Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “H-area”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

18 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2020

Applied Science Investigations to Facilitate Closure of the F-Area and H-Area Seepage Basins

This report provides a roadmap of applied science studies that will facilitate reaching long term monitoring end state corrective actions for groundwater contamination at the F-Area Seepage Basins and the H-Area Seepage Basins at the Savannah River Site in Aiken, SC. The F-Area and H-Area Seepage Basins are waste units on the Savannah River Site in Aiken, SC at which low-level radioactive solutions were disposed into unlined basins, resulting in groundwater contamination. The current contaminants of interest in the groundwater are tritium, iodine-129, strontium-90, uranium isotopes and nitrate. Remediation at both sites has continued since 1988, consisting of closure and capping of the basins, operation of a groundwater pump-and-treat system from 1997 to 2004, and replacement of this system with a comprehensive in situ attenuation-based remedy. This report was requested by the U.S. Department of Energy - Office of Environmental Management in consultation with the Savannah River National Laboratory and Savannah River Nuclear Solutions - Area Completions Projects to provide a scientific basis for proactively addressing groundwater issues that may need to be resolved prior to final corrective actions at the F-Area and H-Area Seepage Basins.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2021

Characterization of Infrequent Samples from the Concentration, Storage, and Transfer Facility: H-Area Diversion Box 7 (HDB-7) Sump Sample: December 2021 Sample

In December 2021, SRR-E sent an ~250 mL sample identified as HDB-7 from an H-Area diversion box sump to SRNL for analysis. The sample was clear and colorless and free from any solids. SRNL analysis indicated that the sample contained 2.97E+05 dpm/mL Cs-137, 3.74E+05 dpm/mL total beta activity, 1.04E+03 dpm/mL beta activity following cesium removal, and below detectable levels of alpha activity and alpha activity following cesium removal. In addition, the pH of the sample was 7.32, free hydroxide concentration was 2.09E-07 M, and the density was 0.991 g/mL.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2022

Characterization of Infrequent Samples from the Concentration, Storage, and Transfer Facility: H-Area Diversion Box 7 (HDB-7) Sump Sample: January 2022 Samples

Savannah River Remediation Engineering (SRR-E) requested that the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) analyze the Concentration, Storage, and Transfer Facility (CSTF) samples from the following Tank Farm areas: the sump encasement, catch tank, drain cell, and waste tank annulus. In general, these CSTF samples will be analyzed on an infrequent basis and analyses will include detection for total beta/gamma, total alpha activities, density, free hydroxide, and pH measurements. This report presents characterization results for the H-Area diversion box 7 sump (HDB-7) 07 January 2022 and 18 January 2022 samples. The samples were clear and colorless and free from any solids. The results are measurements for total gamma, total alpha, total beta, density, free hydroxide, and pH.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2022

Characterization of Infrequent Samples from the Concentration, Storage, and Transfer Facility: H-Area Diversion Box 1 (HDB-1) Sump Sample: January 25, 2022 Sample

Savannah River Remediation Engineering (SRR-E) requested that the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) analyze the Concentration, Storage, and Transfer Facility (CSTF) samples from the following Tank Farm areas: the sump encasement, catch tank, drain cell, and waste tank annulus. In general, these CSTF samples will be analyzed on an infrequent basis and analyses will include detection for total beta/gamma, total alpha activities, density, free hydroxide, and pH measurements. This report presents characterization results for the H-Area diversion box 1 sump (HDB-1) January 2022 sample. The sample was slightly brown with a small amount of suspended fine particulates visually estimated to be less than 1% by volume. The results are measurements for total gamma, total alpha, total beta, density, free hydroxide, and pH.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Rheology and Flow Evaluation of Neutralized Sodium Reactor Experiment Fuel with Manganous Nitrate

H-Canyon is preparing the Sodium Reactor Experiment (SRE) solutions in Tanks 16.3 and 16.4 for discard to the Savannah River Site (SRS) High Level Waste (HLW) Tanks into Sludge Batch (SB) 10. To meet HLW's criticality requirements, manganese will be added to the SRE solutions. The addition of manganese to the existing thorium and uranium in the SRE solution raised concerns with the flow of this neutralized material as it is discharged from H-Canyon through the gravity drain system to the H-Area Pump Pit (HPP). A neutralized Mn adjusted SRE stream will produce primarily Mn, Th, and U solids that can deter transfer. A 2012 rheology study was completed as part of the flowsheet development.1 However, the initial rheology study did not include the addition of manganous nitrate as a poison. Therefore, H-Canyon Engineering requested Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) to determine if the neutralized, Mn-adjusted SRE solutions will flow through the waste header to the HPP. The H-Canyon Technical Task Request (TTR) specified a target of 80 to 1 to bound the uncertainty in Mn target. Parallel studies were being performed to ensure that freshly precipitated Mn did not have a solubility that would result in challenging the DWPF WAC requirements of 70 to 1. This task was requested via a TTR and is governed by a Task Technical and Quality Assurance Plan (TTQAP).

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2020

H-Canyon exhaust tunnel LiDAR data request for information review and release

This request is to release LiDAR data files acquired by SRNL R&D Engineering and H-Area Operations and Engineering while performing scans of the interior of the H-Canyon Exhaust tunnel. LiDAR data includes 3-dimensional (3D) point cloud data sets and panoramic digital images of the interior tunnel wall surfaces. Presently two deployments have been completed, the first in November 2019, Fig. 1, and the second in June of 2020. This request is for the release of the data collected during those two deployments. Detailed information on the deployment and data collected can be found in SRS document C-ESR-H-00072, “November 2019 Initial Deployment of LiDAR”. It is planned to perform ongoing scans at approximately 6-month intervals, the purpose of the deployments is to evaluate the usefulness of the data collected to enable quantitative measurements such as tunnel dimensions and rate of surface erosion and as a precursor to a potential deployment of a LiDAR system on the tunnel inspection crawler.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2021

Dip leg plug formation evaluation and abatement testing in support of the H-Canyon accelerated basin de-inventory

As requested in the Technical Task Request (TTR), the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) performed testing on the current typical bubbler dip leg design used in the H-Area Canyon (HCA). The TTR has a functional classification of General Services. Testing was initiated to ascertain if the plugging described in the TTR could be reproduced and, if so, to obtain general metrics on the resulting plugging dynamics, and evaluate possible mitigating methods, including design changes and cleaning/purging protocols. The bubblers were to be suspended in a simulant typical of H-Canyon solutions containing aluminum nitrate and silica at a temperature of 25°C using a nominal bubbler air flowrate of 7.5 SCFH. Emphasis was placed on minimizing equipment changes necessary to accomplish the mitigations, as equipment changes in the existing facility would be costly. Testing evolved into four (4) phases, concluding that plugging could indeed be reproduced (believed to be attributed to localized evaporation and bridging of crystals in the dip legs). During testing, plug formation information was obtained, including time, pressure, and temperature traces leading to plugging were defined; solution compositions leading to plugging were determined, and various physical characteristics (visual and mechanical) of the crystallized plug were obtained.

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2021

Corrosion of Steel During Long-Term Exposure to Evolving Cementitious Environments

SRS is proceeding with closure of the H-Area Tank Farm (HTF) and F-Area Tank Farm (FTF). Closure consists of removing the bulk waste, heel removal, and filling the tank with tailored grout formulations. The long-term performance of the concrete and steel materials of construction and the closure grout is an important consideration for Performance Assessment (PA) of closed tanks in FTF and HTF. Over PA timeframes of hundreds, thousands, to tens of thousands of years, the chemical and physical properties of the concrete and steel materials will slowly degrade due to environmental exposure and material aging. In the interim these materials will provide a barrier to the leaching of radionuclides into the soil. Savannah River Remediation (SRR) is updating relevant portions of these analysis inputs to support an imminent revision to the HTF PA and a future update to the FTF PA. This analysis provides an update to the previous PA inputs for steel corrosion. The Central Scenario for the PA analysis includes three postulated modeling cases: 1) Realistic Case, 2) Compliance Case, and 3) Pessimistic Case. This analysis also included a Fast Flow Path Case. This latter case considered the circumstance where the initial condition of the concrete was a completely degraded state and that grout shrinkage exposed the steel to the soil environment immediately. In effect, the steel was unprotected by the concrete and grout. The cases have various degrees of conservatism considered. Chemical, physical and tank configuration parameters were investigated to understand their effects on the predicted time to release of the contaminants. The assessment reviewed the initial tank and steel configuration, service life degradation of the steel, and potential corrosion mechanisms associated with degradation of the concrete materials.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2021

Examining Thermolytic Production of Hydrogen from Lubrication Oil

Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) was requested by Savannah River Remediation (SRR) to conduct testing via Technical Task Request (HR) to determine the thermolytic HGR of Mobil SHC™ 630, a lubrication oil. Currently, 35 gallons of contaminated Mobil SHC 630 is proposed for release into the recycle stream from the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) to Tank 22 and then to the 242-16H (2H) Evaporator system. Inhibited recycle waste in the Recycle Collection Tank (RCT) is transferred to Recycle Pump Tank (RPT) in the Low Point Pump Pit (LPPP) and then to the Concentration, Storage and Transfer Facilities (CSTF) H-area. The lubrication oil would be added directly to the RPT, bypassing the RCT. The current DWPF waste compliance plan for liquid transfers from the RCT to the CSTF limits the concentration of Mobil SHC 630 to <1,100 ppm which is equal to <9.3 gallons of Mobil SHC 630 when considering a 7,500 gal RCT batch with an initial Mobil SHC 630 concentration of 42 mg/L. Mobil SHC 630 is expected to be largely immiscible in the caustic aqueous waste stream. It is a blend of base oils including polyalphaolefin (PAO) base oil and additives such as triphenylphosphate and cresyl diphenyl phosphate at various concentrations (<0.25 wt%). While the base oils are expected to be largely unreactive in CSTF waste, the triarylphosphates additives would be expected to hydrolyze in the caustic waste, forming diarylphosphates and phenol. The tests described herein were governed by a single Run Plan and will determine thermolytic HGR from the caustic aqueous solution, as well as from any organic phases present.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2023

Cation Exchange Capacity, Anion Exchange Capacity, and Mineralogy of F-Area Aquifer Sediments

Strontium-90 (Sr-90) is a contaminant of concern in groundwater and surface water at both F-Area and H-Area Seepage Basins. This contaminant was disposed of, along with other heavy metals and radionuclides, into a series of unlined seepage basins from 1955 until 1988. The acidity of the wastewater increased Sr-90 mobility from the basin soil through the vadose zone and into the Upper Aquifer Zone (UAZ), creating a groundwater plume that discharges into wetlands areas and a local stream called Fourmile Branch.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2024

Analysis of Tank 38H (HTF-38-23-95, -96) and Tank 43H (HTF-43-23-93, -94) Samples for Support of the Enrichment Control and Corrosion Control Programs

Savannah River National Laboratory analyzed samples from Tank 38H and Tank 43H to support Enrichment Control Program (ECP) and Corrosion Control Program (CCP). The results indicate the concentrations of most soluble species in the Tank 38H surface sample increased significantly from the previous Tank 38H surface sample. The current Tank 38H subsurface sample shows similar Na, free hydroxide, and anions versus the previous subsurface sample. However, the 38H subsurface sample shows higher concentrations of Al, Ca, Fe, Mn, and Si vs. the previous Tank 38H subsurface sample. The current Tank 38H subsurface sample contained visible sludge solids in excess of the previous sample based on visual appearance. Weight percent solids measurements indicate presence of 3.0 ± 0.1 wt.% insoluble solids in the Tank 38H subsurface sample. The significant differences in the concentrations of major components between the Tank 38H surface and subsurface samples indicate significant stratification of solution species between these two locations within the Tank 38H. Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC) personnel indicated that there were no tank-to-tank transfers into Tank 38H since early January 2023 and the 2H (16H) Evaporator was shut down on 3/26/2023 and has not operated since that time. There have been many pumped non-waste transfers of water from the H-Area diversion box 7 (HDB-7) sump into Tank 38 since the 3/26/2023 date.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2024

Utilizing HYSPLIT for Emergency Response Modeling at SRS

The threat of a disaster happening at the Savannah River Site (SRS) is low, but not zero. When an emergency arises, emergency responders utilize a variety of tools to detect, track, and mitigate the disaster. HYSPLIT is a community atmospheric dispersion model that is highly configurable and has been used operationally to simulate particle, chemical, and radionuclide releases. We have developed a preliminary user interface (UI) that configures HYSPLIT to run for a variety of Emergency Action Level (EAL) scenarios at SRS. Using a hypothetical EAL scenario of an accidental release of Pu-238 in H-area and K-area onsite, an analysis was done to show how a preliminary UI framework allows HYSPLIT to be run on a terminal without the need form an active network connection. The study was successful in multiple aspects. For the preliminary UI, users were able to input certain characteristics of the hypothetical EAL such as hours of emission (how long was Pu-238 being released), curies of release, release start time (when does the model run start), and type of radionuclide directly into the terminal. For HYSPLIT, the model was successful in being able to take the UI input, calculate the results from the inputs and output multiple figures of both total volumetric airborne concentrations and surface deposition. We used the Pu-238 Derived Intervention Level (DIL) deposition thresholds for produce, dairy, and beef for visualization of the surface deposition, showing how a release would impact ingestion pathways.

38 RADIATION CHEMISTRY, RADIOCHEMISTRY, AND NUCLEA↗
DOE OSTI2024

Evaluation of the Potential for Precipitation of Solids during Storage of Non-Aluminum SNF Solutions

Non-aluminum clad spent nuclear fuels (NASNF) stored in the L-Area basin will be dissolved in H-Canyon using the 6.3D electrolytic dissolver. The solutions will be stored in either the hot or warm canyon until the preparation of a sludge batch for the Defense Waste Processing Facility. Spent nuclear fuel solutions could be stored for 1-2 years before transfer to the H-Area Tank Farm depending on the interval between sludge batches. The solution level in the storage tanks will be maintained; therefore, precipitation of solids due to evaporation is not an issue. However, the precipitation of solids from completely dissolved SNF due to solution instabilities has been observed during intermediate storage of solutions generating hydrated oxides.The presence of fissile material in these solids is generally associated with zirconium molybdate, which is known to act as a host lattice for Pu and can carry the actinides upon precipitation. The formation of zirconium molybdate solids which carry fissile material is a potential concern for the storage of NASNF solutions. To address this concern, the Savannah River National Laboratory performed a literature review to identify knowledge gaps which may require experimental work to determine if the formation of solids is a concern during storage of these solutions. Based on the literature review, the precipitation of zirconium molybdate solids from the Campaign 1 NASNF solutions during intermediatestorage is expected. This conclusion is supported by the identification of zirconium molybdate solids found on the H-Canyon 6.1D Dissolver MK-12 insert spacer. The formation of the zirconium molybdate solids is attributed to hydrolysis and radiolytic processes in the nitric acid solution. As the molybdate solids form, U and Pu can substitute for Zr in the crystal lattice resulting in co-precipitation. Generally, the Pu substitutes directly into the crystal lattice during precipitation while the U associated with the molybdate solids more likely absorbs from the solution. The U in the NASNF solutions is present as uranyl nitrate, a 2+ cation which will not substitute as easily into the molybdate crystal lattice for the Zr 4+ ion.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Alternative Treatment of Defense Waste Processing Facility Recycle via Reuse of Existing Liquid Waste Facilities - 20097

The Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) at Savannah River Site (SRS) has been immobilizing high level waste since 1996. The chemical process within DWPF generates a large volume of condensate, which is recycled to the SRS H-Area Tank Farm. The recycle stream includes a small quantity of sludge solids, as well as soluble cesium that is volatilized during melter operation. The recycle waste is currently received into a large, underground waste tank that separates insoluble solids via decanting. The supernate is treated by an evaporator with a concentrate stream that is stored for future processing. The evaporator overheads are collected and sent to the Effluent Treatment Project (ETP) for final polishing and testing prior to discharge to local surface water. Recycle storage and treatment as described above complicates the overall mission within the tank farms, which are primarily engaged in waste retrieval and preparation activities that support sludge and salt disposition, as well as tank characterization and closure. The need to devote a portion of available storage space to recycle treatment limits operational flexibility, and ultimately the DWPF recycle stream must be diverted to fully close all the SRS waste tanks. An alternative treatment process is being explored to decouple the recycle stream from the tank farm. The proposed treatment process will accomplish solids separation via crossflow filtration and will utilize a wiped film evaporator to volume-reduce the filtrate stream. Evaporator overheads will continue to be further processed in ETP while the solids stream and evaporator concentrate stream will be returned for reprocessing with the DWPF and Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF). This process will utilize existing facilities within DWPF and the tank farm that were previously dedicated to Interim Salt Disposition (ISD), but no longer have an identified mission with the startup of SWPF. The reuse of these facilities will remove several constraints from the current Liquid Waste (LW) System Plan without expanding the current footprint of Department of Energy Environmental Management (EM) infrastructure within LW. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Study of an Unrefined Humate Solution as a Possible Attenuation-based Remedy for Uranium Contamination in Acidic Groundwater - 20351

The Savannah River Site (SRS), joined the environmental cleanup program in 1981 after the Cold War, and was designated as a hazardous waste management facility. About 1.8 billion gallons of acid wastes were disposed into the F/H Area Seepage Basin that included many radionuclides and dissolved metals, resulting in highly contaminated groundwater plumes with pH of 3 - 5.5. The acidity of the plumes contributes to the mobility of several constituents of concern (COC) such as H-3, U-238, I-129, and Sr-90 for the F-Area plume and H-3, Sr-90 and mercury for the H-Area plume. An active treatment (pump-and-treat and re-injection) system was constructed and put in place in 1997 to address the removal of metals and radionuclides from the contaminated groundwater. As remediation projects advanced, active treatments were transitioned to more passive or enhanced-passive approaches such as the subsurface barrier with base injection system, which has been controlling the mobility of contaminants. However, new and more efficient attenuation-based remedies are always sought. Several studies have proposed that humic substances can be used to remediate sites contaminated with heavy metals by creating a permeable reactive barrier. Humic substances (HS) are major components of soil organic matter. HS are polyfunctional organic macromolecules formed by the chemo-microbiological decomposition of biomass or dead organic matter. These substances are usually divided into three main fractions: humin (insoluble at all pH values), humic acid (soluble at pH greater than 3.5), and fulvic acid (soluble at all pH values). Humic substances are major components of the soil at SRS and, in addition, are also helpful in the removal process of uranium. This research focuses on uranium (VI), which is a key contaminant of concern in the F-Area groundwater plume. The interaction of uranium with sediment in the presence or absence of humic substances involves complex mechanisms that are not yet well understood. The interaction of U(VI) with humic substances can affect the adsorption of U on sediment, altering its mobility in the subsurface. The objective of this study is to study the mobility of uranium in the presence of humic acid and to determine if sediments amended by humic acid can enhance the sorption of heavy metals onto sediments. In this research, experiments were conducted using background (clean) F-Area aquifer sediments to understand and predict uranium mobility. A blended material, humate, containing both humic and fulvic acids and a chemically modified humate (KW15 modified humic or mod-HA) was studied as a possible amendment for uranium remediation in SRS groundwater. Batch experiments were conducted in triplicates using 20 ml of aqueous suspension in DI water containing SRS sediment and mod-HA and studied the effect of pH, kinetics of humate sorption onto SRS sediment and also studied the sorption of uranium onto mod-HA amended SRS sediment. Results indicate that mod-HA amended sediment increases uranium removal significantly. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

The Challenge of Achieving Site Closure of a Complex Groundwater Plume - 20531

Over the last three decades, DOE has made substantial progress in nearly every area of nuclear waste cleanup and has closed and transitioned 91 of the 107 sites in the EM complex. Several of the remaining groundwater plumes at Hanford, Los Alamos, Paducah, Oak Ridge, and Savannah River are complex and tend to have unique site or contaminant characteristics which provide an almost impossible challenge to remediate to regulatory levels. As a result, these complex sites will require a large investment to remediate. In order for DOE to achieve regulatory closure, a technically sound case must be developed and presented to regulators and stakeholders that clearly demonstrates that remedial goals have been or will be irreversibly achieved or that there is an alternate acceptable end-state. Five lines of evidence are required: - A conceptual site model that is as complete as possible, with the knowledge that it may continue to evolve with time; - Demonstration that trends in contaminant concentrations, or flux, versus time indicate that remedial goals will be achieved on schedule or within a reasonable time thereafter and that trends that deviate from this path are explainable by the conceptual model; - Demonstration that remobilization of attenuated contaminants is unlikely to occur in the future; - Explicit consideration of remedial contingencies, should deviations in the path toward remedial goals occur; - Development of an effective long-term monitoring plan to detect any conditions that might alter the path toward remedial goals. SRS has made significant progress in the remediation of contamination associated with the F-area and H-Area Seepage Basins, and it is currently developing a strategic closure path that addresses each of these lines of evidence and identifies both basic and applied scientific issues that will need to be addressed in order to obtain regulatory closure. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2024

Waste Retrieval Enhancements to Achieve Preliminary Cease Waste Removal in Savannah River Site Liquid Waste Tanks 9H and 10H – 25348

The Liquid Waste (LW) contractor at the Savannah River Site (SRS) is Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC). The LW Mission is tasked with processing legacy nuclear waste stored in underground waste tanks for final disposition. The Concentration, Storage, and Transfer Facilities (CSTF) contain 43 active waste tanks and 8 closed waste tanks between the two tank farms, F-Area Tank Farm (FTF) and H-Area Tank Farm (HTF). The first steps in the Waste Retrieval and Tank Closure (WRTC) process are the waste removal campaigns, consisting of either salt dissolution or sludge mobilization. Two tanks that are rapidly approaching the final closure determination and have demonstrated considerable success with salt dissolution are Tanks 9 and 10. The closure of these tanks is a high priority for the LW Mission due to the greater environmental risk they pose since both tanks reside within the water table and contain active leak sites from the primary tank to the annulus space. Tanks 9 and 10 have each recently completed their respective salt dissolution campaigns and achieved the Preliminary Cease Waste Removal (PCWR) milestone.

Stetson, Jacqueline G.↗
DOE OSTI2020

NASNF Processing and Packaging Technical Study

The ABD program will require development of a strategy for the dispositioning the Non-Aluminum Spent Nuclear Fuel (NASNF), some of which will be very challenging to handle and dissolve as described in this report. Not all the NASNF is suitable for processing through the electrolytic dissolver. The strategy may involve dissolution of the majority of the NASNF inventory in the electrolytic dissolver combined with some other disposition alternative(s) for the fraction that is not suitable for electrolytic dissolution. This report highlights the risks and challenges associated with the baseline approach of using the electrolytic dissolver to process all of the NASNF. In addition, the characteristics of the NASNF and how those characteristics relate to the risks associated with electrolytically dissolving the specific fuel types.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗