Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “MHTGR”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records

Multiphysics Simulation of Moisture-Graphite Oxidation in MHTGR

A small amount of moisture on the ppm level could present in the primary helium coolant under normal operations of High-Temperature Gas-cooled Reactors (HTGRs). One potential safety issue related to HTGRs is the chronic moisture-graphite oxidation, which could affect the integrity of the fuel blocks and reflectors in the reactor core, and the support columns in the hot plenum. However, it is infeasible to perform chronic moisture-graphite oxidation tests under the prototypic high-pressure, high-temperature conditions over a long period of time that is comparable to the full service time, i.e., 36 months for Modular High Temperature Gas-cooled Reactor (MHTGR). As an alternate, accelerated moisture-graphite oxidation tests at the atmospheric pressure and high moisture concentrations have been performed in the literature. Through these accelerated tests, global reaction rate equations have been proposed, which makes it possible to study the moisture-graphite oxidation numerically. This paper is aimed to establish a multiphysics model that can evaluate the moisture-graphite oxidation under MHTGR normal operation conditions. COMSOL Multiphysics was applied to couple the fluid flow, heat and mass transfer, chemical reaction and material structural changes. To reduce the calculation time, the prototypic three-dimensional (3-D) structures were simplified into a two-dimensional (2-D) simulation domain. The performance of four nuclear grades of graphite (IG-110, 2114, PCEA, and NBG-17) over a 36-month service period was then investigated under the most likely prototypic conditions of MHTGR. The simulation results indicate that most oxidation occurs in the three or four bottom fuel blocks due to their higher temperatures. In general, however, only a thin layer of 1 mm into the graphite will be considerably oxidized even for those three or four bottom fuel blocks.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Calculation of Helium Coolant Behavior in A Single Cooling Channel in MHTGR Reflector Region During Pressurized Conduction Cooldown Scenario Using the COMSOL Multiphysics Code

The objective of the calculation performed and discussed in this report was to examine the behavior of the helium flow through a single cooling channel in the modular high-temperature gas-cooled reactor (MHTGR) core during a pressurized conduction cooling scenario (PCC). The region of interest for the single cooling channel flow calculation is in the upper reflector blocks. Flow from the upper reflector blocks, during the PCC scenario, moves upward and into the upper plenum.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

OECD/NEA COUPLED NEUTRONIC/THERMAL-FLUIDS BENCHMARK OF THE MHTGR-350 MW CORE DESIGN: RESULTS FOR PHASE-I EXERCISE 1

This report presents the results from code-to-code comparisons for a prismatic modular high-temperature gas-cooled reactor 350-MW design for steady-state neutron transport calculations. Integral parameters as well as power and flux distributions are provided. Differences between solutions from diffusion and transport operators are analysed. Effects of control rod homogenization between full block and one sixth block are discussed.

42 ENGINEERING↗

IAEA CRP on HTGR UAM: Propagation of Phase I cross section uncertainties to Phase II neutronics steady state using SCALE/SAMPLER and PHISICS/RELAP5-3D

The IAEA Coordinated Research Project (CRP) on High Temperature Gas Cooled Reactor (HTGR) Uncertainties in Modeling (UAM) has been actively supported by the HTGR Methods group at Idaho National Laboratory since 2013. The INL team is responsible for the development of the prismatic reactor design exercises, based on the 350 MW General Atomics Modular HTGR (MHTGR). The focus of this paper is the reporting of the INL results obtained for the propagation of the lattice cross section uncertainties to the stand-alone neutronics simulation of the full MHTGR-350 core. For the nominal (i.e. best-estimate) model, a series of fresh and depleted single block and super cell SCALE/KENO and SCALE/NEWT models were developed at INL to assess spectral effects in the MHTGR-350, and a combination of these lattice cells were used to construct 8-group cross section libraries for use in the INL-developed PHISICS/RELAP5-3D code suite. The block-level homogenized libraries were assigned to the 220 fuel zones utilized in the MHTGR-350 PHISICS core model, according to the fresh and mixed fresh/depleted core loading pattern. A set of 1,000 perturbed NEWT lattice and PHISICS/RELAP5-3D core calculations were performed using the stochastic sampling module SAMPLER in SCALE 6.2. The paper discusses the mean and standard deviation values obtained for the eigenvalue, power offset and peak axial power density uncertainty results for this sequence of 1,000 lattice-to-core MHTGR-350 simulations.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Fully Ceramic Microencapsulated fuel in prismatic high-temperature gas-cooled reactors: Sensitivity of reactor behavior during design basis accidents to fuel properties and the potential impact of the SiC defect annealing process

We conducted reactor performance calculations to assess the potential design basis accident performance of HTGR fuel designs. Three Fully Ceramic Microencapsulated (FCM) fueled HTGR designs were developed in a previous work (Lu et al., 2018). The maximum fuel temperature in the cores fueled by these three FCM fuels was predicted to be higher than that in the reference 350-MWt mHTGR core in both normal operating conditions and during representative design basis accidents (Lu and Brown, 2019). To better understand the potential safety margins in mHTGR design basis accidents, we performed thermal-hydraulics sensitivity studies to investigate how maximum fuel temperature varies considering various parameters, e.g. thermal properties, within the ranges corresponding to the differences between the FCM-fueled prismatic mHTGR cores and the reference core with conventional fuel compacts. We found that the difference in the steady-state axial power distribution contributed the most to the difference in the maximum fuel temperature, in both normal operation and design basis accidents.Experimental data suggested that the annealing process of irradiation defects in SiC would be rapid at mHTGR relevant fuel temperatures. The bounding potential impact of the SiC annealing on the maximum fuel temperature was analyzed considering both the thermal conductivity recovery and the Wigner energy release due to the annealing of SiC. We found that the defect annealing process in SiC would at most increase the peak maximum fuel temperature of an FCM-fueled core by 40 K in loss of forced cooling accidents and by 10 K in a control rod withdrawal accident. Finally, additional experiments on the SiC defect annealing kinetics and Wigner energy release in more relevant conditions are needed.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Multi-Scale Modeling of Thermal-Fluid Phenomena Related to Loss of Forced Circulation Transient in HTGRs

Under the support of DOE-NE’s Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS), an effort had been pursued to support High Temperature Gas-cooled Reactors (HTGR) technology development and its modeling and simulation needs. There was a particular need for advanced modeling & simulation tools to predict thermal-fluid behavior in the nuclear reactor primary system, especially the core and lower and upper plena, during safety-related transients. In this report, two main such activities were presented: 1) system level HTGR simulations using system analysis code SAM for both normal operating and accident conditions; and 2) three-dimensional (3D) computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations on Deteriorated Turbulent Heat Transfer (DTHT) of interest to HTGR transients, including code benchmark and closure correlation development. In this work, Modular High Temperature Gas-cooled Reactor (MHTGR) full loop simulations were performed using System Analysis Module (SAM) code. Two approaches were used to model the reactor core; (i) unit-cell or lumped parameter model, and (ii) detailed ring model, to address the different needs under different reactor conditions. Aside from the core model changes other reactor components in the primary system, such as upper/lower plenum, heat exchanger and blower etc, were kept the same. In the unit-cell core model, the lumped parameter approach was used to model the coolant channels and the heat structures using 1-D and 2-D components, respectively. The fuel assembly heat structure was modeled based on unit-cell thickness approximation. In normal and controlled operating conditions, the calculated maximum temperatures for both coolant and heat structures were within the designed limits. The unit-cell model is, however, not able to capture the radial heat conduction through fuel assemblies, which is the dominant heat transfer mechanism during accident transients, such as pressurized conduction cooldown (PCC) event. To address this modeling challenge, ring models were developed. A simplified ring model was developed first. In this simplified model, the active core was simulated with 9 circular rings consists of 6 rings for homogenized fuel heat structure and 3 rings for gas coolant. It was quickly found that this model gives rather large simulation error as it was not able to correctly capture the solid structure representative geometries. A detailed ring model was developed to address this issue. The active core was simulated with 99 circular rings consists of 66 rings for homogenized fuel heat structure and 33 rings for gas coolant. In both ring models, six additional rings were included to represent inner reflector, outer reflector, core barrel, Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV), RPV coolant channel, and Reactive Cavity Cooling System (RCCS). The detailed ring model was applied in two different SAM simulations; (i) normal operating conditions, and (ii) accident scenarios (more specifically, PCC event), for MHTGR design. In both simulations, the SAM calculated results for coolant and heat structure temperatures were within the reactor designed limits. The newly proposed detailed ring model approach in this work has proved to be a promising method to address the challenging modeling and simulation needs in the MHTGR design. As demonstrated in this work, this model was suitable for MHTGR simulations under both normal and accident conditions. Apart from the SAM model development for gas-cooled reactors, 3D Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) models were developed and validated with relaminarized Deteriorated Turbulent Heat Transfer (DTHT) MIT benchmark test. Two different CFD codes, Nek5000 and STAR-CCM+, were used for this benchmark activity. Compared with MIT data, Nek5000 shows very good agreement between its simulated and experimentally measured wall temperatures. In contrast, STAR-CCM+ under-predicted wall temperature due to over predicted turbulence in the wall region. The Nek5000 code was also used to develop wall-heat transfer correlations for laminar flow in cylindrical tube. Several simulations were performed for various Reynolds flow and wall heat fluxes. Significant deviations were found when compared the predicted heat transfer coefficient and the Sieder-Tate correlation. A new set of heat transfer correlation was proposed for laminar flow which is valid for 400<Re<2000.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Modular high temperature gas reactor core modeling with RELAP5-3D/PHISICS – Optimization schemes for load following

The objective of this study is to develop a 3D/NK model to study the load following operation of a Modular High-Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor (MHTGR). The selected design is the 350 MW prismatic, graphite moderated, helium cooled thermal reactor based on the MHTGR-350 transient benchmark led by the High-Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor (HTGR) Methods Core Simulation Group at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) in the framework of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Nuclear Energy Agency (OECD/NEA). This kind of reactor usually reacts very slowly to the perturbation of the core parameters due to the large amount of graphite in the core. This kind of behavior promotes the reactor stability but on the other hand limits the reactor load-following operability. Recently advances in gas reactor designs have made load-following in gas reactors a feasible and achievable goal. Modern nuclear reactors (such as the MHTGR-350) are designed to withstand the structural stresses associated with load-following. Operating the reactor in load-following mode will inevitably reduce the load factor. Although a higher load factor means more revenue and the best usage of the fuel, following the variable energy demand will increase the maximum achievable fraction of generated nuclear power, being no more limited to the base load power generation. In general, if low impact on material aging and the safe operability are demonstrated the plant economics will be minimally affected. In order to ensure that the system can be safely operated in a load-following mode an extensively study has been carried out. Some tests with linear coolant mass flow rate change demonstrated that the reactor behavior is suitable for operation in load following mode. This assumption has been confirmed by a 4 days load following transient test in which the reactor supplied the requested power with a negligible error.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Graphite waste classification and disposal cost estimation for high temperature gas and salt reactors

As high-temperature reactor designs progress to demonstration, managing the radioactive wastes from these systems presents unique challenges. This work explores the irradiated graphite source term produced by three reactor designs: The Modular High Temperature Gas reactor (MHTGR), a pebble-bed High Temperature Gas Reactor (pb-HTGR), and a Fluoride-cooled High-temperature Reactor (FHR). We predicted a C-14 concentration of 4.3 Ci/m 3 for the MHTGR, 1.2 Ci/m 3 for the pebble bed HTGR, and 2.5 Ci/m 3 for the gFHR after 20 years of operation. The final C-14 concentration highly depended on the graphite nitrogen impurity, a major precursor for C-14. The C-14 concentration in all reactor types exceeded the 0.8 Ci/m3 threshold, resulting in a Class C waste classification. The costs associated with accepting the graphite after 20 years in a low-level waste disposal facility were projected to be 255 dollars per kWe for the MHTGR, 248 dollars per kWe for the pb-HTGR, and 56.8 dollars per kWe for the FHR.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

IAEA Coordinated Research Project on HTGR Physics, Thermal Hydraulics, and Depletion Uncertainty Analysis: PHISICS/RELAP5-3D Results for the Phase III Coupled Core Exercises

This report details the Parallel and Highly Innovative Simulation for INL Code System (PHISICS)/Reactor Excursions and Leak Analysis Program (RELAP5)-3D results obtained for the neutronics stand-alone core exercises defined for Phase II of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Coordinated Research Project (CRP) on high-temperature gas cooled reactor (HTGR) uncertainty analysis in modeling (UAM). The Phase II models and results are linked to the earlier Standardized Computer Analyses for Licensing Evaluation (SCALE)/Sampler/New ESC-based Weighting Transport (NEWT) data generated for the lattice physics (lattice) stage Phase I of the CRP. The focus of this report is the propagation of cross-section uncertainties from the lattice to the core calculation (core) phase of the prismatic 350 megawatt (MW) General Atomics (GA) Modular HTGR (MHTGR). The Phase II neutronics exercises consist of two sub-cases (II-2a and II-2b) specified for the fresh and mixed core loading of the MHTGR-350 prismatic high-temperature reactor design. Exercises II-2a and II-2b are performed without temperature feedback using isothermal temperature profiles. For the nominal lattice physics (i.e., best-estimate) model, a series of fresh and depleted single block and super cell SCALE/KENO and SCALE/NEWT models were developed at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) to assess the impact of spectral effects on the few-group cross sections. A combination of these lattice cells were used in a super cell calculation to construct 8-group cross-section libraries for use in the INL-developed PHISICS/RELAP5-3D code suite. The block-level homogenized libraries were assigned to the 220 fuel zones utilized in the MHTGR-350 PHISICS core model, according to the fresh and mixed fresh/depleted core loading pattern. In order to evaluate the effect of uncertainty propagation, several sets consisting of 1,000 perturbed NEWT lattice and PHISICS/RELAP5-3D core calculations were performed using the SCALE 6.2 ENDF/B-VII.1 cross-section co-variance data and the stochastic sampling module Sampler in SCALE 6.2.0. The Figures of Merit (FOM) investigated include the mean and standard deviation uncertainty values obtained for the eigenvalues, control rod worth values, block-averaged power profiles, power axial offsets, and isothermal temperature feedback coefficients. A sensitivity study on the main nuclide reaction contributors to the FOM uncertainties has not yet been performed since the SCALE/PHISICS/RAVEN coupling with ENDF/B-VII co-variance data is still being developed. It was found that uncertainties in the cross sections lead to uncertainties in the local power values of up to 1.5%. The variances between the fresh and mixed/depleted core models are not as large as the axial variations between the top and bottom within each core model. The core eigenvalue uncertainty is approximately 0.5%, which is significant in comparison to typical eigenvalue difference targets (less than ~0.1% for LWRs). The power peaking and axial offset uncertainties are smaller (0.10% – 0.15%) and probably below the level of significance in typical core design metrics. The use of an 8-group energy structure slightly under-estimates some of the uncertainties, but in absolute terms, the uncertainty results are reasonably close to the 26-group results. The 26- and 8-group mean and nominal results differ by a larger degree, and if it can be afforded in terms of calculation resources, the 26-group structure should be used for HTGR calculations. The 8-group structure can, however, still be useful for reasonably accurate uncertainty assessments of transient cases where computational time is important. It was furthermore found that the use of a super cell during the cross-section generation process for better representation of the spectral environment at the core periphery did not lead to significant changes in the core eigenvalues, axial offset, and power peaking uncertainties. The impact of the super cell cross sections on the nominal and mean eigenvalues is, however, important enough (0.6% – 1.1% lower) to justify the use of these super cells for HTGR core simulation to represent the softer spectral environment in the core peripheral regions for nominal best-estimate calculations. The use of super cells for HTGR uncertainty studies is, therefore, not strictly necessary, but the improvements in nominal results could justify their use.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

OSU High Temperature Test Facility Design Technical Report, Revision 2

The HTTF is an integral test facility, which has been designed to model the behavior of interest for a MHTGR during the Depressurized Conduction Cooldown (DCC) event. It also has the potential to conduct limited explorations into the progression of the Pressurized Conduction Cooldown (PCC) event and phenomena during normal operations. The facility is scaled 1:4 by height and 1:64 by volume. A scaling report has been developed and provides further detail into the scaling analysis for the HTTF. The maximum core power for the facility is approximately 2.2MW. The core region will be of a modular design to allow for both the prismatic block core and the pebble bed core designs to be tested. However, only the prismatic block design is discussed in this report. The HTTF consists of the following systems: A primary system consisting of the reactor pressure vessel (RPV), the circulator, cross over ducts and primary piping. The core internals sit inside the RPV and provide support for the core and core heaters. The purpose of the primary system is to maintain the pressure boundary, remove heat from the core through convection, conduction and radiation, and provide heat to the core through a series of electrical heaters. A secondary system consisting of a steam generator, feed water system and main steam system. The purpose of the secondary system is to remove heat from the primary system during heat up, cool down and normal operations. A reactor cavity simulation system consisting of a cavity tank, gas conditioning system and a series of break valves. Note that the prototypical MHTGR sits inside of a cavity. In the event of a break the helium will blowdown into this cavity. At the HTTF, the cavity is modeled as a separate tank, the reactor cavity simulation tank (RCST) and is connected to the RPV through break valves—hot-leg, cold-leg, upper break, and lower break. A reactor cavity cooling system (RCCS) consisting of a series of water cooled panels and the water supply system for these panels. The HTTF RCCS is not a scaled prototypical RCCS system for the MHTGR. It is provided in the HTTF in order to set the boundary condition for radiation heat transfer from the RPV. Various auxiliary systems including the city water supply system, the electrical power supply and distribution system, the chilled water system and the instrument air system.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Modeling of Prismatic High Temperature Reactors in Pronghorn

Pronghorn is a MOOSE based thermal-hydraulics code developed at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) for advanced nuclear reactor analysis. It has been previously applied to model pebble-bed high temperature reactors (HTRs), liquid-metal cooled reactors, and molten salt reactors, among others. This work leverages the coarse-mesh modeling capabilities in Pronghorn to model the Oregon State University (OSU)'s High Temperature Test Facility (HTTF). The HTTF is a 1:4 height scaled-down facility of General Atomics' Modular High Temperature Gas-cooled Reactor (MHTGR). The facility is primarily built to generate data for code and model validation, and does not precisely replicate MHTGR conditions. Nevertheless, it encompasses the main physics associated with MHTGR transients.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Progress Towards the Validation of a new RELAP5-3D model of the High Temperature Test Facility

Validation is a key step in the development of any type of systems model. As the next generation of reactors approaches, the need for codes that have been validated for these new types of systems continues to grow. An example of a prominent option is the Reactor Excursion Leak Analysis Program (RELAP5-3D), developed by Idaho National Laboratory. This code was developed for the purpose of systems level thermal-hydraulic modeling of light water reactors (LWRS) and postulated transients that can occur in LWRS.RELAP5-3D has been substantially validated against LWR data. Due to its long history as a reactor safety analysis tool, there has been an effort to adapt RELAP5-3D for the purposes of advanced reactor concepts such as prismatic high-temperature gas-cooled reactors (HTGRs). However, RELAP5-3D has not nearly been validated and verified for HTGRs to the degree of LWRs, warranting verification and validation opportunities with computational benchmarks and existing experimental facilities. Examples of such facilities include the modular high-temperature gas-cooled reactor (MHTGR) 350 and the high temperature engineering test reactor (HTTR) from Japan. The MHTGR 350 is a benchmark design concept for code-to-code verification purposes; therefore, it does not provide any experimental data for validation opportunities The HTTR provides useful multiphysics validation data but does not have the in-core instruments to generate thermal-hydraulic experimental data to help with RELAP5-3D validation. Consequently, a facility that could provide key in-core temperatures for thermal-hydraulic validation was still needed. The High Temperature Test Facility (HTTF) is an integral effects facility for HTGR thermal hydraulics developed and operated by Oregon State University. HTTF represents ¼ length scale of the General Atomics MHTGR and is rated for a total power of 2.2 MW. Axially, the core consists of an upper and lower reflector and 10 blocks, numbered from bottom to top (Block 1 is right above lower reflector). The core is heated via graphite resistive heater rods, with respective channels distributed throughout the core. The primary coolant is helium and heat can radiate out of the core to the reactor cavity cooling system (RCCS), which is cooled by water. The primary purpose of the facility is to investigate pressurized conduction cooldown (PCC) and depressurized conduction cooldown (DCC) transients, which are also referred to as the pressurized and depressurized loss of forced cooling respectively. Two experiments were chosen to perform the validation study with a RELAP5-3D model of HTTF. These experiments are PG-27 (PCC) and PG-29 (DCC). These were chosen based off of the quality of available experimental data before and during the experiment which led to their inclusion in the HTGR Thermal Hydraulics Benchmark.

22 - GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Representativity error scaling of models of the high temperature test facility

Error scaling is a critical step toward the validation of modeling capabilities for high-temperature gas-cooled reactors (HTGRs). Extensive effort is being made to bring HTGRs into the validation basis of numerous thermal-hydraulics codes. Here, this paper demonstrates how systems-level codes can be leveraged to perform error scaling analyses between an experimental facility and a plant-to-be facility. Specifically, we focus on two conduction cooldown experiments from the High Temperature Test Facility (HTTF) and the General Atomics 350 MW th modular high-temperature gas-cooled reactor (MHTGR-350). The error scaling methodology employed in this study is representativity, which in the context of this work was used to quantify how well experiments captured the physics of the plant facility by comparing sensitivity vectors between the two facilities. In addition, two different RELAP5–3D models of the HTTF were included in the comparison to determine if modeling methodologies notably impact the representativity results. The key figures of merit are the maximum block temperature and the coolant outlet temperature. The time-dependent maximum block temperature had a low representativity of below 0.1 for both models across both transients. The coolant outlet temperature had a higher representativity of around 0.6 for both models during the pressurized conduction cooldown, but it was below 0.2 for the depressurized conduction cooldown. Overall, the HTTF experiments were not representative of the transients in the MHTGR-350. However, these results can play a significant role in informing future potential experiments for HTGR systems that iterate on what the HTTF accomplished.

22 - GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Ring Model Development and Validation for Prismatic HTGR Core Thermal-hydraulics and Safety Analysis

Because of the complex core geometry, prismatic high temperature gas-cooled reactors (prismatic HTGRs) often exhibit complex thermal fluid behaviors during both normal operating and transient conditions. Most HTGR designs rely on passive safety system for decay heat removal, such as the reactor cavity cooling system (RCCS). During postulated accidents like Pressurized Conduction Cooldown (PCC) event, the decay heat is first radially transferred from the core region to the reactor vessel outer surface, then to the RCCS cooling panels. The peak fuel temperature is controlled by heat transfer mechanisms with two distinctive characteristic length scales, i.e., the core-wise effective heat conduction and local heat conduction in the fuel pellet scale. As both length scales are essential to determine the fuel temperature, from the modeling perspective, computer codes must be able to capture heat transfer in both scales. This is challenging for both computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tools because of extremely large amount of computation resources required, and for system analysis codes because of the challenge to model the complex core geometry. Under the support of DOE-NE’s Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) program, efforts have been pursued to support HTGR technology development and its modeling and simulation needs. There is a particular need for advanced modeling and simulation tools to predict thermal-fluid behavior during safety-related transients. In our previous studies, the ring model was adopted in SAM and further developed to simulate the normal operating condition and a PCC event using the MHTGR-350 design of General Atomics as the reference design. This current work represents a continuation of these previous efforts, and the focus is to critically review and examine simplifications and assumptions made to develop the ring model, and to perform code validation using experimental data from an integral-effect test facility, the High Temperature Test Facility (HTTF) at the Oregon State University. In this study, the test PG-27 from the HTTF test suite was selected for code validation purpose. The test PG-27 is a transient test designed to simulate the PCC event of the MHTGR design. Very good agreements between SAM prediction and experimental measurements were found in both coolant and solid structure temperatures during the transient.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Issue Summary of INL Phase IV Transient Results for IAEA CRP on HTGR UAM Benchmark

This report details the Parallel and Highly Innovative Simulation for Idaho National Laboratory (INL) Code System (PHISICS)/Reactor Excursions and Leak Analysis Program (RELAP5)-3D results obtained for the transient core exercises defined for Phase IV of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Coordinated Research Project (CRP) on high-temperature gas cooled reactor (HTGR) uncertainty analysis in modeling (UAM). The Phase III models and results are linked to the earlier Standardized Computer Analyses for Licensing Evaluation (SCALE)/Sampler/New ESC-based Weighting Transport (NEWT) data generated for the lattice physics (lattice) stage Phase I of the CRP. The focus of this report is the Uncertainty/Sensitivity Assessment (U/SA) of the prismatic modular high-temperature gas cooled reactor (MHTGR)-350 design, and specifically for Exercises IV-1 and IV-2 of the benchmark: the Control Rod Withdrawal (CRW) and Pressurised Loss of Cooling (PLOFC) events. The statistical U/SA methodology is implemented and demonstrated using the RAVEN code, based on perturbed cross-section libraries obtained from the SCALE/Sampler sequence. Uncertainties in nuclear data (cross-sections and the average number of neutrons produced per fission, 235U[¯v ]) lead to standard deviations (uncertainties of one s) of approximately 0.5% in the core eigenvalues of the MHTGR-350 and core models. For the coupled neutronics/thermal fluid model, local power density uncertainties up to 3.6% were observed in the colder regions of the core, while the local maximum fuel temperature uncertainties reached 1.5% for the models that included thermal fluid uncertainties. The addition of thermal fluid uncertainties dominated the impacts of nuclear data uncertainties in all cases. The main contributors to uncertainties in the power density and fuel temperatures during the transients were uncertainties in the reactor operating conditions (total power, inlet mass flow rate and inlet gas temperature). Variations in the bypass flows did not have significant impact on any of the output variables. For the nuclear data uncertainties it was found that the 235U(¯v ) / 235U(¯v ) covariance produced the largest sensitivities in terms of its impact on the eigenvalue and peak reactor power. It was also observed that the impact of any nuclear data uncertainties on the maximum fuel temperature was much less significant that the impact on eigenvalue and power. Another important finding was that although the use of eight or more energy groups is recommended for best-estimate HTGR simulation, two-group models produced acceptable uncertainty and sensitivity results for most FOMs. Since the statistical U/SA methodology is computationally expensive, and most transient solver requirements will scale directly with the number of energy groups, two energy groups could be used by HTGR developers during the early stages of design when larger uncertainty margins can be tolerated.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Assessing the Impact of Effective Thermal Conductivity on Gas-cooled Reactor Transients in RELAP5-3D

High-temperature gas-cooled reactors (HTGRs) are a relatively mature advanced reactor concept that are of interest to industry and government for near-term deployment. These systems feature passive safety through low power density, coated particle fuels, and large graphite volumes that lead to slow heatup. In loss of flow transients, cooldown is achieved through conduction and radiation heat transfer. In prismatic block-type reactors, such as the mHTGR-350, the presence of coolant holes and fuel compacts alters the flow of heat through the blocks. To capture this effect in systems codes like RELAP5-3D, relationships for effective thermal conductivity (ETC) must be used to appropriately degrade the thermal conductivity. This work presents an assessment of the impact of ETC on performance of block-type gas-cooled reactors in a pressurized conduction cooldown (PCC) and depressurized conduction cooldown (DCC) transients. Models for PCC and DCC with bulk material thermal conductivity and ETC were run for both the mHTGR-350 and the High-Temperature Test Facility (HTTF) to determine the impact of ETC on transient performance.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

High Fidelity Simulations of Air-Cooled Reactor Cavity Cooling System

Nuclear energy is increasingly acknowledged as pivotal in the global shift towards cleaner energy solutions. Advanced nuclear technologies, including High Temperature Gas-cooled Reactors (HTGRs), stand out as appealing options among Generation IV reactors due to their high temperature heat output and potential for cogeneration. HTGR designs incorporate passive safety systems, such as the Reactor Cavity Cooling System (RCCS), which utilize natural principles to manage heat dissipation from the reactor pressure vessel (RPV) during accidents or routine shutdowns. Regulatory bodies require thorough validation of safety systems like the RCCS to ensure they meet specified standards. Consequently, there is a pressing need within the industry for advanced simulation tools capable of assessing these systems’ performance accurately. There is a knowladge gap in the literature concerning high-fidelity data for the RCCS, which motivates the focus of this study. This research focuses on a specific RCCS designed for the Modular High-Temperature Gas Reactor developed by General Atomics (GA- MHTGR). Experimental studies on a scaled version of the air-cooled RCCS of GA-MHTGR were conducted by the University of Wisconsin-Madison. This work contributes to a broader initiative aimed at establishing a numerical benchmark based on the UW-Madison experiments. As first step we performed high fidelity simulations of the experimental facility setup, to analyze flow physics in such systems and validate NekRS and the MOOSE heat transfer and radiation modules.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗