SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “GE-Hitachi”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

2 records

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI2022

Benchmark Analysis for the Optical Dilatometry Method Using Silicon Carbide Temperature Monitors

The main objective of this project was to conduct a benchmark analysis for the optical dilatometry method by using NSUF’s SiC temperature monitors: two (2) SiC temperature monitors provided by NSUF’s BSU-8242 experiment and two (2) SiC temperature monitors provided by NSUF’s GE-Hitachi experiment. Per the BSU-8242 experiment, KGT-3597 and KGT-3591 had a design temperature of 400°C and an exposure of 3 dpa. Per the GE-Hitachi experiment, KGT-3341 and KGT-3336 had a design temperature of 290°C +/- 50°C and an exposure of 0.5–1 dpa. The KGT-3336 SiC monitor was split into two pieces during the decontamination process, making the dilatometry method the only way to analyze both those pieces. The BSU-8242 monitors revealed peak irradiation temperatures under the design temperature, and the GE-Hitachi monitors revealed peak irradiation temperatures within the design temperature range. The optical dilatometry method measured the peak irradiation temperature of BSU-8242 KGT-3597 to be 330°C, while the resistivity method measured the peak irradiation temperature of BSU-8242 KGT-3591 to be 320°C +/- 20°C. The optical dilatometry method measured the peak irradiation temperatures of the pieces of GE-Hitachi KGT-3336 to be 260°C (for the larger piece) and 220°C (for the smaller piece), while the resistivity method measured the peak irradiation temperature of GE-Hitachi KGT-3341 to be 300°C, with an accuracy range of -50°C to +20°C. Both methods of SiC temperature monitor analysis produced very similar peak irradiation temperatures for each pair of SiC passive monitors from the two experiments, BSU-8242 and GE-Hitachi. The results show dilatometry method to be a reliable and less time-intensive process for determining irradiation temperatures from passive SiC thermometry.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗

DOE OSTI2025

U.S. Efforts in Support of Examinations at Fukushima Daiichi - September 2024 Meeting Notes

Information obtained from Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station (Daiichi) is required to inform future Decontamination and Decommissioning (D&D) activities, improving the ability of the Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings, Incorporated (TEPCO Holdings) to characterize potential hazards and to ensure the safety of workers involved with cleanup activities. This information also has important implications for the safety and operation of U.S. Commercial nuclear power plants. A collaborative U.S. and Japanese effort was initiated in 2014 by the Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy to identify Daiichi examination needs and evaluate recent Daiichi examination data to address these needs. This document summarizes information presented at and findings, action items, and recommendations by U.S. and Japanese experts in reactor safety and plant operations during the September 2024 Forensics Effort meeting. Significant safety insights were obtained in several areas: system and component performance, radionuclide surveys and sampling, debris end-state location, combustible gas effects, and plant operations and maintenance. In addition to reducing uncertainties and knowledge gaps in severe accident modeling progression, these insights continue to be used to assess whether additional updates are needed in guidance for severe accident prevention, mitigation, and emergency planning. Furthermore, Daiichi-related activities, such as code modeling improvements and analysis, testing, and new technology deployment efforts, have the potential to offer additional safety and economic benefits to the operating fleet and new light water reactor (LWR) and non-LWR designs.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗