Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Heavy Vehicle”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1987

More Durable Tracks for Heavy Vehicles

Tie bars instead of threaded fasteners make track throwing less likely. Proposed undercarriage for tank or bulldozer has flanged edges to prevent rocks and other road debris from getting caught in track drive and damaging or casting off track. Improved track has no threaded fasteners to be loosened by road shock and vibration. Continuous chain of floating guide bars articulated at web junctions. Pins replace bolted connections. Guide bars and flanges on vehicle keep out stones.

Collins, Earl R., Jr.↗
NASA NTRS1994

A shadowgraph study of the National Launch System's 1 1/2 stage vehicle configuration and Heavy Lift Launch Vehicle configuration

A shadowgraph study of the National Launch System's (NLS's) 1 1/2 stage and heavy lift launch vehicle (HLLV) configurations is presented. Shadowgraphs are shown for the range of Mach numbers from Mach 0.6 to 5.0 at various angles-of-attack and roll angles. Since the 1 1/2 stage configuration is generally symmetric, no shadowgraphs of any roll angle are shown for this configuration. The major flow field phenomena over the NLS 1 1/2 stage and HLLV configurations are shown in the shadowgraphs. These shadowgraphs are used in the aerothermodynamic analysis of the external flow conditions the launch vehicle would encounter during the ascent stage of flight. The shadowgraphs presented in this study were obtained from configurations tested in the Marshall Space Flight Center's 14-Inch Trisonic Wind Tunnel during 1992.

Pokora, Darlene C.↗
NASA NTRS1984

A study of aeroelastic and structural dynamic effects in multi-rotor systems with application to hybrid heavy lift vehicles

An aeroelastic model suitable for the study of aeroelastic and structural dynamic effects in multirotor vehicles simulating a hybrid heavy lift vehicle was developed and applied to the study of a number of diverse problems. The analytical model developed proved capable of modeling a number of aeroelastic problems, namely: (1) isolated blade aeroelastic stability in hover and forward flight, (2) coupled rotor/fuselage aeromechanical problem in air or ground resonance, (3) tandem rotor coupled rotor/fuselage problems, and (4) the aeromechanical stability of a multirotor vehicle model representing a hybrid heavy lift airship (HHLA). The model was used to simulate the ground resonance boundaries of a three bladed hingeless rotor model, including the effect of aerodynamic loads, and the theoretical predictions compared well with experimental results. Subsequently the model was used to study the aeromechanical stability of a vehicle representing a hybrid heavy lift airship, and potential instabilities which could occur for this type of vehicle were identified. The coupling between various blade, supporting structure and rigid body modes was identified.

Friedmann, P. P.↗
NASA NTRS1981

Civil markets for buoyant heavy-lift vehicles

Worldwide civil markets for heavy lift airships were investigated. Substantial potential market demand was identified for payloads of from 13 to 800 tons. The largest markets appear to be in applications to relieve port congestion, construction of power generating plants, and, most notably, logging. Because of significant uncertainties both in vehicle and market characteristics, further analysis will be necessary to verify the identified market potential of heavy lift airship concepts.

Mettam, P. J.↗
NASA NTRS2011

Ground and Range Operations for a Heavy-Lift Vehicle: Preliminary Thoughts

This paper discusses the ground and range operations for a Shuttle derived Heavy-Lift Vehicle being launched from the Kennedy Space Center on the Eastern range. Comparisons will be made between the Shuttle and a heavy lift configuration (SLS-ETF MPCV April 2011) by contrasting their subsystems. The analysis will also describe a simulation configuration with the potential to be utilized for heavy lift vehicle processing/range simulation modeling and the development of decision-making systems utilized by the range. In addition, a simple simulation model is used to provide the required critical thinking foundations for this preliminary analysis.

Rabelo, Luis↗
NASA NTRS1981

Hybrid and electric advanced vehicle systems (heavy) simulation

A computer program to simulate hybrid and electric advanced vehicle systems (HEAVY) is described. It is intended for use early in the design process: concept evaluation, alternative comparison, preliminary design, control and management strategy development, component sizing, and sensitivity studies. It allows the designer to quickly, conveniently, and economically predict the performance of a proposed drive train. The user defines the system to be simulated using a library of predefined component models that may be connected to represent a wide variety of propulsion systems. The development of three models are discussed as examples.

Hammond, R. A.↗
NASA NTRS1989

Heavy lift vehicles for transportation to a low earth orbit Space Station for assembly of a Human to Mars Mission

Heavy lift vehicle configurations are proposed which will meet the requirements for transporting the elements of a Human to Mars Mission to a low earth orbit Space Station for assembly. Both near term derivative type vehiles as well as advanced technology vehicles are considered. The capability of these vehicles to accommodate the precursor missions are also examined. The implications on launch vehicle payload accommodation design and orbital operations are discussed.

Swalley, Frank E.↗
NASA NTRS2011

Heavy Lift Vehicle (HLV) Avionics Flight Computing Architecture Study

A NASA multi-Center study team was assembled from LaRC, MSFC, KSC, JSC and WFF to examine potential flight computing architectures for a Heavy Lift Vehicle (HLV) to better understand avionics drivers. The study examined Design Reference Missions (DRMs) and vehicle requirements that could impact the vehicles avionics. The study considered multiple self-checking and voting architectural variants and examined reliability, fault-tolerance, mass, power, and redundancy management impacts. Furthermore, a goal of the study was to develop the skills and tools needed to rapidly assess additional architectures should requirements or assumptions change.

Hodson, Robert F.↗
NASA NTRS1990

A test manager's perspective of a test concept for a heavy lift vehicle

The developmment of a test concept is a significant part of the advanced planning activities accomplished for the Initial Operational Test and Evaluation (IOT&E) of new systems. A test concept is generally viewed as a description, including rationale, of the test structure, evaluation methodology and management approach required to plan and conduct the IOT&E of a program such as a new heavy lift launch vehicle system. The test concept as presented in this paper is made up of an operations area, a test area, an evaluation area, and a management area. The description presented here is written from the perspective of one test manager, and represents his views of a possible framework of a test concept using examples for a potential IOT&E of a heavy lift launch vehicle.

Pargeon, John I., Jr.↗
NASA NTRS1988

Assessment of external tank for heavy lift launch vehicle tankage

A new Heavy Lift Launch Vehicle (HLLV) will be required to lift future heavy payloads scheduled for launch in the mid to late 1990s. This report describes a study conducted at Martin Marietta which evaluated the use of an External Tank (ET) from the National Space Transportation System (NSTS) as a cryogenic, expendable upper stage for the HLLV. Design requirement changes necessary to adopt the existing ET to the HLLV mission were identified and an upper stage design configuration was defined which made maximum use of existing ET hardware and tooling. Performance improvements that could be achieved by substituting advance aluminum alloys (Aluminum-Lithium) in the tankage design were also determined. Using an upper stage design derived from the ET provides the advantages of using proven hardware, existing manufacturing facilities and existing tooling.

Hansen, Lawrence L.↗
NASA NTRS1989

Shuttle C: Heavy-lift vehicle of the 1990's

The unmanned, Shuttle-C, a low cost evolution of the U.S. Space Shuttle is described. It is capable of delivering 45,400 to 77,100 kg payloads by 1994. The Shuttle-C's design is evolved directly from the Space Shuttle. The payload carrier, the only new element of the Shuttle-C, is a cylindrical payload bay 4.6 m in diameter by 25 m in length. Diagrams of similarities and differences betwen the Shuttle and Shuttle-C are presented. A typical mission profile is illustrated. Payload carrying abilities and other applications are described.

Lee, Thomas J.↗
NASA NTRS1990

Shuttle-C - Heavy lift vehicle of the 90's

The design philosophy and the advantages of Shuttle-C, an unmanned vehicle capable of flying 45,400-77,100-kg payloads, are briefly reviewed. The development of Shuttle-C emphasizes the evolution and integration of existing reliable systems through their cost-effective and technological lifetimes. The flexibility, reliability, and cost efficiency of Shuttle-C will provide capabilities considered essential for effective space operations in the 1990s.

Eudy, Glenn R.↗
NASA NTRS1989

Shuttle-C heavy-lift vehicle of the 90's

An unmanned cargo version of the Shuttle is being defined with the objective of achieving early high-lift capability. This vehicle, Shuttle-C, is a low-cost evolution of the current Space shuttle that may be flying 100,000-170,000-pound payloads by late 1994. The only new element of the Shuttle-C will be a cylindrical payload carrier with a 15-foot diameter, 82-foot long payload bay. The discussion covers the advantages of Shuttle-C, Shuttle-C design, the main propulsion system, the power system and auxiliary power units, a typical mission, and candidate payloads.

Eudy, Robert G.↗
NASA NTRS2005

Shuttle Derived In-Line Heavy Lift Vehicle

This paper introduces an evolvable Space Shuttle derived family of launch vehicles. It details the steps in the evolution of the vehicle family, noting how the evolving lift capability compares with the evolving lift requirements. A system description is given for each vehicle. The cost of each development stage is described. Also discussed are demonstration programs, the merits of the SSME vs. an expendable rocket engine (RS-68), and finally, the next steps needed to refine this concept.

Greenwood, Terry↗
NASA NTRS1988

Space station heavy lift launch vehicle utilization

The use of Heavy Lift Launch Vehicles (HLLVs) for Space Station assembly, logistics. and resupply is explored. Potential HLLVs, including those based on the Titan, and Shuttle-derived vehicles (SDV), are discussed. The baseline Critical Evaluation Task Force (CETF) Space Station assembly sequence is described and compared with assembly options made possible through the use of HLLVs. The issues of cost, dual compatibility with the Space Shuttle Space Transportation System (STS), co-manifesting of payloads with other science missions cargo return, and ground handling and launch facilities are also considered. The main advantage achieved by using HLLVs are simplification of assembly procedures, added resupply capability, and increased assured access to space. The major disadvantages are increased orbital flight operations complexity, higher logistics costs, and additional ground handling/launch facility requirements. Also, there will not be any improvement in return cargo capacity, nor any addition to crew transport capabilities. Finally, the dual STS/HLLV compatibility should be maintained to minimize program risk. HLLV and Orbital Maneuvering Vehicle design must parallel that of the Space Station.

Deryder, L. J.↗
NASA NTRS1985

Heavy Lift Launch Vehicles for 1995 and Beyond

A Heavy Lift Launch Vehicle (HLLV) designed to deliver 300,000 lb to a 540 n mi circular polar orbit may be required to meet national needs for 1995 and beyond. The vehicle described herein can accommodate payload envelopes up to 50 ft diameter by 200 ft in length. Design requirements include reusability for the more expensive components such as avionics and propulsion systems, rapid launch turnaround time, minimum hardware inventory, stage and component flexibility and commonality, and low operational costs. All ascent propulsion systems utilize liquid propellants, and overall launch vehicle stack height is minimized while maintaining a reasonable vehicle diameter. The ascent propulsion systems are based on the development of a new liquid oxygen/hydrocarbon booster engine and liquid oxygen/liquid hydrogen upper stage engine derived from today's SSME technology. Wherever possible, propulsion and avionics systems are contained in reusable propulsion/avionics modules that are recovered after each launch.

Toelle, R.↗
NASA NTRS1991

Heavy-lift launch vehicle propulsion considerations

Information on heavy-lift launch vehicle (HLLV) propulsion is given in viewgraph form. The objective was to investigate Earth to orbit options which minimize on-orbit operations and impacts to Space Station Freedom, have a reasonable capability to support Mars missions, and minimize mass in low Earth orbit. Potential synergism with the Space Transportation System is considered. Launch vehicle sizing results, HLLV thrust requirements, and propulsion system reliability are covered.

Ordway, Wayne L.↗
NASA NTRS1995

Advanced transportation system studies technical area 2(TA-2): Heavy lift launch vehicle development: Executive summary - volume 1

The purpose of the TA-2 contract was to provide advanced launch vehicle concept definition and analysis to assist NASA in the identification of future launch vehicle requirements. Contracted analysis activities included vehicle sizing and performance analysis, subsystem concept definition, propulsion subsystem definition (foreign and domestic), ground operations and facilities analysis, and life cycle cost estimation. This document is part of the final report for the TA-2 contract. The final report consists of three volumes: Volume 1 is the Executive Summary, Volume 2 is Technical Results, and Volume 3 is Program Cost Estimates. The document-at-hand, Volume 1, provides a summary description of the technical activities that were performed over the entire contract duration, covering three distinct launch vehicle definition activities: heavy-lift (300,000 pounds injected mass to low Earth orbit) launch vehicles for the First Lunar Outpost (FLO), medium-lift (50,000-80,000 pounds injected mass to low Earth orbit) launch vehicles, and single-stage-to-orbit (SSTO) launch vehicles (25,000 pounds injected mass to a Space Station orbit).

McCurry, J.↗