Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “LEDs”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2013

Life-Cycle Assessment of Energy and Environmental Impacts of LED Lighting Products, Part 3: LED Environmental Testing

This report covers the third part of a larger U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) project to assess the life- cycle environmental and resource impacts associated with the manufacturing, transport, use, and disposal of light-emitting diode (LED) lighting products in relation to incumbent lighting technologies. All three reports are available on the DOE website (www.ssl.energy.gov/tech_reports.html). Part 1: Review of the Life-Cycle Energy Consumption of Incandescent, Compact Fluorescent and LED Lamps; Part 2: LED Manufacturing and Performance; Part 3: LED Environmental Testing. Parts 1 and 2 were published in February and June 2012, respectively. The Part 1 report included a summary of the life-cycle assessment (LCA) process and methodology, provided a literature review of more than 25 existing LCA studies of various lamp types, and performed a meta-analysis comparing LED lamps with incandescent and compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs). Drawing from the Part 1 findings, Part 2 performed a more detailed assessment of the LED manufacturing process and used these findings to provide a comparative LCA taking into consideration a wider range of environmental impacts. Both reports concluded that the life-cycle environmental impact of a given lamp is dominated by the energy used during lamp operation—the upstream generation of electricity drives the total environmental footprint of the product. However, a more detailed understanding of end-of-life disposal considerations for LED products has become increasingly important as their installation base has grown. The Part 3 study (reported herein) was undertaken to augment the LCA findings with chemical analysis of a variety of LED, CFL, and incandescent lamps using standard testing procedures. A total of 22 samples, representing 11 different models, were tested to determine whether any of 17 elements were present at levels exceeding California or Federal regulatory thresholds for hazardous waste. Notably, this type of testing does not provide an indication of product safety during use. Key findings include: • The selected models were generally found to be below thresholds for Federally regulated elements, although volatile mercury in the CFLs is presumed to have escaped detection; • Nearly all of the lamps (regardless of technology) exceeded at least one California threshold— typically for copper, zinc, antimony, or nickel; • The greatest contributors were the metal screw bases, drivers, ballasts, and wires or filaments— internal LED light sources generally did not cause LED lamps to exceed thresholds. This study was exploratory in nature and was not intended to provide a definitive indication of regulatory compliance for any specific lamp model or technology. Further study would be needed to more broadly characterize the various light source technologies; to more accurately and precisely characterize a specific model; or to determine whether product redesign would be appropriate. However, concentrations of regulated elements in LED lamps were found to be comparable to cell phones and other types of electronic devices, which like incandescent lamps and CFLs have also have been shown to exceed the stringent California thresholds for hazardous waste. Although LED lamps offer reduced life-cycle energy and environmental impacts when compared to CFLs and incandescent lamps, recycling will likely gain importance as consumer adoption of this emerging technology continues to increase.

bulb↗
DOE OSTI2014

LEDS GP Success Story: Fostering Coordinated LEDS Support in Kenya (Fact Sheet)

The LEDS Global Partnership (LEDS GP) strives to advance climate-resilient, low-emission development through catalyzing collaboration, information exchange, and action on the ground. The Government of Kenya is a key LEDS GP member and offers an inspiring example of how LEDS GP is having an impact globally. The 2012 LEDS Collaboration in Action workshop in London provided an interactive space for members to share experiences on cross-ministerial LEDS leadership and to learn about concrete development impacts of LEDS around the world. Inspired by these stories, the Kenya's Ministry of State for Planning, National Development and Vision 2030 (MPND) began to collaborate closely with the Ministry of Environment and Mineral Resources to create strong links between climate change action and development in the country, culminating in the integration of Kenya's National Climate Change Action Plan and the country's Medium Term Development Plan.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗
DOE OSTI2021

Initial Benchmarks of UV LEDs and Comparisons with White LEDs

The primary goal of this report is to benchmark the initial level of performance of a selection of commercial UV LEDs across all three bands (i.e., UV-A, UV-B, UV-C). To provide the initial performance benchmarks, a test matrix containing 13 different UV LED products was created in association with the LED Systems Reliability Consortium (LSRC). The products in this test matrix were all commercially available as of June 2021, and at least 22 samples of each product were tested. In addition, two common, commercial white LEDs were tested to provide a benchmark against blue-pumped white LEDs. Testing of the samples included electrical performance testing (e.g., current-voltage measurements) and photometric testing in a calibrated integrating sphere capable of measuring devices in the UV-A, UV-B, and UV-C bands. The electrical testing provided insights into the performance of the semiconductor layers in the LEDs, allowing parameters such as the threshold voltage (V th ) and serial resistance (R serial ) of each sample to be determined. The photometric testing provided insights into emission wavelengths, peak shapes, and radiant efficiencies for each sample. Combined, the information from these tests permits the overall device efficiencies to be compared and provides insights into the electrical and optical performance of the technology.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗
DOE OSTI2023

Recovering the efficiency of AlGaInP red micro-LEDs using sidewall treatments

A sidewall treatment process is proposed to recover the external quantum efficiency (EQE) loss in AlGaInP micro-LEDs ( μ LEDs). The proposed sidewall treatment consists of thermal annealing, ammonium sulfide chemical treatment, and sidewall passivation using atomic-layer deposition (ALD). The devices with sidewall treatment show improved optical power of more than 500% and 190% at 5 and 100 A cm −2 , respectively, compared to devices with ALD sidewall passivation. The reduction in EQE was 20% when shrinking the device dimensions from 100 × 100 to 20 × 20 μ m 2 . Finally, this work reveals that AlGaInP μ LEDs can be energy efficient by employing proper sidewall treatments.

Wong, Matthew S.↗
DOE OSTI2014

Investigating the LED's dark side. Novel LED Model Offers New Insights

A revolution in lighting is well on its way. Rewind the clock a year or so and the prices of LED bulbs made many shoppers wince. But now it is possible to get a high-quality 60 W equivalent for well under $10, and that’s allowing sales of LED bulbs incorporating chips from the likes of Cree and Philips Lumileds to take off. Although these solid-state bulbs are much more pricey than incandescents, which have largely disappeared from shelves due to legislation, they more than make up for that additional up-front cost with a substantial trimming of the electricity bill. It is a more tricky decision, however, whether it makes more sense to buy an LED bulb or a cheaper compact fluorescent (CFL). In terms of durability, adaptability and environmental impact, the solid-state bulb is the clear winner. But both types of light are similar in the efficiency stakes, and thus the running costs.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗
DOE OSTI2018

Devices combining thin film inorganic LEDs with organic LEDs and fabrication thereof

Devices including organic and inorganic LEDs are provided. Techniques for fabricating the devices include fabricating an inorganic LED on a parent substrate and transferring the LED to a host substrate via a non-destructive ELO process. Scaling techniques are also provided, in which an elastomeric substrate is deformed to achieve a desired display size.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2019

Devices combining thin film inorganic LEDs with organic LEDs and fabrication thereof

Devices including organic and inorganic LEDs are provided. Techniques for fabricating the devices include fabricating an inorganic LED on a parent substrate and transferring the LED to a host substrate via a non-destructive ELO process. Scaling techniques are also provided, in which an elastomeric substrate is deformed to achieve a desired display size.

Forrest, Stephen R.↗
DOE OSTI2020

High Performance Green LEDs for Solid State Lighting

The development of white LEDs for solid state lighting (SSL) has been driven in recent years by phosphor converted LEDs (pc-LEDs). However, losses (known as Stokes’ losses) between the blue pump LED and phosphor impose a fundamental efficiency limit of ~300 lm/W on pc-LEDs. White light can also be generated from color mixed LEDs (cm-LEDs), which employ red, green, blue, and amber LEDs and have a fundamental efficiency limit of ~400 lm/W. Efficient group III-nitride materials are used for the blue LED, while efficient group III-phosphide materials are used for the red LED component. Currently, the poor efficiency of green and amber LEDs (i.e. the “green gap”) is the primary limitation for cm-LEDs. Relative to nitride-based blue LEDs, green and amber nitride LEDs suffer from lower radiative recombination rates and higher nonradiative recombination rates, which ultimately lead to reduced internal quantum efficiency (IQE). The IQE represents the portion of all electron-hole recombination events that result in a photon. In addition, long-wavelength LEDs have lower electrical efficiency (EE) compared to their blue counterparts. Addressing the green gap, would ultimately enable cm-LEDs that rival or exceed the performance of pc-LEDs. Our project focused on III-nitride materials growth and characterization, device fabrication and testing, and semiconductor physics to understand efficiency limitations of green LEDs and develop solutions to these challenges. Insights gained during our research has led to novel long-wavelength LED designs which will enable efficient solid-state lighting.

30 DIRECT ENERGY CONVERSION↗
DOE OSTI2017

Al x In 1-x P LEDs with II-VI Cladding Layers for Efficient Red and Amber Emission. Final Scientific & Technical Report

Realizing solid state lighting systems with high efficiency and enhanced functionality will require the adoption of color-mixing (cm-LEDs) architectures combining highly efficient red, green, blue and amber light emitting diodes. Already, the hybrid architectures (hy-LEDs) pair phosphor-converted wide bandgap nitride LEDs with (Al x Ga 1-x ) 0.51 In 0.49 P red LEDs to improve the emission spectrum and reduce losses in the infrared. However, the efficiencies of (Al x Ga 1-x ) 0.51 In 0.49 P red and amber LEDs are still too low to truly enable these approaches. The DOE Solid-State Lighting R&D Plan highlights red and amber LED improvement as a long-term research goal. Excessive electron leakage out of the cladding layers, in particular, leads to strong thermal droop and red LED efficiencies of ~25% at normal operating temperatures. The typical device architecture for red and amber LEDs is based on indirect bandgap (Al y Ga 1-y ) 0.51 In 0.49 P cladding layers used to confine injected electrons and holes within a lower, direct bandgap (Al x Ga 1-x ) 0.51 In 0.49 P light-emitting active layer (x < y). The challenge with this approach is that the electron confinement is limited and decreases as the emission wavelength is shortened. Hence, thermal droop and overall device efficiency are very poor for amber LEDs. Innovative solutions to this problem must be sought through the use of new semiconductor materials and structures that will increase electron confinement. We plan to develop Al x In 1-x P LEDs with a II-VI semiconductor electron cladding layer to greatly increase the carrier confinement. Such an approach has the potential to improve red and amber LED efficiency, temperature stability, and light extraction. Al x In 1-x P active layers provide high direct bandgap energies needed to reach amber wavelengths without detrimental internal losses. ZnSe-based alloys are attractive candidates for the electron cladding layer because they can be engineered to provide high conduction band energies relative to the Al x In 1-x P active layer while maintaining roughly the same lattice constant. The lower index of refraction of the II-VI cladding layer will also aid light extraction. While extended defects have largely precluded the use of II-VI semiconductors as the light emitting layer in LEDs and lasers, the effects of these defects on device performance can be mitigated by limiting the use of II-VI materials to the thin, heavily doped cladding layer. Proposed research will focus on optimizing the quality of the Al x In 1-x P active layer and the heteropolar growth of the III-V/II-VI interface, tuning the II-VI cladding layer composition, and device design to maximize electron confinement and LED efficiency. Significant improvement in the performance of red and amber LEDs through this new approach is expected to advance the capabilities of next generation solid-state lighting technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗