Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “M–L multiple bonds”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

Crystallography of Reactive Intermediates

Metal–ligand (M–L) multiply bonded complexes hold a central place in inorganic chemistry and catalysis: From fundamental and historical perspectives, these species have played a critical role in the articulation of important bonding principles (i.e. the vanadyl ion in the development of molecular orbital theory); from a practical perspective, these species are critical intermediates in a variety of chemical reactions (i.e. N 2 and O 2 reduction, H 2 O oxidation, and C–H functionalization). For many high-valent, early metal complexes, overlap of ligand-based electrons with vacant π-symmetry orbitals leads to strong M–L multiple bonds. The stability of these species enables straightforward characterization with a suite of standard spectroscopic and diffraction-based experiments. Mid- and late-transition metal complexes, with attendant higher d-electron counts, often support more reactive M–L multiply bonded fragments. The reactivity of these species simultaneously renders them attractive intermediates for catalysis but challenging synthetic targets to observe and characterize. A number of important strategies have been advanced to enable experimental characterization of mid- to late-metal–ligand multiply bonded species. Synthetic manipulation of the coordination geometry and ligand donicity, as well as introduction of sterically encumbering ligands, have each emerged as powerful methods to tame the inherent reactivity of kinetically labile M–L multiple bonds. While these efforts have resulted in families of well-characterized complexes and provided critical insights regarding structure and bonding, the synthetic derivatization required to stabilize M–L fragments of interest often obviates the substrate functionalization activity relevant to catalysis. Photochemical synthesis of reactive species provides a conceptually attractive strategy to generate reactive M–L fragments under conditions compatible with time-resolved or cryogenic steady-state characterization, and photogeneration has enabled observation of a number of reactive M–L fragments. The suite of tools available to characterize photogenerated reactive species is often more limited than typical for kinetically stabilized complexes and structural characterization is typically not possible. Recently, photocrystallographic experiments, in which reactive M–L multiply bonded intermediates are generated within single-crystal matrices, have been advanced as a strategy to interrogate the structures of reactive intermediates in C–H functionalization. Lastly, this Comment describes the historical antecedents to these experiments, highlights examples of photocrystallographic characterization of reactive intermediates, and discusses future opportunities.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

On the performance of large Gaussian basis sets for the computation of total atomization energies

The total atomization energies of a number of molecules have been computed using an augmented coupled-cluster method and (5s4p3d2f1g) and 4s3p2d1f) atomic natural orbital (ANO) basis sets, as well as the correlation consistent valence triple zeta plus polarization (cc-pVTZ) correlation consistent valence quadrupole zeta plus polarization (cc-pVQZ) basis sets. The performance of ANO and correlation consistent basis sets is comparable throughout, although the latter can result in significant CPU time savings. Whereas the inclusion of g functions has significant effects on the computed Sigma D(e) values, chemical accuracy is still not reached for molecules involving multiple bonds. A Gaussian-1 (G) type correction lowers the error, but not much beyond the accuracy of the G1 model itself. Using separate corrections for sigma bonds, pi bonds, and valence pairs brings down the mean absolute error to less than 1 kcal/mol for the spdf basis sets, and about 0.5 kcal/mol for the spdfg basis sets. Some conclusions on the success of the Gaussian-1 and Gaussian-2 models are drawn.

Martin, J. M. L.↗