MCNP6 Parallel Performance Analysis: How to Efficiently Run MCNP6 in Parallel
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Here, this work develops a predictive density tool in Python, named Plutonium Nitrate Solutions (PuNS), to reduce bias and uncertainty in nuclear criticality safety calculations for plutonium nitrate systems. The Pitzer method and an empirical method were implemented into the PuNS tool to generate atom densities for use in MCNP6 material cards. These material cards are directly prepared into an MCNP6 input text file and are calculated based on customizable user inputs of plutonium content, nitric acid content, temperature, and plutonium isotope weight percentages. The PuNS tool is validated and verified against the International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project Handbook experiments and is observed to predict densities within a root mean square error of 0.89% for the Pitzer method and 1.82% for the empirical method. These errors in density lead to up to 1569 pcm difference in MCNP6 calculated k eff for the Pitzer method and up to a 1751 pcm difference for the empirical method when compared to experimental benchmarks. Simultaneous work is also being performed at Los Alamos National Laboratory and the University of New Mexico to create a similar tool for plutonium chloride solutions, named Plutonium Chloride Solution, which aims to provide the accreditation of the chlorine absorption. These capabilities will not only provide more accurate models but also facilitate an improved understanding of solution systems and a potential relaxation in the conservatism of current aqueous plutonium processing criticality safety limits.
A Python tool for converting the MCNP6 HDF5 PTRAC file to a list of Python trees is presented. The particle trees store MCNP6 simulated events for each history using parent-child relationships, which ensures that branching processes are accurately reproduced. A variety of post-processing scripts are presented and used in conjunction with the Python particle trees to make special tallies that are currently not available in the MCNP6 software and visualize the particle tracks.
Criticality safety models for aqueous plutonium chloride systems often contain a significant bias due to assumptions in material compositions. These systems are currently modeled as a fictitious metal-water mixture because little is known about the true solution density. Furthermore, no predictive density tools or capabilities for modeling aqueous plutonium chloride systems are approved for use at Los Alamos National Laboratory. Recent density measurements of this ternary system (PuCl 3 -HCl-H 2 O) have allowed for the development of a more realistic density law, which is applied in this work via an empirical method based in Python. This tool, entitled PuCS (Plutonium Chloride Solution tool) may be used to determine solution density and composition based on the plutonium content, acid content, and temperature for MCNP6 inputs. PuCS has been found to predict density within 2% of experimental data. In conclusion, MCNP6 calculations have found that crediting minimal amounts of free acid (0.5 M) may correspond to a ~12% decrease in peak reactivity in comparison to current modeling methods.
As originally introduced in MCNP6.2, the δ-ray production subroutine had a number of flaws related to treatment of particle or nuclear spin contributions to the production cross section. A recent update by the author to the MCNP6 code corrects these flaws. This report documents those changes for the benefit of MCNP6 users who use the delta ray production capability. Additionally, this report aims to provide a more comprehensive documentation of the delta ray production, building on the prior documentation by C. Anderson and coworkers. On this latter point, the goal is to save future MCNP developers from a visit to the library to dig out ancient texts from 1952, or at least to provide useful points of reference should such a visit be necessary.
Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP)1 is a general-purpose Monte Carlo particle transport code developed by Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). To efficiently handle long simulations, MCNP version 6 (MCNP6) supports parallel execution using two primary programming models: • Shared-memory task-based threading using OpenMP (Open Multi-Processing), and • Distributed-memory calculations using MPI (Message Passing Interface). The OpenMP and MPI programming models enable MCNP6 to scale from desktop systems to high-performance computing (HPC) clusters, allowing users to run MCNP in one of three parallel modes: • OpenMP-only, • MPI-only, and • Hybrid (MPI + OpenMP). The choice of parallelization mode depends on the underlying computer architecture and the characteristics of the simulation problem.
An analytic solution to a previously studied toy problem is derived and used as a code verification benchmark. Using various Random Number Generators (RNGs) in MCNP6, including the newest SFC64 RNG available in MCNP6.3.1, and their various properties (e.g., RNG stride), we show how these RNGs perform and how to correct or workaround potential issues with respect to the analytic benchmark problem.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Accuracy is vital for many radiation transport applications. Monte Carlo (MC) codes are the most accurate, but they are expensive for fine meshes. Functional Expansion Tallies (FETs) yield smoother, lower-variance results with far fewer degrees of freedom.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.