Catalytic HTL -derived biochar and sol-gel synthesized (Mn, Ti)-oxides for asymmetric supercapacitors
Not provided.
SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Not provided.
We compute the two-loop hard-thermal-loop (HTL) resummed thermodynamic potential for \( \mathcal{N} \) = 4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills (SYM). Our final result is manifestly gauge-invariant and was renormalized using only simple vacuum energy, gluon mass, scalar mass, and quark mass counter terms. The HTL mass parameters m D , M D , and m q are then determined self-consistently using a variational prescription which results in a set of coupled gap equations. Based on this, we obtain the two-loop HTL-resummed thermodynamic functions of \( \mathcal{N} \) = 4 SYM. We compare our final result with known results obtained in the weak- and strong-coupling limits. We also compare to previously obtained approximately self-consistent HTL resummations and Padé approximants. We find that the two-loop HTL resummed results for the scaled entropy density is a quantitatively reliable approximation to the scaled entropy density for 0 ≤ λ ≲ 2 and is in agreement with previous approximately self-consistent HTL resummation results for λ ≲ 6.
Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) offers an attractive route to produce fuel blendstocks from wet wastes. Scaleable hydrotreating data for the conversion of HTL biocrude to fuels is critical to the commercialization of HTL. Herein, we demonstrate pore diffusion limitations for the hydrotreating of HTL biocrudes. We demonstrate scale-able hydrotreating of HTL biocrude to produce a high cetane diesel fuel and demonstrate the hydrotreating limitations.
PNNL has developed Hydrothermal Liquefaction (HTL) technology, which can directly convert sewage sludge to a biocrude oil that can be refined into renewable diesel fuel and provide a significant reduction in the volume of biosolids produced as ash with far less potential environmental impacts associated with disposal. HTL also produces an aqueous byproduct stream that requires treatment before it can be returned to the headworks of the Wastewater Resource Recovery Facilities (WRRF). The goal of this project is to evaluate synergies of using HTL and advanced AD to enable the treatment and recycle of HTL aqueous phase. This CRADA will; 1) formalize and strengthen the working relationship between PNNL and GLWA, 2) jointly evaluate HTL and AD scenarios for WRRFs and 3) help enable the implementation of HTL/AD technology at GLWA and other WRRFs.
This paper presents the upgrading of HTL (Hydrothermal Liquefaction) bio oil produced by from various sources such as sewage sludge and food wastes. The HTL oil was hydrotreated over a CoMo/Al2O3 (guardbed) and NiMo/Al2O3 (mainbed) catalysts at WHSV 0.5hr-1, 400°C and 1500 psi. The steady state densities (at 40°C) were 0.79 and 0.81 g/ml for HTL biocrude derived from sewage sludge and food waste, respectively. After 1500 hours of steady state operation, variations in process conditions that affect the hydrotreating performance had been identified in the following order; Pressure>WHSV>Temperature. Pressure had huge impact on the hydrotreating performance. The hydrotreating efficiency was reestablished to base line conditions with minimal deactivation of catalyst at 2000 hours run time.
Not Available
Characteristics of solid residuals generated during hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) of biomass are reported to establish disposition options for these residuals to reduce liability or barriers to commercialization of HTL. HTL solids from pilot scale are reported and compared to existing HTL solids literature for a variety of biomass feedstocks and HTL configurations, noting differences among literature HTL solids due to solids collection methods. Reported analyses include CHNOS, moisture, ash, inorganics by Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP), and High Heating Value (HHV). HTL solids are determined to be substantially compatible with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) disposal regulations within existing data. Disposition and valorization routes are identified, yet combustion as valorization is determined to be not economically beneficial. Further, research gaps are identified, which include the need for future research to be performed on HTL solids that are representative of a continuous, commercializable flowsheet; verification that specific HTL solids meet EPA disposal requirements; exploration of valorization options; and the need for invention of continuous HTL solids separations/management.
Valorization of agricultural and food waste digestates is crucial for sustainable waste management to reduce environmental impacts and improve the economics of commercial farms. Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) of anaerobic digestates was evaluated to recover resources by converting them into carbon-dense biocrude oil and a nutrient-rich HTL aqueous phase (HTL-AP) coproduct. The effects of HTL temperature (280–360 °C), reaction time (10–50 min), feedstock pH (2.5–8.5), digestate salt content (1–5 wt%), and digestate cellulose-to-lignin ratio (0.2–1.8) on energy and nutrient recovery were systematically investigated in a set of well-designed experiments following a half-fractional central composite protocol. Response surface analysis combined with HTL product characterization and comparative literature study produced a comprehensive reaction pathway for HTL of anaerobic digestates. Moreover, this analysis revealed the importance of acidic feedstocks (pH 3.00–5.53), high reaction temperatures (337–360 °C), and reaction times <45 or 45–50 min for digestates with Cel/Lig >1 or <1, for maximizing the energy recovered in biocrude (high carbon yield and low heteroatom content) and the amounts of P, NH 3 –N, and Mg distributed in the HTL-AP. Acidic conditions catalyzed biocrude production, inhibited the Maillard reaction (lowering the nitrogen content in biocrude), and partitioned nutrients into the HTL-AP. Higher reaction temperatures coupled with longer reaction times activated hydro-denitrogenation and deoxygenation reactions to improve biocrude quality. Finally, this work provides not only validated methods to achieve targeted resource recovery for specific feedstock compositions using HTL, but also a comprehensive mechanistic understanding of the HTL of biomass waste for controlling target product characteristics.
Catalytic hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) can convert wet biomass into crude-like oil and has potential to degrade pollutants during the thermal depolymerization process. To avoid negative environmental impacts from per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in sewage sludge after its final disposal, we comprehensively evaluated catalytic destruction of PFAS in sludge through HTL. Here the results showed that adding red mud to HTL was beneficial for the biocrude yield and significantly increased the carbon conversion efficiency and energy recovery of the hydrothermal process. HTL at 300 °C for 2 h degraded > 96% of spiked perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA). The mass of spiked perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) and pre-existing perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA) and perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHpA), however, increased in the HTL product streams. The remaining PFAS after HTL mainly stayed in the biocrude phase. Our findings indicated that HTL under the studied condition was not able to degrade all PFAS existed in sewage sludge. Although adding red mud could improve the HTL performance with respect to biocrude, this reagent did not improve the removal of perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs). As a matter of fact, the hydrothermal process amended with the selected reagents resulted in increased mass of PFBS, PFHxA, and PFHpA in the HTL products due to degradation of PFAA precursors. Thus, other treatment approaches for PFAS removal from sewage sludge need to be identified to prevent possible contamination of environments receiving PFAS-containing sludge.
Major differences in thermal stability and hydrotreatment behavior of HTL and pyrolysis oils have been reported in the literature. However, little is known about the variations in the chemical composition of these oils that could explain such differences. Two commercial wood pyrolysis oils (Pyrovac and BTG), and their water-soluble (WS) and water-insoluble fractions (WIS) were analyzed and compared with the aqueous (WS WD-57 ) and oily (WIS WS-57 ) fractions obtained from hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) of Douglas-fir. The samples were characterized by GC/MS, Karl Fischer titration, carbonyl content, total acid number, elemental composition, calorific value, proximate analysis, Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), Folin-Ciocalteu (FC), and UV fluorescence. All the fractions were also analyzed by Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectroscopy (FT-ICR-MS) and by Electrospray Ionization (EI). The most prevalent class of compounds in the water insoluble phases were phenols derived from lignin. Water-soluble phases contain mostly the oxygenated compounds derived from cellulose and hemicellulose and were richer in carbonyl functional groups. The water content of the resulting aqueous phases were between: 65 (WS BTG ) and 96 (WS Pyrovac ) wt. %. The bio-oil from BTG has higher water content and lower HHV, compared to Pyrovac oil. The GC/MS results of BTG oil show the presence of a more prominent acetic acid peak and higher TAN number than the Pyrovac oil. The GC/MS of Pyrovac oil showed more obvious mono-phenol peaks. The quantification of this family by Folin-Ciocalteu method confirmed higher content of monophenolic compounds compared with the BTG oil. The lower thermal stability of pyrolysis oils compared with HTL biocrudes can be partially explained by the fact that pyrolysis oils (BTG and Pyrovac) contain carbohydrates while HTL biocrude (WIS WD-57 ) doesn’t. Thus, we decided to further investigate the chemical differences between the phenolic rich fractions insoluble in water and the holocellulose derived compounds soluble in water. Even after water extraction, the acid content of the water insoluble fraction from BTG (WISBTG) was higher than the acid content of the water insoluble fraction obtained by HTL (WISWSD-57). Likewise, the acid content of the aqueous phases derived from pyrolysis oils (WS Pyrovac , WS BTG ) was also higher than for the aqueous phase obtained by HTL (WSWSD-57). This result is in part due to the use of bases in the HTL process that neutralizes the acid formed in that process. Moreover, the starting feedstock may also influence the differences between the oils. Although, the UV-Fluorescence spectra, ICR-MS and the EI analyses showed some minor differences in the molecular weight and chemical make-up of the oligomers soluble and insoluble in water from pyrolysis and HTL; the differences observed were not large enough to justify the differences in behavior between these oils reported in the literature. Our results suggest that the differences observed between HTL biocrudes and pyrolysis oils are likely partially due to the presence of holocellulose derived products in the pyrolysis oils and higher acid contents.
Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) is a thermal process that converts wet biomass to renewable hydrocarbon fuel blendstocks (i.e., renewable naphtha, renewable diesel, and sustainable aviation fuel (SAF)). It can utilize a wide range of pure and blended wet feedstocks, including sewage sludge from water resource recovery facilities (WRRF), food and agriculture wastes, algae, fats, oils and greases (FOG) and blends of dry and wet wastes/feedstocks. Historically, techno-economic analysis (TEA) and annual state of technology (SOT) assessments with standard economic assumptions used by the Bioenergy Technologies Office (BETO) were conducted for the wet waste HTL pathway leveraging experimental data collected from Pacific Northwest National Laboratory’s (PNNL) continuous flow reactor systems. The objective of the SOT assessment has been to guide and track progress of BETO’s HTL research and development (R&D) toward reduced cost and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for the pathway. However, gaps exist between BETO’s traditional SOT updates and the needs of key external stakeholders that – if addressed – will accelerate technology adoption. This Business Case Study aims to bridge this gap by providing an updated design, TEA, and LCA based on PNNL’s FY23 R&D with added analyses and information that provide enhanced relevance for stakeholders of the HTL technology. This includes specific siting, regional wet waste resource inventory and transportation cost analyses, fuel market information, sustainable fuel policy impacts, economic metrics of net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR), greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions analysis, and statistical analysis of cost and technical uncertainties of the HTL plant design. The study focuses on the “Detroit combined statistical area (CSA)” region for siting of a wet waste HTL plant adjacent to the Great Lakes Water Authority (GLWA) facility with guidance from industry participants. Regional resource and siting analyses were conducted to identify feedstock availability, scale, and cost, as well as a beneficial site location. TEA with detailed rigorous capital cost estimation for the specific site application was conducted to evaluate the key economic metrics of most value to industrial partners. These include total capital investment, operating costs, minimum fuel selling price (MFSP) of the biocrude and fuel blendstock, and NPV and internal rate of return IRR with sustainable fuel credits. Life cycle analysis was conducted to evaluate the supply chain greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for the wet waste HTL process as compared with petroleum derived diesel. This study is also informed by years of R&D and process de-risking learnings and was conducted with a basic engineering HTL plant design and costing that akin to a “first-of-a-kind” plant economics. This differs from our conventional “nth plant ” SOT assessments. Specifically, the HTL process model has been updated with more operationally reliable methods for feed heating and phase separations. Further, we have implemented additional spare equipment for redundancy, a more rigorous installed equipment cost estimation approach, and additional costs associated with feed formatting and delivery, building, piping and site development. An Excel-based cost sheet based on the basic engineering design is also released alongside the report that allows users to conduct customized TEA with their own feed composition and financial assumptions.
This report summarizes the research at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) to evaluate the economic viability and environmental impact of using microalgae to produce fuels and other products via hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL). Over the past several years, PNNL has examined key aspects of feedstock cost and availability, formatting and conversion techniques, and the utilization of all HTL products. Investigations of feedstock cost led to opportunities to work with cost-advantaged algal feedstocks that can be provided at minimal cost for HTL processing. Cost-advantaged algae include wastewater-grown algae and harvested algal blooms. Although farm-cultivated algae offer the best possible biomass composition and scalability for HTL processing, the cost of the feedstock is too high to yield an economically competitive biofuel. Processing cost-advantaged feedstocks creates other unique challenges in adapting HTL to upgrade biomass with higher than typical ash content and less preferred composition (low lipid). Despite the challenges, HTL of cost-advantaged algae results in economically competitive pricing scenarios and significant advantages in reducing net emissions below 70% of the petroleum baseline. The utilization of a variety of potential non-fuel products from algal HTL, such as the use of HTL solids as a cement additive, provides a significant reduction in net emissions by offsetting emissions from other carbon-intense products. This report presents an analysis of the research conducted at PNNL to develop an economically and environmentally beneficial process for algae HTL.
Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) is a thermal process that converts wet biomass to renewable hydrocarbon fuel blendstocks (i.e., renewable naphtha, renewable diesel, and sustainable aviation fuel (SAF)). It can utilize a wide range of pure and blended wet feedstocks, including sewage sludge from water resource recovery facilities (WRRF), food and agriculture wastes, algae, fats, oils and greases (FOG) and blends of dry and wet wastes/feedstocks. Historically, techno-economic analysis (TEA) and annual state of technology (SOT) assessments with standard economic assumptions used by the Bioenergy Technologies Office (BETO) were conducted for the wet waste HTL pathway leveraging experimental data collected from Pacific Northwest National Laboratory’s (PNNL) continuous flow reactor systems. The objective of the SOT assessment has been to guide and track progress of BETO’s HTL research and development (R&D) toward reduced cost and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for the pathway. However, gaps exist between BETO’s traditional SOT updates and the needs of key external stakeholders that – if addressed – will accelerate technology adoption. This Business Case Study aims to bridge this gap by providing an updated design, TEA, and LCA based on PNNL’s FY23 R&D with added analyses and information that provide enhanced relevance for stakeholders of the HTL technology. This includes specific siting, regional wet waste resource inventory and transportation cost analyses, fuel market information, sustainable fuel policy impacts, economic metrics of net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR), greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions analysis, and statistical analysis of cost and technical uncertainties of the HTL plant design. The study focuses on the “Detroit combined statistical area (CSA)” region for siting of a wet waste HTL plant adjacent to the Great Lakes Water Authority (GLWA) facility with guidance from industry participants. Regional resource and siting analyses were conducted to identify feedstock availability, scale, and cost, as well as a beneficial site location. TEA with detailed rigorous capital cost estimation for the specific site application was conducted to evaluate the key economic metrics of most value to industrial partners. These include total capital investment, operating costs, minimum fuel selling price (MFSP) of the biocrude and fuel blendstock, and NPV and internal rate of return IRR with sustainable fuel credits. Life cycle analysis was conducted to evaluate the supply chain greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for the wet waste HTL process as compared with petroleum derived diesel. This study is also informed by years of R&D and process de-risking learnings and was conducted with a basic engineering HTL plant design and costing that akin to a “first-of-a-kind” plant economics. This differs from our conventional “nth plant ” SOT assessments. Specifically, the HTL process model has been updated with more operationally reliable methods for feed heating and phase separations. Further, we have implemented additional spare equipment for redundancy, a more rigorous installed equipment cost estimation approach, and additional costs associated with feed formatting and delivery, building, piping and site development. An Excel-based cost sheet based on the basic engineering design is also released alongside the report that allows users to conduct customized TEA with their own feed composition and financial assumptions.
Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) is the process in which biological compounds can be converted into biocrude diesel; various feedstocks, such as algae and wet biowaste, can be utilized. Almost 20 million dry tons of wet biowaste is deposited in U.S. municipal wastewaters annually. If recovered and converted into biodiesel, it can act as a massive source of renewable energy. Preliminary experiments on a diesel engine show that HTL fuel can achieve similar performance and emission levels to diesel. In order to further understand the influence of the HTL fuel properties, the HTL fuel and blends with diesel are observed in a constant volume chamber. Previously, 10% and 20% of the HTL fuel were blended with diesel by volume and demonstrated properties that roughly matched diesel in terms of combustion. In this study, 50% and 100% HTL fuel blends are tested on the same apparatus. It was discovered that the workability of HTL is almost the same as that of diesel and is less sensitive to ambient temperatures. When the ambient temperature is reduced from 1200 K to 800 K, the change ratio of ignition delay is only 62% of diesel. By analyzing the combustion process, it can be seen that there is no need to make major modifications to the engine control strategy if HTL fuel is applied to diesel engines. Though, under low temperature and low oxygen conditions, the soot luminosity peak of HTL100 is 3.12 times than that of diesel.
The hydrothermal liquefaction aqueous phase (HTL-AP), a nutrient- and carbon-rich waste byproduct of the HTL process, can be recirculated to enhance biocrude production efficiency. To avoid dilution of the HTL feedstock and reduced fuel quality associated with recirculating untreated HTL-AP, this study investigated nanofiltration to concentrate organic compounds and separate nutrients from HTL-AP of three algal biomass sources: an algal wastewater treatment system and two from harmful algal blooms in lakes. Up to 99% of the organics were recovered in the concentrated HTL-AP (retentate), and significant increases in both permeate flux and permeation of nitrogenous compounds were achieved by increasing HTL-AP temperature to 45 °C and pH to 11. Recirculating the concentrated HTL-AP increased biocrude yield by 70%-116% and reduced biocrude nitrogen content by up to 12%. The carbon and energy capture in the biocrude also increased by 66% and 68%, respectively.