SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
The evaluated spectroscopic data are presented for known nuclides of mass 249 (Cm, Bk, Cf, Es, Fm, Md, No). {sup 249}No has not been identified as yet. Significant amounts of new data have been added since the last evaluation of A=249 nuclides. This work supersedes earlier full evaluations of A=249 published by 1999Ar21.
Berkelium-249 ( 249 Bk) and einsteinium-254 ( 254 Es) are isotopes of great importance for the investigation of berkelium and einsteinium chemical properties and super heavy element research. Therefore, it is necessary to be able to isolate acceptable, pure quantities of both isotopes to further research capabilities. These isotopes, along with californium-252 ( 252 Cf), are synthesized through the irradiation of mixed-curium targets in the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR), which has the highest continuous thermal neutron flux in the world. Once irradiated, the targets are transferred to the Radiochemical Engineering Development Center for further chemical processing and final purification to separate 249 Bk and 254 Es from the remainder of isotopes present. Several methods of separation, such as the Berkex batch solvent extraction along with cation-exchange and alpha-hydroxy-isobutyrate (AHIB) columns, are employed to achieve a clean separation of the isotopes. Production Campaigns 74–77 are discussed in depth for 252 Cf, 249 Bk, and 254 Es production and isolation of 249 Bk and 254 Es. An attempt to isolate 257 Fm in Campaign 77 is discussed as well. Table 1 summarizes the total amount of material isolated in each campaign.
In 1957 Glenn T. Seaborg conceived and advocated for the construction of the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) and the Transuranium Processing Plant (since then renamed the Radiochemical Engineering Development Center, or REDC) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. There, heavily shielded hot cells, glove boxes, and laboratories allow recovery of transuranium elements produced in substantial quantities. Seaborg’s vision of HFIR and REDC producing milligram quantities of berkelium, californium, and einsteinium has been fulfilled beginning in 1966 through May 2019 with 78 production campaigns yielding a cumulative totals of 1.2 g of 249 Bk, 10.2 g of 252 Cf, 39 mg of 253 Es, and 15 pg of 257 Fm. Notably, 252 Cf is a neutron source used in many industrial applications including oil exploration; process control systems for the cement industry, coal analysis, and power production; sources to start nuclear reactors and perform nondestructive materials analyses; homeland security and national defense detection devices; and medical research. Isotopes made available through transplutonium production at HFIR/REDC have enabled scientists to study the nuclear properties and reactions, chemical properties, optical properties, and solid-state properties of transplutonium elements. Long-lived isotopes have served as targets in heavy ion accelerators to produce heavier elements leading to the discovery of 104 Rf, 105 Db, 106 Sg, 113 Nh, 114 Fl, 115 Mc, 116 Lv, 117 Ts, and 118 Og. This paper reviews the evolution of the processing flowsheets to produce, separate, and purify transplutonium isotopes, which have evolved over 50 years of operation at HFIR and REDC, and summarizes directions of future work to improve the efficiency of the production operations.
Detailed level schemes, decay schemes, and the experimental data on which they are based are presented for all nuclei with mass number A=248. The experimental reaction and decay data are evaluated; inconsistencies and discrepancies are noted; and adopted values are given for various level properties (including spin and parity, halflife, and configuration), γ properties (including energy, intensity, and multipole character) and α properties (including energy, intensity, and hindrance factor). This evaluation replaces the A=248 evaluation published by A. Akovali in Nuclear Data Sheets 87, 249 (1999)