Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Fe3Mo”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

Materials Data on Fe3Mo by Materials Project

Fe3Mo is beta Cu3Ti-like structured and crystallizes in the hexagonal P6_3/mmc space group. The structure is three-dimensional. Mo is bonded to twelve Fe atoms to form MoFe12 cuboctahedra that share corners with six equivalent MoFe12 cuboctahedra, corners with twelve equivalent FeFe8Mo4 cuboctahedra, edges with eighteen FeFe8Mo4 cuboctahedra, faces with eight equivalent MoFe12 cuboctahedra, and faces with twelve FeFe8Mo4 cuboctahedra. There are six shorter (2.56 Å) and six longer (2.57 Å) Mo–Fe bond lengths. There are two inequivalent Fe sites. In the first Fe site, Fe is bonded to four equivalent Mo and eight Fe atoms to form distorted FeFe8Mo4 cuboctahedra that share corners with four equivalent MoFe12 cuboctahedra, corners with fourteen FeFe8Mo4 cuboctahedra, edges with six equivalent MoFe12 cuboctahedra, edges with twelve FeFe8Mo4 cuboctahedra, faces with four equivalent MoFe12 cuboctahedra, and faces with sixteen FeFe8Mo4 cuboctahedra. There are a spread of Fe–Fe bond distances ranging from 2.47–2.65 Å. In the second Fe site, Fe is bonded to four equivalent Mo and eight equivalent Fe atoms to form distorted FeFe8Mo4 cuboctahedra that share corners with four equivalent MoFe12 cuboctahedra, corners with fourteen FeFe8Mo4 cuboctahedra, edges with six equivalent MoFe12 cuboctahedra, edges with twelve equivalent FeFe8Mo4 cuboctahedra, faces with four equivalent MoFe12 cuboctahedra, and faces with sixteen FeFe8Mo4 cuboctahedra.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

A Garnet-Type Solid-Electrolyte-Based Molten Lithium–Molybdenum–Iron(II) Chloride Battery with Advanced Reaction Mechanism

Solid-electrolyte-based molten-metal batteries have attracted considerable attention for grid-scale energy storage. Although ZEBRA batteries are considered one of the promising candidates, they still have the potential concern of metal particle growth and ion exchange with the β”-Al 2 O 3 electrolyte. Herein, a Li 6.4 La 3 Zr 1.4 Ta 0.6 O 12 solid-electrolyte-based molten lithium–molybdenum–iron(II) chloride battery (denoted as Li–Mo–FeCl 2 ) operated at temperature of 250 °C, comprising a mixture of Fe and LiCl cathode materials, a Li anode, a garnet-type Li-ion ceramic electrolyte, and Mo additive, is designed to overcome these obstacles. Different from conventional battery reaction mechanisms, this battery revolutionarily synchronizes the reversible Fe–Mo alloying–dealloying reactions with the delithiation–lithiation processes, meaning that the porous Mo framework derived from Fe–Mo alloy simultaneously suppresses the growth of pure Fe particles. By adopting a Li anode and a Li-ion ceramic electrolyte, the corrosion problem between the cathode and the solid electrolyte is overcome. With similar battery cost ($12 kWh –1 ), the theoretical energy density of Li–Mo–FeCl 2 battery surpasses that of a Na–FeCl 2 ZEBRA battery over 25%, to 576 Wh kg –1 and 2216 Wh L –1 , respectively. Experimental results further prove this cell has excellent cycling performance (472 mAh g LiCl –1 after 300 cycles, 50 mg active material) and strong tolerance against the overcharge–overdischarge (3–1.6 V) and freezing–thawing (25–250 °C) incidents.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗