Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Cr(MoS2)2”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

Materials Data on Cr(MoS2)2 by Materials Project

Cr(MoS2)2 crystallizes in the monoclinic Cc space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are four inequivalent Mo+2.50+ sites. In the first Mo+2.50+ site, Mo+2.50+ is bonded to six S2- atoms to form distorted MoS6 octahedra that share corners with six CrS6 octahedra, edges with six MoS6 octahedra, and a faceface with one CrS6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 47–56°. There are a spread of Mo–S bond distances ranging from 2.37–2.61 Å. In the second Mo+2.50+ site, Mo+2.50+ is bonded to six S2- atoms to form distorted MoS6 octahedra that share corners with six CrS6 octahedra, edges with six MoS6 octahedra, and a faceface with one CrS6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 48–57°. There are a spread of Mo–S bond distances ranging from 2.37–2.61 Å. In the third Mo+2.50+ site, Mo+2.50+ is bonded to six S2- atoms to form distorted MoS6 octahedra that share corners with six CrS6 octahedra, edges with six MoS6 octahedra, and a faceface with one CrS6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 48–59°. There are a spread of Mo–S bond distances ranging from 2.38–2.64 Å. In the fourth Mo+2.50+ site, Mo+2.50+ is bonded to six S2- atoms to form distorted MoS6 octahedra that share corners with six CrS6 octahedra, edges with six MoS6 octahedra, and a faceface with one CrS6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 48–58°. There are a spread of Mo–S bond distances ranging from 2.37–2.64 Å. There are two inequivalent Cr3+ sites. In the first Cr3+ site, Cr3+ is bonded to six S2- atoms to form CrS6 octahedra that share corners with twelve MoS6 octahedra, edges with two equivalent CrS6 octahedra, and faces with two MoS6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 47–59°. There are a spread of Cr–S bond distances ranging from 2.45–2.51 Å. In the second Cr3+ site, Cr3+ is bonded to six S2- atoms to form CrS6 octahedra that share corners with twelve MoS6 octahedra, edges with two equivalent CrS6 octahedra, and faces with two MoS6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 48–58°. There are a spread of Cr–S bond distances ranging from 2.45–2.53 Å. There are eight inequivalent S2- sites. In the first S2- site, S2- is bonded in a 5-coordinate geometry to three Mo+2.50+ and two Cr3+ atoms. In the second S2- site, S2- is bonded in a 5-coordinate geometry to three Mo+2.50+ and two Cr3+ atoms. In the third S2- site, S2- is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to three Mo+2.50+ and one Cr3+ atom. In the fourth S2- site, S2- is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to three Mo+2.50+ and one Cr3+ atom. In the fifth S2- site, S2- is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to three Mo+2.50+ and one Cr3+ atom. In the sixth S2- site, S2- is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to three Mo+2.50+ and one Cr3+ atom. In the seventh S2- site, S2- is bonded in a 5-coordinate geometry to three Mo+2.50+ and two Cr3+ atoms. In the eighth S2- site, S2- is bonded in a 5-coordinate geometry to three Mo+2.50+ and two Cr3+ atoms.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Highly efficient removal and sequestration of Cr(VI) in confined MoS 2 interlayer Nanochannels: Performance and mechanism

Environmental contamination by Cr(VI) is of particular concern because of its severe toxicity and high mobility. In this study, we employed two-dimensional MoS 2 nanosheets in the removal of Cr(VI), with an emphasis on revealing the removal mechanisms, and how the compositional and structural uniqueness of 2D MoS 2 nanomaterials intrinsically impact the Cr removal efficiency. Through batch experiments with dispersed nanosheets, we found that MoS 2 nanosheets exhibited a high Cr(VI) removal capacity at ~1100 mg/g via a phase-dependent mechanism. Particularly, the 1T polymorph in the MoS 2 nanosheets removed Cr(VI) through a redox-reaction mechanism, which was different from the adsorptive removal of Cr(VI) by MoS 2 reported previously, highlighting the compositional effects on the removal mechanism and performance. More importantly, the reduced product Cr(III) was concurrently removed via precipitation and adsorption onto the MoS 2 nanosheets, which could avoid the additional pH-elevation step that is typically needed in the conventional treatment. The unique 2D flake-like structure of MoS 2 nanosheets enabled the formation of aligned and ion-accessible nanochannels, where Cr(VI) species were accommodated, reduced and sequestered. The irreversible shrinking of the nanochannels under drying modified the interior of the layer-stacked structure into confined compartments preventing the release and re-oxidation of the immobilized Cr(III). In conclusion, the compiled results highlight the effects of MoS 2 composition and structure on the Cr removal efficiency and mechanism, which has substantial implications on future studies tailoring these unique features of 2D nanomaterials for various remediation scenarios.

42 ENGINEERING↗