Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “DCLL blanket”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2017

MHD thermohydraulics analysis and supporting R&D for DCLL blanket in the FNSF

A Fusion Nuclear Science Facility (FNSF) has been recognized in the fusion community as a necessary facility to resolve the critical technology issues of in-vessel components prior to the construction of a DEMO reactor (Abdou et al., 1996) [1]. Among these components, development of a reliable, low-cost and safe blanket system that provides self-sufficient tritium breeding and efficient conversion of the extracted fusion energy to electricity, while meeting all material, design and configuration limitations is among the most important but still challenging goals. In the recent FNSF study in the US (Kesel et al., 2015) [2], a Dual-Coolant Lead-Lithium (DCLL) blanket has been selected as the main breeding blanket concept. This paper summarizes the most important details of the proposed DCLL blanket design, presents the MHD thermohydraulic analysis for the PbLi flows in the blanket conduits and introduces supporting R&D studies, which are presently ongoing at UCLA. We also discuss the required pre-FNSF R&D in the area of MHD Thermofluids to support the further work on the DCLL blanket design & analysis and its integration into the fusion facility.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗
DOE OSTI2014

Vacuum Permeator Analysis for Extraction of Tritium from DCLL Blankets

It is envisioned that tritium will be extracted from DCLL blankets using a vacuum permeator. We derive here an analytical solution for the extraction efficiency of a permeator tube, which is a function of only two dimensionless numbers: one that indicates whether radial transport is limited in the PbLi or in the solid membrane, and another that is the ratio of axial and radial transport times in the PbLi. The permeator efficiency is maximized by decreasing the velocity and tube diameter, and increasing the tube length. This is true regardless of the mass transport correlation used; we review several here and find that they differ little, and the choice of correlation is not a source of significant uncertainty here. The PbLi solubility, on the other hand, is a large source of uncertainty, and we identify upper and lower bounds from the literature data. Under the most optimistic assumptions, we find that a ferritic steel permeator operating at 550 °C will need to be at least an order of magnitude larger in volume than previous conceptual designs using niobium and operating at higher temperatures.

DCLL↗
DOE OSTI2013

Progress on DCLL Blanket Concept

Under the US Fusion Nuclear Science and Technology Development program, we have selected the Dual Coolant Lead Lithium concept (DCLL) as a reference blanket, which has the potential to be a high performance DEMO blanket design with a projected thermal efficiency of >40%. Reduced activation ferritic/martensitic (RAF/M) steel is used as the structural material. The self-cooled breeder PbLi is circulated for power conversion and for tritium breeding. A SiC-based flow channel insert (FCI) is used as a means for magnetohydrodynamic pressure drop reduction from the circulating liquid PbLi and as a thermal insulator to separate the high-temperature PbLi (~700°C) from the helium-cooled RAF/M steel structure. We are making progress on related R&D needs to address critical Fusion Nuclear Science and Facility (FNSF) and DEMO blanket development issues. When performing the function as the Interface Coordinator for the DCLL blanket concept, we had been developing the mechanical design and performing neutronics, structural and thermal hydraulics analyses of the DCLL TBM module. We had estimated the necessary ancillary equipment that will be needed at the ITER site and a detailed safety impact report has been prepared. This provided additional understanding of the DCLL blanket concept in preparation for the FNSF and DEMO. This paper will be a summary report on the progress of the DCLL TBM design and R&Ds for the DCLL blanket concept.

Wong, Clement↗
DOE OSTI2022

Steady state thermo-mechanics and material property definition framework for analyzing DCLL blanket in the fusion nuclear science facility

In this work, a thermo-mechanics model that relies on creating the material property definition framework (MPDF) and multiphysics coupling of the heat transfer and the solid mechanics modules is developed to determine the structural integrity of the recently designed dual cooled lead lithium (DCLL) inboard blanket (IB) for the Fusion Nuclear Science Facility under steady state loads. The MPDF is called to supply fusion relevant neutron irradiation and temperature induced changes in material properties during multiphysics finite element runs, and PbLi temperature profiles are used to approximate Magnetohydrodynamics effect and the nuclear volumetric heating on the PbLi. Neutron irradiation and temperature induced reduction of the yield and ultimate strengths of F82H steel at the first wall (FW) are quantified for one year. A blanket in an assembly with gaps between blanket sectors and another blanket in an assembly with no gaps between blanket sectors, both exposed to radiation damage that lasted for one year are analyzed. Analysis using the elastic ITER structural design criteria for in-vessel components (ITER SDC-IC) design rules and a linear isotropic-hardening-type elastoplastic material model are used where most appropriate. The IB blanket with gaps between blanket sectors will withstand the steady state combined thermal and coolant loads for one year operational period but will fail if no gaps are allowed between blanket sectors. It is recommended that a gap of about 7.62 mm should be provided between IB blanket sectors during assembly which would close up during service, stop neutron streaming, reduce stresses and reduce bending of the FW into the scrape-off layer.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗
DOE OSTI2022

Modeling of Transport Processes in Liquid-Metal Fusion Blankets: Past, Present, and Future

The successful development of robust breeding blanket systems will strongly rely on computational tools for predicting the complex behavior of the electrically conducting liquid-metal (LM) breeder flowing in the complex-shaped blanket ducts in the presence of a strong plasma-confining magnetic field, volumetric heating, and tritium generation. Associated transport processes involve magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) flows, heat transfer, corrosion, and tritium transport. This paper is an overview of past and present efforts in the development, application, and verification and validation (V&V) of such computational tools. As a result of the ongoing campaign on V&V of computer codes for LM blankets, the international fusion community has identified several candidates that promise to become real blanket design and analysis tools in the near future. Among them are HIMAG, MHD-UCAS, COMSOL Multiphysics, ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX, and OpenFOAM. The progress, over the last decade, in the application of such codes in blanket studies is tremendous. This is illustrated with two examples for a dual-coolant lead-lithium (DCLL) blanket: (1) integrated computer modeling for the recently designed DCLL blanket in the United States and (2) application of the code MHD-UCAS to the analysis of PbLi flows and heat transfer in a generic DCLL blanket prototype at high Hartmann (Ha ~ 10 4 ) and Grashof numbers (Gr ~ 10 12 ). Here, this paper also presents an approach to the development of a new integrated computational tool called the virtual dual-coolant lead-lithium (VDCLL) blanket, which elaborates the existing U.S. MHD code HIMAG.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗
DOE OSTI2022

Demonstration of RELAP5-3D for transient analysis of a dual coolant lead lithium fusion blanket concept

Our research aims to build a multiphysics framework for transient analysis of the Dual- Coolant Lead-Lithium (DCLL) blanket design of the proposed Fusion Nuclear Science Facility (FNSF) for all Onticipated Operational Occurrences (AOOs) using Reduced Order Models (ROMs). This paper presents an assessment of using RELAP5-3D for transient thermal-hydraulic blanket analysis of the DCLL design. Preliminary validation studies for the RELAP5-3D properties were conducted using a representative vertical flow loop model and a comparison study using experimental data from the thermal convection corrosion loops at ORNL. These studies inspected the thermal hydraulic response of Lead-Lithium Eutectic (PbLi) systems within the RELAP5-3D code; mainly pressure drop and heat transfer, as compared to analytical calculations and experimental data. The Magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) pressure drop effect for liquid metal under the effects of a uniform magnetic field was implemented into our models using an equivalent forms loss coefficient based on the phasic momentum equations. We verified our implementation of MHD pressure drop within RELAP5-3D using a systematic approach consisting of two studies. Models were developed to perform comparison studies based on experimental data from the Argonne Liquid metal EXperiment (ALEX) facility and the Magnetohydrodynamic PbLi Experiment (MaPLE) facility. Using the developed validation basis, we built a simplified DCLL channel model within RELAP5-3D, inspected MHD pressure drop and performed transient temperature analysis. The DCLL channel model used radial heating data from the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) which was normalized to the FNSF design. Here, a representative startup transient was performed using a relative power curve from the initial ramp up of a long-term power pulse of the Tore Supra reactor. This study demonstrated that RELAP5-3D ROMs are capable of accurate transient analysis of the DCLL blanket. We have since utilized MCNP to develop heating profiles based on the FNSF design and are working toward implementing them into our DCLL model.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗
DOE OSTI2025

Q2 Report for FY25 Theory and Simulation Performance Target: Development of an integrated modeling framework for fusion reactor design and assessment

This report describes the work and activities carried out towards the completion of each of the following milestones in FY25 Q2: 1. Demonstrate workflow for generating self-consistent CESOL plasma profiles + first wall and divertor loading prediction and generate the CAT plasma and neutron loading needed for further engineering analysis: $\circ$ Run CESOL with BOUT++/Hermes-3 and immersed boundary condition to directly map to wall: • Run BOUT++/Hermes-3 through the IPS workflow to find radial particle and energy diffusivities to match either the Eich or the physics-based scaling of the SOL heat flux width, and • Expand source of first wall heat flux to include charged particles, neutrals, and radiation from the core+edge. 2. Generate medium fidelity parametrized CAD: $\circ$ Develop the TRACER tool to read an existing CAD, regenerate the geometry based on vertex location and connectivity information, define vertex translation and parameters needed for scaling the CAD, and $\circ$ Utilize the FreeGS code to determine CAT PF coil placement, including minimizing the number of coils, coil current, and electromechanical stresses. 3. Utilize plasma loading for engineering analysis: $\circ$ Couple the plasma loading to input for OpenFOAM and demonstrate initial test of thermal analysis of CAT first wall loading with typical DCLL blanket component cooling boundary conditions. 4. Demonstrate nuclear analysis: $\circ$ Apply initial analysis of tritium transport in DCLL blanket by evaluating spatially resolved tritium generation rates, tritium diffusion and convection.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗
DOE OSTI2021

Compatibility of SiC with ODS FeCrAl in flowing Pb-Li at 600° - 700°C

To establish the maximum operating temperature for the dual coolant lead lithium (DCLL) blanket concept, thermal convection loop (TCL) experiments were conducted for 1000 h with a peak temperature of 700 °C to determine compatibility with commercial eutectic Pb~17at.%Li. Two TCLs were fabricated from alloy APMT (FeCrAlMo) and the baseline TCL experiment contained only APMT specimens. The second TCL experiment exposed more fusion relevant CVD SiC and ODS Fe-10Cr-6Al specimens in the hot and cold legs. In the second experiment, the mass losses were much larger for the ODS FeCrAl specimens and most of the CVD SiC specimens experienced a mass gain as SiC reacted to form an Fe- and Cr-rich carbide reaction product. Dissolved Fe and Cr reacted with the SiC and removing Fe and Cr from the liquid appeared to increase ODS FeCrAl dissolution. Such a dissimilar material interaction appears consistent with thermodynamic calculations. Significant attack at the top of the hot leg in both experiments suggests that the Pb-Li compatibility of FeCrAl alloys is inadequate at 700 °C in a flowing environment and the maximum PbLi temperature is < 675 °C.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2017

Overview of the fusion nuclear science facility, a credible break-in step on the path to fusion energy

Here the Fusion Nuclear Science Facility (FNSF) is examined as part of a two step program from ITER to commercial power plants. This first step is considered mandatory to establish the materials and component database in the real fusion in-service environment before proceeding to larger electricity producing facilities. The FNSF can be shown to make tremendous advances beyond ITER, toward a power plant, particularly in plasma duration and fusion nuclear environment. A moderate FNSF is studied in detail, which does not generate net electricity, but does reach the power plant blanket operating temperatures. The full poloidal Dual Coolant Lead Lithium (DCLL) blanket is chosen, with alternates being the Helium Cooled Lead Lithium (HCLL) and Helium Cooled Ceramic Breeder/Pebble Bed (HCCB/PB). Several power plant relevant choices are made in order to follow the philosophy of targeted technologies. Any fusion core component must be qualified by fusion relevant neutron testing and highly integrated non-nuclear testing before it can be installed on the FNSF in order to avoid the high probability of constant failures in a plasma-vacuum system. A range of missions for the FNSF, or any fusion nuclear facility on the path toward fusion power plants, are established and characterized by several metrics. A conservative physics strategy is pursued to accommodate the transition to ultra-long plasma pulses, and parameters are chosen to represent the power plant regime to the extent possible. An operating space is identified, and from this, one point is chosen for further detailed analysis, with R = 4.8 m, a = 1.2 m, I P = 7.9 MA, B T = 7.5 T, β N < 2.7, n/n Gr = 0.9, f BS = 0.52, q95 = 6.0, H 98 ~1.0, and Q = 4.0. The operating space is shown to be robust to parameter variations. A program is established for the FNSF to show how the missions for the facility are met, with a He/H, a DD and 5 DT phases. The facility requires ~25 years to complete its DT operation, including 7.8 years of neutron production, and the remaining spent on inspections and maintenance. The DD phase is critical to establish the ultra-long plasma pulse lengths. The blanket testing strategy is examined, and shows that many sectors have penetrations for heating and current drive (H/CD), diagnostics, or Test Blanket Modules (TBMs). The hot cell is a critical facility element in order for the FNSF to perform its function of developing the in-service material and component database. The pre-FNSF R&D is laid out in terms of priority topics, with the FNSF phases driving the time-lines for R&D completion. A series of detailed technical assessments of the FNSF operating point are reported in this issue, showing the credibility of such a step, and more detailed emphasis on R&D items to pursue. These include nuclear analysis, thermo-mechanics and thermal-hydraulics, liquid metal thermal hydraulics, transient thermo-mechanics, tritium analysis, maintenance assessment, magnet specification and analysis, materials assessments, core and scrape-off layer (SOL)/divertor plasma examinations.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗
DOE OSTI2021

Overview of the fusion nuclear science facility, a credible break-in step on the path to fusion energy

The Fusion Nuclear Science Facility (FNSF) is examined here as part of a two step program from ITER to commercial power plants. This first step is considered mandatory to establish the materials and component database in the real fusion in-service environment before proceeding to larger electricity producing facilities. The FNSF can be shown to make tremendous advances beyond ITER, toward a power plant, particularly in plasma duration and fusion nuclear environment. A moderate FNSF is studied in detail, which does not generate net electricity, but does reach the power plant blanket operating temperatures. The full poloidal Dual Coolant Lead Lithium (DCLL) blanket is chosen, with alternates being the Helium Cooled Lead Lithium (HCLL) and Helium Cooled Ceramic Breeder/Pebble Bed (HCCB/PB). Several power plant relevant choices are made in order to follow the philosophy of targeted technologies. Any fusion core component must be qualified by fusion relevant neutron testing and highly integrated non-nuclear testing before it can be installed on the FNSF in order to avoid the high probability of constant failures in a plasma-vacuum system. A range of missions for the FNSF, or any fusion nuclear facility on the path toward fusion power plants, are established and characterized by several metrics. A conservative physics strategy is pursued to accommodate the transition to ultra-long plasma pulses, and parameters are chosen to represent the power plant regime to the extent possible. An operating space is identified, and from this, one point is chosen for further detailed analysis, with R = 4.8 m, a = 1.2 m, IP = 7.9 MA, BT = 7.5 T, βN Gr = 0.9, fBS = 0.52, q95 = 6.0, H98 ∼1.0, and Q = 4.0. The operating space is shown to be robust to parameter variations. A program is established for the FNSF to show how the missions for the facility are met, with a He/H, a DD and 5 DT phases. The facility requires ∼25 years to complete its DT operation, including 7.8 years of neutron production, and the remaining spent on inspections and maintenance. The DD phase is critical to establish the ultra-long plasma pulse lengths. The blanket testing strategy is examined, and shows that many sectors have penetrations for heating and current drive (H/CD), diagnostics, or Test Blanket Modules (TBMs). The hot cell is a critical facility element in order for the FNSF to perform its function of developing the in-service material and component database. The pre-FNSF R&D is laid out in terms of priority topics, with the FNSF phases driving the time-lines for R&D completion. A series of detailed technical assessments of the FNSF operating point are reported in this issue, showing the credibility of such a step, and more detailed emphasis on R&D items to pursue. These include nuclear analysis, thermo-mechanics and thermal-hydraulics, liquid metal thermal hydraulics, transient thermo-mechanics, tritium analysis, maintenance assessment, magnet specification and analysis, materials assessments, core and scrape-off layer (SOL)/divertor plasma examinations.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗
DOE OSTI2017

Multiphysics modeling of the FW/Blanket of the U.S. fusion nuclear science facility (FNSF)

The dual coolant lead-lithium (DCLL) blanket concept, which is utilized in the Fusion Nuclear Science Facility (FNSF) conceptual design, is based on a helium-cooled first wall and blanket structure with RAFS (Reduced Activation Ferritic Steel) and a self-cooled LiPb breeding zone. The objective of this work is to develop a multiphysics modeling process in order to optimize the design and achieve long lifetime, maintainability, and high reliability. 3D finite element multiphysics modeling of the DCLL first wall and blanket (midplane of one sector) has been performed using COMSOL 5.2. The multiphysics aspect of the design is demonstrated via coupling of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), conjugate heat transfer and solid mechanics. Both normal and off-normal loading conditions have been analyzed. The results of velocity, pressure, and temperature distributions of helium flow, as well as the primary and thermal stress of the structure were obtained. This was followed by determination of the factors of safety along three critical paths based on the ITER Structural Design Criteria for In-vessel Components (ISDC-IC). We show here that the structural design meets the ITER-ISDC design rules under both normal and off-normal operating conditions, though the safety factors under off-normal condition with 8 MPa helium pressure are marginal. Thus simple design optimization was conducted based on a parametric study on first wall dimensions to improve the design.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗
DOE OSTI2022

Toward full simulations for a liquid metal blanket: part 2. Computations of MHD flows with volumetric heating for a PbLi blanket prototype at Ha ~10 4 and Gr ~10 12

On the pathway toward full simulations for a liquid metal (LM) blanket, this part 2 extends a previous study of purely magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) flows in a DCLL blanket in reference Chen et al (2020 Nucl. Fusion 60 076003) to more general conditions when the MHD flow is coupled with heat transfer. The simulated prototypic blanket module includes all components of a real LM blanket system, such as supply ducts, inlet and outlet manifolds, multiple poloidal ducts and a U-turn zone. Volumetric heating generated by fusion neutrons is added to simulate thermal effects in the flowing lead–lithium (PbLi) breeder. The MHD flow equations and the energy equation are solved with a DNS-type finite-volume code ‘MHD-UCAS’ on a very fine mesh of 470 × 10 6 cells. The applied magnetic field is 5 T (Hartmann number Ha ~ 10 4 ), the PbLi velocity in the poloidal ducts is 10 cm s –1 (Reynolds number Re ~10 5 ), whereas the maximum volumetric heating is 30 MW m –3 (Grashof number Gr ~ 10 12 ). Four cases have been simulated, including forced- and mixed-convection flows, and either an electrically conducting or insulating blanket structure. Various comparisons are made between the four computed cases and also against the purely MHD flows computed earlier in reference Chen et al (2020 Nucl. Fusion 60 076003) with regards to the (1) MHD pressure drop, (2) flow balancing, (3) temperature field, (4) flows in particular blanket components, and (5) 3D and turbulent flow effects. The strongest buoyancy effects were found in the poloidal ducts. In the electrically non-conducting blanket, the buoyancy forces lead to significant modifications of the flow structure, such as formation of reverse flows, whereas their effect on the MHD pressure drop is relatively small. In the electrically conducting blanket case, the buoyancy effects on the flow and MHD pressure drop are almost negligible.

Physics↗
DOE OSTI2025

MHD Analysis of Dual-Coolant Lead-Lithium Blanket for Spherical Tokamak Advanced Reactor

The tritium breeding blanket is vital for future fusion power plants, with the Spherical Tokamak Advanced Reactor (STAR) project highlighting the dual-coolant lead-lithium (DCLL) design. The DCLL blanket performs shielding, energy exhaust, and tritium breeding using a lead-lithium alloy , with lithium as the breeder and lead as the neutron multiplier. It also serves as the primary coolant, with helium providing supplemental cooling. Reduced-activation ferritic/martensitic steel is used for the blanket structure. Magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) phenomena influence the liquid metal flow in a magnetic field, affecting heat transfer in the breeder affected by energetic neutrons. Understanding key flow parameters in such conditions is critical for efficient DCLL design. This study uses three-dimensional thermofluid MHD analysis with ANSYS CFX software, modified at Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, to simulate high Hartmann flows. The neutronics code MCNP, coupled with plasma equilibrium, provides heat source distribution. In conclusion, we examine electromagnetic interactions in adjacent fluid domains and analyze the magnetic field’s impact on flow distribution in the inboard and outboard blanket layout, using detailed mesh generation for accurate results.

DCLL↗
DOE OSTI2017

Tritium aspects of the fusion nuclear science facility

The Fusion Nuclear Science Facility (FNSF) is intended to bridge the technical gaps from ITER to DEMO, and provide a fully nuclear environment for the advancement of materials and blanket science, among other missions. Though smaller (~500 MW fusion power) than the envisioned DEMO, our FNSF design still seeks to test DEMO-relevant components and technologies, and to that end one of its goals is to achieve a tritium breeding ratio near one using a dual-cooled lead lithium (DCLL) blanket. We explore here the migration of bred tritium through in-vessel components and coolant loops, which is exacerbated by the relatively low solubility of tritium in PbLi and the high operating temperatures envisioned in later phases of operation. Some features inherent to the design of the DCLL help limit tritium losses, namely the relatively high PbLi flow rates; coupled with efficient tritium extraction, the DCLL potentially achieves low tritium permeation losses without the use of permeation barriers. We outline here the design of such an extraction system, and some of the materials challenges that must be met in order to realize it. The efficacy of these and other design features, such as coaxial piping, is demonstrated via a series of parameter studies. We also investigate the effect of parameter uncertainties, and find that the imprecise knowledge of the tritium solubility in PbLi in particular leads to very disparate estimates of tritium losses. Depending on the experimental value used, losses range from ~0.05 to over 6 grams of tritium per year. As a result, the former is acceptable based on estimated environmental releases and resultant dose to members of the public; the latter exceeds regulatory limits.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗
DOE OSTI2022

GAMBL – A dual-cooled fusion blanket using SiC-based structures

We describe a novel fusion reactor blanket concept called GAMBL – GA Modular BLanket. This design concept exploits the advantages of SiC-based structures while minimizing their limitations. Material microstructures are tailored for different functions throughout the first wall and blanket, including the use of graded W/SiC composites to enhance heat transfer capabilities and resist erosion at the plasma-facing surface. The design contains a decoupled first wall and breeding blanket, which we show can provide adequate tritium breeding. By decoupling the breeding part of the blanket, we can operate at very low PbLi breeder pressure and support gravity loads in simple, radiatively-cooled structural beams that do not contain coolant. First wall performance capabilities are enhanced by eliminating constraints imposed by the deep blanket. We have performed initial fluid, thermal, mechanical and neutronics analysis of this concept to show its capabilities to meet the design requirements. R&D needs are mostly related to materials development. Except for unique manufacturing needs, no new facilities are required beyond existing or planned facilities for the US base program on steel-based DCLL blankets.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗