Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “EBR-2 REACTOR”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2021

A Rate Theory Model of Radiation-Induced Swelling in an Austenitic Stainless Steel

Many rate theory models of cavity (void) swelling have been published over the past 50 years, all having the same, or similar, structures. A rigorous validation of the models has not been possible because of the dearth of information concerning the microstructures that correspond with the swelling data. Whereas the lack of microstructure information is still an issue for historical swelling data, in the past 10–20 years data have been published on the evolution of the microstructure (point defect yields from collision cascades, cavity number densities, and dislocation densities/yield strengths) allowing certain gaps in information to be filled when considering historic swelling data. With reasonable estimates of key microstructure parameters, a standard rate theory model can be applied, and the model parameter space explored, in connection with historical swelling data. By using published data on: (i) yield strength as a function of dose and temperature (to establish an empirical expression for dislocation density evolution); (ii) cavity number densities as a function of temperature; and (iii) freely migrating defect (FMD) production as a function of primary knock-on atom (PKA) spectrum, the necessary parameter and microstructure inputs that were previously unknown can be used in model development. This paper describes a rate-theory model for void swelling of 316 stainless steel irradiated in the EBR-2 reactor as a function of irradiation temperature and neutron dose.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2022

Nuclide inventory characterization of EBR-II MOX fuel test pins

Characterization of 3 mixed oxide (MOX) fuel pins from the Experimental Breeder Reactor II (EBR-II) SPA-2/-2B experiment program was performed in support of the Advanced Reactor Experiments for Sodium Fast Reactor Fuels (ARES) joint project between Idaho National Laboratory (INL) and the Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA). The characterization efforts were performed to enable transient testing in the Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) facility at INL and will include post irradiation examination (PIE) and other analyses. MOX fuel pins UW02009, 02011, and 06024 were historically irradiated from 1989 to 1994 for a total of 822.42 effective full power days (EFPDs) and peak burnup of approximately 14.3 at.% (atomic percent of heavy metal atoms, ∼134.4 GWd/t). They had since been placed in storage until a future use was identified. Characterization of the fission products and activation of each fuel pin was necessary to enable removal from storage and subsequent irradiation testing or PIE activities. The initial fuel pin geometry and composition were established using historical documentation. Irradiation history details were utilized to compute irradiated and decayed fuel pin masses, atomic densities, and activities. A pellet-wise axial neutron flux was also computed to assist in evaluation of the axial distribution of {sup 235}U and {sup 239}Pu, per pellet, within each of the test fuel pins. The results computed herein supported experiment design for advanced high-burnup MOX fuel designs under slow transient overpower (MOXTOP) conditions, which was Phase I of the ARES project. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2017

Feasibility of processing the experimental breeder reactor-II driver fuel from the Idaho National Laboratory through Savannah River Site's H-Canyon facility

Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) was requested to evaluate the potential to receive and process the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) uranium (U) recovered from the Experimental Breeder Reactor II (EBR-II) driver fuel through the Savannah River Site’s (SRS) H-Canyon as a way to disposition the material. INL recovers the uranium from the sodium bonded metallic fuel irradiated in the EBR-II reactor using an electrorefining process. There were two compositions of EBR-II driver fuel. The early generation fuel was U-5Fs, which consisted of 95% U metal alloyed with 5% noble metal elements “fissium” (2.5% molybdenum, 2.0% ruthenium, 0.3% rhodium, 0.1% palladium, and 0.1% zirconium), while the later generation was U-10Zr which was 90% U metal alloyed with 10% zirconium. A potential concern during the H-Canyon nitric acid dissolution process of the U metal containing zirconium (Zr) is the explosive behavior that has been reported for alloys of these materials. For this reason, this evaluation was focused on the ability to process the lower Zr content materials, the U-5Fs material.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Advanced Retrieval and Disposition Techniques for Remote Handled Mixed Low-Level Waste - 20319

Legacy waste generated by the sodium-cooled fast reactor, EBR-II, program at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) (owned by the U.S. Department of Energy and managed and operated by Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC) is challenging to treat and disposition using conventional methods. As a result, Veolia Nuclear Solutions is under contract with the Idaho National Laboratory to demonstrate an integrated retrieval and disposition solution for Remote-Handled Mixed Low-Level Waste currently stored in underground liners at INL. Delivery of the integrated solution builds on the expertise and successes of Veolia Nuclear Solutions under its Problematic Waste Treatment Initiative with INL. This initiative focuses solely on the treatment of problematic (reactive metal containing) waste streams using the Veolia Nuclear Solutions GeoMelt{sup R} In-Container Vitrification (ICV{sup TM}) technology. Under the contract, Veolia Nuclear Solutions will provide a fully commissioned prototype remote retrieval system to semi-remotely retrieve and size-reduce problematic waste liners into a safe and consolidated package for transport. The consolidated package will be shipped to Richland, Washington for demonstration treatment using the robust GeoMelt Richland system at Perma-Fix Northwest. The treated waste will ultimately be disposed of as a vitrified Low-Level Waste glass monolith. Veolia Nuclear Solutions has delivered countless remotely operated systems globally to solve some of the industry's most challenging problems. To ensure risk is mitigated in the best possible manner, a methodical phased approach is being utilized to validate the integrated solution. This contract focuses on the delivery and deployment of the prototype retrieval system onsite and the treatment of a single liner. Following successful demonstration treatment using GeoMelt ICV, the project is planning to make prototype enhancements before retrieving and treating another liner. Establishing a new integrated approach for retrieval and disposition of waste offers many benefits to INL and the U.S. Department of Energy. It is anticipated that the integrated solution will provide significant cost and schedule savings by increasing the number of liners dispositioned per year. In addition, the complexity of the overall waste disposition process will be reduced. Remotely retrieving and size-reducing waste in the field will provide additional safety to operational personnel and allow critical resources, such as hot cells, to focus on the primary missions at hand. Vitrification (using the GeoMelt ICV technology) allows for the direct processing of metal clad waste thereby significantly reducing pretreatment steps while providing a robust waste form for long-term disposal. The results from this ongoing contract are presented in this paper. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

GAMSOR: Gamma Source Preparation and DIF3D Flux Solution

Nuclear reactors that rely upon the fission reaction have two modes of thermal energy deposition in the reactor system: neutron absorption and gamma absorption. The gamma rays are typically generated by neutron absorption reactions or during the fission process which means the primary driver of energy production is of course the neutron interaction. In conventional reactor physics methods, the gamma heating component is ignored such that the gamma absorption is forced to occur at the gamma emission site. For experimental reactor systems like EBR-II and FFTF, the placement of structural pins and assemblies internal to the core leads to problems with power heating predictions because there is no fission power source internal to the assembly to dictate a spatial distribution of the power. As part of the EBR-II support work in the 1980s, the GAMSOR code was developed to assist analysts in calculating the gamma heating. The GAMSOR code is a modified version of DIF3D and actually functions within a sequence of DIF3D calculations. The gamma flux in a conventional fission reactor system does not perturb the neutron flux and thus the gamma flux calculation can be cast as a fixed source problem given a solution to the steady state neutron flux equation. This leads to a sequence of DIF3D calculations, called the GAMSOR sequence, which involves solving the neutron flux, then the gamma flux, then combining the results to do a summary edit. In this manuscript, we go over the GAMSOR code and detail how it is put together and functions. We also discuss how to setup the GAMSOR sequence and input for each DIF3D calculation in the GAMSOR sequence. With the GAMSOR capability, users can take any valid steady state DIF3D calculation and compute the power distribution due to neutron and gamma heating. The MC2-3 code is the preferable companion code to use for generating neutron and gamma cross section data, but the GAMSOR code can accept cross section data from other sources. To further this aspect, an additional utility code was created which demonstrates how to merge the neutron and gamma cross section data together to carry out a simultaneous solve of the two systems.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2017

EBR-II Reactor Physics Benchmark Evaluation Report

This report provides a reactor physics benchmark evaluation with associated uncertainty quantification for the critical configuration of the April 1986 Experimental Breeder Reactor II Run 138B core configuration.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Experimental Study of Molten Metallic Fuel Relocation in Sodium-Filled Fuel Structures

The Prototype Generation-IV Sodium-cooled Fast Reactor (PGSFR) is being developed by Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI). While their design incorporates inherent safety features demonstrated in the landmark Shutdown Heat Removal Test (SHRT) conducted at EBR-II including a large pool configuration and uranium alloy fuel, it is still necessary to evaluate metal fuel relocation and theirs consequences in case of postulated core disruptive accidents. Extensive data regarding fuel relocation in sodium from both in-pile and out-of-pile tests were obtained for oxide fuels in the 1960's - 1970's, while few studies of metallic fuel behavior were performed because of concerns that metallic fuel could not achieve high burnup due to the irradiation induced swelling problem. Following new metal fuel design development that mitigated the swelling problem, experiments regarding interaction of molten metal fuels and liquid sodium have been conducted by several researchers. Most studies that were conducted using metal simulants in various liquids concluded that the molten metals were heavily fragmented after liquid contact and the dominant factors governing the fragmentation were superheating and latent heat of fusion of the molten metal fuel. Gabor et al. conducted experiments using kilogram quantities of various molten uranium alloys in an open sodium pool configuration. They found that the metal fuel fragments were basically in forms of filaments and sheets with a high bed voidage in the order of 0.9. Their calculation indicated that the debris beds formed by relocated metal fuels in an open sodium pool would be largely coolable by conduction heat transfer; and even if deep beds were to form, convective heat transfer and boiling heat transfer could preclude further melt penetration. Although Gabor's tests are useful in evaluating the coolability of relocated metal fuels during a postulated accident in a SFR, they focused on late phase behavior in which the core material relocates downward through the core support plate into the inlet plenum where the structures are more open and thus consistent with the open pool configuration. There is still a knowledge gap related to nature of metal fuel fragmentation and relocation within the fuel assembly structures. Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) is planning to conduct experiments regarding metal fuel relocation in the core structures which mock up the PGSFR's fuel assembly design. In the present study, preliminary tests for demonstration of melting and injecting the metal fuel were conducted using copper. Metal fuel relocation experiments with single fuel pin test section are planned to be conducted for understanding the flow and freezing behavior of the molten metal fuel in a narrow sodium channel and for evaluating the coolability of the relocated fuel. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2016

An Investigation on the Sustainability of a Sodium-cooled Breed-and-Burn Fast Reactor (B and BR)

Fast reactor can effectively handle the used nuclear fuel (UNF) by transmuting long-living transuranic (TRUs) into relatively short-living fission products. It can also be used to produce fissile from fertile nuclides as fuels for another reactor. The breed-and-burn fast reactor (B and BR) is a unique concept of fast reactor, which can breed the fissile fuels and use the bred fuels in situ. Thanks to this characteristic, the fuel utilization in a B and BR can be extremely high and even the recycled fuel of a B and BR can be used as a fuel to spawn the next generation B and BR. The UNF from the first B and BR should be reprocessed or reconditioned so that it can be reused in the second B and BR. A fuel reprocessing technology named melt refining was used in EBR-II from 1964 to 1969 and it was also applied in our previous study which showed that second B and BR can be started using the recycled UNF of first B and BR. However, about 95% of rare earths are removed during the melt refining and the associated processes are not very simple. Moreover, the actinide loss can also be significant. To enhance the proliferation-resistance and economy of the reprocessing, a super-simplified melt and treatment (SSMT) process without removing rare earth nuclides is suggested and the feasibility study to start the second B and BR using SSMT is carried out in this paper. The neutronics simulations were done using the Monte Carlo code McCARD in conjunction with ENDF/B-VII cross-section library. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2017

Advanced Simulation Aided Metallic Fuel Design

Nuclear engineering is reaching a domain space in which computational power and methods are starting to surpass the models that are used to simulate nuclear fuel rods. As these models are updated, simulations utilizing different compositions, operating conditions, fabrication techniques, and geometries can provide core designers with an important first step towards fuel qualification. Due to the cost associated with fuel irradiations, it can be expected that time and money spent building better fuel models may provide an attractive return during initial studies of advanced fuels, especially with regards to fuels beyond the extensively studied uranium oxide system. In general, the primary U.S. experience with irradiated fuel rods beyond traditional oxide fuel is with binary (U-Zr) and ternary (U-Pu-Zr) metal fuels. The bulk of the experimental data for metal fuels is obtained from rods irradiated in the EBR-II sodium fast reactor (SFR), thus many of the correlations developed for metal fuels comes from the post-irradiation (PIE) examination of EBR-II rods. One of the unique characteristics that set U-Pu-Zr fuels apart from traditional oxide fuels is the presence of different phases that develop in the fuel during irradiation. Each of these different phases has unique thermal, mechanical, and diffusive behavior. The transitions between these phases are not static as the initially homogenous zirconium diffuses towards the center and edge of the fuel rod, resulting in a low-Zr, high-U ring. Along with the differing material properties that occur in each phase, the increase in uranium corresponds to an increase in localized fission and power production. The direct coupling between the thermal and diffusion solves highlights one of the many examples of tightly coupled phenomenon that are present in nuclear fuel, and motivation for the development of codes that simultaneously solve each piece of physics in a fully-coupled manner.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Sensitivity Analysis of an Experimental Breeder Reactor II Fuel Assembly

The Experimental Breeder Reactor II (EBR-II) was selected as a candidate for a reactor physics benchmark evaluation due to its unique features and capabilities. In connection with the benchmark evaluation, the goal of this work was to perform a sensitivity analysis. The EBR-II was a sodium cooled, pool type, metal fueled, fast spectrum reactor. EBR-II operated from 1964 through 1994. It had a maximum heat output of 62.5 MW which could produce 20 MW of electricity. The design of EBR-II consisted of 637 hexagonal shaped, removable assemblies. The assemblies were divided into three regions: the core, an inner blanket, and an outer blanket. The core region contained assemblies with 91 fuel rods in each. The fuel was enriched uranium metal and was clad within stainless steel. The core region also included two safety assemblies and eight control assemblies with the difference being that these assemblies only contained 61 fuel rods. Additional assemblies in the core region included stainless steel dummies, half worth drivers, and experimental/instrumentation assemblies. The inner blanket region initially consisted of depleted uranium for fuel breeding, but was replaced, after proving the concept of breeding, with stainless steel reflectors for the purpose of irradiation. The outer blanket region consisted of depleted uranium. Figure 1 shows a cross section view of the EBR-II core layout. Each assembly was approximately 234 cm long with the uranium fuel section being 33 cm long. Above and below the fuel were stainless steel neutron reflectors. Additionally, orifices at the bottom of the assembly allowed for sodium coolant to flow upward, with larger holes in the subassemblies at the center where the greatest heat was produced. The core of EBR-II was enclosed by a stainless steel reactor vessel which was comprised of a radial shell, a lower grid plenum structure, and an upper reactor vessel cover that served as a neutron shield. Surrounding the reactor vessel radially were layers of graphite and borated graphite shielding. The entire assembly is submerged 3 meters in a pool of sodium. The pool contained up to 337,000 liters of sodium which was forced through the core and blanket regions using two centrifugal pumps that were also submerged within the sodium pool. The design of EBR-II included many safety features. The compatibility between the sodium and stainless steel prevented corrosion and therefore the risk of a radioactive release due to corrosion. The sodium coolant was kept at near atmospheric pressure which made any leak more controllable. The metal fuel, cladding, and coolant allowed for heat to be removed easily. The large volume of sodium allowed for heat to be absorbed without problems occurring. Lastly, the reactor would expand as temperature increased which would result in greater neutron leakage. This extra leakage caused a large negative temperature reactivity feedback which automatically shut the reactor down in case of an accident. EBR-II had unique capabilities which were proven during the Integral Fast Reactor initiative. This program lasted from 1984 to 1994. The goal of this program was to solve many of the perceived problems with nuclear energy through scientific means. The safety features of EBR-II were put to the test in April 1986. The tests simulated loss of reactor coolant flow and loss of a heat sink. For both of these tests, the reactor was at 100% power and was not scrammed. During both tests, the reactor shut itself down and achieved a safe steady state temperature all due to the design of the reactor. It was because of these tests that EBR-II was chosen for a reactor physics benchmark evaluation. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Enhancements to BISON U-Zr Metallic Fuel X447 Example Problem

As development of a metallic fuel modeling capability in BISON has progressed, the need for an example problem used as a comparison basis was observed. Collaborative work between researchers at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL) then proceeded to determine a viable rod to use as the basis and create a BISON input deck utilizing as many metallic fuel models as feasible. The basis chosen was what would be considered a generic rod from subassembly X447, an assembly irradiated in EBR-II towards the end of its operating life, heavily based on reported data for fuel pin DP11. Thus, the approach was adopted to use flow characteristics from subassembly X447 as a basis for the convective heat transfer solution, power history and axial power profiles that are representative of rod DP11 from subassembly X447. The rod simulated is a U-10Zr wt% (U-22.5Zr at%) composition. A 2D-RZ mesh would be used to capture axial thermal hydraulic effects, axial swelling and stress-strain calculations over the full length of the rod. After initial work was invested, a refinement of the various models and input parameters was conducted to ensure consistency between operator-declared conditions, model input requirements and those represented in the example problem. This report serves as a synopsis of the enhancements and refinements to the example problem conducted throughout the 2016 fiscal year.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2017

Preliminary Analysis of FFTF Loss-of-Flow Tests with SAS4A/SASSYS-1

The Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF) was the most recent Sodium-cooled Fast Reactor (SFR) built in the United States. The Passive Safety Test (PST) program was carried out on FFTF between 1984 and 1986 to demonstrate the capability of passive reactor shutdown and decay heat removal in response to protected and unprotected transients. In order to recover the information and knowledge that has been gained from FFTF, a research project was initiated focusing on the simulation of Unprotected Loss of Flow Without Scram (LOFWOS) tests similar to the knowledge preservation activities conducted for EBR-II by Argonne National Laboratory in earlier years. These knowledge preservation activities are intended to support the validation of computational tools and methods in the area of SFR passive safety. Comparisons with experimental data and other safety codes provide opportunities to improve SFR design and safety analysis codes and methods.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Constituent Redistribution in U-Zr Metallic Fuel Using the Advanced Fuel Performance Code BISON

Previous work done by Galloway, et. al. on EBR-II ternary (U-Pu-Zr) fuel constituent redistribution yielded accurate simulation data for the limited data sets of Zr redistribution. The data sets included EPMA scans of two different irradiated rods. First, T179, which was irradiated to 1.9 at% burnup, was analyzed. Second, DP16, which was irradiated to 11 at% burnup, was analyzed. One set of parameters that most accurately represented the zirconium profiles for both experiments was determined. Since the binary fuel (U-Zr) has previously been used as the driver fuel for sodium fast reactors (SFR) as well as being the likely driver fuel if a new SFR is constructed, this same process has been initiated on the binary fuel form. From limited binary EPMA scans as well as other fuel characterization techniques, it has been observed that zirconium redistribution also occurs in the binary fuel, albeit at a reduced rate compared to observation in the ternary fuel, as noted by Kim et. al. While the rate of redistribution has been observed to be slower, numerous metallographs of U-Zr fuel show distinct zone formations.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Improved Gamma Yield and Interaction Cross-Section Libraries of MC2-3

The MC{sup 2}-3 code developed by Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) has been widely used for multigroup cross section generation for fast reactor design and analysis. The neutron cross sections generated with MC{sup 2}-3 have been validated with various fast critical experiments. The gamma production data and interaction cross sections were also verified with the EBR-II benchmark problem. The current gamma calculation process is based on the 21-group gamma libraries generated with the NJOY code, which does not include the delayed gamma production and does not account for the self-shielding effect on the KERMA (Kinetic Energy Released in Material) factor. In order to improve gamma prediction accuracy, the gamma libraries of MC{sup 2}-3 have recently been extended from 21 to 94 groups, including delayed gamma data and kinetic energy release per reaction data. The latter is used to take into account the self-shielding effect on KERMA factors. Gamma transport calculation capabilities have also been added to MC{sup 2}-3. In this paper, we present the updated data and gamma transport capabilities along with the verification tests with ABTR and EBR-II benchmark problems. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2017

DIissolution of low enriched uranium from the experimental breeder reactor-II fuel stored at the Idaho National Laboratory

The Idaho National Laboratory (INL) is actively engaged in the development of electrochemical processing technology for the treatment of fast reactor fuels using irradiated fuel from the Experimental Breeder Reactor-II (EBR-II) as the primary test material. The research and development (R&D) activities generate a low enriched uranium (LEU) metal product from the electrorefining of the EBR-II fuel and the subsequent consolidation and removal of chloride salts by the cathode processor. The LEU metal ingots from past R&D activities are currently stored at INL awaiting disposition. One potential disposition pathway is the shipment of the ingots to the Savannah River Site (SRS) for dissolution in H-Canyon. Carbon steel cans containing the LEU metal would be loaded into reusable charging bundles in the H-Canyon Crane Maintenance Area and charged to the 6.4D or 6.1D dissolver. The LEU dissolution would be accomplished as the final charge in a dissolver batch (following the dissolution of multiple charges of spent nuclear fuel (SNF)). The solution would then be purified and the 235 U enrichment downblended to allow use of the U in commercial reactor fuel. To support this potential disposition path, the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) developed a dissolution flowsheet for the LEU using samples of the material received from INL.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Treatment of Problematic Reactive Metal Wastes Using the GeoMelt{sup R} In-Container Vitrification (ICV{sup TM}) Process - 20326

Decommissioning of sodium-cooled reactors and fast reactor technologies has generated a number of reactive metal waste configurations that are problematic to treat and typically lack cost effective treatment methods and disposition options. As a result, Veolia Nuclear Solutions, under contract with Idaho National Laboratory (owned by the U.S. Department of Energy and managed and operated by Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC) demonstrated its GeoMelt{sup R} In-Container Vitrification (ICV){sup TM} technology to safely convert sodium metal to a non-reactive vitrified oxide form. The demonstration project, supported by glass formulation and crucible testing, consisted of a series of ICV{sup TM} melts that processed elemental sodium into stable non-reactive glass. INL is currently implementing GeoMelt{sup R} technology as a means to safely and reliably convert radioactive reactive metal residues that contaminate sodium cooled reactor components into waste forms that comply with existing disposition pathways. Reactive metal wastes require treatment in order to remove the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) reactivity and ignitability characteristics to comply with land disposal restrictions. GeoMelt{sup R}, which is an alternative to other potential treatment approaches, provides a robust approach that chemically converts the reactive metals to an inert oxide while also immobilizing radionuclides in a vitrified waste form with durability equal to or better than vitrified nuclear fuel reprocessing wastes (very robust and inert waste forms). Most other treatment approaches generate hydrogen gas which is problematic. In 2016, Veolia Nuclear Solutions first demonstrated the effectiveness of the GeoMelt{sup R} ICV{sup TM} process in deactivating reactive sodium metal. Crucible, bench-scale, and engineering-scale demonstrations were conducted on several surrogate waste configurations with various ratios of sodium metal and glass formers. Each ratio and configuration demonstrated complete deactivation of the surrogate sodium metal. Follow-on work in 2017 demonstrated the deactivation of reactive sodium by GeoMelt{sup R} ICV{sup TM} at a higher waste loading relative to previously demonstrated work performed in 2016; the higher waste loading optimized glass chemistry while enhancing the economical full-scale treatment of reactive metals. Additionally, follow-on demonstration testing in 2018 and 2019 focused on more complex shapes and other reactive-metals (mocked up Experimental Breeder Reactor II [EBR-II] subassembly, sodium filled heat exchanger, and a can containing sodium potassium alloy) which were all performed at engineering scale. Veolia Nuclear Solutions designed, installed, and commissioned in September 2018, at Perma-Fix Northwest in Richland Washington, a 10-metric ton full-scale GeoMelt unit (GeoMelt{sup R} Richland) for the treatment of reactive metal wastes. As of September 2019, over 900 55-gallon drums containing a total of around 3,500 lb of sodium with low levels of radioactivity have been treated at GeoMelt{sup R} Richland, with resulting glass monoliths disposed at the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS). A full-scale radiological demonstration melt on an actual EBR-II subassembly has also been performed using the full-scale melter in 2019. The GeoMelt{sup R} technology is a proven radioactive waste treatment technology capable of immobilizing radioactive wastes, including bulk rubble such as drums and other steel vessels usually without pretreatment. Utilizing the GeoMelt{sup R} technology to treat reactive metals eliminates pretreatment steps resulting from having to separate the reactive metal from steel containers or jackets as GeoMelt{sup R} can easily operate at temperatures sufficient to melt the steel and expose the reactive metal for treatment. Eliminating handling steps of reactive metals is a significant safety advantage since reactive metals are pyrophoric. The results generated as a part of the 2018-2019 demonstration program are presented in the paper. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

The Use of Long-wave Infrared Cameras for Hazardous Waste Remediation - 20457

For over fifty years, infrared cameras have been used in military applications, nondestructive testing, condition monitoring, and predictive maintenance. As infrared cameras continue to become more sophisticated and less expensive, they are providing value in an ever-increasing variety of unique applications, including hazardous waste remediation. This paper describes several instances of how infrared cameras have been used within the US Department of Defense and the US Department of Energy in support of waste remediation projects, including the author's recent use of an infrared camera in support of the Calcine Retrieval Project at the Idaho National Laboratory. Infrared cameras provide images of infrared radiation, or heat energy, which is otherwise invisible to the unaided eye. Infrared radiation is part of the electromagnetic spectrum, which includes visible light. But unlike visible light, infrared has wavelengths longer than the human eye can detect. Infrared is emitted by everything with a temperature above absolute zero (-273 deg. C, or -459 deg. F); the higher the temperature, the greater the infrared thermal radiation, or heat, that is emitted. Even objects that feel cold to us, like ice, emit thermal radiation and can be imaged by infrared cameras. These cameras are typically used to look for abnormally hot or cold spots on a component or target area under normal operating conditions. The method provides a rapid, wide-area, noncontact technique for identifying problems associated with a temperature differential. All infrared cameras can provide qualitative thermal information by displaying relative differences in temperatures within a two-dimensional image. More expensive infrared cameras can also provide quantitative information where an absolute temperature value is assigned to each pixel associated with the displayed two-dimensional image. Proper camera calibration and a solid understanding of heat transfer and thermography techniques are required when using an infrared camera to obtain quantitative information. Case studies outlined in this paper include the rapid, non-intrusive detection of hazardous decontamination solution within one-ton shipping containers at Pine Bluff Arsenal, the non-intrusive identification of residual elemental sodium within the cooling loops of the Experimental Breeder Reactor II (EBR-II) reactor at the Idaho National Laboratory, process monitoring of heat exchanger melt-and-drain efforts during EBR-II decommissioning, and the remote detection of internal steel supports within calcine storage bins prior to bin penetration. For each use of thermography, the author describes a summary of the waste remediation effort, the infrared camera used, the thermal imaging technique employed, and the results obtained. The paper concludes with a discussion on common mistakes to avoid for similar applications of thermography. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗