DOE OSTI2026
This slide deck summarizes a comparative fuel performance assessment of four annular fuel concepts for pressurized water reactor applications against a reference 17×17 fuel design. Overall, annular fuel geometry improves several key thermal-mechanical performance metrics, with the large-annulus configuration providing the most favorable balance of benefits. Relative to the reference design, annular fuel reduces peak fuel temperature by lowering thermal resistance through a thinner fuel pellet and smaller heat-conduction path. At the same time, the reduced fuel volume raises local burnup and correspondingly increases fission gas release. Despite this, rod internal pressure at end of life decreases because the annular geometry provides greater internal void volume. Annular designs also tend to delay fuel-cladding gap closure, although this advantage diminishes in thin-gap configurations where the smaller initial gap accelerates closure. Similarly, hoop stress and hoop strain are generally reduced for annular fuel, but both increase as the initial gap becomes smaller, indicating a potential cladding integrity concern for thin-gap designs. Corrosion performance shows no meaningful variation among the concepts considered. Taken together, the results indicate that annular fuel can offer significant performance advantages in a PWR environment, with large-annulus designs emerging as the strongest candidate while thin-gap geometries introduce more challenging mechanical margins.
11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗