Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “GMRES”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2023

Iterated Gauss-Seidel GMRES

The GMRES algorithm of Saad and Schultz [SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput., 7 (1986), pp. 856-869] is an iterative method for approximately solving linear systems Ax = b, with initial guess x0 and residual r0 = b Ax0. The algorithm employs the Arnoldi process to generate the Krylov basis vectors (the columns of Vk ). It is well known that this process can be viewed as a QR factorization of the matrix Bk = [r0, AVk] at each iteration. Despite an O (..epsilon..)..kappa.. (Bk ) loss of orthogonality, for unit roundoff ..epsilon..and condition number ..kappa.. , the modified Gram-Schmidt formulation was shown to be backward stable in the seminal paper by Paige et al. [SIAM J. Matrix Anal.Appl., 28 (2006), pp. 264-284]. We present an iterated Gauss-Seidel formulation of the GMRES algorithm (IGS-GMRES) based on the ideas of Ruhe [Linear Algebra Appl., 52 (1983), pp. 591-601] and Swirydowicz et al. [Numer. Linear Algebra Appl., 28 (2020), pp. 1-20]. IGS-GMRES maintains orthogonality to the level O (..epsilon..)..kappa.. (Bk ) or O (..epsilon..), depending on the choice of one or two iterations; for two Gauss-Seidel iterations, the computed Krylov basis vectors remain orthogonal to working accuracy and the smallest singular value of Vk remains close to one. The resulting GMRES method is thus backward stable. We show that IGS-GMRES can be implemented with only a single synchronization point per iteration, making it relevant to large-scale parallel computing environments. We also demonstrate that, unlike MGS-GMRES, in IGS-GMRES the relative Arnoldi residual corresponding to the computed approximate solution no longer stagnates above machine precision even for highly nonnormal systems.

Arnoldi-QR↗
DOE OSTI2022

Optimal size of the block in block GMRES on GPUs: computational model and experiments

The block version of GMRES (BGMRES) is most advantageous over the single right hand side (RHS) counterpart when the cost of communication is high while the cost of floating point operations is not. This is the particular case on modern graphics processing units (GPUs), while it is generally not the case on traditional central processing units (CPUs). Here, in this paper, experiments on both GPUs and CPUs are shown that compare the performance of BGMRES against GMRES as the number of RHS increases, with a particular focus on GPU performance. The experiments indicate that there are many cases in which BGMRES is slower than GMRES on CPUs, but faster on GPUs. Furthermore, when varying the number of RHS on the GPU, there is an optimal number of RHS where BGMRES is clearly most advantageous over GMRES. A computational model for the GPU is developed using hardware specific parameters, providing insight towards how the qualitative behavior of BGMRES changes as the number of RHS increase, and this model also helps explain the phenomena observed in the experiments.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2022

Compressed basis GMRES on high-performance graphics processing units

Krylov methods provide a fast and highly parallel numerical tool for the iterative solution of many large-scale sparse linear systems. To a large extent, the performance of practical realizations of these methods is constrained by the communication bandwidth in current computer architectures, motivating the investigation of sophisticated techniques to avoid, reduce, and/or hide the message-passing costs (in distributed platforms) and the memory accesses (in all architectures). This article leverages Ginkgo’s memory accessor in order to integrate a communication-reduction strategy into the (Krylov) GMRES solver that decouples the storage format (i.e., the data representation in memory) of the orthogonal basis from the arithmetic precision that is employed during the operations with that basis. Given that the execution time of the GMRES solver is largely determined by the memory accesses, the cost of the datatype transforms can be mostly hidden, resulting in the acceleration of the iterative step via a decrease in the volume of bits being retrieved from memory. Together with the special properties of the orthonormal basis (whose elements are all bounded by 1), this paves the road toward the aggressive customization of the storage format, which includes some floating-point as well as fixed-point formats with mild impact on the convergence of the iterative process. We develop a high-performance implementation of the “compressed basis GMRES” solver in the Ginkgo sparse linear algebra library using a large set of test problems from the SuiteSparse Matrix Collection. We demonstrate robustness and performance advantages on a modern NVIDIA V100 graphics processing unit (GPU) of up to 50% over the standard GMRES solver that stores all data in IEEE double-precision.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2021

Toward efficient polynomial preconditioning for GMRES

Here, we present a polynomial preconditioner for solving large systems of linear equations. The polynomial is derived from the minimum residual polynomial (the GMRES polynomial) and is more straightforward to compute and implement than many previous polynomial preconditioners. Our current implementation of this polynomial using its roots is naturally more stable than previous methods of computing the same polynomial. We implement further stability control using added roots, and this allows for high degree polynomials. We discuss the effectiveness and challenges of root-adding and give an additional check for stability. In this article, we study the polynomial preconditioner applied to GMRES; however it could be used with any Krylov solver. This polynomial preconditioning algorithm can dramatically improve convergence for some problems, especially for difficult problems, and can reduce dot products by an even greater margin.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2022

Neumann Series in MGS-GMRES and Inner-Outer Iterations: Preprint

A low-synchronization MGS-GMRES Krylov solver employing a truncated Neumann series for the inverse compact WY MGS correction matrix T is presented. A corollary to the backward stability result of Paige et al. [1] establishes that T = I - Lk is sufficient for convergence of GMRES when kLkp F = O("p)_p F (B), where the strictly lower triangular matrix L is defined by the inner products of Krylov vectors V T 1:k-2 vk-1. The preconditioner is the classical Ruge-Stuben AMG algorithm with compatible relaxation and inner-outer Gauss-Seidel smoother. This smoother may also be expressed as a truncated Neumann series. Drop tolerances are applied to the lower triangular matrices arising in the smoother in order to reduce the number of non-zeros and accelerate the time to solution. The number of small matrix elements are found to increase from fine to coarse levels and thus the effciency gains are greater for large problems with many levels in the V -cycle. The solver is applied to the pressure continuity equation for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Unlike the inner-outer iteration, the solver convergence rate with the standard Gauss-Seidel smoother deteriorates with dropping. The solver compute time is reduced by up to 50% without a change in the convergence rate.

Gauss-Seidel smoother↗
DOE OSTI2023

High-Performance GMRES Mixed-Precision (HPG-MxP) Benchmark

SAND2024-08539O The High Performance GMRES Mixed-Precision (HPG-MxP) is a benchmark for ranking high-performance supercomputers, allowing use of mixed-precision. Similar to HPCG benchmark, it is designed to profile the computers' capabilities to perform the computational and communication tasks that are commonly found in important classes of real-world applications. At the same time, like HPL-MxP benchmark, it allows the use of mixed-precision arithmetic, while ensuring the double-precision accuracy of the computed solution. Sandia National Laboratories is a multimission laboratory managed and operated by National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Honeywell International Inc., for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-NA0003525.

SciDAC↗
DOE OSTI2026

NCCS High Performance GMRES Mixed Precision

HPG-MxP is a software package that performs a fixed number of multigrid preconditioned (using a Gauss-Seidel smoother) Generalized minimal residual (PGMRES) iterations in order to solve a possibly nonsymmetric large sparse linear system of equations. It is designed to be a benchmark to measure a computer's performance for sparse linear algebra workloads typical in scientific computing while allowing the use of mixed precision methods. The solution is required to have convergence characteristics and accuracy similar to double precision GMRES. It is based on the High Performance Conjugate Gradient Benchmark (HPCG) which restricts all implementations to use only the IEEE double precision format (FP64). The original implementation (https://github.com/hpg-mxp/hpg-mxp) was written by Ichitaro Yamazaki, Jennifer Loe, Christian Glusa, Sivasankaran Rajamanickam, Piotr Luszczek, and Jack Dongarra. Please refer to that repository for documentation on the original implementation. This version is maintained by the National Center for Computational Sciences at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. It is highly scalable and optimized for Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility (OLCF) systems, particularly Frontier.

Kashi, Aditya [Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL↗
DOE OSTI2025

Convergence Analysis of the Alternating Anderson–Picard Method for Nonlinear Fixed-Point Problems

Anderson acceleration (AA) has been widely used to solve nonlinear fixed-point problems due to its rapid convergence. This work focuses on a variant of AA in which multiple Picard iterations are performed between each AA step, referred to as the Alternating Anderson–Picard (AAP) method. Furthermore, despite introducing more “slow” Picard iterations, this method has been shown to be efficient and even more robust in both linear and nonlinear cases. However, there is a lack of theoretical analysis for AAP in the nonlinear case. In this paper, we address this gap by establishing the equivalence between AAP and a multisecant-GMRES method that uses GMRES to solve a multisecant linear system at each iteration. From this perspective, we show that AAP “converges” to the Newton-GMRES method. Specifically, as the residual approaches zero, the multisecant matrix, the approximate Jacobian inverse, the search direction, and the optimization gain of AAP converge to their counterparts in the Newton-GMRES method. These connections provide insights for analyzing the asymptotic convergence properties of AAP. Consequently, we show that AAP is locally 𝑞-linear convergent and provide an upper bound for the convergence factor of AAP. To validate the theoretical results, numerical examples are provided.

Anderson acceleration↗
DOE OSTI2023

Scaled ILU Smoothers for Navier-Stokes Pressure Projection

Incomplete LU (ILU) smoothers are effective in the algebraic multigrid (AMG) V-cycle for reducing high-frequency components of the error. However, the requisite direct triangular solves are comparatively slow on GPUs. Previous work has demonstrated the advantages of Jacobi iteration as an alternative to direct solution of these systems. Depending on the threshold and fill-level parameters chosen, the factors can be highly nonnormal and Jacobi is unlikely to converge in a low number of iterations. We demonstrate that row scaling can reduce the departure from normality, allowing us to replace the inherently sequential solve with a rapidly converging Richardson iteration. There are several advantages beyond the lower compute time. Scaling is performed locally for a diagonal block of the global matrix because it is applied directly to the factor. Further, an ILUT Schur complement smoother maintains a constant GMRES iteration count as the number of MPI ranks increases, and thus parallel strong-scaling is improved. Our algorithms have been incorporated into hypre, and we demonstrate improved time to solution for linear systems arising in the Nalu-Wind and PeleLM pressure solvers. For large problem sizes, GMRES+AMG executes at least five times faster when using iterative triangular solves compared with direct solves on massively parallel GPUs.

algebraic multigrid↗