Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Er(BC)2”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

Materials Data on Er(BC)2 by Materials Project

ErB2C2 crystallizes in the tetragonal P4_2/mmc space group. The structure is three-dimensional. Er is bonded in a 8-coordinate geometry to eight equivalent B and eight equivalent C atoms. All Er–B bond lengths are 2.72 Å. All Er–C bond lengths are 2.69 Å. B is bonded in a 2-coordinate geometry to four equivalent Er and two equivalent C atoms. Both B–C bond lengths are 1.60 Å. C is bonded in a 2-coordinate geometry to four equivalent Er, two equivalent B, and one C atom. The C–C bond length is 1.42 Å.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Materials Data on Er(BC)2 by Materials Project

ErB2C2 crystallizes in the tetragonal P4/mbm space group. The structure is three-dimensional. Er is bonded in a 8-coordinate geometry to eight equivalent B and eight equivalent C atoms. All Er–B bond lengths are 2.72 Å. All Er–C bond lengths are 2.66 Å. B is bonded in a distorted trigonal planar geometry to four equivalent Er and three equivalent C atoms. There is one shorter (1.52 Å) and two longer (1.60 Å) B–C bond length. C is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to four equivalent Er and three equivalent B atoms.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Bioenergy pathways within United States net-zero CO 2 emissions scenarios in the Energy Modeling Forum 37 study

The Energy Modeling Forum 37 study is organized around carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) mitigation scenarios reaching net-zero CO 2 emissions by 2050 in the United States. Here, this paper summarizes the potential contribution of bioenergy use in the electric power, transportation, industrial, and buildings sectors toward meeting that target based on model results. Thirteen modeling teams reported bioenergy consumption in the Reference and Net Zero scenarios. Consumption of bioenergy increased over time in the Reference scenario, from an average across models of 3.2 exajoules (EJ) in 2020 to 3.8 EJ in 2050. Average bioenergy consumption in 2050 increased further to 7.3 EJ in the Net Zero scenario. All scenarios that reach net-zero emissions required some form of carbon dioxide removal to offset emissions that are difficult to reduce. Carbon dioxide removal using bioenergy with CO 2 capture and storage (BECCS) varies widely across models, up to 1000 Mt CO 2 in 2050. Some models rely instead on direct air carbon capture and storage (DACCS), up to 2200 Mt CO 2 , and others use a combination of BECCS and DACCS. Model results show a strong inverse relationship between the amounts of BECCS and DACCS deployed. All modeling teams assumed a carbon sink from land use, land use change, and forestry, further offsetting a portion of emissions from fossil fuels and industry that are expensive to eliminate. Bioenergy consumption in 2050 decreased by an average of 1.5 EJ across eight models in a Net Zero+ scenario relative to the Net Zero scenario, due in part to a lower equilibrium carbon price resulting from optimistic cost assumptions for all energy technologies.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗