Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Average Displacement Threshold Energy”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

4 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2022

Radiation Damage Calculation Methodology

This report outlines the consensus radiation damage calculation methodology used by the Neutronics Analysis Group at Idaho National Laboratory. This methodology includes calculation of radiation damage rates via the Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) code, and calculation of radiation damage in mixed materials, such as alloys. A consistent method for calculating the average displacement threshold energy of a mixed material has been established by the Neutronics Analysis Group. No standard method currently exists to account for radiation damage caused by neutron-induced transmutations. Only one documented case addresses transmutation radiation damage in materials containing nickel, and that method was incorporated by the Neutronics Analysis Group into their radiation damage calculation methodology.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2022

Effect of Stress on Irradiation Responses of Highly Oriented Pyrolytic Graphite

The effect of stress on irradiation responses of highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG) was studied by combing molecular dynamics (MD) simulation, proton irradiation, and Raman characterization. MD simulations of carbon knock-on at energies < 60 eV were used to obtain average threshold displacement energies (E¯d) as a function of strain ranging from 0 to 10%. Simulations at a higher irradiation energy of 2–5 keV were used to study the effect of strain on damage cascade evolution. With increasing tensile strain, E¯d was reduced from 35 eV at 0% strain to 31 eV at 10% strain. The strain-reduced E¯d led to a higher damage peak and more surviving defects (up to 1 ps). Furthermore, high strains induced local cleavage around the cavities, as one additional mechanism of damage enhancement. Experimentally, HOPG film was folded, and the folded region with the maximum tensile stress was irradiated by a 2 MeV proton beam. Raman characterization showed significantly enhanced D to G modes in comparison to the stress-free irradiation. Based on the strain dependence of E¯d and the Kinchin–Pease model, a formula for displacement estimation under different tensile strains is proposed. The stress effects need to be considered in graphite applications in a reactor’s harsh environment where both neutron damage and stress are present.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2023

Insights into radiation resistance of titanium alloys from displacement cascade simulations

Radiation damage in beam window materials limits the use of high power proton beams in high energy physics research. The alloy Ti-6Al-4V is presently used as a beam window material but a prospective alternative, Ti-15V-3Cr-3Sn-3Al has been proposed. Since both these alloys contain dual phases at room temperature, we compare the radiation damage in the α and ß-phases of these two materials via primary knock-on atom (PKA) cascade simulations in the 10-40keV energy range. At PKA energies 30 and 40keV, the number of Frenkel pairs in the ballistic stage is higher in the ß-phase of Ti-6Al-4V than that in the ß-phase of Ti-15V-3Cr-3Sn-3Al almost by a factor of 2. The α-phase, of both these alloys, by far outperforms the ß-phases of the two alloys, both in terms of damage during the ballistic stage and in terms of the surviving defects. The average displacement threshold energy (E d ) in the α-phase of both alloys was found to be 66eV while that in the ß-phase of Ti-15-3 was 55 eV and in the ß-phase of Ti-6-4 was 46. Further, while the number of surviving defects is almost equal in both alloys, the vacancy and interstitial clustering mechanisms differ notably, which can impact the degree of radiation hardening and loss of ductility. Our simulations show larger vacancy and interstitial clusters form in Ti-6Al-4V as compared to that in Ti-15-3-3-3 alloy. These results indicate that Ti-15-3-3-3 alloys may be a promising candidate for next generation beam window material with a higher radiation tolerance than the existing Ti-6-4 alloy.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2022

Evaluation of the GaAs displacement damage metric using updated nuclear data

The emerging use of the physics-based athermal recombination-corrected displacement per atom (arc-dpa) model for the displacement damage efficiency has motivated a re-evaluation of the historical empirically-derived GaAs damage response function with the purpose of highlighting needs for future analytical and experimental work. The 1-MeV neutron damage equivalence methodology used in the ASTM E-722 standard for GaAs has been re-evaluated using updated nuclear data. This yielded a higher fidelity representation of the GaAs displacement kerma and, through the use of the refined PKA recoil energy-dependent damage efficiency model, an updated 1-MeV(GaAs) displacement damage function. This re-evaluation included use of the Norgett-Robinson-Torrens (NRT) model for an updated threshold treatment, rather than the sharp-threshold Kinchin-Pease model used in the current ASTM standard. The underlying nuclear data evaluations have been updated to use the ENDF/VIII.0 {sup 75}As and TENDL-2019 {sup 71}Ga/{sup 69}Ga evaluations. The displacement kerma and 1-MeV-equivalent damage responses were calculated using a modified NJOY-2016 code which allowed for refinements in some of the damage models. This paper shows that an updated displacement damage function, based upon the latest nuclear data, is consistent with the experimental data used to develop the current ASTM E-722 GaAs standard. Using a double ratio approach to compare the available experimental data with the calculated response, the average legacy double ratio was found to be 0.97 ± 0.05 and the average updated double ratio was found to be 0.94 ± 0.05. (authors)

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗