SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Computed materials data using density functional theory calculations. These calculations determine the electronic structure of bulk materials by solving approximations to the Schrodinger equation. For more information, see https://materialsproject.org/docs/calculations
Molybdenum oxides (MoO 2 and MoO 3 ) are attractive anode materials for Li- and Na- ion batteries. Although there have been extensive studies on them individually, systematic and comparative studies are still lacking. Here, we demonstrate a facile and straightforward synthesis method to control the phase and oxidation state in the MoO x /CNTs nanocomposites via hydrothermal reaction followed by heat-treatment. By changing the gas atmosphere during the annealing process, well-dispersed MoO 2 /CNTs and MoO 3 /CNTs nanocomposites are formed without altering their overall morphology. This strategy enables us to investigate the true structure-property correlation of MoO x /CNTs nanocomposites by comparing the structure and electrochemical properties of MoO 2 /CNTs and MoO 3 /CNTs. When tested as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries, both HT-MoO 2&3 /CNTs electrodes show much-improved cycling stability and rate performance compared to the rod-shaped bulk MoO 3 electrode. In situ Mo K-edge x-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) has been further employed to compare and elucidate Li + storage mechanisms of both electrodes. When employed to the negative electrode of a high-power lithium-ion capacitor (LIC), the LIC full-cell composed of HT-MoO 3 /CNTs negative and activated carbon positive electrodes demonstrates impressive energy and power densities (~ 90 Wh kg –1 with 2000 W kg –1 ) and excellent cycling stability (96.8 % capacity retention after 300 cycles), revealing the versatility of the MoO x /CNTs electrodes in energy applications.
Photocatalyst dissolution greatly diminishes the usability of photocatalysts in water treatments. Coating conductive polymers on the surface of photocatalysts can reduce dissolution without compromising the photocatalytic properties of the material. In this investigation, polypyrrole (PPy) and polyaniline (PANI) were used to coat two magnetic MoO 3 nanoparticles with different surface chemistries. The polymer-coated MoO 3 @Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles were synthesized by optimizing the mole fractions of PPy or PANI, MoO 3 , and Fe 3 O 4 . The optimized PPy@ MoO 3 @Fe 3 O 4 (PMF1) and PANI@MoO 3 @Fe 3 O 4 (PMF2) resulted in 95.39 and 75.98% methylene blue dye removal, respectively. MoO 3 dissolutions of 4.12 and 5.6% were obtained for PMF1 and PMF2, respectively, demonstrating the reduced solubility of the coated nanoparticles as compared to their uncoated counterparts (7.87% for MF1 and 18.1% for MF2). In situ small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) was utilized to investigate the polymerization kinetics of PPy and PANI on nanoparticles. The results revealed that an increase in base material oxygen vacancies resulted in the reduction of both the polymer size and the polymerization rate. Furthermore, this study demonstrated that SANS provides valuable insights into the polymer growth mechanisms on nanoparticle surfaces.
A common route for the synthesis of molybdenum nitrides is through the temperature-programmed reaction of molybdenum oxides with NH3, or ammonolysis. In this work, the role of precursor phase, gas phase chemistry (impact of H2O), and temperature profile on the reaction outcome (700 °C) was examined, which resulted in varying amounts of MoO2, H2MoO5, and the nitride phases—cubic γ (nominally Mo2N) and hexagonal δ (nominally MoN). The phase fraction of the δ phase increased with precursor in the sequence MoO2 > MoO3 > H2MoO5. Steam in the reaction gas also favored the production of δ over γ, but with too much steam, MoO2 was obtained in the product. Synthesis conditions for obtaining nearly phase-pure δ were identified: MoO2 as the precursor, 2% H2O in the gas stream, and a moderate heating rate (3 °C/min). In situ X-ray diffraction provided insights into the reaction pathway. Extensive physico-chemical analysis of the δ phase, including synchrotron X-ray and neutron diffraction, electron microscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and prompt gamma activation analysis, revealed its stoichiometry to be MoO0.108(8)N0.892(8)H0.012(5), indicating non-trivial oxygen incorporation. The presence of N/O ordering and an impurity phase Mo5N6 were also revealed, detectable only by neutron diffraction. Notably, a computationally predicted MoON phase (doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.236402), of interest due to its potential to display a metal-insulator transition, did not appear under any reaction condition examined.