impinged on downwardly deflected flap segments. In the other case, the fan was located on the upper surface of the flap such that fan and flap moved as a unit, with no exhaust impingement. Results for takeoff and approach fan speeds and flap deflections were used to estimate STOL airplane perceived noise levels. Internally generated noise directivity corresponded with fan axis orientation for the fan-on-flap, but no consistent redirection of internal noise was observed with changes in flap angle for the fan-under-wing. With the fan-on-flap arrangement, the wing shielded some fan inlet noise from the ground. Since no impingement of the exhaust on solid surfaces occurred, the external noise was jet noise alone. In contrast, for the fan-under-wing, the jet/flap interaction noise dominated the external noise except at angles near the jet axis even with no flap deflection. If internal noise is reduced by fan design and acoustic treatment, the jet/flap interaction noise will dominate.

Groeneweg, J. F.

Jet transport noise - A comparison of predicted and measured noise for ILS and two-segment approaches

Centerline noise measured during standard ILS and two-segment approaches in DC-8-61 aircraft were compared with noise predicted for these procedures using an existing noise prediction technique. Measured data is considered to be in good agreement with predicted data. Ninety EPNdB sideline locations were calculated from flight data obtained during two-segment approaches and were compared with predicted 90 EPNdB contours that were computed using three different models for excess ground attenuation and a contour with no correction for ground attenuation. The contour not corrected for ground attenuation was in better agreement with the measured data.

White, K. C.

Noise measurements obtained during engineering evaluation of two-segment approaches in a 727-200 aircraft

A series of noise measurements were made during engineering evaluation tests of two-segment approaches in a 727-200 aircraft equipped with acoustically treated nacelles. A two-segment approach having a 6-degree upper glide slope angle intercepting the Instrument Landing System (ILS) 2.9-degree glide slope at an altitude of 690 feet gave a 5-EPNdB decrease in measured noise at distances greater than 3 nautical miles from the runway threshold when compared with a normal ILS approach. Several of the noise measurements were taken under adverse weather conditions which were outside the specified limits of FAR Part 36. This may introduce uncertainties into the data from several approaches.

Tanner, C. S.

Noise measurements obtained during visual approach monitor evaluation in 747 aircraft

The results are reported of acoustic measurements made on the 747 aircraft during visual approach monitor evaluation approaches. This display is designed to improve approach and landing precision under visual flight rule conditions. The purpose of the acoustic portion of the test was to measure, evaluate, and identify the noise levels during various types of aircraft approaches. Six noise measurement sites were positioned on the centerline of the approach ground track. The six noise measurement stations on the approach ground track were positioned between approximately 1 and 6 nautical miles from runway threshold. The 1-nautical mile point was chosen as the beginning of the ground track because it is specified as the approach measurement point in the FAA noise certification requirements. The 6-nautical mile point was chosen for its proximity to the point where the approach is initiated.

Tanner, C. S.

Experimental clean combustor program; noise measurement addendum, Phase 2

Combustor noise measurements were performed using wave guide probes. Test results from two full scale annular combustor configurations in a combustor test rig are presented. A CF6-50 combustor represented a current design, and a double annular combustor represented the advanced clean combustor configuration. The overall acoustic power levels were found to correlate with the steady state heat release rate and inlet temperature. A theoretical analysis for the attenuation of combustor noise propagating through a turbine was extended from a subsonic relative flow condition to include the case of supersonic flow at the discharge side. The predicted attenuation from this analysis was compared to both engine data and extrapolated component combustor data. The attenuation of combustor noise through the CF6-50 turbine was found to be greater than 14 dB by both the analysis and the data.

Emmerling, J. J.

Some effects of the atmosphere and microphone placement on aircraft flyover noise measurements

The effects of varying atmospheric conditions on certification-type noise measurements were studied. Tests were made under various atmospheric conditions at two test sites, Fresno, California, and Yuma, Arizona, using the same test aircraft, noise, and weather measuring equipment, and operating personnel. Measurements were made to determine the effects of the atmosphere and of microphone placement on aircraft flyover noise. The measurements were obtained for characterization of not only the acoustic signature of the test aircraft, but also specific atmospheric characteristics. Data are presented in the form of charts and tables which indicate that for a wide range of weather conditions, at both site locations, noise data were repeatable for similar aircraft operating conditions. The placement of microphones at ground level and at 1.2 m over both spaded sand and concrete illustrate the effects of ground reflections and surface impedance on the noise measurements.

Hosier, R. N.

NON-THERMAL NOISE MEASUREMENTS NEAR PLANETS

Measurements of cosmic noise, solar and jovian noise bursts, atmospheric noise and whistlers and vlf emissions, for the study of planetary ionization and magnetic fields

WHISTLER

Ground noise measurements during landing, take-off, and flyby operations of a four-engine turbopropeller STOL airplane

Noise measurements were obtained for a four-engine turbopropeller STOL airplane during a Federal Aviation Administration flight evaluation program at the National Aviation Facilities Experimental Center. These noise measurements involved landing-approach, takeoff-climbout, and flyby operations of the airplane. A total of 13 measuring positions were used to define the noise characteristics around a simulated STOL port. The results are presented in the form of both physical and subjective measurements. An appendix is included to present tabulated values of various subjective reaction units which may be significant for the planning and operation of STOL ports. The main source of noise produced by this vehicle was found to be the propeller, and noise levels decrease generally in accordance with the inverse-distance law for distances up to about 457 meters. For similar slant ranges, somewhat lower noise levels were experienced during flyby than during takeoff or landing.

Hilton, D. A.