SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Results for “ANTIMATTER”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Observation of the antimatter hypernucleus $^4_{\bar{\Lambda}}\overline{\hbox{H}}$
Matter-antimatter asymmetry is a research topic of fundamental interest, as it is the basis for the existence of the matter world, which survived annihilation with antimatter in the early Universe. High energy nuclear collisions create conditions similar to the Universe microseconds after the Big Bang, with comparable amounts of matter and antimatter. Much of the antimatter created escapes the rapidly expanding fireball without annihilation, making such collisions an effective experimental tool to create heavy antimatter nuclear objects and study their properties. In this paper, we report the first observation of the antimatter hypernucleus $^4_{\bar{\Lambda}}\overline{\hbox{H}}$, composed of an $\bar{\Lambda}$, an antiproton and two antineutrons. The discovery was made through its two-body decay after production in ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions by the STAR experiment at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider. In total, 15.6 candidate $^4_{\bar{\Lambda}}\overline{\hbox{H}}$ antimatter hypernuclei are obtained with an estimated background count of 6.4. Lifetimes of the antihypernuclei $^3_{\bar{\Lambda}}\overline{\hbox{H}}$ and $^4_{\bar{\Lambda}}\overline{\hbox{H}}$ are measured and compared with lifetimes of their corresponding hypernuclei, testing the symmetry between matter and antimatter. Various production yield ratios among (anti)hypernuclei and (anti)nuclei are also measured and compared with theoretical model predictions, shedding light on their production mechanism.
The asymmetry of antimatter in the proton
The fundamental building blocks of the proton—quarks and gluons—have been known for decades. However, we still have an incomplete theoretical and experimental understanding of how these particles and their dynamics give rise to the quantum bound state of the proton and its physical properties, such as its spin1. The two up quarks and the single down quark that comprise the proton in the simplest picture account only for a few per cent of the proton mass, the bulk of which is in the form of quark kinetic and potential energy and gluon energy from the strong force2. An essential feature of this force, as described by quantum chromodynamics, is its ability to create matter–antimatter quark pairs inside the proton that exist only for a very short time. Their fleeting existence makes the antimatter quarks within protons difficult to study, but their existence is discernible in reactions in which a matter–antimatter quark pair annihilates. In this picture of quark–antiquark creation by the strong force, the probability distributions as a function of momentum for the presence of up and down antimatter quarks should be nearly identical, given that their masses are very similar and small compared to the mass of the proton. Here we provide evidence from muon pair production measurements that these distributions are considerably different, with more abundant down antimatter quarks than up antimatter quarks over a wide range of momenta. These results are expected to revive interest in several proposed mechanisms for the origin of this antimatter asymmetry in the proton that had been disfavoured by previous results, and point to future measurements that can distinguish between these mechanisms.
Publisher Correction: The asymmetry of antimatter in the proton
The fundamental building blocks of the proton—quarks and gluons—have been known for decades. However, we still have an incomplete theoretical and experimental understanding of how these particles and their dynamics give rise to the quantum bound state of the proton and its physical properties, such as its spin1. The two up quarks and the single down quark that comprise the proton in the simplest picture account only for a few per cent of the proton mass, the bulk of which is in the form of quark kinetic and potential energy and gluon energy from the strong force2. An essential feature of this force, as described by quantum chromodynamics, is its ability to create matter–antimatter quark pairs inside the proton that exist only for a very short time. Their fleeting existence makes the antimatter quarks within protons difficult to study, but their existence is discernible in reactions in which a matter–antimatter quark pair annihilates. In this picture of quark–antiquark creation by the strong force, the probability distributions as a function of momentum for the presence of up and down antimatter quarks should be nearly identical, given that their masses are very similar and small compared to the mass of the proton3. Here we provide evidence from muon pair production measurements that these distributions are considerably different, with more abundant down antimatter quarks than up antimatter quarks over a wide range of momenta. These results are expected to revive interest in several proposed mechanisms for the origin of this antimatter asymmetry in the proton that had been disfavoured by previous results4, and point to future measurements that can distinguish between these mechanisms.
Does Antimatter Fall Up?
Antimatter is one of those things that sound like science fiction, rather than science fact. Yet it is a very real substance, predicted in 19281 and discovered in 19322. While the story of antimatter is rich and complex3, there is a common question often asked by introductory students, which is “Does antimatter fall up?” This question is far more subtle than appears at first blush, with unexpected facets that can lead to interesting classroom discussion involving the nature and definition of matter. Furthermore, while the theory of general relativity weighs in on the topic, as with all serious physics questions, the definitive answer requires an empirical test. In this article, I will briefly introduce what antimatter is, describe some of the interesting intellectual exercises that can arise from considering the effect of gravity on antimatter, and finally conclude with the results of a recent experiment that definitively answer the question.
Constraint on the matter–antimatter symmetry-violating phase in neutrino oscillations
The charge-conjugation and parity-reversal (CP) symmetry of fundamental particles is a symmetry between matter and antimatter. Violation of this CP symmetry was first observed in 1964, and CP violation in the weak interactions of quarks was soon established. Sakharov proposed that CP violation is necessary to explain the observed imbalance of matter and antimatter abundance in the Universe. Yet, CP violation in quarks is too small to support this explanation. So far, CP violation has not been observed in non-quark elementary particle systems. It has been shown that CP violation in leptons could generate the matter–antimatter disparity through a process called leptogenesis. Leptonic mixing, which appears in the standard model’s charged current interactions, provides a potential source of CP violation through a complex phase δ CP , which is required by some theoretical models of leptogenesis. This CP violation can be measured in muon neutrino to electron neutrino oscillations and the corresponding antineutrino oscillations, which are experimentally accessible using accelerator-produced beams as established by the Tokai-to-Kamioka (T2K) and NOvA experiments. Until now, the value of δ CP has not been substantially constrained by neutrino oscillation experiments. Here we report a measurement using long-baseline neutrino and antineutrino oscillations observed by the T2K experiment that shows a large increase in the neutrino oscillation probability, excluding values of δ CP that result in a large increase in the observed antineutrino oscillation probability at three standard deviations (3σ). The 3σ confidence interval for δ CP , which is cyclic and repeats every 2π, is [-3.41, -0.03] for the so-called normal mass ordering and [-2.54, -0.32] for the inverted mass ordering. Our findings indicate CP violation in leptons and our method enables sensitive searches for matter–antimatter asymmetry in neutrino oscillations using accelerator-produced neutrino beams. Future measurements with larger datasets will test whether leptonic CP violation is larger than the CP violation in quarks.
Observation of the effect of gravity on the motion of antimatter
Einstein’s general theory of relativity from 1915 remains the most successful description of gravitation. From the 1919 solar eclipse to the observation of gravitational waves, the theory has passed many crucial experimental tests. However, the evolving concepts of dark matter and dark energy illustrate that there is much to be learned about the gravitating content of the universe. Singularities in the general theory of relativity and the lack of a quantum theory of gravity suggest that our picture is incomplete. It is thus prudent to explore gravity in exotic physical systems. Antimatter was unknown to Einstein in 1915. Dirac’s theory appeared in 1928; the positron was observed in 1932. There has since been much speculation about gravity and antimatter. The theoretical consensus is that any laboratory mass must be attracted by the Earth, although some authors have considered the cosmological consequences if antimatter should be repelled by matter. In the general theory of relativity, the weak equivalence principle (WEP) requires that all masses react identically to gravity, independent of their internal structure. Here we show that antihydrogen atoms, released from magnetic confinement in the ALPHA-g apparatus, behave in a way consistent with gravitational attraction to the Earth. Repulsive ‘antigravity’ is ruled out in this case. This experiment paves the way for precision studies of the magnitude of the gravitational acceleration between anti-atoms and the Earth to test the WEP.
Mystery of the Universe: Matter-antimatter Asymmetry
Why do we exist today? The question simply comes to mind and most of us must have wondered at least once. Scientifically answering it is one of the serious but engrossing challenges in modern physics. The question is translated into another one in language of particle physics; why is there more matter than antimatter in our Universe? Antimatter is composed of antiparticles which have an opposite electric charge to that of particle. In the early Universe, both particles were present in equal amount. However, looking around the present Universe, everything, such as the moon, galaxies and human being, is made of matter. The puzzle is known as matter-antimatter asymmetry of the Universe. This talk will discuss theoretical approaches to solving the mystery in terms of particle physics introducing one possible hypothesis, electroweak baryogenesis, which is the most testable scenario in experiments.
Link between antimatter and dark matter probed
Two of the most intriguing mysteries in modern cosmology are the apparent preponderance of ordinary matter over antimatter and the nature of dark matter, which accounts for about 85% of the mass in the Universe. Here, dark matter has made its presence known only through its gravitational effects on astrophysical objects. Therefore, whatever type of particle it is made of must have feeble interactions with other matter. One leading candidate is the axion — a light neutral particle that was originally postulated to explain why the neutron lacks a measurable electric dipole moment.
The study of the journey of cosmic antimatter
A potential observation of low-energy antihelium-3 nuclei would have profound impacts on our understanding of the Galaxy. Here, experiments at particle colliders help us understand how cosmic antimatter travels over long distances before reaching Earth.
The geometrization of Maxwell's equations and the emergence of gravity and antimatter
Not Available
Plasma and trap-based techniques for science with antimatter
Positrons (i.e., antielectrons) find use in a wide variety of applications, and antiprotons are required for the formation and study of antihydrogen. Available sources of these antiparticles are relatively weak. To optimize their use, most applications require that the antiparticles be accumulated into carefully prepared plasmas. We present an overview of the techniques that have been developed to efficiently accumulate low energy antiparticles and create, in particular, tailored antiparticle plasmas. Techniques are also described to create tailored antiparticle beams. Many of these techniques are based on methods first developed by the nonneutral plasma community using electron plasmas for increased data rate. They have enabled the creation and trapping of antihydrogen, have been critical to studies of positron and positronium interactions with matter, including advanced techniques to characterize materials and material surfaces, and have led to the creation and study of the positronium molecule. Rather than attempting to be comprehensive, we focus on techniques that have proven most useful, applications where there has been significant, recent progress, and areas that hold promise for future advances. Examples of the latter include the ever more precise comparisons of the properties of antihydrogen and hydrogen, tests of gravity using antihydrogen and positronium atoms, and efforts to create and study phases of the many-electron, many-positron system.
Asymmetry of antimatter in the proton from SeaQuest and perspective from SpinQuest
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
New mechanism for matter-antimatter asymmetry and connection with dark matter
Not Available
Polarized antimatter in the proton from a global QCD analysis
Not Available
The asymmetry of antimatter in the proton
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Collaborative Research: Experimental and Theoretical Study of the Plasma Physics of Antihydrogen Generation and Trapping (Final Technical Report)
The charge-parity-time (CPT) invariance principle and the weak equivalence principle (WEP) undergird our current understanding of Nature. CPT, which is based on only Lorentz invariance, locality, and spin-statistics, is basic to local relativistic quantum field theory (QFT) models of physical laws. Testing established principles like these is a long-standing and honorable tradition in physics. Beginning with Newton’s Laws, many firmly established laws have been superseded, often to the great surprise of contemporaneous physicists. Certainly, CPT rests on firmer grounds than the earlier widely believed, but erroneous principles, of parity (P) and charge-parity (CP) invariance, but this does not necessarily make CPT inviolable. Tests of CPT confront the entire framework of QFT, and are quite distinct from most other “beyond the Standard Model” searches, which look for new physics within the QFT framework. With the failure, so far, to find new physics at the LHC or in dark matter searches, the motivation to test QFT itself is urgent. The revolutionary consequences of CPT and WEP violation would be so great that these principles are under intense scrutiny in many different systems. Here we focus on tests of CPT and WEP that employ antimatter, specifically antihydrogen. Such tests are difficult to realize experimentally, but constitute some of the simplest and most profound matter-antimatter comparisons that can be performed. Antimatter particles have been investigated since the prediction and subsequent discovery of the positron in the 1930s. That early discovery motivated the search for the antiproton, culminating in its creation and detection in Berkeley two decades later. As far as we know today, particles and their antiparticles share identical properties except for the sign of their charge. Antihydrogen is the simplest antimatter system—it is the antiparticle of the simplest atom, hydrogen. Differences between the spectra of the two are forbidden by CPT. The weak equivalence principle (WEP), demands that matter and antimatter accelerate identically in a gravitational field. WEP has never been subjected to a direct, free fall test using antimatter. Because of the weakness of the gravita tional force, direct antimatter WEP tests must employ a neutral particle, of which antihydrogen is the simplest to obtain. There are reasons to suspect that something is amiss with our understanding of antimatter. All generally accepted theories of the Big Bang predict that roughly equal amounts of matter and antimatter should have been created. Instead, very little antimatter has been observed in the Universe. This baryogenesis problem is arguably the most fundamental issue with the theory of the Big Bang. Its resolution may come from the discovery of enhanced CP violation, but could also come from CPT or WEP violation.