Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “ART GCR”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2025

Thermal Hydraulics Validation Activities in the ART-GCR Campaign

The Advanced Reactor Technologies - Gas Cooled Reactor Campaign (ART-GCR) is part of the United States Department of Energy - Office of Nuclear Energy's Advanced Reactor Technologies program aimed at developing a High Temperature Gas-cooled Reactor (HTGR) which will offer enhancements in safety and efficiency. The Design, Methods, and Validation arm of the ART-GCR program provides experience and advanced tools for HTGR design and analysis. The Methods and Validation arm is developing data to validate predictions of decay heat removal through an extensive experimental campaign the Natural Convection Shutdown Heat Removal Test Facility at Argonne National Laboratory. In-core thermal hydraulics validation is being facilitated through the OECD/NEA's Thermal Hydraulic Code Validation Benchmark for High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactors using HTTF Data. That benchmark contains code-to-code and code-to-data comparisons for 3 sets of HTGR thermal hydraulics phenomena. This ongoing benchmark activity has 16 participants from 9 countries developing leading insights into HTGR thermal hydraulics code validation. The ART-GCR campaign is also working on the development of state-of-the-art MOOSE-based models of the High Temperature Engineering Test Reactor (HTTR). Through the OECD/NEA's HTTR Loss of Forced Cooling (LOFC) program, the ART-GCR campaign is developing a multiphysics transient code validation benchmark based on 3 HTTR experiments that will provide an opportunity for international collaboration on multiphysics code validation.

22 - GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2024

DOE ART-GCR Program Overview

To provide Advanced Reactor Technologies Gas-Cooled Reactor Program: Overview of ART-GCR and Graphite program objectives, status, and activities. Also Identify research areas and outcomes that will benefit stakeholders and clients (HTGR designers, suppliers, regulators, DOE-NE, etc.), and to Identify remaining R&D gaps and future needs.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2025

2025 ART-GCR Annual Review Methods Area Overview

This presentation summarizes the work occurring in the Advanced Reactor Technologies - Gas-Cooled Reactor Program. It is part of the 2025 ART-GCR annual program review.

22 - GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2022

FY22 Status Report on the ART-GCR CMVB and CNWG International Collaborations

This work presents the numerical model for the high temperature test reactor (HTTR) loss of forced cooling (LOFC) experiment with the INL codes Griffin, BISON, and RELAP-7, based on the Multiphysics Object-Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE) framework. Promising results were obtained, with the overall behavior of the reactor successfully captured. Changes in the heat transfer coupling, as compared to the fiscal year (FY)-21 model, enabled drastic improvement of the steady-state solution, both in terms of computational time and global energy discrepancies. The former was reduced by a factor of roughly 60, whereas the latter decreased from 11% to less than 2%. Furthermore, the discrepancy in the steady-state multiplication factor was improved from +2,300 and +2,900 pcm (for the 30 and 9 MW cases) to -700 and +1,200 pcm, respectively, and now falls well within the large measurement uncertainties stemming from graphite impurities. Validation of the Monte Carlo model used to generate cross sections was also performed against available measurements. Though significant, the discrepancies remain acceptable overall in light of the large uncertainty. Numerous improvements are still needed to better compare with the experiment involving the 9 MW case and to instill greater confidence in the model’s ability to accurately predict the 30 MW behavior. Specifically, the power levels predicted by the 9 MW transient simulation following re-criticality remain low, pointing to an underestimation of the passive cooling of the core. A key aspect of future work will be to better understand the flow pattern during the LOFC event, particularly to determine if natural or forced convection is occurring inside the reactor pressure vessel (RPV). More generally, additional validation data would be immensely useful for further enhancing the numerical model and better matching the experiments. In addition, a more sophisticated thermal-hydraulics model that simulates all the channels as a single system model should be considered to take into account the rest of the primary loop. Finally, even if the results are in better agreement with the experiments, sensitivity analysis and uncertainty quantification will be necessary to evaluate the model uncertainty.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Air-Cooled RCCS CFD Modeling Validation 2025

Slide deck for the Advanced Reactor Technologies Gas Cooled Reactor (ART-GCR) program review. The slides show the progress on the air-cooled reactor cavity cooling system (RCCS) CFD validation work. The validation of the air-cooled RCCS is performed using the experimental facility at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. The slide deck provides a progress update on this year's achievements. The natural convection tests under uniform power are modeled and compared with the experimental results. The results show good agreement with the experimental results. A sensitivity study on the RANS turbulence models is performed. Additionally, the contribution of radiative and convective heat transfer within the heated cavity is calculated and compared to forced convection setups.

22 - GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2020

HTGR Simulation Methods & International Collaborations

ART-GCR “Methods” activity is split between Experimental Validation data from the ANL NSTF and OSU HTTF (next three presentations). HTGR core simulation (this presentation). International collaboration within OECD Generation-IV (Gen-IV) and USA/Japan bi-lateral agreements (this presentation) HTGR Simulation Methods No new NE-52 funding for HTGR Methods support in FY20; ~$200K FY19 carry-over funds only. Consists of international code-to-code benchmarks (IAEA CRP on HTGR UAM and OECD/NEA MHTGR-350) and refinement of a few-group Pebble Bed Reactor (PBR) cross section (XS) generation methodology. Funding will be requested in FY21 to produce the final reports for the two benchmarks and continue the development of the PBR XS generation methodology. Additional (non-ART) HTGR-related support work at INL NEAMS: HTR-Application work package at INL Create a benchmark for the pebble shuffling and depletion algorithms being developed for NEAMS Griffin code. iFOA award with X-Energy: Develop independent Monte Carlo model of Xe-100 design. Independent design confirmatory analysis of Xe-100 design using NEAMS tools Griffin and Pronghorn. Support X-Energy design team to use their own legacy design tools (VSOP99 and MGT). Support NEAMS Griffin and Pronghorn development team for the iFOA needs (received $50K additional funding for required development).

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2021

FY21 Status report on the CMVB and CNWG International Collaborations

The ART-GCR Methods area includes an international collaboration work package that covers the tasks defined for the Computational Methods Validation and Benchmark (CMVB)and Civil Nuclear Energy Research and Development Working Group (CNWG) projects. This report summarizes the status of the FY21 tasks and planned FY22 DOE contributions. The CMVB Project Arrangement (PA) is not yet formally approved by all signatories, and no work has therefore been performed in FY21 at INL related to this activity. The CNWG activities inFY21 consisted of the simulation of the High Temperature Test Reactor (HTTR) Loss Of Forced Cooling (LOFC) experimental with the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) codes Griffin, BISON and RELAP-7 based on the Multiphysics Object-Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE).It was found that the multiphysics coupled suite is capable of simulating all the important phenomena occurring during the Depressurized Loss of Forced Cooling (DLOFC) experiments showing promising agreement with the measurements given the number of uncertainties and approximations introduced into the model.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Continue Effort to Improve Alloy 800H Weldment

This memorandum formally documents the completion of the Level 3 milestone M3AT-22IN0604055 titled, “Continue effort to improve Alloy 800H weldment creep rupture performance,” by the transmittal of this deliverable document, entitled, “Issue memo ‘Preliminary assessment of UTP A 2133 Mn as a matching filler metal for Alloy 800H in Section III Division 5 applications.’” The deadline for this milestone is August 27, 2022. This milestone is part of the ART GCR work package AT-22IN060405, “Long-Term Very-High Temperature Reactor (VHTR) Material Qualification – INL.”

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2023

RELAP5-3D Solutions to Exercise 1 of the OECD-NEA HTTF Benchmark

Discussion of RELAP5-3D solutions to Exercise 1 of the OECD-NEA High Temperature Test Facility (HTTF) Benchmark. Results from ongoing benchmark activities supported by the Advanced Reactor Technologies - Gas-Cooled Reactor Program with use of the High Performance Computing Center at Idaho National Laboratory. Also discussion of Ultra Safe Nuclear Corporation and BWXT plans for the decade, and issues of modern thermal hydraulic tools for prismatic HTGR modeling. Open discussion of verification and validation and ART-GCR campaign to spearhead the development of an HTGR thermal hydraulics benchmark based on the HTTF.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2024

NDMAS Portal Updates

Overview of current ART-GCR Data, including fuel fabrication, irradiation monitoring, fuel and graphite, post-irradiation examination, graphite characterization, high temperature metals mechanical tests, methods validation data (including: HTTR, NSTF, and HTTF), addition of AGR fuel data, other GCR and related data, updated high temperature metals, ongoing and upcoming work, users guide, and the link to those interested in access to NDMAS.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Generating An Advanced Cross-section Library For HTGR Pebble Bed Depletion Calculations Using Reduced-Order Model Generation Techniques

For code development, Advanced Reactor Technologies - Gas Cooled Reactors Program (ART-GCR) rely on a collaboration with the Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) program, but the cross sections generation and the methodology definition is part of this program area goals. Based on previous studies in FY23, the size of microscopic cross section libraries increases rapidly with the number of tabulations, requiring significant amount of memory and drastically slowing down the Griffin calculations when evaluating cross sections via the multivariate linear interpolation approach. Rising to these challenges, this work investigates constructing Reduced-order Models (ROMs) for the multi-group microscopic cross sections to accelerate the cross section evaluation in Griffin. A database of multigroup cross sections is first collected considering all possible parameters that a designer could change for optimization. Down-selection of the ROM techniques afterward shows Deep Neural Network (DNN) as the best candidate when jointly consider memory efficiency, predictive accuracy, computational cost, scalability, flexibility and ease of implementation of the algorithms in comparison to the multidimensional interpolation. This work develops a specific interface that enables the cross section predictions using pre-trained DNN models into Griffin leveraging the existing ROM capabilities. DNNs have been trained for all isotopes for use in Griffin. Preliminary Griffin testing shows that DNNs exhibit exceptional predictive accuracy and the use of DNNs provides orders of magnitude improvement in memory efficiency compared to conventional interpolation techniques. With such ROM techniques, it holds great promise to further increase the fidelity of the Pebble Bed Reactor (PBR) simulation by increasing the number of tabulations/state variables during cross section evaluation, while maintaining the computational cost affordable in Griffin.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗