Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “LWR”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records

Overview of recent SCALE activities for Non-LWR inventory and decay heat analysis

In 2019, the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission initiated a project for the development and assessments of non-light-water reactor (non-LWR) accident progression using the SCALE and MELCOR simulation tools. SCALE simulations are used to generate nuclide inventories, full-core power distributions, decay heat, and kinetics parameters to initialize MELCOR simulations of severe accident scenarios. Five non-LWR concepts were studied: high-temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR), heat pipe reactor (HPR), high-temperature fluoride salt-cooled reactor (FHR), molten salt-fueled reactor (MSR), and sodium-cooled fast reactor (SFR). This paper summarizes the SCALE results obtained in 2021 for the first three non-LWR concepts, compares characteristics and results to common LWRs, and provides the strategy for the analysis of the remaining two non-LWRs. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

SCALE Non-LWR Models for NRC Volume 3

This dataset contains input and result files of computational simulations with the SCALE code system. The simulations cover radionuclide inventory and reactivity analyses of various advanced reactors. Users wanting to reproduce results from this dataset are required to obtain a license to the SCALE code system for which details on the distribution can be found here: https://www.ornl.gov/scale/releases

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

SCALE Non-LWR Models for NRC Volume 5

This dataset contains input and result files of computational simulations with the SCALE code system. The simulations cover radionuclide inventory generation, criticality calculations, and dose rate/shielding analyses of various advanced reactors. Users wanting to reproduce results from this dataset are required to obtain a license to the SCALE code system for which details on the distribution can be found here: https://www.ornl.gov/scale/releases

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Polaris-PARCS Sensitivity Study on LWR Fuel Cycles: Polaris Input Options

This study is the first of a multi-phase effort to assess the sensitivity of light-water reactor (LWR) core-level prediction biases to changes in lattice-level calculation parameters. Prediction bias is the measured-to-predicted difference in a core-level quantity of interest (QOI) which can be estimated by comparing the simulation results with the plant-measured data for key nuclear parameters. The LWR two-step neutronics codes employed herein are the SCALE–Polaris lattice physics code (v6.3.1) and the Purdue Advanced Reactor Core Simulator (PARCS) nodal diffusion simulator (v3.4.2), both funded and used for confirmatory analysis to support licensing by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Polaris–PARCS is used to model Watts Bar Unit 1 cycles 1–3 and Peach Bottom Unit 2 cycles 1–3. This study focuses on the impact of changes to Polaris input options such as scattering treatment or quadrature settings and how these input options induce changes in core-level quantities of interest (QOIs)bias. The report documents multiple bias assessments for different modeling choices and compares the bias magnitude to the QOI measurement uncertainties. Future companion reports will investigate the sensitivity of core-level LWR prediction bias to Polaris input options and Polaris-computed QOIs such as few-group assembly-homogenized cross sections to gain an understanding of the key drivers of prediction bias at lattice and core levels for application of a two-step LWR neutronics procedure in a licensing scenario.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Advanced Fuel Cycle Cost Basis Report: Module D1-1: Uranium-based Ceramic LWR Fuel Fabrication (Rev.2)

Cost module on LWR fuel fabrication to accompany the Advanced Fuel Cycle Cost Basis Report. In this update, we are adding detailed life cycle cost data and a calculated, levelized fabrication cost derived from a non-proprietary bottom-up estimate prepared in 1978 by Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) (Judkins and Olsen 1978a). In 2018, the 1978 ORNL estimate was escalated by SA&I authors to 2017 USD using factors that represent inflation, escalation above inflation typical of nuclear projects, and the effects of more stringent safety and environmental regulations. In this FY-21 document, the $/kgU results in 2017 USD from the unpublished 2018 interim study (Williams and Ganda 2018) can be escalated to 2020 USD using a factor of 1.052. The literature-based unit cost (or price) data from previous (2004–2017) AFC-CBRs are escalated to 2020 USD using factors from Chapter 8 of the main FY-21 AFC-CBR document. This data, in addition to the results of the updated bottom-up estimate, are used to define the “what-it-takes” (WIT) range for the unit fabrication costs for conventional ceramic UOX light-water reactor (LWR) fuel. This FY-23 document also includes calculated unit costs for accident-tolerant LWR fuels (ATFs) of three different types. Some of these fuels constitute a ceramic pelletized form with fuel meat uranium compounds other than UO2 (a.k.a.,. UOX), thus the change in the title of this module in which the word “UO2” is changed to “Uranium-based Ceramic.”

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Key nuclear data for non-LWR reactivity analysis

An assessment of nuclear data performance for non-light-water reactor (non-LWR) reactivity calculations was performed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory that involved a thorough literature review to collect related observations made across different research institutions, an interrogation of the latest ENDF/B evaluated nuclear data libraries, and propagation of nuclear data uncertainties to key figures of merit associated with reactor safety for six non-LWR benchmarks. The outcome of this comprehensive study was published in a technical report issued by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. This paper provides a summary of the study’s key observations and conclusions and demonstrates with two examples how the various methods available in the SCALE code system were used to identify key cross section uncertainties for non-LWR reactivity analyses.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

I 2 S-LWR microchannel heat exchanger design and experimental validation

The Integral Inherently Safe Light Water Reactor (I 2 S-LWR) includes primary-to-secondary coolant heat exchangers located in the downcomer of the reactor pressure vessel. A microchannel heat exchanger (MCHX) configuration is selected to meet the limited available volume and high heat duty requirements. The design, modeling, and optimization of the liquid-liquid MCHX is outlined. In addition, the performance of a MCHX test section representative of the I 2 S-LWR MCHX design is validated experimentally. Experimental results show that heat transfer and pressure drop correlations developed for larger, macroscale channels lead to accurate predictions of performance. Additionally, this study shows that an MCHX can deliver the required heat duties within the available space and pressure drop constraints of the overall I2 S-LWR design.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

Development and Evaluation of Embrittlement Resistant Alloys for Advanced LWR Cladding

The primary challenge preventing the deployment of reactor designs that leverage wrought FeCrAl as an advanced light-water reactor (LWR) cladding is irradiation hardening and embrittlement. Wrought FeCrAl alloys experience a loss of post-irradiation ductility and fracture toughness under low-temperature neutron irradiation (< 350°C) resulting from the combined effects of dislocation loop formation and the irradiation-enhanced precipitation of Cr-rich alpha-prime precipitates throughout the microstructure. Over the past decade, significant improvements in our understanding regarding the effect of Cr and Al content have been enabled through neutron irradiations, but even optimized wrought alloys such as C26M remain vulnerable to brittle failure during storage, transportation, and handling following irradiation. This report summarizes multiple irradiation campaigns initiated over the past 7 years and provides recent insights into the effect of (1) minor alloying composition, (2) alloy processing strategy, (3) crystal structure, and (4) the use of advanced oxide dispersion strengthened (ODS) alloys. The first irradiation campaign irradiated body-centered cubic FeCrAl alloy C26M with and without elements such as Mo and Y. It also included face-centered cubic alumina-forming austenitic (AFA) alloys that have a steeper neutronic penalty but that have far superior high-temperature strength than wrought FeCrAl. Finally, this campaign compared conventional wrought C26M with the same material produced using modern powder metallurgical hotisostatic pressing (PM-HIP). The second irradiation campaign, initiated in 2018, irradiated wrought and FeCrAl-ODS materials up to 50 dpa to assess their irradiation resistance to high-doses. The results of this work indicate that wrought C26M suffers significant degradation following neutron irradiation at LWR-relevant temperatures regardless of Mo and Y content. The PM-HIP variant appears to be more resilient to irradiation-induced ductility loss in comparison with wrought variants but still loses almost all ductility by 8 dpa. Notably, the AFAs retained at least 5% total elongation after irradiation at the same dose and temperature condition, although additional deterioration may be expected at higher fluence levels. FeCrAl-ODS materials show the greatest promise as a transformative longer-term accident-tolerant fuel (LT-ATF) cladding material. The extruded 106ZY10C alloy retained 10% total elongation after 16 dpa irradiation and retained 8% total elongation after 50 dpa. Additional challenges with FeCrAl-ODS alloys also remain, including optimization of end cap joining methodologies, enhancement of fracture toughness, scaling production to prove economic viability, and optimizing post-pilger heat treatments to maximize ductility and irradiation resistance. This series of irradiations demonstrates the efficacy of the LWR testbed available within the United States for the rapid irradiation and down-selection of LT-ATF candidates. As the country rapidly accelerates its timeline for the deployment of advanced reactor concepts, the effective utilization of the High Flux Isotope Reactor for separate-effects style irradiations should continue to be prioritized to answer the final questions pertaining to LT-ATF candidates necessary for the deployment of advanced boiling water reactors and small modular reactors.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Future Opportunities for LWR Irradiations in US Test Reactors

After several years of relatively low activity in the field of Light Water Reactor (LWR) fuel development, the Department of Energy again began to engage in developing new fuel technologies and irradiation performance data prompted by the Fukushima Daichi nuclear accidents. New competencies for irradiation testing in material test reactors in the United States began to be developed at this time using the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR), High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR), Massachusetts Institute of Technology Reactor (MITR), and the Transient Reactor Test Facility (TREAT). Capsules for testing fuel and cladding materials in ATR and HFIR were deployed, a Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) condition loop for testing fuel rods was established in ATR, cladding corrosion studies were performed using a water loop in MITR, and TREAT pulse testing capabilities were commissioned for fuel rods in water capsules. The more recent and unexpected closure of the Halden Boiling Water Reactor (HBWR) also prompted further investments in Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA) testing capabilities at TREAT. New configurations of these test devices show further potential in enhanced steam condition control and other investigations are building toward a flowing water loop for testing transient to dryout conditions. The closure of HBWR also prompted a major project currently underway to construct additional water loops in ATR where a novel approach is being pursued to enable Boiling Water Reactor (BWR) conditions. A meaningful collaborative project was awarded to MITR which, amidst an unexpected major overhaul of the reactor, has expanded cladding corrosion test capabilities at MITR. New explorations have led to methods for unique experiments at HFIR including channel box irradiations. New device developments are also bridging toward future potential for instrumented capsule irradiation tests in ATR and HFIR. Finally, a new project referred to as the System Physics Advanced Reactor Critical facility (SPARC) is gaining traction towards a large zero-power reactor able to produce physics validation data for LWR fuel bundle designs with increased enrichment and enhanced absorbers for 24-month operation cycles. This paper provides a brief summary of the status of these irradiation testbed capabilities with an emphasis on current efforts toward future capabilities to obtain new data and maximize the performance potential of LWR fuel technologies.

Woolstenhulme, Nicolas [Idaho National Laboratory ↗

Performance of U 3 Si 2 in an LWR following a cladding breach during normal operation

High-density fuels have been proposed as a possible replacement for uranium-dioxide as a fuel for light water reactors (LWRs) due to their increased loading of fissionable material. The objectives of this proposal are (1) to increase reactor cycle length and reactor power, and (2) to offset any neutronic penalty associated with advanced cladding systems. Of the high-density fuels under consideration, there is particular interest in triuranium disilicide (U 3 Si 2 ) due to its increased metal density and favorable thermal properties as compared to UO 2 . However, there are concerns regarding the chemical compatibility of U 3 Si 2 with water and steam as used for LWR coolant.This paper summarizes research on fuel-coolant chemical compatibility for UO 2 LWR fuel during a cladding breach and highlights that generally, because of its chemical inertness, UO 2 -coolant reactions are of little consequence to reactor operation. However, the volumetric expansion associated with the reaction of UO 2 and oxygen is a concern for possible conditions encountered during air ingress of dry storage. These same concerns arise for U 3 Si 2 , which exhibits greater volumetric expansion than UO 2 when exposed to water or steam. These reactions ultimately result in increased fuel volume that the cladding must accommodate, as well as additional heat generated as the fuel reacts.The BISON fuel performance code was used to perform a comparative analysis on the behavior of UO 2 and U 3 Si 2 under normal operation. Silicide fuel simulations were then extended to demonstrate how varying thermodynamic and chemical kinetics influence fuel expansion and subsequent cladding performance during a cladding breach. These simulations were further extended to a 3D subsection of a fuel rod to demonstrate the characteristics of the resulting cladding crack.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Porous Flow Modeling of Axial Gas Redistribution in Fragmented LWR Fuel Rods using MOOSE

Understanding how gas axially redistributes within fragmented fuel pellets is crucial for predicting the behavior of Light Water Reactor (LWR) fuel rods, particularly during transient and accidental scenarios. The time scale of this phenomenon plays a fundamental role in determining the progression and hazard of a Loss Of Coolant Accident (LOCA), especially when high burn-up fuel in a severe state of fragmentation is involved. Here, this study presents a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model developed within the Multiphysics Object-Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE) to predict the time-scale of plenum depressurization in Light-Water Reactor (LWR) fuel rods driven by axial gas transport through fragmented pellets. The model examines the effects of incorporating non-linearities in the friction term by comparing the results with experimental data. The experiment employed surrogate fuel rods containing pellets subjected to mechanical and/or thermal loadings to simulate various severity of cracking, and aimed at studying the influence of fuel conditions on axial gas redistribution. The results of this analysis indicate that under certain flow regime conditions - determined by the value of an equivalent Reynolds number - accounting for the non-linear friction term in Navier-Stokes equations guarantees better predictions for the time-scale of plenum depressurization. Also, the model enabled the simulation of the pressure decay by assigning distinct permeability values to each pellet instead of a single uniform value. Multiple simulations were run across all possible pellet position combinations, having each pellet assigned with values of permeability extracted from the experimental data. This allows to quantify the impact of the considering various non-uniform distributions of permeability on the dynamics of axial gas redistribution. The present work findings enhance the understanding of axial gas transport, and provide valuable insights for the integration of a model for predicting the axial gas redistribution during a LOCA scenario into the BISON fuel performance code.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Unveiling damage mechanisms of chromium-coated zirconium-based fuel claddings at LWR operating temperature by in-situ digital image correlation

Here, we investigate the coupled thermomechanical fracture mechanisms of coated nuclear fuel claddings at Light Water Reactor (LWR) operating temperatures. These coated claddings are a highly attractive, near-term solution, which addresses the demands for accident-tolerant fuel systems and provide greater oxidation resistance. However, the fracture mechanisms of these coatings, which may create channels for oxidation ingression, must be fully understood prior to implementation. Thus, high-temperature expanding plug experiments were conducted on coated cladding specimens at a temperature of 315 °C, consistent with the operating environment of LWRs. Furthermore, in-situ thermomechanical deformation was measured with stereo digital image correlation during heating and mechanical testing to separately resolve contributions of thermal and mechanical strain. Digital image correlation, supported by acoustic emissions (AE) detection, was also leveraged to track cracking activity during loading. Coating fracture was found to initiate at total hoop strains of 0.34%. The thermal deformation of the coated claddings was investigated via finite element simulations, revealing a bidirectional stress-state within the coating with axial and circumferential strains of 0.026 and 0.031%. This bidirectional stress-state was attributed with the generation of off-axis fracture pattern within the coating as identified via post-experiment scanning electron microscopy. Thus, this study unveiled critical, coupled thermomechanical mechanisms governing the coating fracture of coated claddings at LWR temperatures.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Microstructural and nanomechanical studies of PVD Cr coatings on SiC for LWR fuel cladding applications

The microstructure and nanomechanical properties of pure Cr coatings deposited on SiC with various physical vapor deposition (PVD) methods have been investigated for the mitigation of hydrothermal corrosion of SiC-SiC f (SiC fiber-reinforced SiC matrix) composite fuel cladding in light water reactors (LWR). Cr coatings (4–7 μm thick) were deposited on unbiased SiC substrates using six variants of magnetron sputtering processes: (i) standard (S-DCMS), (ii) pulsed (P-DCMS), (iii) ion-assisted (I-DCMS), and (iv) pulsed ion-assisted direct current magnetron sputtering (PI-DCMS), (v) high-power impulse magnetron sputtering (HiPIMS), and (vi) bipolar HiPIMS (B-HiPIMS). Microstructural characterization and nanoindentation testing were used to evaluate effects of deposition technique on coating microstructure and nanomechanical properties. The application of positive reverse pulses to the sputter target induced coarsening of the columnar grain structure, while ion bombardment of substrates during deposition promoted densification of the coating microstructure. Both effects are exemplified in B-HiPIMS deposition, resulting in a high-density microstructure with compressive residual stress. Material pile-up around nano-indents and plastic work during nanoindentation were analyzed to understand deformation behavior of the coatings. Finally, the results suggest the B-HiPIMS process to be among the promising methods for the deposition of Cr coatings on SiC-SiC f for LWR cladding application.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

NEUP Final Report: Multilayer Composite Fuel Cladding and Core Internals for LWR Performance Enhancement and Severe Accident Tolerance

Accident tolerance of LWR fuels and structures is of paramount importance, as highlighted by the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station. The ability of fuel cladding and core internals to resist runaway oxidation during a beyond design basis accident (BDBA), as well as to minimize corrosion during steady state operation and design basis accidents (DBAs), determines its degree of accident tolerance. A gap was identified in the accident tolerant fuel (ATF) concepts under consideration, as most consisted either of coatings which may not hold their integrity under prolonged operation, or different materials altogether which incur significant neutronic penalties. A compromise was therefore sought – by minimizing the amount of coating material while ensuring a strong microstructural bond, it was thought that a Zircaloy-steel layered composite would achieve the best of both approaches.The goal of this NEUP project was to develop a multi-metallic layered composite (MMLC) tailored to addressing accident tolerance of LWR fuel cladding and core internal structures using an innovative fabrication technology. The MMLC developed in this program is expected to enhance the accident tolerance of LWRs, thereby reducing the cost by recovering lost operating margins and/or increasing operating windows of peak cladding temperature, peak linear power, reducing steady-state corrosion, and enhancing severe accident tolerance.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Isotopic and Fuel Lattice Parameter Trends in Extended Enrichment and Higher Burnup LWR Fuel Vol I: PWR fuel

Commercial light water reactor (LWR) operators and fuel vendors in the United States are pursuing changes to nuclear fuel that include extended enrichment (EE) and accident-tolerant fuel (ATF) designs. The term EE (8% > 235 U > 5%) is used in this report to refer to a subset of high assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU) that is considered usable in commercial US LWRs in the near term. ATF features are designed to improve fuel system performance under accident conditions. One goal of EE is to improve fuel cycle economy by enabling fuel to be depleted to higher burnup than the typical current maximum pin burnup limits (62 gigawatt-days per metric ton of uranium [GWd/MTU]). Adoption of EE, ATF, and high burnup (HBU) fuels in the US commercial fleet requires a clear understanding of the effects on core physics parameters and used fuel isotopic content, as well as confidence in the accuracy of computer code predictions over an expanded range of materials, enrichment, and burnup. A thorough understanding of the applicability and adequacy of benchmark data (e.g., criticality, decay heat, isotopic content) for computer code validation is necessary to ensure that appropriate safety margins are maintained. To prepare for and support these potential changes, the effects of EE, ATF, and HBU are being assessed for selected representative LWR fuel designs. The project is divided into phases: this report summarizes the findings of Phase 1, which focuses on the lattice physics parameter and used fuel isotopic changes for a conventional Westinghouse 17×17 pressurized water reactor (PWR) design. The primary investigation tool is the SCALE Polaris code using the SCALE 56-group Evaluated Nuclear Data File (ENDF)/B-VII.1 cross sections. The goal of the current work is to (1) identify and explain important effects of EE and HBU (reactivity, lattice physics, and isotopic effects) assuming that PWR fuel design and usage remain similar to those for current enrichment fuel, (2) provide limited code-to-code comparisons with higher order cross section libraries and/or codes, and (3) identify any apparent anomalous trends in the results for further investigation.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Isotopic and Fuel Lattice Parameter Trends in Extended Enrichment and Higher Burnup LWR Fuel, Volume II: BWR

Commercial light water reactor (LWR) operators and fuel vendors in the United States are pursuing changes to nuclear fuel that include extended enrichment (EE) and accident-tolerant fuel (ATF) designs to further improve reactor safety and plant economics. Extended fuel enrichments above 5% 235 U pin enrichment and up to 10% 235 U are a subset of high assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU) that may be deployed in commercial US LWRs in the near term. ATF features, such as cladding coatings or alternative cladding materials, are designed to improve fuel system performance under accident conditions. One goal of EE is to improve fuel cycle economy by enabling fuel to be depleted to higher burnup than the typical current limits (62 gigawatt-days per metric ton of uranium [GWd/MTU]). Adoption of EE, ATF, and high burnup (HBU) fuels in the US commercial fleet requires a clear understanding of the effects on core physics parameters and used fuel isotopic content, as well as confidence in the accuracy of computer code predictions over an expanded range of materials, enrichment, and burnup. A thorough understanding of the applicability and adequacy of benchmark data (e.g., criticality, decay heat, isotopic content) for computer code validation is necessary to ensure that appropriate safety margins are maintained. As part of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) agreement number 31310019N0008, “SCALE Code Development, Assessment and Maintenance,” the effects of EE, ATF, and HBU are being assessed for selected representative LWR fuel designs. The project is divided into phases, and this report summarizes the findings of the Phase 1 work, which focuses on lattice physics parameter and used fuel isotopic changes for a conventional GE14 10 x 10 boiling water reactor (BWR) design with GNF-2 part length rod patterns to model a modern BWR assembly design.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Methods and Usability Enhancements in Shift for Non-LWR Applications

Several development and analysis tasks were undertaken in FY21 under the Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation program to enhance modeling of non light–water reactors (LWRs) with Shift. Specifically, these efforts targeted enhancements for tristructural isotropic (TRISO) fuel modeling. A new Shift user interface was developed that allows for much better usability and ease of modeling for non-LWR problems and TRISO fuel. Performance studies were conducted using an HTR-10 fuel pebble model by comparing different geometry packages in Shift, KENO-VI, and Serpent. These studies showed that the new geometry package in Shift performs well compared to Serpent for TRISO fuel modeling with consistent tracking options between both packages. The studies also identified the most critical areas of improvement for more efficiently performing Monte Carlo transport on TRISO fuel models with Shift. Tally calculations in Shift were optimized for non-LWR cross section generation and depletion calculations, and areas for further optimization and accuracy improvements were identified. Finally, initial collaboration efforts were formed between Idaho National Laboratory, Argonne National Laboratory, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to use Shift for Comprehensive Reactor Analysis Bundle support.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Non-LWR Fuel Cycle Scenarios for SCALE and MELCOR Modeling Capability Demonstration

To assess the modeling and simulation capabilities for radionuclide characterization, criticality, and shielding in the nuclear fuel cycle of non-light–water reactor (LWR) technologies, the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) initiated a collaborative project between the NRC, Sandia National Laboratories (SNL), and Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) with the goal to demonstrate capabilities of MELCOR and SCALE to calculate accident scenarios in all stages of the nuclear fuel cycle for relevant non-LWRs. The first project task was to develop representative nuclear fuel cycles and identify potential hazards and accident scenarios in the individual fuel cycle stages based on publicly available information. Because the nuclear fuel cycle is not established for any non-LWR concept, many assumptions were made, and it is anticipated that the details of the fuel cycles will eventually look different.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗