Carbonation cell materials compatibility
Material test and evaluation program for compatibility of materials with alkaline and acid electrolyte environments of carbonation cell system
Bannerton, N. P.↗
SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Results for “Materials Compatibility”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Hydrocarbon-fuel/combustion-chamber-liner materials compatibility
Results of material compatibility experiments using hydrocarbon fuels in contact with copper-based combustion chamber liner materials are presented. Mil-Spec RP-1, n- dodecane, propane, and methane fuels were tested in contact with OFHC, NASA-Z, and ZrCu coppers. Two distinct test methods were employed. Static tests, in which copper coupons were exposed to fuel for long durations at constant temperature and pressure, provided compatibility data in a precisely controlled environment. Dynamic tests, using the Aerojet Carbothermal Test Facility, provided fuel and copper compatibility data under realistic booster engine service conditions. Tests were conducted using very pure grades of each fuel and fuels to which a contaminant, e.g., ethylene or methyl mercaptan, was added to define the role played by fuel impurities. Conclusions are reached as to degradation mechanisms and effects, methods for the elimination of these mechanisms, selection of copper alloy combustion chamber liners, and hydrocarbon fuel purchase specifications.
Gage, Mark L.↗
Propellant material compatibility program and results
The effects of long-term (up to 10 years) contact of inert materials with earth-storable propellants were studied for the purpose of designing chemical propulsion system components that can be used for current as well as future planetary spacecraft. The primary experimental work, and results to date are reported. Investigations include the following propellants: hydrazine, hydrazine-hydrazine nitrate blends, monomethyl-hydrazine, and nitrogen tetroxide. Materials include: aluminum alloys, corrosion-resistant steels, and titanium alloys. More than 700 test specimen capsules were placed in long-term storage testing at 43 C in the special material compatibility facility. Material ratings relative to the 10-year requirement have been assigned.
Toth, L. R.↗
Material Compatibility with Space Storable Propellants. Design Guidebook
An important consideration in the design of spacecraft for interplanetary missions is the compatibility of storage materials with the propellants. Serious problems can arise because many propellants are either extremely reactive or subject to catalytic decomposition, making the selection of proper materials of construction for propellant containment and control a critical requirement for the long-life applications. To aid in selecting materials and designing and evaluating various propulsion subsystems, available information on the compatibility of spacecraft materials with propellants of interest was compiled from literature searches and personal contacts. The compatibility of both metals and nonmetals with hydrazine, monomethyl hydrazine, nitrated hydrazine, and diborance fuels and nitrogen tetroxide, fluorine, oxygen difluoride, and Flox oxidizers was surveyed. These fuels and oxidizers encompass the wide variety of problems encountered in propellant storage. As such, they present worst case situations of the propellant affecting the material and the material affecting the propellant. This includes material attack, propellant decomposition, and the formation of clogging materials.
Uney, P. E.↗
TRW materials compatibility study with ethylene oxide/Freon 12 decontamination processes
Organic materials compatibility with ethylene oxide and Freon decontamination processes
Okumura, J. K.↗
A Materials Compatibility and Thermal Stability Analysis of Common Hydrocarbon Fuels
A materials compatibility and thermal stability investigation was conducted using five common liquid hydrocarbon fuels and two structural materials. The tests were performed at the NASA Glenn Research Center Heated Tube Facility under environmental conditions similar to those encountered in regeneratively cooled rocket engines. Scanning-electron microscopic analysis in conjunction with energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) was utilized to characterize the condition of the tube inner wall surface and any carbon deposition or corrosion that was formed during selected runs. Results show that the carbon deposition process in stainless steel tubes was relatively insensitive to fuel type or test condition. The deposition rates were comparable for all fuels and none of the stainless steel test pieces showed any signs of corrosion. For tests conducted with copper tubing, the sulfur content of the fuel had a significant impact on both the condition of the tube wall and carbon deposition rates. Carbon deposition rates for the lowest sulfur fuels (2 ppm) were slightly higher than those recorded in the stainless steel tubes with no corrosion observed on the inner wall surface. For slightly higher sulfur content (25 ppm) fuels, nodules that intruded into the flow area were observed to form on the inner wall surface. These nodules induced moderate tube pressure drop increases. The highest sulfur content fuels (400 ppm) produced extensive wall pitting and dendritic copper sulfide growth that was continuous along the entire tube wall surface. The result of this tube degradation was the inability to maintain flow rate due to rapidly increasing test section pressure drops. Accompanying this corrosion were carbon deposition rates an order of magnitude greater than those observed in comparable stainless steel tests. The results of this investigation indicate that trace impurities in fuels (i.e. sulfur) can significantly impact the carbon deposition process and produce unacceptable corrosion levels in copper based structural materials.
Meyer, M. L.↗
NASA Engineering and Safety Center Technical Bulletin No. 24-01: Material Compatibility of Common Aerospace Metals in MMH/MON-3
The NESC evaluated material compatibility of some common aerospace metals in monomethylhydrazine (MMH) and nitrogen tetroxide (MON-3). Previous work had identified a lack of quantitative compatibility data for nickel alloy 718, 300 series stainless steel, and titanium Ti-6Al-4V in MMH and MON-3 to support the use of zero-failure-tolerant, thin-walled pressure barriers in these propellants. Static (i.e., not flowing) general corrosion and electrochemistry testing was conducted, evaluating varied processing forms and heat treatment of the metals, water content of propellant, and exposure duration. Corrosion-rate data for all tested product forms, fluids, and durations were on the order of 1 x 10 –6 inch per year rather than the previously documented “less than 1 x 10 –3 inch per year”. The majority of the corrosion products were seen in the first 20 days of exposure, with an overall corrosion rate decreasing with time due to the increased divisor (time). It is therefore recommended that corrosion testing be performed at multiple short-term durations to inform the need for longer-duration testing.
Heather K Hickman↗
Space-power-system Material Compatibility Tests of Selected Refractory Metal Alloys with Boiling Potassium
Turbogenerator material compatibility tests of niobium and tantalum alloys with boiling potassium
Moss, T. A.↗
Space-power-system material compatibility tests of selected refractory metal alloys with boiling potassium
Space power system material compatibility tests of selected refractory metal alloys with boiling potassium
MATERIAL TESTING↗
Materials compatibility in vacuum environment.
Polymeric materials, metals and lubricant compatibility with vacuum environment, considering radiation damage and thermal control effects
MATERIAL TESTING↗
RP-1 Thermal Stability and Copper Based Materials Compatibility Study
A series of electrically heated tube tests was performed at the NASA Glenn Research Center s Heated Tube Facility to investigate the effect that sulfur content, test duration, and tube material play in the overall thermal stability and materials compatibility characteristics of RP-1. Scanning-electron microscopic (SEM) analysis in conjunction with energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) were used to characterize the condition of the tube inner wall surface and any carbon deposition or corrosion formed during these runs. Results of the parametric study indicate that tests with standard RP-1 (total sulfur -23 ppm) and pure copper tubing are characterized by a depostion/deposit shedding process producing local wall temperature swings as high as 500 F. The effect of this shedding is to keep total carbon deposition levels relatively constant for run times from 20 minutes up to 5 hours, though increasing tube pressure drops were observed in all runs. Reduction in the total sulfur content of the fuel from 23 ppm to less than 0.1 ppm resulted in the elimination of deposit shedding, local wall temperature variation, and the tube pressure drop increases that were observed in standard sulfur level RP-1 tests. The copper alloy GRCop-84, a copper alloy developed specifically for high heat flux applications, was found to exhibit higher carbon deposition levels compared to identical tests performed in pure copper tubes. Results of the study are consistent with previously published heated tube data which indicates that small changes in fuel total sulfur content can lead to significant differences in the thermal stability of kerosene type fuels and their compatibility with copper based materials. In conjunction with the existing thermal stability database, these findings give insight into the feasibility of cooling a long life, high performance, high-pressure liquid rocket combustor and nozzle with RP-1.
Stiegemeier, B. R.↗
Materials compatibility issues related to thermal energy storage for a space solar dynamic power system
Attention is given to results obtained to date in developmental investigations of a thermal energy storage (TES) system for the projected NASA Space Station's solar dynamic power system; these tests have concentrated on issues related to materials compatibility for phase change materials (PCMs) and their containment vessels' materials. The five PCMs tested have melting temperatures that correspond to the operating temperatures of either the Brayton or Rankine heat engines, which were independently chosen for their high energy densities.
Faget, N. M.↗
ECLSS Universal Waste Management System (UWMS) Metal Materials Compatibility Study - Elgiloy: Electrochemical and Crevice Corrosion Evaluation
Electrochemical evaluations were conducted on samples of Elgiloy in support of the materials compatibility program for the Environmental Control and Life Support System (ECLSS). Results were compared alongside three previously tested metals: Titanium 6Al-4V, Inconel 625, and Hastelloy C276. Titanium exhibited the best results of all the metals, indicating superior corrosive nobility and galvanic protection properties. Elgiloy demonstrated anti-corrosion behavior which appeared to be superior to the two nickel-chromium alloys. For this current effort, the results have clearly shown that Elgiloy possesses excellent corrosion protection properties and is galvanically compatible with the other three metals in the subject test media.
Lee, R. E.↗
Diglycolamine Material Compatibility through Mechanical Testing
One promising candidate for use as a liquid sorbent in air revitalization technologies is a mixture of diglycolamine and water. This solution can react heavily with certain materials, putting a constraint on what materials can be used when designing and operating a liquid amine air revitalization system. Initial testing on materials has been done in the Air Revitalization labs at NASA Ames Research Center (ARC) through dunk testing of materials and physically checking for swelling, cracking, or any sort of corrosion of the material at hand. While this approach allowed for a quick way of material testing, a more thorough approach is favorable to allow for a database of compatible materials and their properties after contact with the solution for extended periods of time to be compiled. With this database, an air revitalization system intended for long-duration space flight can be designed and operated with confidence that the materials chosen will not degrade and need to be replaced over time.
Tiago Faria Costa↗
Material Compatibility Testing of Green Hydrazine
Green Hydrazine Propellant Blend (GHPB) is a new green propellant developed by Aerojet Rocketdyne and selected for continued testing at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC). It primarily differs from previous "green” propellants by maintaining traditional hydrazine as the base constituent, along with additives that are intended to increase handling safety by lowering the concentration of hydrazine in the vapor. GSFC has performed material compatibility testing. The scope of this campaign included materials that are common in spacecraft or ground support equipment (GSE), and also included typical safety materials (e.g. permeation rates through gloves). The conclusion in a broad sense is that GHPB is less reactive than hydrazine, including the absorption of metals into the propellant, as examined by Inductively-Coupled Plasma (ICP) analysis of metals uptake.
Eric H Cardiff↗
Passive Dust Mitigation Technologies Being Developed for Demonstration Under Patch Plate Materials Compatibility Analysis Task
With the Artemis program, we are planning longer stays on the surface, with more activities that have the potential to put the astronauts and equipment in contact with greater quantities of lunar dust. The success of these missions will depend on our understanding of material interactions with lunar dust and the development of ways to mitigate dust effects in cases where exposure to dust will lead to failure of components, unacceptable loss of power or thermal control, unacceptable loss of visibility, or health issues. Passive dust mitigation by coating or surface alteration is one method that is being developed and demonstrated under the Space Technology Mission Directorate’s Game Changing Technology, Dust Mitigation Program as part of the Patch Plate Materials Compatibility Assessment Task. The goal of the task is to alter the surfaces of materials in order to passively reduce the adhesion of dust, demonstrate their performance in relevant ground-based tests using lunar simulants, and prepare them for demonstration through experiment on the lunar surface. Optically transparent, sputter deposited, work function matching coatings are being developed to reduce adhesion of dust to windows, lenses and display panels by matching the minimum energy to remove an electron from the surface to that of lunar dust in order to reduce adhesion due to charge transfer. Low surface energy coatings and surfaces for thermal control are also being developed to reduce the bonding of dust with the surface enabling it to be removed more easily. Conductive coatings with the ability to shed dust more easily are being developed for use with the active Electrodynamic Dust Shield technology to help reduce the power needed to remove dust from the surface. Passive dust mitigation surfaces for metals such as aluminum, stainless steel, and titanium are being developed that reduce the area of dust contact with the surfaces through topographical modification using laser ablation patterning to impart hierarchical topographies with nanometer to micrometer length scales in a single step. Topographically modified polymeric materials, both those with extensive space heritage and those with lower technology readiness levels, are also being evaluated. Space suit fabric surfaces that can reduce dust penetration into and through the fabric are also being investigated as well as pristine and topographically modified ceramic materials that exhibit high wear resilience. An overview of the passive dust mitigation surfaces and coatings being developed under this task, ground testing being conducted using lunar simulants, characterization techniques, and materials preparation for flight sample delivery for integration into the Alpha Space Regolith Adherence Characterization experiment going to the lunar surface on a Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) lander in 2023 will be discussed.
Lunar dust, passive mitigation, lunar simulant, co↗
Patch Plate Materials Compatibility Assessment
Lunar dust proved to be a greater problem during the Apollo missions than was originally anticipated. The highly angular, charged dust particles stuck to seals, radiators, and visors; clogged mechanisms; and abraded space suits. As reported by Apollo 12 astronaut Pete Conrad "We must have had more than a hundred hours suited work with the same equipment, and the wear was not as bad on the training suits as it is on these flight suits in just the eight hours we were out.". Dust clinging to surfaces was also transport-ed into habitable spaces leading to lung and eye irritation of the astronauts. The Apollo astronauts were on the Lunar surface less than 24 hours and experienced many dust related problems. With the Artemis program, we are planning longer stays on the surface, with more activities that have the potential to put the astronauts and equipment in contact with greater quantities of Lunar dust. The success of these missions will depend on our understanding of material interactions with Lunar dust and the development of ways to mitigate dust effects in cases where exposure to dust will lead to failure of components, unacceptable loss of power or thermal control, unacceptable loss of visibility, or health issues. Through the Lunar Surface In-novation Initiative (LSII), we are initiating a Patch Plate Materials Compatibility Assessment project. The overall goal of the three year project is to develop passive approaches to mitigate Lunar dust adhesion to surfaces for technologies that are currently at TRL levels 2-3 to bring them to TRL level 5 through ground-based assessment, culminating in a demonstration flight experiment on a Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) lander in 2022-2023. This paper discusses the detailed technical objectives and approach for this project. References: Gaier, J.R. "The Effects of Lunar Dust on EVA Systems During the Apollo Missions," NASA/TM-2005-213610/REV1, (2005), Apollo 12 Technical Crew Debriefing, December 1, 1969, pp. 10-54.
Miller, S. K. R.↗
Materials Compatibility Testing in Concentrated Hydrogen Peroxide
Materials test methods from the 1960's have been used as a starting point in evaluating materials for today's space launch vehicles. These established test methods have been modified to incorporate today's analytical laboratory equipment. The Orbital test objective was to test a wide range of materials to incorporate the revolution in polymer and composite materials that has occurred since the 1960's. Testing is accomplished in 3 stages from rough screening to detailed analytical tests. Several interesting test observations have been made during this testing and are included in the paper. A summary of the set-up, test and evaluation of long-term storage sub-scale tanks is also included. This sub-scale tank test lasted for a 7-month duration prior to being stopped due to a polar boss material breakdown. Chemical evaluations of the hydrogen peroxide and residue left on the polar boss surface identify the material breakdown quite clearly. The paper concludes with recommendations for future testing and a specific effort underway within the industry to standardize the test methods used in evaluating materials.
Boxwell, R.↗