Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Cellular dendritic growth”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

Which way does the dendrite grow? Competition among epitaxy, preferred growth direction, and thermal gradients in powder bed fusion additive manufacturing

The as-processed microstructure of metal alloy parts manufactured through laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) is heavily derived from the cellular dendritic solidification. The growth direction of dendrites within the melt pool is determined through competition among epitaxial growth, preferred growth directions, and maximum thermal gradients. However, the dominant factor and the specific role of each in developing melt pool microstructures remain unknown. Here, in this study, we performed single laser track scans on an SS316L single crystal substrate and combined experimental characterization of microstructure and crystal orientations with Computational Fluid Dynamics simulations of thermal gradients to evaluate the role of each factor in determining dendritic growth direction and evolution. Our results reveal that epitaxial growth dominates microstructure development by preferentially growing along a single 〈100〉 variant of the single crystal substrate adjacent to the melt pool boundary. Under LPBF’s highly curved and rapidly evolving thermal field, this preferential dendrite variant selection and its continued growth from the melt pool boundary to the centerline are governed by the local temperature gradient magnitude at the solid-liquid interface, rather than by the instantaneous maximum temperature gradient direction alone. Using these findings, we successfully predict changes in the dendrite growth direction with changing laser scan direction on a single crystal substrate, and show that the geometric melt pool centerline can deviate from the microstructural centerline because asymmetric local temperature gradient magnitudes transiently limit growth, resulting in different dendrite travel distances on each side of the melt pool.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Variations in GARS powder microstructure as a function of powder chemistry and particle size

The properties of metal produced through powder metallurgy depends on the feedstock used. Powders produced via gas atomization reaction synthesis (GARS) are used to produce oxide dispersion strengthened alloys. The desired powder size range can vary for each consolidation technique. However, powder microstructure also can vary with powder particle size, which in turn can impact the microstructure and properties of the consolidated parts. In this study, GARS powders are characterized via inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy, inert gas fusion, and high-resolution x-ray diffraction to determine variations in elemental and phase compositions. Transmission electron microscopy was used to understand microstructure variations as a function of chemistry and size. Across the three batches tested intermetallic content was 0.73–1.35 wt% in the 0-20 μm powder batch and increased to 2.46–3.80 wt% in the coarse 45-106 μm batch. Across all batches, volume percent of surface oxidation decreased with powder diameter, with volume percents within the range of 0.75–1.2 % across 10 μm powder particles, and below 0.4 % across coarse powder particles approximately 100 μm in diameter. These observations were supported by inert gas fusion measurements. However, the oxide layer was thicker in coarse powder particles due to a slower cooling rate. Increasing oxygen content in atomization gas to 2000 ppm and adding yttrium increased both the surface oxidation content and yttrium intermetallic content. Lastly, intermetallic phases within the powder coarsened with powder size. Intermetallic morphology changed from fine spherical intermetallic and columnar dendritic growth to a cellular structure with finer spherical intermetallic, to coarse irregular intermetallic and intermetallic along grain boundaries as a result of slower cooling rate and solidification rate in coarse powder particles. Furthermore, the addition of zirconium does not appear to significantly change intermetallic morphology, but the composition changed from a Y-Fe rich intermetallic to a Y-Zr-Fe intermetallic.

42 ENGINEERING↗

Uncovering grain and subgrain microstructure at the scale of additive manufacturing melt tracks with a scalable cellular automaton solidification model

Metal additive manufacturing, characterized by rapid solidification, yields refined grains with a distinctive cellular subgrain microstructure that plays a pivotal role in determining material properties. Due to the significant computational expense demanded to simulate the required physics with submicron spatial resolution, their numerical simulations have been limited to proof-of-concept studies to either 2D or small subregions of a melt pool. In this study, an open-source, scalable, solidification code, muMatScale, based on the cellular automaton method, has been developed to predict the grain and the underlying subgrain microstructure over an entire melt pool. The model incorporates flexible parallelization schemes, utilizing MPI and OpenMP GPU Offloading, in addition to appropriate multi-physics specific to non-equilibrium rapid solidification in AM. The impact of nucleation parameters on grain microstructures was investigated with a focus on grain size variations and morphology transitions. With selected nucleation parameters, the simulation predicted the grain size, subgrain morphology, crystallographic orientation, and microsegregation aligned with experimental measurements. The model demonstrates that epitaxial grain growth is a dominant factor at the melt pool boundary, influencing grain size variation under different grain sizes in the build plate while maintaining consistent primary dendrite arm spacing under identical thermal conditions. Here, the highly efficient numerical model enables large-scale simulations with a spatial resolution of 100 nm or less, unveiling unprecedented insights into thermal and solutal diffusion driven grain growth, and the subgrains with microsegregation within grains in 3D across scales. muMatScale will enable the linking of submicron length-scale microstructure to part-level material behavior by investigating fundamental solidification problems at the intercellular scale in many-track and many-layer builds.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

On the numerical sensitivity of cellular automata grain structure predictions to large thermal gradients and cooling rates

Cellular automata (CA) models of as-solidified grain structure, originally developed and applied to casting, have become a common means of predicting grain structure resulting from Additive Manufacturing (AM) processes. The majority of these models are based on the decentered octahedron approach, which attempts to correct for the effect of grid anisotropy on the prediction of competitive solidification of dendritic grains. However, AM solidification occurs under cooling rates ($\dot{T}$) and thermal gradients (G) that are orders of magnitude larger than those encountered in casting, and no systematic investigation on the effect of the CA model cell size (Δx) and time step (Δt) on AM microstructure predictions has been performed. Here, in this study, such an investigation is first performed via simulation of individual grains of various crystallographic orientations with a fixed, unidirectional G, showing that CA prediction of the steady-state undercooling matched the expected values based on the interfacial response function at small G and deviated from the expected values at large G. Simulation of competitive growth of multiple grains showed a weakening of the predicted texture as G and Δx became large. Simulation of solidification under AM conditions, where G and $\dot{T}$ vary spatially across the melt pools, showed that not only does grain selection weaken and deviate from expectations at large Δx, but grains with crystallographic $\langle$100$\rangle$ aligned with the grid directions are more adversely affected by the temperature field discontinuities than grains with other crystallographic orientations. Despite the fact that the exact grain competition results depended on Δt, the overall texture development was notably less sensitive to Δt than Δx, provided that a reasonable value of Δt is selected based on the ratio of Δx to the maximum local solidification velocity in the simulation domain. Finally, from the directional solidification and AM simulation results, an analysis of computational cost compared to simulation resolution is performed based on an equation derived to quantify the relatively inaccuracy in grain selection based on the model and temperature field inputs. From this analysis, it is concluded that there is a need for algorithmic improvements to improve CA grain competition accuracy for large G processing conditions as sufficiently small Δx to resolve the necessary competition is intractable for many AM processing conditions.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗