Boolean Matrix Factorization via Nonnegative Auxiliary Optimization
Not Available
97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Results for “Boolean matrix factorization”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Quantum annealing algorithms for Boolean tensor networks
Abstract Quantum annealers manufactured by D-Wave Systems, Inc., are computational devices capable of finding high-quality heuristic solutions of NP-hard problems. In this contribution, we explore the potential and effectiveness of such quantum annealers for computing Boolean tensor networks. Tensors offer a natural way to model high-dimensional data commonplace in many scientific fields, and representing a binary tensor as a Boolean tensor network is the task of expressing a tensor containing categorical (i.e., $$\{0, 1\}$$ { 0 , 1 } ) values as a product of low dimensional binary tensors. A Boolean tensor network is computed by Boolean tensor decomposition, and it is usually not exact. The aim of such decomposition is to minimize the given distance measure between the high-dimensional input tensor and the product of lower-dimensional (usually three-dimensional) tensors and matrices representing the tensor network. In this paper, we introduce and analyze three general algorithms for Boolean tensor networks: Tucker, Tensor Train, and Hierarchical Tucker networks. The computation of a Boolean tensor network is reduced to a sequence of Boolean matrix factorizations, which we show can be expressed as a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization problem suitable for solving on a quantum annealer. By using a novel method we introduce called parallel quantum annealing, we demonstrate that Boolean tensor’s with up to millions of elements can be decomposed efficiently using a DWave 2000Q quantum annealer.
97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
Factorization of Binary Matrices: Rank Relations, Uniqueness and Model Selection of Boolean Decomposition
The application of binary matrices are numerous. Representing a matrix as a mixture of a small collection of latent vectors via low-rank decomposition is often seen as an advantageous method to interpret and analyze data. In this work, we examine the factorizations of binary matrices using standard arithmetic (real and nonnegative) and logical operations (Boolean and $\mathbb{Z}$ 2 ). We examine the relationships between the different ranks, and discuss when factorization is unique. In particular, we characterize when a Boolean factorization X = W$\land$H has a unique W, a unique H (for a fixed W), and when both W and H are unique, given a rank constraint. We introduce a method for robust Boolean model selection, called BMFk, and show on numerical examples that BMFk not only accurately determines the correct number of Boolean latent features but reconstruct the pre-determined factors accurately.
97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
Tucker-1 Boolean Tensor Factorization with Quantum Annealers
Quantum annealers are an emerging computational architecture that have the potential to address some challenging computational issues that will be left unresolved as we approach the end of the Moore's Law era of computing. D-Wave quantum annealers are designed to solve a challenging set of problems - quadratic unconstrained binary optimization problems. This makes them a natural fit for solving problems with binary or Boolean variables. Here, we explore the use of a quantum annealer to solve Boolean tensor factorization. The goal of Boolean tensor factorization is to represent a high-dimensional tensor filled with Boolean values as a product of Boolean matrices and a Boolean core tensor. We show that a particular Boolean tensor factorization problem (called Tucker-1 factorization) can be decomposed into a sequence of quadratic unconstrained binary optimization problems that can be solved with a D-Wave 2000Q quantum annealer. While quantum annealers specifically and quantum computers in general are at a fairly early stage in their development, they are currently capable of solving these Boolean tensor factorization problems. Importantly, our results show that for fairly small tensors, we are frequently able to obtain an accurate (sometimes exact) factorization using quantum annealing.
97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
Quantum Time-Space Tradeoffs for Matrix Problems
We consider the time and space required for quantum computers to solve a wide variety of problems involving matrices, many of which have only been analyzed classically in prior work. Our main results show that for a range of linear algebra problems—including matrix-vector product, matrix inversion, matrix multiplication and powering—existing classical time-space tradeoffs, several of which are tight for every space bound, also apply to quantum algorithms with at most a constant factor loss. For example, for almost all fixed matrices 𝐴, including the discrete Fourier transform matrix, we prove that quantum circuits with at most 𝑇 input queries and 𝑆 qubits of memory require 𝑇 = Ω(𝑛 2 /𝑆) to compute matrix-vector product 𝐴𝑥 for 𝑥 ∈{0,1 𝑛 . We similarly prove that matrix multiplication for 𝑛 ×𝑛 binary matrices requires 𝑇 = Ω(𝑛 3 /$\sqrt{𝑆}$). Because many of our lower bounds are matched by deterministic algorithms with the same time and space complexity, our results show that quantum computers cannot provide any asymptotic advantage for these problems with any space bound. We obtain matching lower bounds for the stronger notion of quantum cumulative memory complexity—the sum of the space per layer of a circuit. We also consider Boolean (i.e., AND-OR) matrix multiplication and matrix-vector products, improving the previous quantum time-space tradeoff lower bounds for 𝑛 × 𝑛 Boolean matrix multiplication to 𝑇 = Ω(𝑛 2.5 /𝑆 1/4 ) from 𝑇 = Ω(𝑛 2.5 /𝑆 1/2 ). Our improved lower bound for Boolean matrix multiplication is based on a new coloring argument that extracts more from the strong direct product theorem that was the basis for prior work. To obtain our tight lower bounds for linear algebra problems, we require much stronger bounds than strong direct product theorems. We obtain these bounds by adding a new bucketing method to the quantum recording-query technique of Zhandry that lets us apply classical arguments to upper bound the success probability of quantum circuits.
lower bounds↗