Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “ICSBEP Benchmark”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2020

Validation and Independent Uncertainty Analysis of the MIX-SOL-THERM-003 ICSBEP Benchmark

The International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project (ICSBEP) was started in 1992 by the United States Department of Energy and later in 1995 became an international project with contributions from 22 countries. The project is now organized by the OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA). In its most recent iteration, the ICSBEP handbook contains over five thousand evaluations of critical, near-critical, and subcritical experiments conducted in facilities all around the world. These benchmarks serve as valuable information for criticality safety engineers who can use them to validate calculation techniques and establish minimum subcritical margins for operations with fissionable materials. The benchmarks in the handbook are categorized by their fissile material composition, material form (oxide, solution, or metal), and fission energy spectra. This is especially useful for those looking for benchmarks similar to a system they are working on to compare methods and identify trends. The ICSBEP Handbook Uncertainty Guide is document outlining recommended practices and methods for determining uncertainties in these benchmarks. Quantifying these uncertainties thoroughly is crucial as it allows a higher degree of confidence that data used from them is valid and relevant. The guide stresses the importance of a thorough and well documented uncertainty analysis when evaluating an experiment. All measured values of a system, whether they be dimensions or material compositions, have a certain amount of uncertainty associated with them and can be analyzed one by one to determine their effects on the system. Many evaluated benchmarks in the handbook present this in detail, however some do not, mostly earlier evaluations performed in the 1990’s and early 2000’s. Recently at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), the Nuclear Criticality Safety Division (NCSD) of LANL has been validating MCNP6.2 ® input files of criticality benchmarks for use by Whisper, a criticality safety code developed at LANL. This effort is also part of the OECD NEA Working Party on International Nuclear Data Evaluation Co-operation (WPEC) Subgroup 45, also known as Validation of Nuclear Data Libraries (VaNDaL). The goal of VaNDaL is to compile a set of validated simulation inputs for use in validating nuclear data and simulation codes. As part of these efforts, one of the benchmarks reviewed was the MIX SOL-THERM-003 ICSBEP benchmark. This paper provides an independent uncertainty analysis of this benchmark experiment.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2025

ICSBEP Benchmarking Tutorial for DNCSH

As part of the DOE/NRC Collaboration for Criticality Safety Support for Commercial-Scale HALEU for Fuel Cycles and Transportation (DNCSH), a workshop was held on Teams on how to write a ICSBEP benchmark that meets modern standards. The workshop prepared people performing experiments and writing benchmarks so that they have an increased chance of submitting a benchmark that will be accepted. The workshop was led by experts from LANL, LLNL and Sandia.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2024

ICSBEP Benchmark Template

The purpose of this document is to demonstrate the ability of LATEX to create an ICSBEP benchmark evaluation. Creating a large document in LATEX offers many benefits, such as automatic numbering of items such as tables and figures, and easier placement of objects in the page. Additionally, it is easier to have multiple styles of pages in the same document, and in general the handling of large documents (which evaluations very commonly are) is not problematic. The formatting of this document is meant to conform to both the standards of the document and formatting guide and established practices in order to make the creation of new evaluations a more streamlined process. This will also help reduce the benchmark-to-benchmark variation in style.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2021

Investigation of Delayed Neutron Sensitivities for Several ICSBEP Benchmarks using MCNP

The effective delayed neutron (β$_{eff}$) is a very important parameter for reactor and criticality applications. This parameter is equal to the difference in reactivity between delayed critical ($k_{eff}$ = 1, which requires both prompt and delayed neutrons to achieve criticality) and prompt critical ($k_p$ = 1, which requires only prompt neutrons to achieve criticality). This is often referred to as the delayed critical "window" (the region of criticality between delayed and prompt critical). β$_{eff}$ is a reactor kinetics parameters and depends on the nuclides in the system that undergo fission as well as the spectral characteristics of the system. Measurements of β$_{eff}$ have been performed for many criticality experiments. The EUCLID (Experiments Underpinned by Computational Learning for Improvements in nuclear Data) project at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) aims to constrain nuclear data by using a suite of measurement types beyond $k_{eff}$. Our team has recently investigated the use of pulsed spheres for nuclear data validation. Several other measurement methods are also of interest, including β$_{eff}$ (investigated here) and reactivity coefficients (investigated in a separate work at this same meeting). One focus of our work is to determine if other methods are complimentary to the critical experiments already utilized for nuclear data validation. This is important because if a method has similar sensitivities then it will not be particularly useful for nuclear data validation as it will provide the same information as the critical experiments already being used. Here "similar" could refer to several characteristics, one being the shape of a sensitivity profile over energy. In the future, these methods will be utilized (with both existing and new experiments) in machine learning algorithms for nuclear validation, similar to what is currently done for criticality experiments. In order to use a measurement type for nuclear validation, it is necessary to obtain cross-section sensitivities for that parameter. This work looks at one approach to estimate β$_{eff}$ sensitivities by utilizing $k_{eff}$ sensitivities within Monte Carlo N-Particle ® Code Version 6.2. This is applied to several criticality benchmarks. Results are compared and the benefits and limitations of this approach are discussed.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Data Testing CIELO Evaluations with ICSBEP Benchmarks

We review criticality data testing performed at Los Alamos with a combination of ENDF/B-VII.1 + potential CIELO nuclear data evaluations. The goal of CIELO is to develop updated, best available evaluated nuclear data files for 1 H, 16 O, 56 Fe, 235,238 U and 239 Pu. because the major international evaluated nuclear data libraries don’t agree on the internal cross section details of these most important nuclides.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Validating ENDF/B-VIII.1beta3 with LLNL Pulsed-Sphere Experiments and ICSBEP Benchmarks [Slides]

LPS experiments are not benchmarks but can provide valuable input. 22/1/24 LPS experiments are not benchmarks but can provide valuable input. LPS (run by Denise) help validate nuclear data up to 15 MeV. They test scattering and fission data. They have incomplete uncertainties from 2-8%. I take note when: (1) I see C/E differences above the peak and before late times => 20%. (2) Simulated results between libraries change by => 20% without a good explanation.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Neutron Leakage Spectra Sensitivities for ICSBEP Benchmarks

Neutron leakage spectra have been measured, simulated, and investigated by many groups. These spectra have many uses, including determining shielding requirements and calculating dose for radiation protection purposes, validating nuclear data, and determining material composition. It has even been proposed to use measurements of neutron leakage spectra to determine the soil composition of Mars. As part of the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) Experiments Underpinned by Computational Learning for Improvements in nuclear Data (EUCLID) Laboratory Directed Research Development (LDRD) project, the authors are working on developing methods to calculate sensitivities to neutron leakage spectra. This may allow nuclear data evaluators to better use neutron leakage spectra data to constrain or adjust nuclear data. This may also be particularly useful as many neutron leakage spectra measurements do not require fissile material and can be performed with well characterized neutron sources. Neutron leakage spectra measurements are usually performed by placing a detector at the outside of a nuclear system. This may be a reactor, a neutron generator, or a neutron source. Certain detection systems can use pulse height data to infer neutron energies, other detector systems rely on other ways of determining neutron energy (for example, a Bonner sphere with multiple moderator thicknesses can be used to measure neutron spectrum). These measurements typically rely on some unfolding of the measured results. For pulsed systems like the "Livermore Pulsed Spheres," time-of-flight information can also help to constrain the neutron energy spectra data.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Finalizing the {sup 63}Cu and {sup 65}Cu Resonance Evaluations for the ENDF/B-VIII Release

The resolved resonance region evaluation for the only two natural isotopes of copper ({sup 63}Cu and {sup 65}Cu) was carried out at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) in support of the US Department of Energy (DOE) Nuclear Criticality Safety Program (NCSP). The particular interest in the isotope of copper arose because it was linked with poor performance of the Zeus series of integral benchmarks from the International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project (ICSBEP). Good agreement between the calculated and experimentally measured values for the ICSBEP benchmarks is essential to the NCSP because the ICSBEP benchmarks are used for validation purposes of criticality safety calculations. The particular set of four Zeus experiments had a highly-enriched uranium core with a thick copper-reflector resulting in a large sensitivity of the criticality of these systems to the cross section of copper in the intermediate energy range. Sobes et al. presented the effect of the newly resolved resonance region evaluations for the two isotopes of copper on the Zeus integral benchmarks, as well as 23 other benchmarks from the ICSBEP during the 2016 ANS Annual Meeting. The results presented in Ref. were calculated with the ENDF/B-VII.1 cross section libraries used for all other materials. However, it is suggested that the resolved resonance region evaluations for the isotopes of copper should not be judged only on their performance in the integral benchmark calculations especially when the ENDF/B-VII.1 cross sections are used for all of the other isotopes. Three reasons are provided for this. First and foremost, a new evaluation is an assessment of the physics of the nucleus of the particular isotope, and the goal of an application agnostic nuclear data evaluation is to improve evaluation by fitting state-of-the art R-Matrix formalism to highly precise experimental cross section measurements. The improved performance in the integral benchmarks should only come as a consequence of the improvement in the physics of the evaluation. Secondly, there is some uncertainty in the nuclear data evaluation of the cross section of all isotopes, so there could be some error in evaluating another isotope used in calculating the integral benchmark experiment. Such an error may have been having a compensating effect, in combination with the previous evaluations for the isotopes of copper. Thirdly, with the two isotopes of copper proposed for inclusion in the upcoming release of the ENDF/B-VIII library, performance of the new resonance evaluation for copper should be evaluated based on the calculation of the integral benchmarks with all of the evaluations proposed for inclusion in the ENDF/B-VIII release. These benchmarking results using the ENDF/B-VIII evaluations as they converge closer to their final form will be presented at the conference. This summary stresses the importance of the physics of the evaluation and reviews some of the steps taken in finalizing a resolved resonance region evaluation. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Finalizing the 63 Cu and 65 Cu Resonance Evaluations for the ENDF/B-VIII Release

The resolved resonance region evaluation for the only two natural isotopes of copper ( 63 Cu and 65 Cu) was carried out at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) in support of the US Department of Energy (DOE) Nuclear Criticality Safety Program (NCSP). The particular interest in the isotope of copper arose because it was linked with poor performance of the Zeus series of integral benchmarks from the International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project (ICSBEP). Good agreement between the calculated and experimentally measured values for the ICSBEP benchmarks is essential to the NCSP because the ICSBEP benchmarks are used for validation purposes of criticality safety calculations.

07 ISOTOPE AND RADIATION SOURCES↗
DOE OSTI2019

Critical and Subcritical Experiment NEA Benchmark Possibilities for Measurements at ORCEF and Other USDOE Facilities

This report documents a wide variety of critical and subcritical measurements that could be Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) or International Criticality Safety Benchmark Program (ICSBEP) benchmarks. The list has omitted some few measurements. The experiments are divided into four classes: critical experiments only, critical and subsequent subcritical experiments, subcritical experiments (all performed in critical experiment facilities, and fourth subcritical measurements performed in Material Balance Areas at the Y-12 National Security Complex (NSC) for Y-12 nuclear criticality safety. This report documents to number of critical facility days utilized used for the measurements. Measurement at critical and subsequently subcritical in critical facilities at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORCEF), Los Alamos National Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, and Babcock and Wilcox at Lynchburg, Va, utilized ~350 operational days of critical facility time, Measurement only at subcritical at ORCEF utilized ~200 operational days in this critical facility, and subcritical measurements in Material Balance Areas of the Y-12 National Security Complex used 350 operational days, many were unattended measurements. In view of the high cost of critical facility time and the limitation of only one facility available for measurements in the United States, it is very cost-effective to mine the existing data to produce benchmarks such as those already in NEA and ICSBEP. For measurements at ORCEF the material descriptions from Y-12 NSC and the accuracy of the configurations should (bases on experience with existing NEA or ICSBEP of ORCEF measurement benchmarks) result in uncertainties in measured k eff values lower than ±0.001 and may be as low as ±0.0002; thus, allowing more accurate comparisons between measurements and calculations and thus more accurate verification of calculations.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Intrinsic value of the international benchmark projects, ICSBEP and IRPhEP, for advanced reactor development

The International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project, a sanctioned program under the auspices of the Nuclear Energy Agency of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, has been a highly successful and productive collaboration, now encompassing over 5,000 evaluated experimental benchmarks trusted and relied upon throughout the international nuclear communities. The success of this project led to the development of the International Reactor Physics Experiment Evaluation Project, which is dedicated to the evaluation of benchmark experiment data to sustain current and future reactor physics validation needs. These exemplary programs, and their widely utilized handbooks, serve as gold standards to which other databases strive to emulate. The purpose of the two projects is to preserve modern and legacy experimental data and evaluate it in a standardized handbook format to provide quality benchmarks to support modern and future criticality safety and reactor physics validation. These two projects have often served as the mechanism through which historic and modern neutronics experiments are evaluated and shared across international borders, to best provide unique, high-quality peer-reviewed, and often otherwise unavailable, benchmark data. The contents of these handbooks are utilized not only in validating criticality safety, reactor physics, and advanced reactor calculations, but are used to validate neutronics calculations and nuclear data for most other nuclear applications. This paper discusses both international programs and available content to enable advanced reactor design validation.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Gaussian Process Optimization of Sensitivity-Based Similarity Metrics between New Nuclear Applications and New/Existing Benchmarks

Confidently designing safe, new nuclear criticality experiments requires expert judgement, which could take years of experience. Sensitivity/uncertainty (S/U) analysis can be utilized by less experienced individuals to conservatively estimate uncertainties in important parameters, such as k eff , in newly proposed nuclear applications. This type of analysis relies on matching new nuclear applications with existing benchmark experiments. The Whisper-1.1 software package included in MCNP6.2 ®1 contains more than 1,100 International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project (ICSBEP) benchmarks. These benchmarks however rarely match new nuclear applications. The number of benchmarks available to match a given set of materials or geometric configurations varies significantly. Furthermore, recently performed benchmark experiments may not have had enough time to be properly documented and published. Benchmarks are vital for determining the accuracy of nuclear data and can assist nuclear physics and evaluators in improving nuclear data libraries. Exhaustively exploring the parameter space using simulations with software such as MCNP is too computationally expensive. In this work, Gaussian process optimization was implemented to reduce the number of simulations needed for optimization over multiple parameters. This optimization scheme was designed to selectively generate new benchmarks with high sensitivity-based similarity metrics to user-defined nuclear applications. Two benchmark models of spherically nested shells containing plutonium, uranium, tantalum, and water were used in the optimization to match an application containing plutonium plates, stacked in a tantalum reflector, surrounded by water.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Gaussian Process Optimization of Sensitivity-Based Similarity Metrics between New Nuclear Applications and New/Existing Benchmarks [Slides]

This presentation discusses Nuclear Criticality Safety (NCS) and how designing safe, new nuclear criticality experiments requires expert judgement, which could take years of experience. Sensitivity/uncertainty (S/U) analysis can be utilized by less experienced individuals to conservatively estimate uncertainties in important parameters, such as k eff , in newly proposed nuclear experiments. The presentation poses the question of how this analysis can be performed and states that the answer lies in matching new nuclear experiments with existing benchmark experiments using similarity metrics. By increasing the criticality safety of the application in this work, higher mass limits could be used in PF-4 operations. Additionally, the presentation discusses MCNP6.2®, Whisper-1.1, the software that can be used in this analysis. Also discussed is the fact that International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project (ICSBEP) benchmarks rarely match new nuclear applications and that there are significant differences in given set of materials and/or geometry. If there are no benchmarks that match the application, the presentation discusses the possibility of creating new benchmarks. In conclusion, this work presents a Gaussian process (GP) optimization scheme that was used to generate new benchmarks with the highest sensitivity-based similarity metrics to user-defined nuclear applications. The Gaussian process optimization successfully designed 3 new experimental benchmarks that were highly correlated to the application of interest and had k eff values near critical. Optimization over c k,i-r has shown that investigating specific isotope reactions for different applications is crucial to designing benchmark experiments. Partial contribution from Pu dominates c k similarity metric. Future work includes testing new stand-alone similarity metrics or new combinations of similarity metrics as the design criterion of this optimization – design criterion is application dependent.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2025

HEU Systems at Low Temperatures [Slides]

This project is sponsored by the Nuclear Criticality Safety Program (NCSP) in collaboration with Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) with a novel interest surrounding the transportation of fissile material: there is a concern regarding the inadvertent introduction of the material in a low-temperature environment. The low-temperature environment will be bounded down to temperatures not below -40 ºC, since this is the limit allotted for packages containing general radioactive material exposed to air. Eventually, the goal of the project is to conduct experiments spanning multiple fission energies at these low temperatures, concluding in an International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project (ICSBEP) benchmark.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Modeling Approach to Critical in the Upcoming CERBERUS Experiment

The planned Critical Experiment Reflected By coppEr to betteR Understand Scattering (CERBERUS) seeks to maximize sensitivity to elastic neutron scattering in the intermediate energy region (0.625 eV to 100 keV). It will be performed near the end of FY 2023 at the National Criticality Experiments Research Center (NCERC). Very few International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project (ICSBEP) benchmarks are sensitive to copper in this region. Creating a benchmark sensitive in this area will make the Zeus benchmark series, an intermediate benchmark evaluation that uses a copper reflector, more useful for code and nuclear data validation. Approaching criticality in a safe manner is of utmost importance to avoid a criticality accident, which would present a safety concern and could cause damage to equipment. The two rules that are followed closely to ensure that a criticality accident does not occur are the 3/4 rule and the 1/2 rule. The 3/4 rule states that no more than 3/4 of a critical mass can be assembled by hand, and the 1/2 rule states that no more than 1/2 of the material expected to reach criticality, or 1/2 the distance needed to reach criticality, can be added before another measurement of the count rate has been taken. This work will discuss the approach to criticality as modeled in MCNP6® 1 particle transport code with the ENDF/B- VIII.0 cross-section library and the .00c data library.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗