SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Computational pyrolysis”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

ANALYSIS OF THE MSL/MEDLI ENTRY DATA WITH COUPLED CFD AND MATERIAL RESPONSE.

The Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) was protected during its atmospheric entry by an instrumented heat-shield using NASA's Phenolic Impregnated Carbon Ablator (PICA) material. PICA is a lightweight carbon fiber/polymeric resin material that offers out-standing performances for protecting probes during planetary entry. The Mars Entry Descent and Landing Instrument (MEDLI) suite on MSL offers unique in-flight validation data for models of material response and atmospheric entry. MEDLI recorded, among other things, time-resolved in-depth temperature data of PICA using thermocouple sensors assembled in the MEDLI Integrated Sensor Plugs (MISP). The objective of this work is to showcase and analyze the coupling between the material response and the aerothermal environment. As shown in Figure 1, the workflow is divided into the following steps. First, the aerothermal properties are computed in the Data Parallel Line Relaxation (DPLR) code [3] and used with the Nonequilibrium air radiation (NEQAIR) program [8] to compute radiative heating. Second, the thermal response inside the material is computed in the Porous material Analysis Toolbox based on Open-FOAM (PATO) using a fixed blowing correction parameter. Third, the pyrolysis gases computed in PATO are used as inputs to a blowing boundary condition within DPLR. Fourth, the new environment properties from DPLR are used in NEQAIR to provide an updated solution, then both the updated aerothermal environment and radiative heating are used in PATO without blowing correction. The third and fourth steps are then repeated until convergence in surface temperature is obtained. Convergence in the radiative heating is generally achieved before surface temperature, at which point the radiative heating is no longer updated. Char mass loss rates are forced to zero to produce a non-receding surface condition. For early time points in the trajectory, where flow around the MSL aeroshell is rarefied, the Direct Simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) code, SPARTA, is used to compute the aerothermal environment. Iteration between PATO and SPARTA is not performed due to the computational cost of DSMC simulations. Preliminary results of the coupling between PATO and DPLR for the MSL heatshield atmospheric entry model are presented in Figures 2-4 at 65 seconds after entry interface. Figure 2 shows the surface temperature results from an uncoupled simulation in PATO with the blowing correction parameter applied (left) along with the coupled surface temperature after iteration (right). Figure 3 shows the surface temperature along the centerline from windward to leeward for easier comparison. Figure 4 shows the coupled and uncoupled pyrolysis gas blowing rate. Mars 2020 used a similar heatshield consisting of PICA for thermal protection during entry, descent, and landing. In preparation for Mars 2020 post-flight analysis, the predictive material response capability is benchmarked against flight data from MEDLI. This work represents an important milestone toward the development of validated predictive capabilities for designing thermal protection systems for planetary probes.

Mars Science Laboratory↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Analysis of MSL/MEDLI Entry Data with Coupled CFD and Material Response

The Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) was protected during its atmospheric entry by an instrumented heatshield using NASA's Phenolic Impregnated Carbon Ablator (PICA) material [1]. PICA is a lightweight carbon fiber/polymeric resin material that offers outstanding performances for protecting probes during planetary entry. The Mars Entry Descent and Landing Instrument (MEDLI) suite on MSL offers unique in-flight validation data for models of material response and atmospheric entry. MEDLI recorded, among other things, time-resolved in-depth temperature data of PICA using thermocouple sensors assembled in the MEDLI Integrated Sensor Plugs (MISP) [2]. The objective of this work is to showcase and analyze the coupling between the material response and the aerothermal environment. As shown in Figure 1, the workflow is divided into the following steps. First, the aerothermal properties are computed in the Data Parallel Line Relaxation (DPLR) code [3] and used with the Nonequilibrium air radiation (NEQAIR) program [8] to compute radiative heating. Second, the thermal response inside the material is computed in the Porous material Analysis Toolbox based on OpenFOAM (PATO) [4,5,6] using a fixed blowing correction parameter. Third, the pyrolysis gases computed in PATO are used as inputs to a blowing boundary condition within DPLR. Fourth, the new environment properties from DPLR are used in NEQAIR to provide an updated solution, then both the updated aerothermal environment and radiative heating are used in PATO without blowing correction. The third and fourth steps are then repeated until convergence in surface temperature is obtained. Convergence in the radiative heating is generally achieved before surface temperature, at which point the radiative heating is no longer updated. Char mass loss rates are forced to zero to produce a non-receding surface condition. For early time points in the trajectory, where flow around the MSL aeroshell is rarefied, the Direct Simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) code, SPARTA [7], is used to compute the aerothermal environment. Iteration between PATO and SPARTA is not performed due to the computational cost of DSMC simulations. Preliminary results of the coupling between PATO and DPLR for the MSL heatshield atmospheric entry model are presented in Figures 2-4 at 65 seconds after entry interface. Figure 2 shows the surface temperature results from an uncoupled simulation in PATO with the blowing correction parameter applied (left) along with the coupled surface temperature after iteration (right). Figure 3 shows the surface temperature along the centerline from windward to leeward for easier comparison. Figure 4 shows the coupled and uncoupled pyrolysis gas blowing rate. Mars 2020 used a similar heatshield consisting of PICA for thermal protection during entry, descent, and landing. In preparation for Mars 2020 post-flight analysis, the predictive material response capability is benchmarked against flight data from MEDLI. This work represents an important milestone toward the development of validated predictive capabilities for designing thermal protection systems for planetary probes.

Thermal Protection Systems↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Coupling CFD and Material Response for Analysis of Mars Entry

In computing the response of an ablating thermal protection system during atmospheric entry, the aerothermal environment and material response are generally computed separately with a blowing correction term in the material response model to account for the blowing of char and pyrolysis gases [1]. In this work, we apply a coupled approach in which pyrolysis blowing gases, computed in the PATO material response code [2], are used with a blowing boundary condition in the DPLR hypersonic CFD code [3]. This leads to an iterative method in which blowing products from PATO are input into DPLR to update surface heating estimates. The full iterative method, with the addition of radiative heating estimates using the NEQAIR radiation solver [4], is shown in Fig. 1. The method is demonstrated on a sphere case with the environment and material properties based on the Mars Science Laboratory entry. Future work includes utilizing this method in computing full 3D material response during the Mars 2020 entry.

Heat Transfer↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Coupling CFD and Material Response for Analysis of Mars Entry

In computing the response of an ablating thermal protection system during atmospheric entry, the aerothermal environment and material response are generally computed separately with a blowing correction term in the material response model to account for the blowing of char and pyrolysis gases. In this work, we apply a coupled approach in which pyrolysis blowing gases, computed in the PATO material response code, are used with a blowing boundary condition in the DPLR hypersonic CFD code. This leads to an iterative method in which blowing products from PATO are input into DPLR to update surface heating estimates. The full iterative method, with the addition of radiative heating estimates using the NEQAIR radiation solver, is shown in Fig. 1. The method is demonstrated on a sphere case with the environment and material properties based on the Mars Science Laboratory entry. Future work includes utilizing this method in computing full 3D material response during the Mars 2020 entry.

Ablation↗

NASA NTRS1983

Soot formation in pyrolysis of acetylene, allene and 1,3-butadiene

The formation of soot behind reflected shock waves in argon-diluted mixtures of acetylene, allene, and 1,3-butadiene was investigated by monitoring the attenuation of a laser beam in both the visible (632.8 nm) and the infrared (3.39 microns) regions of the spectrum. The experiments utilized temperatures ranging from 1500-3100 K, reflected shock pressures of 0.3-7.0 bar, and total carbon atom concentrations of 2-20 x 10 to the 17th atoms/cu cm. A bell-shaped dependence of soot yield on temperature was observed during the pyrolysis of all three compounds, which was similar to that previously found for toluene. For acetylene, the decrese in total pressure was found to shift the soot bell to higher temperatures with a significant increase in the maximum soot yield. A computer simulation for acetylene pyrolysis suggested that the reactions between C2H3, C4H3, and C4H4 may be those which lead to the formation of aromatic structures. In addition, it was found that soot is formed much faster and in much larger quantities from allene than from 1,3-butadiene.

Frenklach, M.↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Recent Advancements in the PATO Material Response Code

Introduction: Predicting the complicated multiphysics phenomena during atmospheric entry requires high-fidelity modeling tools to refine estimates of mission risks during entry. To this end, new capabilities are being added to the Porous-material Analysis Toolbox based on OpenFOAM (PATO). PATO is an open-source software for Computational Material Response (CMR) of reactive porous materials submitted to high-temperature environments. The objective of this work is to highlight current efforts to add to and improve upon the modeling capabilities of PATO. These include efforts to loosely couple PATO with other discipline specialized codes including hypersonic Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), to assess the interaction effects between pyrolysis gas blowing and the boundary layer, and Computational Solid Mechanics (CSM), to address modeling of mechanical erosion. Other refinements include surface phenomena modeling capabilities to address the effects of silicone-based coatings applied to the TPS during flight preparation, and a unified multiphase solver for a mixed porous-material and plain-fluid domain. Coupling CMR with CFD (CMR/CFD): A loose coupling between PATO and the Data Parallel Line Relaxation (DPLR) CFD code has been achieved by making use of a blowing boundary condition at the heatshield surface available in DPLR. Starting with heat flux estimates with no pyrolysis gas blowing at the surface, blowing gases are computed by the CMR and passed to the CFD such that aerothermal properties of the environment can be recomputed for a new CMR computation. This leads to an iterative process which is supplemented with an estimate of the radiative heat flux using the Nonequilibrium air radiation (NEQAIR) program. The entire iterative process is illustrated in Figure 1. This coupling strategy has been utilized in computing the MSL material response. The goal is to compare the coupled CMR/CFD results with material response results obtained using traditional blowing corrections. Coupling CMS with CMR: A mechanical erosion model is currently being implemented in PATO to account for the additional mass removal induced by high shear conditions. The modeling process at each timestep consists of updating the mechanical properties as a function of temperature and computing the stress tensor and displacement fields of the material. Then, a failure criteria model determines the regions in which the stress exceeds the ultimate strength values resulting in mesh movement to account for mass removal. This model allows the material response simulation to compute the recession due to both oxidation and shear-induced erosion. The model is demonstrated by computing material response of sphere-cone arc jet samples. Surface Modeling Capabilities: NuSil, a silicone-based coating, was sprayed onto the MSL and Mars 2020 heatshields to mitigate shedding of phenolic dust. To better understand the effects of the NuSil coating on the material response, a novel model has been implemented in PATO. In this model, the equilibrium of the charred NuSil surface is modeled as pure silica, and a constant offset, inspired by the classical spallation model, is added to the the char blowing rate and wall enthalpy to reproduce HyMETS experimental results. The model has also been used to estimate the 3D material response of the MSL heatshield. Unified Solver: In addition to the iterative loose coupling approach mentioned above, a multiphase unified solver is being developed to couple the environment (plain-fluid phase) and the porous-material phase. The solver is based on the volume averaged conservation of mass, momentum, and energy for the macroscale with closure models which include microscale effects through effective physicochemical properties. The unified solver has been used to compute flow through a porous plug and solve the Beavers and Joseph problem. Since the strong coupling between phases is inherent to this solver, modeling assumptions present in other coupling methods of material response are mitigated. This strategy also makes it feasible to capture the competition between surface and volume ablation in the same computational domain, which is usually not possible with other coupling approaches.

Material Response↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Recent Advancements in the PATO Material Response Code

Introduction: Predicting the complicated multiphysics phenomena during atmospheric entry requires high-fidelity modeling tools to refine estimates of mission risks during entry. To this end, new capabilities are being added to the Porous-material Analysis Toolbox based on OpenFOAM (PATO) [1,2,3]. PATO is an open-source software for Computational Material Response (CMR) of reactive porous materials submitted to high-temperature environments. The objective of this work is to highlight current efforts to add to and improve upon the modeling capabilities of PATO. These include efforts to loosely couple PATO with other discipline specialized codes including hypersonic Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), to assess the interaction effects between pyrolysis gas blowing and the boundary layer, and Computational Solid Mechanics (CSM), to address modeling of mechanical erosion. Other refinements include surface phenomena modeling capabilities to address the effects of silicone-based coatings applied to the TPS during flight preparation, and a unified multiphase solver for a mixed porous-material and plain-fluid domain. Coupling CMR with CFD (CMR/CFD): A loose coupling between PATO and the Data Parallel Line Relaxation (DPLR) [4] CFD code has been achieved by making use of a blowing boundary condition at the heatshield surface available in DPLR. Starting with heat flux estimates with no pyrolysis gas blowing at the surface, blowing gases are computed by the CMR and passed to the CFD such that aerothermal properties of the environment can be recomputed for a new CMR computation. This leads to an iterative process which is supplemented with an estimate of the radiative heat flux using the Nonequilibrium air radiation (NEQAIR) [5] program. The entire iterative process is illustrated in Figure 1. This coupling strategy has been utilized in computing the MSL material response. The goal is to compare the coupled CMR/CFD results with material response results obtained using traditional blowing corrections. Coupling CMS with CMR: A mechanical erosion model is currently being implemented in PATO to account for the additional mass removal induced by high shear conditions. The modeling process at each timestep consists of updating the mechanical properties as a function of temperature and computing the stress tensor and displacement fields of the material. Then, a failure criteria model determines the regions in which the stress exceeds the ultimate strength values resulting in mesh movement to account for mass removal. This model allows the material response simulation to compute the recession due to both oxidation and shear-induced erosion. The model is demonstrated by computing material response of sphere-cone arc jet samples. Surface Modeling Capabilities: NuSil, a silicone-based coating, was sprayed onto the MSL and Mars 2020 heatshields to mitigate shedding of phenolic dust. To better understand the effects of the NuSil coating on the material response, a novel model has been implemented in PATO. In this model, the equilibrium of the charred NuSil surface is modeled as pure silica, and a constant offset, inspired by the classical spallation model, is added to the the char blowing rate and wall enthalpy to reproduce HyMETS experimental results. The model has also been used to estimate the 3D material response of the MSL heatshield [6]. Unified Solver: In addition to the iterative loose coupling approach mentioned above, a multiphase unified solver is being developed to couple the environment (plain-fluid phase) and the porous-material phase. The solver is based on the volume averaged conservation of mass, momentum, and energy for the macroscale with closure models which include microscale effects through effective physicochemical properties. The unified solver has been used to compute flow through a porous plug and solve the Beavers and Joseph problem [7]. Since the strong coupling between phases is inherent to this solver, modeling assumptions present in other coupling methods of material response are mitigated. This strategy also makes it feasible to capture the competition between surface and volume ablation in the same computational domain, which is usually not possible with other coupling approaches.

Thermal Protection Systems↗

NASA NTRS2013

Ablator Response Model Development: From Flight Data Back to Fundamental Experiments

The successful Mars atmospheric entry by the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL-Curiosity) combined with the success of the Earth atmospheric entry by the Stardust capsule have established PICA as a major Thermal Protection Systems (TPS) material. We expect that this class of materials will be on the short list selected by NASA for any atmospheric entry missions and that it will be the lead of that list of materials in any planning, feasibility studies or flight readiness studies. In addition to NASAs successes, the Dragon capsule, the successful commercial space vehicle built by SpaceX, uses PICA-X, while the European Space Agency is considering ASTERM for its exploration missions that involve atmospheric entries, both of these materials are of the same family as PICA. In the talk, a high-fidelity model will be detailed and discussed. The model tracks the chemical composition of the gases produced during pyrolysis. As in the conventional models, it uses equilibrium chemistry to determine the recession rate at high temperatures but switches to in-volume finite-rate ablation for lower temperatures. It also tracks the time evolution of the porosity of the material. Progress in implementing this high-fidelity model in a code will be presented. In addition, a set of basic experimental data being supported for model validation will be summarized. The validation process for the model development will be discussed. Preliminary results will be presented for a case where detailed pyrolysis product chemistry is computed. Finally, a wish list for a set of validation experiments will be outlined and discussed.

Mansour, Nagi N.↗

NASA NTRS2023

Assessment of the Fluid Dynamics Boundary Condition in Ablating or Blowing Flows

Improved models of ablative thermal protection systems have enabled the treatment of materials and fluid behavior in a coupled manner. This paper reports a new approach to modeling the interface between fluid and material, with attention to the conservation of species mass flux and energy on the fluid side of the interface. The general equation is presented and is shown to recover the traditional uncoupled fluid/materials response interface. Including the chemical reaction terms on the CFD side of the interface makes the heat flux exchange independent of the thermodynamic reference state and, therefore, a measurable quantity. Doing so allows the material response solver to take as input the surface heat flux rather than a film coefficient. Removing the film coefficient approximation enables more direct solution of vehicle thermal response but requires consistency in the wall state. The mixing of the shock layer and pyrolysis gas is then computed with finite rate chemistry within the fluid solver. The boundary conditions described have been implemented in the DPLR v4.05.1 code. Char removal is captured using finite rate chemistry in DPLR’s gas surface interaction module. Aspects of coupling these solutions to material response are discussed.

Ablation↗

NASA NTRS2023

Assessment of the Fluid Dynamics Boundary Condition in Ablating or Blowing Flows

Ablation↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Material Response Modeling of Ablative Thermal Protection Systems using PATO

Developing thermal protection systems (TPS) for future space vehicles involves an extensive design and test cycle. A key component of the cycle is determining margins for a safe design that rely on confidence in the performance of the TPS. Predicting the complicated multiphysics phenomena that occur during atmospheric entry requires high-fidelity modeling tools. To this end, the Porous-material Analysis Toolbox based on OpenFOAM (PATO) has been developed. PATO is an open-source software for computing material response of reactive porous materials submitted to high-temperature environments. Recent applications of PATO include computation of the full heatshield 3D material response from the Mars Science Laboratory atmospheric entry and ablation during arc jet testing. Current efforts are underway to loosely couple PATO with other discipline specialized codes including hypersonic computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to assess the effects of pyrolysis-gas blowing into the boundary layer and computational solid mechanics to address modeling of mechanical erosion. Surface phenomena modeling capabilities to address the effects of silicone-based coatings applied to the TPS during flight preparation are also being added.

Thermal Protection Systems↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Material Response Modeling of Ablative Thermal Protection Systems using PATO

Thermal Protection Systems↗

NASA NTRS1998

An Integrated Tool for the Coupled Thermal and Mechanical Analysis of Pyrolyzing Heatshield Materials

Materials that pyrolyze at elevated temperature have been commonly used as thermal protection materials in hypersonic flight, and advanced pyrolyzing materials for this purpose continue to be developed. Because of the large temperature gradients that can arise in thermal protection materials, significant thermal stresses can develop. Advanced applications of pyrolytic materials are calling for more complex heatshield configurations, making accurate thermal stress analysis more important, and more challenging. For non-pyrolyzing materials, many finite element codes are available and capable of performing coupled thermal-mechanical analyses. These codes do not, however, have a built-in capability to perform analyses that include pyrolysis effects. When a pyrolyzing material is heated, one or more components of the original virgin material pyrolyze and create a gas. This gas flows away from the pyrolysis zone to the surface, resulting in a reduction in surface heating. A porous residue, referred to as char, remains in place of the virgin material. While the processes involved can be complex, it has been found that a simple physical model in which virgin material reacts to form char and pyrolysis gas, will yield satisfactory analytical results. Specifically, the effects that must be modeled include: (1) Variation of thermal properties (density, specific heat, thermal conductivity) as the material composition changes; (2) Energy released or absorbed by the pyrolysis reactions; (3) Energy convected by the flow of pyrolysis gas from the interior to the surface; (4) The reduction in surface heating due to surface blowing; and (5) Chemical and mass diffusion effects at the surface between the pyrolysis gas and edge gas Computational tools for the one-dimensional thermal analysis these materials exist and have proven to be reliable design tools. The objective of the present work is to extend the analysis capabilities of pyrolyzing materials to axisymmetric configurations, and to couple thermal and mechanical analyses so that thermal stresses may be efficiently and accurately calculated.

Pronchick, Stephen W.↗

NASA NTRS2012

Effect of Surface Nonequilibrium Thermochemistry in Simulation of Carbon Based Ablators

This study demonstrates that coupling of a material thermal response code and a flow solver using finite-rate gas/surface interaction model provides time-accurate solutions for multidimensional ablation of carbon based charring ablators. The material thermal response code used in this study is the Two-dimensional Implicit Thermal Response and Ablation Program (TITAN), which predicts charring material thermal response and shape change on hypersonic space vehicles. Its governing equations include total energy balance, pyrolysis gas momentum conservation, and a three-component decomposition model. The flow code solves the reacting Navier-Stokes equations using Data Parallel Line Relaxation (DPLR) method. Loose coupling between material response and flow codes is performed by solving the surface mass balance in DPLR and the surface energy balance in TITAN. Thus, the material surface recession is predicted by finite-rate gas/surface interaction boundary conditions implemented in DPLR, and the surface temperature and pyrolysis gas injection rate are computed in TITAN. Two sets of gas/surface interaction chemistry between air and carbon surface developed by Park and Zhluktov, respectively, are studied. Coupled fluid-material response analyses of stagnation tests conducted in NASA Ames Research Center arc-jet facilities are considered. The ablating material used in these arc-jet tests was a Phenolic Impregnated Carbon Ablator (PICA). Computational predictions of in-depth material thermal response and surface recession are compared with the experimental measurements for stagnation cold wall heat flux ranging from 107 to 1100 Watts per square centimeter.

Chen, Yih-Kang↗

NASA NTRS2012

Effect of Non-Equilibrium Surface Thermochemistry in Simulation of Carbon Based Ablators

This study demonstrates that coupling of a material thermal response code and a flow solver using non-equilibrium gas/surface interaction model provides time-accurate solutions for the multidimensional ablation of carbon based charring ablators. The material thermal response code used in this study is the Two-dimensional Implicit Thermal-response and AblatioN Program (TITAN), which predicts charring material thermal response and shape change on hypersonic space vehicles. Its governing equations include total energy balance, pyrolysis gas mass conservation, and a three-component decomposition model. The flow code solves the reacting Navier-Stokes equations using Data Parallel Line Relaxation (DPLR) method. Loose coupling between the material response and flow codes is performed by solving the surface mass balance in DPLR and the surface energy balance in TITAN. Thus, the material surface recession is predicted by finite-rate gas/surface interaction boundary conditions implemented in DPLR, and the surface temperature and pyrolysis gas injection rate are computed in TITAN. Two sets of nonequilibrium gas/surface interaction chemistry between air and the carbon surface developed by Park and Zhluktov, respectively, are studied. Coupled fluid-material response analyses of stagnation tests conducted in NASA Ames Research Center arc-jet facilities are considered. The ablating material used in these arc-jet tests was Phenolic Impregnated Carbon Ablator (PICA). Computational predictions of in-depth material thermal response and surface recession are compared with the experimental measurements for stagnation cold wall heat flux ranging from 107 to 1100 Watts per square centimeter.

Chen, Yih-Kanq↗

NASA NTRS2013

Implicit Coupling Approach for Simulation of Charring Carbon Ablators

This study demonstrates that coupling of a material thermal response code and a flow solver with nonequilibrium gas/surface interaction for simulation of charring carbon ablators can be performed using an implicit approach. The material thermal response code used in this study is the three-dimensional version of Fully Implicit Ablation and Thermal response program, which predicts charring material thermal response and shape change on hypersonic space vehicles. The flow code solves the reacting Navier-Stokes equations using Data Parallel Line Relaxation method. Coupling between the material response and flow codes is performed by solving the surface mass balance in flow solver and the surface energy balance in material response code. Thus, the material surface recession is predicted in flow code, and the surface temperature and pyrolysis gas injection rate are computed in material response code. It is demonstrated that the time-lagged explicit approach is sufficient for simulations at low surface heating conditions, in which the surface ablation rate is not a strong function of the surface temperature. At elevated surface heating conditions, the implicit approach has to be taken, because the carbon ablation rate becomes a stiff function of the surface temperature, and thus the explicit approach appears to be inappropriate resulting in severe numerical oscillations of predicted surface temperature. Implicit coupling for simulation of arc-jet models is performed, and the predictions are compared with measured data. Implicit coupling for trajectory based simulation of Stardust fore-body heat shield is also conducted. The predicted stagnation point total recession is compared with that predicted using the chemical equilibrium surface assumption

Ablation↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Extinction of the Stagnation Point Diffusion Flame: Effect of Conductive Heat Loss into Solid Interior

The planned microgravity experiment Growth and Extinction Limit (GEL) is designed to study the material flammability and extinction of thermally thick solid with an emphasis to quantify the effect of conductive heat loss into the solid interior by measuring the in-depth temperature profile. To obtain a more detailed understanding of the extinction phenomena, a previously developed one-dimensional axisymmetric stagnation-point diffusion flame model is expanded to account for the excessive heat loss into the solid beyond the steady burning state. This is important because for thick solids, this is important because the burning period can have a long and slow solid transient with a quasi-steady gas -phase. A non-dimensional excessive conductive heat loss parameter Ψ is defined in the paper and extensive numerical computations have been performed to determine the extinction boundary and the characteristics of near-limit flames. The classical U-shaped flammability boundary in the oxygen vs. stretch rate plot now becomes a series of U-shaped boundaries as a function of Ψ. For a given oxygen ambient, extinction boundary is a function of Ψ. The boundary consists of a blowoff branch and a radiative quenching branch. This is similar to the steady burning flammability boundary (Ψ =0) in the oxygen vs stretch rate plot. Extensive computed data including flame and pyrolysis temperatures, burning rate, flame standoff distance, and reaction rate are presented along the extinction boundaries. In particular, we note that the non-dimensional gas reaction rate is the ratio of diffusion reaction time to the reaction diffusion time, so it has the classical Damhkoler number character. By examining the maximum non-dimensional reaction rates, we observe that along the extinction boundaries, they are approximate constant across the entire range of stretch rates (from quenching to blow-off). These critical values are of the order unity but may vary in different oxygen ambient. The implication will be discussed in the presentation together with the near-limit flame structures.

Chengyao Li↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Extinction of the Stagnation Point Diffusion Flame: Effect of Conductive Heat Loss into Solid Interior

The flammability boundary of a solid is U-shaped with the ordinate as ambient oxygen percentage (or total pressure) and the abscissa represents flow velocity, gravity level, stretch rate, etc. The left side of the flammability boundary is the quenching branch, and the right side is the blow-off branch. Quenching is due to a weak flame whose heat release from combustion cannot overcome the excessive heat losses from, for example, radiation. Blow-off is due to a short gas residence time that is smaller than the chemical reaction time (traditionally referred to as the small Damköhler number effect). For thick solids, the heat conduction into the solid interior has a long transient after ignition before the solid temperature reaches the steady state. During this slow transient, there is excessive (i.e. more than that at the steady state) gas phase heat conduction into the solid interior. From the viewpoint of the quasi-static gaseous flame, this is an additional heat loss that will affect the gas flame's flammability. In this work, a previously developed one-dimensional axisymmetric stagnation-point diffusion flame model is extended to account for the excessive heat loss into the solid beyond the steady burning state. A non-dimensional excessive conductive heat loss parameter Ψ is defined in the paper to account for the transient solid effect. For each Ψ, the gas phase is considered reaching a quasi-steady state. Extensive numerical computations have been performed to determine the extinction boundary and the characteristics of near-limit flames. The U-shaped flammability boundary is now a series of boundaries with Ψ as a parameter. Flame structures under the same environment condition but with different Ψ are compared. For a given oxygen ambient, the extinction boundary Ψ vs stretch rate is an inverted U-shape. The boundary consists of a blowoff branch and a radiative quenching branch. Extensive computed data including flame and pyrolysis temperatures, burning rate, flame standoff distance, species concentration, and reaction rate are presented along the extinction boundaries. Heat balance analysis is performed for both the gas phase and the gas-solid interface. Along the extinction boundary, the relative importance of conduction, convection, radiation, and chemical reaction are analyzed in detail.

Stagnation point diffusion flame↗