ASME Code Development: Design Rules
ASME Code Development: Design Rules, ASME BPVC, and ASME BPVC HHA-3000, Design Task Group Papers, Presentations, and Memorandums, and records.
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Results for “ASME Design Rules”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Example Evaluation of a Representative Heat Pipe Test Article Design for Structural Acceptability using ASME Design Rules
This report describes a design analysis of a test article mimicking a core block of a heat-pipe mi-croreactor using the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code Section III, Division 5, Subsection HB, Subpart B rules. These rules cover the design and construction of elevated temperature nu-clear reactor structural components, like the core block of a heat-pipe microreactor emulated by the test article. The purposes of the report are to: (1) provide a step-by-step example of applying the ASME rules to a reasonable core block geometry and corresponding loading conditions, (2) to provide design feedback on the test article, and (3) to evaluate the ASME rules for use in the design of complex heat-pipe microreactor components. The test article design has a relatively short ASME design life, limited by high thermal stresses. The current ASME rules are adequate for evaluating the core block component designs, though they could be optimized to increase the design efficiency and reduce the amount of designer/analyst time required to execute the design process. The report covers both the current, 2019 edition ASME rules and modified, currently unapproved, rules designed to improve the design process for components with complex geometries and high secondary stresses, like the core block test article.
22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
ASME Design Code Rule Changes for Nuclear Graphite
The American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler Pressure and Vessel Code (ASME BPVC) Section III, Division 5, Article HHA-3000 outlines graphite core component and graphite core assembly design guidelines. Graphite core components are defined as ?components manufactured from graphite that are installed to form a graphite core assembly within the reactor pressure vessel of a high temperature, graphite moderated fission reactor.? (p. 413) Graphites? inherent defect distributions do not allow for deterministic material reliability. Rather, graphite has variable strength distributions which change by grade. Article HHA-3000 outlines two semi-probabilistic methods, the full and simplified assessments, which set design load limit targets for each of three component structural reliability classes. The Design Task Group was officially recognized as a specialized task group within ASME November of 2023, though we?ve been collaborating since 2022. The purpose of the Design Task Group is to correct, clarify, and make HHA-3000 function as intended. The Design Task Group will sunset once we?ve achieved our objectives. The Design Task Group was specifically told to not write new Code. While there may be more precise and more accurate methods to determine reliability targets, the current methods are conservative, relatively simple to implement, and have thus far been considered satisfactory for setting design reliability targets. Much of the ground-work to write proposal files and background documents for records to make the changes needed to achieve our objective have been completed. The Design Task Group has documented much of their work through papers, presentations, and memorandums. Three memorandums in which INL team members had substantial contributions are found in the Appendices: FEA Modeling for the Baseline Program, Evaluating the Effects on Margin of Updating the Threshold and Shape Parameters in the Full Assessment, and Interpretations of the Full and Simplified Assessments in ASME BPVC. Most of the on-going work to achieve the Design Task Group?s objective will be addressing comments on existing records and moving records through the balloting process. The Design Task Group met bi-weekly mostly through the end of FY2023. Since February 2024, the Design Task Group has mostly been completed with solving and documenting the technical issues associated with the assessments. Unless new tasks are identified, the remaining work of the Design Task Group will be political and editorial.
97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
Comprehensive Margin Assessment of the ASME Section III, Division 5, Class A Primary Load Design Rules
This report provides a comprehensive margin assessment of the ASME Section III, Division 5, Subsection HB, Subpart B rules for the design of high temperature reactor components against load controlled stress limits. These rules, often called the Code primary load design rules, provide protection against creep rupture and plastic collapse under steady conditions. The method adopted here is to compare the deterministic ASME design life, according to the primary load design rules, against the expected, statistical service life of the component, considering creep rupture as the relevant failure mode. The report provides the design margin of the ASME rules in terms of the probability of premature failure -- the probability that the component fails in service before reaching the ASME design life. To complete this assessment, the report describes the development of a statistical creep life assessment procedure accounting for variations in the component loading, material creep rate, and the material rupture time. This includes a novel method for correlating creep rupture data using a Gaussian process accounting for heat-to-heat variation in the Larson-Miller time-temperature parameter. The report applies the complete margin assessment process to quantify the design margin inherent in the ASME primary load design rules as a function of temperature for relevant component geometries and materials. The overall conclusion is that the ASME rules are conservative, providing designs with very small probability of premature failure, but some optimization of the Code design rules is possible to provide a more uniform design margin.
22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
A Novel Approach for Bounding the Stress Experienced by the Core of Utility-Scale Printed Circuit Heat Exchangers Under Thermohydraulic Loads
Printed circuit heat exchangers (PCHEs) have rapidly gained popularity since being introduced nearly three decades ago, and they are currently widely deployed in the petrochemical and aviation industry. Their compactness, thermohydraulic efficiency, inherent suitability for high temperature/pressure fluids containment, and demonstrated durability are some of the reasons the nuclear industry is seeking to adopt this technology as well. However, the relatively strict nuclear-related regulatory design code, especially when classified as critical to the safety of the reactors, is posing challenges to adopting the technology. From stress analysis point of view, one undesirable feature of PCHEs is their geometrical complexity, which is implied by their multilength-scale features. As a result, a full-scale model of a utility-scale exchanger cannot simply be solved on a computer because meshing such components results in a vast number of degrees-of-freedom. Here, this work seeks to address the challenge of stress analyses to PCHEs by presenting a method to simplify the geometry of PCHE designs. The models proposed by this work can be practically analyzed on a standard computer and provide a path for implementing ASME design rules. The analyses presented herein are divided into five separate investigations. Each is carried out to incrementally simplify the analyzed model by addressing features such as the shapes of the flow passages, the complex distribution of stress in large components, the three-dimensionality of the stress and strain, the thermal stresses caused by thermohydraulic operation observed experimentally and more.
42 ENGINEERING↗
Designing Cladded Components for High Temperature Nuclear Service: Part I—Analysis Methods
Use of corrosion-resistant cladding can greatly extend the design life of structural components in many advanced reactor systems. However, there are currently no ASME design rules for cladded components to guard against creep-fatigue failure and ratcheting strain accumulation in elevated temperature nuclear service. This paper, presented in two parts, addresses this gap by proposing a design strategy for cladded components that do not require long-term testing of clad materials. The proposed approach relies on approximate design analysis methods for two types of clad materials—a soft clad that creeps much faster than and has lower yield stress than the class A base material and a hard clad that creeps much slower than and has higher yield stress than the class A base material. Part I discusses the approximate analysis strategies for the clad materials—treat a soft clad as perfectly compliant and a hard clad as linear elastic—and Part II develops a complete set of design rules for each of the two types of cladded components. In conclusion, finite element analyses of representative high temperature reactor components show that the proposed design analysis methods can bound the design quantities in soft cladded components and approximate the design quantities in hard cladded components.
22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
Modeling Graphite Degradation (Oxidation and Irradiation)
Presentation Outline: Background and motivation Component design (ASME rules) Graphite degradation Oxidation Irradiation MOOSE modeling Oxidation modeling Graphite component stress modeling Oxidized conditions Irradiated conditions Future work
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
An Initial Assessment of the Design Margins of Different ASME Section III, Division 5 Design Rules
This report develops a method for assessing the design margin of the ASME Section III, Division 5 Class A design rules, focusing on a definition of margin as the ratio between the actual, expected component life and the ASME design life. Full inelastic finite element simulations with a complete damage model capturing the available creep, creep-fatigue, fatigue, and tension test failure data produce the expected component lives, which can then be compared to corresponding ASME design calculations. The focus of this particular work is on Alloy 617 and the ASME creep-fatigue design rules, but the approach is general and could be applied to other design limits and to other materials. A margin assessment of a representative Alloy 617 component shows the ASME creep-fatigue design rules applied to this component have a margin of 10 on design life. The report describes several challenges in completing a more comprehensive margin assessment of the ASME rules, in particular challenges in developing probabilistic assessment methods for high temperature structural components. The report details these challenge and discusses the immediate possibilities of the deterministic margin assessment method developed here.
22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
Assessing the ASME Section III, Division 5, Class A Primary Load Design Rules Against Creep Notch Effects
This report assesses the ASME Section III, Division 5, Subsection HB, Subpart B rules covering the design and construction of high temperature Class A nuclear reactor components for their robustness against creep notch effects. The creep notch effect combines the effect of multiaxial stresses on material creep deformation and damage. This report considers both effects, including the potential for creep mechanism shifts affecting the extrapolation of design data from high stress, short-time experimental data to low stress, long time operating component conditions. The report summarizes the history of and literature on multiaxial creep and surveys the current ASME design rules dealing with multiaxial effects. The report then describes the results of two dedicated numerical studies, one assessing the robustness of the ASME rules against uncertainty in extrapolating from uniaxial creep test data to multiaxial component conditions and a second study examining the potential effects of a mechanism shift from high stress, dislocation-mediated creep to diffusion-dominated creep at lower stresses. The final conclusion of the report is that the ASME rules adequately guard against multiaxial creep failure, though there are several aspects of the Code that could be optimized to provide less over-conservative design predictions or to provide a more consistent design margin as a function of temperature and stress. In a few areas, particularly the potential for mechanism shifts outside the currently-available experimental data, the Code rules should be revaluated as additional experimental data and new modeling and simulation results become available
22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
Design by analysis rules for ASME Section III, Division 5, Class B components
The current rules for elevated temperature ASME Section III, Division 5, Class B components, other than piping, were basically adapted from the Design-by-Rule approach for Section VIII, Division 1 vessels. A goal of the proposed new rules is to explicitly account for the design life and cyclic service while recognizing the less-rigorous requirements commensurate with lesser safety consideration. Further goals are to maximize the use of modern computational technology, for example finite element analysis in conjunction with reference stress concepts, and to avoid the need for stress classification. This paper summarizes the work done to address these issues. A summary of the design-by-analysis for primary loads, strain limit evaluation, and creep-fatigue damage assessment is presented. The proposed design-by-analysis creep-fatigue damage calculation approach uses a new elastic follow-up-based Isochronous Stress Strain Curve stress relaxation procedure. A set of sample problems are selected to validate the proposed design-by-analysis rules for creep-fatigue damage assessment. The proposed Class B rules are evaluated against the Class A elastic design rules and the experimental data obtained from a family of a simplified model test-based key-feature test results. The proposed Class B creep-fatigue damage assessment methodology yields conservative design cycles estimates compared to the experimental results.
36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
Structural design challenges and implications for high temperature concentrating solar power receivers
High operating temperatures along with diurnal cycling and high operating stresses bring many material and engineering challenges for concentrated solar power (CSP) receivers. Current design rules in ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel (B&PV) Code for high temperature structural components were not intended for CSP components. The paper reviews the design rules in several sections of ASME B&PV Code in terms of their applicability in designing high temperature CSP receivers. With some restrictions and modifications, the conditions assumed in the design rules in Section III, Division 5 of ASME B&PV Code are found to closely resemble the loading conditions of CSP receiver, including accounting for the interaction between creep and fatigue damage. Further, the paper applies the proposed design rules to an external tubular receiver design and discusses several lessons learned from the design study. The creep damage accumulation due to high thermal stresses resulting from circumferentially non-uniform flux distribution is found to control the design of CSP receivers. Several mitigation actions to improve the design life of receivers are also discussed.
14 SOLAR ENERGY↗
DESIGN-BY-ANALYSIS RULES FOR ASME SECTION III, DIVISION 5, CLASS B COMPONENTS
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Mahajan, Heramb↗
Preliminary design analysis workflow for Division 5 HHA-3200 requirements for graphite core components
This report presents a design analysis workflow for graphite core components and assemblies, based on the design rules of ASME Boiler Pressure and Vessel Code, Section III, Division 5, Article HHA-3000. The workflow contains three stages: developing the design of the graphite core component, modeling the component with the finite element software MOOSE, and assessing if the component passes/fails the criteria of the HHA-3000 design rules. Since the design rules use probabilistic metrics specifically established to evaluate brittle materials, we developed a python library that performs all the statistical calculations necessary for the evaluations of the HHA-3000 criteria.
97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
Experimental and Analytical Verification of ASME Section IiII Division 5 Creep-Fatigue Design Rules
The continuous advancement of structural materials and the growing demands for more reliable and economical structural components in high-temperature reactor applications have necessitated the development of comprehensive design methodologies and design rules. Mechanical degradation of structural components at elevated temperatures subjected to cyclic deformation is controlled by the creep-fatigue damage. Over the past few decades, diligent research efforts have been dedicated to refining the development of elevated temperature design rules in the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC), Section III, Division 5 and to develop conservative design rules that can effectively guard against the risk of creep-fatigue failure. In ASME Section III, Division 5, for a design to pass the creep-fatigue acceptance criteria, creep damage and fatigue damage are evaluated separately, and these damages must not violate the bi-linear creep-fatigue interaction diagram, i.e., the so-called D-diagram. The creep-fatigue damage evaluation procedure assumes that the effects of the actual cyclic loading sequence can be bounded by assuming that the individual loading cycles are uniformly distributed throughout the component design life. In this study, creep-fatigue experiments with variable amplitudes and loading sequencies were designed and performed on Alloy 617 at high temperatures. The results were analyzed to evaluate the loading history effect on creep-fatigue damage accumulation and to verify the assumptions for the creep-fatigue evaluation design rules.
36 - MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
Reference constitutive model for Alloy 617 and 316H stainless steel for use with the ASME Division 5 design by inelastic analysis rules
This report describes the development, calibration, and validation of an inelastic constitutive model describing the monotonic, cyclic, and creep behavior of Alloy 617 from room temperature to 983 °C . The model is intended for incorporation into a new Nonmandatory Appendix to Section III, Division 5, Subsection HB, Subpart B of the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code providing guidance on developing models for use with the ASME design by inelastic analysis provisions as well as a listing of acceptable material models for each Class A material that designers can use without further validation. The report described the development of the A617 model as well as providing an updated draft appendix, ready for ASME ballot, incorporating the A617 and and the previously-developed 316H model. The development of this appendix and the related material models will promote the widespread application of the generally more efficient inelastic analysis rules rules.
22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
ASME, Section III, Division 5, Metallic
Presentation on American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Section III, Division 5 design rules for metallic components at the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel (BPV) III International Meeting, September 25 to 28, 2023
22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
Design rules for 316H nuclear components cladded with nickel or tungsten
The existing Class A metallic materials qualified in the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code Section III, Division 5 rules for high temperature nuclear reactors are not ideally suited for long term molten salt corrosion resistance in high temperature molten salt reactors. Potentially, corrosion or corrosion driven environmentally assisted cracking could limit the design life of structural components in molten salt reactors. A solution to this limitation is the use of cladded components – overlay the Class A material with a thin layer of some non-qualified, corrosion-resistant material. However, this necessitates the development of design methods for cladded components that do not require long-term testing of clad materials in order to support the near-term deployment of molten salt reactors. This report develops such a methodology along with a complete set of rules presented in a format compatible with an ASME nuclear Code Case. These design rules are for 316H Class A components cladded with either nickel or tungsten. The report also discusses the development of a set of general criteria for selecting clad materials beyond the specific 316H/tungsten and 316H/nickel systems and general acceptance tests for checking the mechanical integrity of the clad/base metal interface. Finally, the report includes a set of fully-documented sample problems detailing the application of the rules to high temperature cladded components
36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE ART Graphite R&D Introduction
Introduction of ART Graphite R&D to include oxidation activities, oxidation resistant graphite, model development, ASME component failure, ASME code development (design rules), ceramic composites, AGC update, molten salt intrusion, split-disk studies, wear testing, and concluding remarks.
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗